I found here at www.commondreams.org perhaps the most brilliant, astounding writing I have ever read (and I’m a book addict).
I give you an excerpt from the memo sent to President Obama dated 04/30/2009. I only copied the introductory statement to the official memo compiled by The Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), signed by some very heavy-hitters formerly in the Intel Community. Membership in VIPS totals 70 or more. You will recognize many of the listed signatures and names with their credentials.
Most high regard and honors are due this group of courageous truly patriotic Americans. They warned Bush and Cheney in time to have turned away from the disastrous path they were hell-bent to pursue, to the tragic, unnecessary and unjustified war of agression against Iraq.
Now, in this memo to President Obama, they are again holding out to him the product of their exceptional minds and strong convictions….will he listen and responsibly conduct the affairs of State as demanded by the Oath of Office to which he swore ?
Published on Thursday, April 30, 2009
An Anti-Torture Memorandum for President ObamaVeteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
MEMORANDUM FOR: The President
FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
SUBJECT: TortureThis memorandum is VIPS’ first attempt to inform you on a major intelligence issue, as we did your predecessor; thus, some background might be helpful. Five former CIA officers established Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) in January 2003, when we saw our profession being corrupted to justify an attack on Iraq. Since then, our numbers have grown to 70 intelligence professionals, mostly retired, who have served in virtually all U.S. civilian and military intelligence agencies.
In our first Memorandum for the President (George W. Bush), dated February 5, 2002, [should be 2003] we provided a same-day commentary on Colin Powell’s U.N. speech. We warned the president that "an invasion of Iraq would ensure overflowing recruitment centers for terrorists into the indefinite future [and that] far from eliminating the [terrorist] threat, it would enhance it exponentially."
We strongly urged the former president to widen the discussion on Iraq "beyond the circle of those advisers clearly bent on a war for which we see no compelling reason and from which we believe the unintended consequences are likely to be catastrophic." VIPS’ second pre-war Memorandum for the President was titled, "Forgery, Hyperbole, Half-Truth: A Problem"-a reference to the bogus intelligence we saw being ginned up to "justify" war.
President Bush ignored our warning and the warnings of other informed individuals and groups. The corporate media uncritically echoed the Bush administration’s misuse and misrepresentation of the intelligence, despite the questions raised-including those raised by our unique movement. (It was the first time an alumni group of intelligence officials had formed expressly to chronicle and to halt the corruption of intelligence.)
The cheerleading for war had begun-a war that would fit the post-WWII Nuremberg Tribunal’s description of a "war of aggression." Nuremberg defined such a war as "the supreme international crime, differing from other war crimes only in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."
Torture: An Accumulated Evil
Torture is one of those accumulated evils. Violating domestic laws like the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 is another. You were right to unceremoniously jettison former CIA director Michael Hayden, who betrayed the thousands of NSA professionals who, until he directed that domestic law could be ignored, had adhered scrupulously to the 1978 FISA law as NSA’s "First Commandment"-Thou Shalt Not Eavesdrop on Americans Without a Court Warrant.
In contrast, we believe you were badly misguided in giving a prominent White House post to former CIA director George Tenet’s protégé John Brennan, who has publicly defended "extraordinary rendition" in full knowledge that its purpose was torture. Brennan also had complicit knowledge of the lengths to which Tenet conspired with the Department of Justice to distort history and the law in drafting opinions that attempted to "justify" torture.
With all due respect, Mr. President, it would be another mistake for you to believe what you are hearing from the likes of Brennan and Hayden and the journalists they have fed and domesticated. Please do not be deceived into thinking that most intelligence officials, past and present, condone torture-still less that they are angry that you have put a stop to such techniques. We are referring, of course, to what President Bush called "an alternative set of procedures" involving cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment that violates domestic and international law. We focus on torture in the VIPS statement that follows these introductory remarks.
[some of bold = mine] If this article was previously covered here at the Lake, no matter – It should be nailed on every courthouse door in America!



16 Comments







I will add that if I were a juror and this writing were presented by Ray McGovern as the prosecution’s concluding statement, Bush and Cheney would leave that courtroom in shackles. (if my vote counted, that is).
Thanks very much for the link, acquarius. I note two typos — in the intro you’ve quoted, when the authors refer to their first memo as having been written on 5 February 2002 — should be 2003 — and then also in a funny mix-up between Jack Cloonan and Matthew Alexander: they have Cloonan as author of How To Break a Terrorist, but I’m pretty sure that’s Alexander’s book.
I agree with you — it’s a very strong statement, and it’s appalling that it hasn’t had any effect on Obama’s attitudes before now.
Thank you, skdadl. Edit still worked so I added a correction to 2003 in brackets; didn’t want to change the original. You’re right on Matt Alexander being the author of “How to Break a Terrorist”.
How can Obama ignore these impressive men?? They’re not just pissant nobodies ranting as I sometimes do. I wonder if the memo ever reached Obama; whether it was stopped by one of his minders…? Say, for instance Rahm..or special advisor Kissinger, or someone of that mindset.
