Cenk seized the TV scoop when grassroots media monitors at StopRush reported a strange source for the traffic making “Rush Babes for America” over 70,000 strong on Facebook. The clicks were coming from New Delhi, India.
Yes, Facebook openly reports the #1 city that traffic comes from when users “like” or share a page.
In a scathing take-down, Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks took to calling Rush a “fraud” and “pathetic” for paying Indians bargain wages to create fake buzz on Facebook for his anti-woman promotion.
Limbaugh, or his recently hired crisis management expert Brian Glicklich scurried to switch to US-based astroturf experts which changed the city listed as his #1 source from New Delhi to Indianapolis. Had the multimillionaire radio host simply bought American in the first place, we might have never learned of his PR team’s embarrassing oversight.
Today it’s Houston – good to see Americans getting the jobs, even if it’s a “make pretend” campaign for Limbaugh.
You might remember the “Rush Babes” site with the silhouetted woman’s form lifted from a mud flap, also likely part of Glicklich’s “new media” plan to boost Limbaugh’s online followers. They began giving away $500 iPads to get new Twitter followers, “paying for it” just like his disciple Sean Hannity who only gives t-shirts away for retweets.
Dittoheads crowed when the “Rush Babes” surpassed the popularity of the National Orgnization of Women on Facebook. Rush even had the audacity to accuse NOW of padding their numbers. That was a “tell”, as Rush thereby revealed his knowledge of how the system is gamed.
While this overwhelmingly suggests Limbaugh is buying friends, it’s also possible a staffer or surrogate is doing it for Limbaugh so he can deny involvement on the air, as he did when it was discovered his bosses at Premier Radio were selling a fake caller service to talk shows.
In that scandal, Limbaugh admitted “people” approached him to plant calls but claims he would never “pay for it”. We found examples however, of callers that Sean Hannity’s producers coached without informing the host.
This latest “buying friends” item was lost over the past few days, overshadowed by coverage of Rush Limbaugh’s “retroactive” revision of a statement he made about a supervillain invented for Batman in the early 1990s. Earlier in the week, Rush lied to his audience in saying the name “Bane” was intentionally put into the latest Batman flick to subliminally implant moviegoers with a negative connotation with Bain Capital, the vulture investment firm headed by Mitt Romney.
Rush Limbaugh Tuesday:
“Do you think that it is accidental that the name of the really vicious, fire-breathing, four-eyed whatever it is villain in this movie is named Bane?
Limbaugh claimed Thursday never to have suggested such a “conspiracy theory”, but was excoriated for “changing his story” without simply admitting he made it up.
Image screengrabbed from The Young Turks




7 Comments

Just when I think this guy can’t get any lower, he does.
Bane was an enemy of Batman decades before anyone heard of Mitt.
Thank you God Rush is not a Comics Geek, Comic Geeks have enough image problems without adding Rush to their number.
This is your post I won’t visit RushBabes and give them traffic but this site is what Women who supposedly like Rush and thats it no comment from these paid we presume women nothing?
Just what is the supposed draw of this site to women? Also whats Rush’s radio ratings with Women of late?
Can you imagine trying to listen to him on a date? NO, and I won’t go there. But it is not surprising he would need to “buy” women…(horrors). It’s just a surprise that anyone would go along….
There are some real “babes” that go along with Rush. I guess it’s okay to call them babes, huh?
Many of them provide their picture, full name and personal information just by clicking “like”. I’m not sure if I would want anyone to call my mother, wife or daughter “babe”, or even worse “Rush’s babe”, but they have plenty of ditto heads who have signed up…
Wait, you’re saying the only way Rush can get babes is by paying for it? I’m shocked like Claude Rains here.
73,000 likes on the Babes page and he claims to have an audience of 20 million. At a minimum 50% of the initial posts were men. I wouldn’t be surprised if 50,000+ of the likes were bought.