This weekend marks the anniversary of the most brutal confrontation in the history of the American labor movement, the Battle of Blair Mountain. For one week during 1921, armed, striking coal miners battled scabs, a private militia, police officers and the US Army. 100 people died, 1,000 were arrested, and one million shots were fired. It was the largest armed rebellion in America since the Civil War.
This is how it happened. In the Twenties, West Virginia coal miners lived in “company towns.” The mining companies owned all the property. They literally ran union organizers out of town – or killed them.
In 1912, in a strike at Paint Creek, the mining company forced the striking miners and their families out of their homes, to live in tents. Then they sent armed goons into that tent city, and opened fire on men, women and children there with a machine gun.
By 1920, the United Mine Workers had organized the northern mines in West Virginia, but they were barred from the southern mines. When southern miners tried to join the union, they were fired and evicted. To show who was boss, one mining company tried to place machine guns on the roofs of buildings in town.
In Matewan, when the coal company goons came to town to take it upon themselves to enforce eviction notices, the mayor and the sheriff asked them to leave. The goons refused. Incredibly, the goons tried to arrest the sheriff, Sheriff Hatfield. Shots were fired, and the mayor and nine others were killed. But the company goons had to flee.
The government sided with the coal companies, and put Sheriff Hatfield on trial for murder. The jury acquitted him. Then they put the sheriff on trial for supposedly dynamiting a non-union mine. As the sheriff walked up the courthouse steps to stand trial again, unarmed, company goons shot him in cold blood. In front of his wife.
This led to open confrontations between miners on one hand, and police and company goons on the other. 13,000 armed miners assembled, and marched on the southern mines in Logan and Mingo Counties. They confronted a private militia of 2,000, hired by the coal companies.
President Harding was informed. He threatened to send in troops and even bombers to break the union. Many miners turned back, but then company goons started killing unarmed union men, and some armed miners pushed on. The militia attacked armed miners, and the coal companies hired airplanes to drop bombs on them. The US Army Air Force, as it was known then, observed the miners’ positions from overhead, and passed that information on to the coal companies.
The miners actually broke through the militia’s defensive perimeter, but after five days, the US Army intervened, and the miners stood down. By that time, 100 people were dead. Almost a thousand miners then were indicted for murder and treason. No one on the side of the coal companies was ever held accountable.
The Battle of Blair Mountain showed that the miners could not defeat the coal companies and the government in battle. But then something interesting happened: the miners defeated the coal companies and the government at the ballot box. In 1925, convicted miners were paroled. In 1932, Democrats won both the State House and the White House. In 1935, President Roosevelt signed the National Labor Relations Act. Eleven years after the Battle of Blair Mountain, the United Mine Workers organized the southern coal fields in West Virginia.
The Battle of Blair Mountain did not have a happy ending for Sheriff Hatfield, or his wife, or the 100 men, women and children who died, or the hundreds who were injured, or the thousands who lost their jobs. But it did have a happy ending for the right to organize, and the middle class, and America.
Now let me ask you one thing: had you ever heard of this landmark event in American history, the Battle of Blair Mountain, before you read this? And if not, then why not? Think about that.
Courage,
Alan Grayson




25 Comments

Simple answer: Read Howard Zinn-”The People’s History of the United States”, or a “People’s History of the Twentieth Century”.
I’m embarrassed to admit I never heard of this! But I did know America’s corporate bosses have had a bloody history of killing dissent and the human right to organize. The corporate bosses got smart since FDR. Now they own the media, instead of a whip, to control the minds of Americans.
Well, yes,I have known about the history of mining strikes and battles for years. But then I’m not only a “Boomer” who learned a lot of labor history during the seventies, and a film buff who’s seen “Matewan” a few times, but a West Virginian. The latter may be the most significant reason, even though I have to admit my ancestors include no miners, to my knowledge.
Is Alan saying that it will take armed insurrection to get the Democrats to do the right thing?
Oh, I doubt it. But it is a part of our history that we should all know about. And (my opinion only), knowing about it might just influence how we think about labor, unions, management, corporations and employment, working conditions, regulation versus corporate “self-regulation”, and a whole bunch of other issues that have not gone away.
This is why I keep urging some folks on this blog to read American history. People seem to think that just because they are living something, the situation is more dire than anything ever has been and it’s just not true. Corporate greed and an American form of fascism are unfortunately nothing new. Nor is political extremism and an ideologically driven Supreme Court. Yep, things are bad right now but it bugs me when people want to put our Republic in an early grave or want me to believe that it is corrupted beyond any redemption.
For those who are interested in more peoples history look up the Ludlow Co Massacre or the Bisbee Az Deportation.
And it concerns me that some do not seem to understand that each successive “time” that the oligarchs sought to take control, that they have come MUCH closer to doing so.
Each successive time, the ability of the powerful to co-opt, the Executive, Congress, AND the Judiciary has gotten MORE successful.