Obama will ignore these impressive men. Why? Because he has corporations to feed. Corporations that feast on the dead bodies of Americans and Iraqi alike. Obama has betrayed us. He will not end war, he will escalate it. Obama will not restore the rule of law, he will evade it. I voted for him but now, seeing the back room deals and the constant caving to extreme right wing groups, I would support impeachment. He is complicit in war crimes as is SOS Clinton. If we ignore this, we commit national suicide. Right now the gun is in our hand and heading for our temple. Will we be able to pull it back. I fear not.
Well, Dave, I wish I could disagree with you, but so far Obama himself is proving you to be right. I, too voted for him (like, no choice really). Now, at this point in time, my view is that he is either (1) he is either the lyingest flim-flam man alive; or (2) he has found out that he has no real power and is just a tool of the Big Money that put him where he is.
Lets assume the latter (no real power, just a tool of Big Money) and figure out how to help him become the hero we want him to be.
I truly wish someone or some group would figure that out, kindGSL, but it is discouraging when our ‘leaders’ won’t listen to the advise of these 70 plus former intelligence officers. It is clear that this group has the true best interest of our country, the rule of law, and humane conduct as their guiding principles. I simply cannot understand how the sanity, logic and reason of this group’s purpose can be disregarded.
Thanks for the link
You’re most welcome, Jason.
Thanks Acquarius
Ray McGovern and so many others were trying their best to warn against the invasion based on questionable intelligence. They continue to be committed to sharing their knowledge, insights and expertise to keep this administration from digging themselves into a deeper hole
Leen, after you posted your diary with the Ray McGovern clip I spent the day watching and listening to him on clips. I had known he was good guy, but had no idea the brilliance of this man or his life-long dedication to the America he was born in and fought for. I only wish he were our Intel Czar.
Did you see the clip in which he tells of his opponents trying to shut him up by trying to take away his retirement pension (after 27 years as a CIA analyst !). Fortunately they did not succeed.
I first heard Ray McGovern on the Diane Rehm show or Talk of the Nation before the invasion of Iraq. He was questioning the validity of the intelligence in a most studied way. Along with Scott Ritter, Jimmy Carter, Brezenski etc. Hell I even heard Robert Mcnamara question the intelligence.
The next time I saw Ray was on a film called “Uncovered” a much watch
http://www.truthuncovered.com/
Ray is a true patriot
Thanks for the link, Leen. Going there now. Can’t wait to hear what he has to say.
It is a great documentary. Ray is posted at Countepunch and Information clearing house a great deal. He has written quite a bit.
this timeline is great
http://www.truthuncovered.com/timeline.php
imeline: The Bush Administration’s Justification for War
* March 17, 2002
“We know they have biological and chemical weapons.” – Vice President Richard Cheney
The Statement was misleading because it professed certainty when the intelligence community provided only an “estimate.” According to CIA Director George Tenet, “it is important to underline the word estimate. Because not everything we analyze can be known to a standard of absolute proof.” In addition, the statement failed to acknowledge the Defense Intelligence Agency position that: “There is no reliable information on whether Iraq is producing and stockpiling chemical weapons or where Iraq has — or will — establish its chemical warfare agent production facilities.” Source: Press Conference by Vice President Cheney and his Highness Salam bin Hamad Al Khalifa, Crown Prince of Bahrain, White House
* November 14, 2002
“a week, or a month” Saddam Hussein could give his weapons of mass destruction to al Qaeda, which could use them to attack the United States and killed “30,000, or 100,000 . . . human beings.” – Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld
The Statement was misleading because, by evoking the specter of thousands of deaths in a time frame as short as “a week, or a month,” it suggested that Iraq posed an urgent threat. The U.S. intelligence community, however, had deep divisions and divergent points of view regarding Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. Further, according to the National Intelligence Estimate, the intelligence community had “low confidence” regarding whether Iraq would provide al Qaeda with weapons of mass destruction. Source: Secretary Rumsfeld Live Interview with Infinity CBS Radio, Infinity-CBS Radio
‘NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW” yeah right
Not one person not one held accountable for all of the false pre-war intelligence. Not one.
Hundreds of thousands dead, injured, millions displaced. Most Americans could give a damn. We are morally Going down down down “to the burning ring of fire”
Leen, I posted a comment but it has disappeared into the ‘unknown unknown land’.
There is a video of the Charlie Rose Show on 02/20/2004 in which he holds a debate between Ray McGovern and former Dir CIA, Jim Woolsey on the subject of that film, Truth Uncovered. Woolsey had already left the CIA and was in some position with Booz-Allen-Hamilton (who just happen to be the biggest $$$ receivers for CIA contract interrogators).
Anybody who agrees to debate McGovern is up against irrefutable facts and evidence; he has a mind like a steel trap and is utterly devoted to truth.
IMO, the quality of Charlie’s shows has deteriorated since the time of this debate. It’s a good one.
Ray McGovern is a retired 27 year CIA analyst and co-founder of this group of Intel Officers (Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity) who sent these memos to Bush and Obama. Here at my diary of a few days ago you can watch the video of one of his best talks given at a meeting of this group.
It gives strength, sometimes in a light-hearted way, to those of us who become discouraged.