And this time, Margaret IS different in precisely THAT degree,
No one that I am aware of is suggesting that there have NOT be internal threats to democracy and civil society … but the treason this time, goes beyond the “racket” of war, although that IS one “centerpiece”, it goes beyond the economic “sacrifice” of the many, of the quality of human being’s lives and well-being, to the dictates of the banking elite, which is another “centerpiece” … and it adds a level of thought-control which is quite unique.
Not since the reign of the “Peculiar Institution”, has the Rule of Law been quite so perverted … as well.
And NEVER has the empire been so very close to demise and so capable of and so willing to inflict both domestic and foreign terror on so many, even to the point of destroying the viability of civil society to survive OR the earth’s capacity to provide the basics required for human existence.
The profound ability of “authority” to spy upon people, to know the most intimate details of EVERYONE’S lives coupled with the power to use DRONES to kill anyone, anywhere, at anytime … as the whims of ONE PERSON may dictate IS something new to the “mix”.
Further, common understanding, this time, is at an ALL time low, despite the number of human beings who DO understand the “nature” of what is occurring as well as the long-term implications.
For instance, many people, living in this nation and “abroad” must realize that the current administration, the Obama administration, is NOT behaving in a manner conducive to civil or social well-being … and yet … all that is required for this failed and destructive administration to retain ever greater power is simply an “adversary” who is clearly and completely unhinged and even more diabolically opposed to civil and social well-being …
Eugene Debs was precisely correct one hundred years ago when he said, as Kevin Gosztola pointed out here:
http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2012/08/23/interview-with-green-party-presidential-candidate-jill-stein-governing-as-an-organizer-in-chief/
What Debs said was this, “There is no longer even the pretense of difference between the so-called Republican and Democratic parties. They are substantially one in what they stand for. They are opposed to each other on no question of principle, but purely in a contest for the spoils of office.”
Over the last hundred years, the evidence has mounted that Debs is absolutely correct, whether or not you choose to agree with that evidence or the inherent implication of a single “view” of hegemony and control … held between the legacy parties.
Heretofore, that alliance had sufficient cracks and fissures, to allow at least the pretense of “honorable opposition” … now it is merely Kabuki, a “performance” that that less and less “effort” is made to obtain every day … The powers that be prefer Obama, for his “medicine” will be swallowed with nary a whimper, so the Grand Old Party rises to the occasion, as it is their “turn” to do so … and then there is no question of Obama’s actual performance, but only the fearful spectre of evil incarnate … and do the Democrats even rise up and say, “we will protect the rights of women”, or “we will protect the hard-won rights to dignity in old age, to the right to good health and well-being, and the return to the people of their investment in civil society, in the social well- being of everyone”?
Do they even bother to pretend to care about such things?
This time, Margaret, despite your brave assertion, “things” are very much more dangerous … and while we must welcome your optimism, for such it must be, such optimism, by and of itself, is more in the nature of “feel good” expression than any meaningful “guarantee”.
For, I am certain you will agree that, in the past, “things” did NOT right themselves without the effort, the energy, and the willingness of the people to pay the price necessary to bring about the necessary change … so, it is premature to assume that the people, this time, once again, with or without a knowledge of “history”, and better it were Zinn’s history than the “official” tomes, that most people are propagandized with, WILL rise to the occasion and, once again, save this poor old nation, drunk with power or sobered with understanding, from the dreams of the sociopaths and worse who now quite control all of the levers of power AND the organs of information, excepting only, and who knows for how long, the very medium we share these thoughts upon.
The power of “authority” to “CONTROL”, has NEVER been so great nor so coveted.
We have NEVER been so close to an all-compelling police state, nor have the people ever been as deliberately divided, not about issues of principle but on the basis of appeals to fear and hatred, to easily manipulated emotional prejudice and fears of the loss of employment.
This time is ALL of the other “times” rolled into one, bounded by a heartless, inhuman technology, wielded by an elite that more than ever before, “believe” that they are invincible and entitled to absolute rule.
It would take a larger history than just of this nation to contain all the elements of inhumanity and disregard of human life that this nation now faces.
Your encouragement of hope is fully appreciated, but not your sanguine assumption of good and just “outcome” …
DW
‘
To get the Hollywood version of events, watch the movie Matewan.
US history books are consistent in ignoring the class divisions in our society. Three common everyday examples are armories, parks, and the olympics. WRT armories, cities began building these areas for the National Guard to train. Almost all in the northeast were brick edifices that could withstand almost any gunfire short of a cannon. The expressed intent was that city officials would retreat to these locations when the masses rioted/revolted and the city officials would wait for the federal government to help them. Curious how every major industrial town in the northeast has one or more of these buildings.
WRT parks, the cities created two types of parks, low class and high class parks. The low class parks had playing fields, and few amenities. The upper class parks had veranda’s, walking pathways, manicured areas, lakes and places to watch the symphony. If you lived in one such town (i.e. Worcester, MA), you knew which park you were allowed to be in.
WRT Olympics. One of the big ideals of the Olympics was the distinction of the professional athlete vs. the amateur. The wealthy could afford to be amateurs and did not like the idea of competing against someone of the lower class who had to be paid to do his sport. Thus baseball/football are the sports of the lower classes and track and field are the sports of the educated/wealthy.
Here’s a little something to go along with what you are saying.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/08/24/jill-stein-and-the-99-percent/
Yes, the elite are very close to finishing off Main Street.
WRT to “Matewan”, it is hardly a “Hollywood” version of the events. It was written and directed by John Sayles, who, as a filmmaker, is about as far from Hollywood as one can get. It is a terrific film about the Matewan Massacre. It is historically accurate and well worth watching if you have an interest in this topic.
it ia a great one w/James Earl Jones and Chris Cooper
That sure was a long winded comment to wind up with such a mistaken assumption. Please do us all the kindness of citing where I argued that there will be a “good and just outcome”
In my considered judgement, DW is exactly right in his perception of the comment’s implication, whether the writer agrees or not. The writer’s counter-accusation or defense consists of a variation of the “hey, he didn’t use those exact words, in that exact order” excuse technique perfected by thin-skinned Obama cult of personality loyalists for the past four years, which I personally do not find persuasive.
From Slavery, to Civil War, to Coal Wars and Oil Wars….
Energy being the common denominator with servitude being the ultimate goal. The natural “aristocracy” among men has been codified where basic needs sustaining life are are now realized at the expense of life. How unexceptional, from an historical perspective, when blinders are removed…….
Then you do not anticipate that the “…grave … redemption” will be good or just?
What “outcome” or “continuation” do you, Margaret, then imagine?
A kinder, gentler empire?
A more benevolent tyranny?
A compassionate capitalism?
I would suggest that this nation and civil society are at an extreme crossroads, possibly a dead end has been chosen, not by the people, but by the masters.
If you do not see goodness and justice, then what do you see of imagine?
And how, do you consider that whatever you see, if it is to be not just “more of the same” … is to be brought about?
Where do you imagine the inspiration for something “better” is to come “from”?
As I say, your hopeful sentiment is most welcome, but upon what, somewhat specifically, do you base this hopefulness upon?
If it is to be past history, then point to the means, to the method, to the enlivening “philosophy”.
Empty, ballyhooed hope is become a tiresome thing, and we have a very recent “history” which confirms THAT reality …
DW
‘
Once again you are putting words into my mouth. I said very clearly that we have been here, (or worse), before. I also very clear said that I think burying our republic is premature. What I very clearly did not offer you or anyone else was “hope” nor did I suppose an outcome. All of that came from your own imagination which seems bent on painting me as unreasonably optimistic in order to make whatever point it is you’re trying to make and if that doesn’t break the Carnac rule, then I suppose nothing does. I’m finished with you DW. You go too far. There’s your reality.
DW, someone just broke the Carnac Rule to charge you with breaking the Carnac Rule. Don’t laugh at that. The real answer in the envelope is “Piggly Wiggly.” Laugh at that instead.
heh…
Right so you are saying what?
“that we have been here (or worse)…”
Meaning what?
That we have slogged along in some “survival” mode, burdened by “exceptional” myths of superiority as some sort of “chosen” beings, while common “reality” is brutish and nasty?
Margaret, if your whole argument is NOT about hope … and but a “premise” (not a promise) for mere survival, or something better, something just and good, then what does it amount to?
I find it “interesting” that you consider that I break the Carnac rule if I suggest that you appear to be offering a rather simplistic “hope” and what you clearly imply is historic “perspective”?
Margaret, you have my sympathy and my concern.
And my apologies for misunderstanding, in your opinion and assumption about what I think, that is, according to your interpretation of what I typed, that you are being “unreasonably optimistic”, when all you really “offer”, then, is “more of the same” and clearly, you, find some value and a kind of reassurance in that sameness?
If you do not want anyone to respond to you, then perhaps you’d best not offer any thoughts, opinions, or perspectives … for someone might ask you to clarify, as did I.
You treat my reasonable questions as attack and assault, and act as if your comments are above any question or that any of us may have the “right” of reasonable doubt regarding your assertions.
I promise, henceforth, to never suggest that your words offer either hope or unreasonable optimism.
If this “difference”, this respectful seeking of clarity, is sufficient for you to be “done with” me, then, Margaret, I hold that we both have lost for, if respect of friendship and sensibility is THAT tenuous and slight, then these times and the stresses attendant are, clearly and indeed, those that try human souls.
So, Margaret I have but one further thought, at the moment, to share with you …
Namaste
DW
Your perspective, and humor, UCT1, are much appreciated, and gave me a genuine laugh.
It is always what is in the last envelope that belies the previous curses.
Thank you.
;~DW
Exactly. Remarkable that when a bounty of energy resources are tapped some slavery is eliminated but no preparation is made for the exhaustion of that resource. Instead, the prophets of crapitalism thunder.
The gods must be laughing.
When someone treats their judgment – like Mahgret’s assessment that things have been worse, as an objective fact, I wonder under whose authority is that authoritarian pronouncing?
It’s bad. Really bad.
This here makes me as sad as what I’m hearing on the tv.
Peg, get out the tshirt. New Surge.
I’m out.
Chahlie goes to Candy Mountain