Drugs are a serious problem in America but, unfortunately, so is the war on drugs. Drugs mess up peoples’ lives, but not as much as the war on drugs where blacks and Hispanics are scapegoated for America’s problem. Despite the fact that studies show that blacks and whites use drugs at the same rate, blacks are incarcerated for drugs at a rate 6 times that of whites 4.2% vs. 0.7%.
By arresting minorities, America tries to show that it’s fighting the drug problem while whites in the suburbs stay free to use and abuse drugs without solid police interference. In fact, while use of the stereotypical drugs associated with African-Americans (i.e. crack and marijauna) is declining, there are major meth and prescription pill epidemics occurring across poorer rural and more affluent white communities. This problem has gone virtually ignored even though this level of drug addiction has become a silent killer in many of these areas.
One of the biggest problems with the war on drugs is the level of guns and violence involved. By criminalizing drugs, the US puts the distribution and manufacturing of drugs in the hands of violent, competing criminals. Gangs like the Bloods and the Crips all get their guns from US manufacturers. Often these guns are bought by gun runners who buy or ‘steal’ the firearms from Virginia and then sell them up and down the east coast. Most guns used in drug related gun violence are illegally sold, but there has been no action by the US government to crack down on these illegal sales and, whether legal or illegal, all firearm profits somehow still get into the hands of gun manufacturers.
American gun laws not only fuel the drug war at home but also around the world. Recently on 60 Minutes, Mexican officials complained that most of the guns used in Mexico’s drug wars were bought in the USA. The Mexican drug wars are caused by American need for drugs as the cartels fight over who gets to service American addictions, leaving thousands of Mexicans dead, injured or kidnapped. The high level of money that American drug addiction brings into the United States makes it impossible for the Mexican government not to be corrupted. When the only Third World billionaire is a drug dealer, it’s obvious that drugs have become that part of the world’s major industry.
And, even when it’s about fueling these international or suburban addictions, drug violence often stays isolated in our local black and Latino communities. In the film Traffic, the actor Topher Grace gave an excellent speech to Michael Douglass about this phenomenon.
America’s drug addiction and drug laws have also created narco-states in Jamaica, Haiti, the Dominican Republic and Guyana, which serve as ports for cocaine between South America and the US. All of these countries have large amounts of drug related violence facilitated by American weapons. American drug addiction, drug laws and weapons have fueled the wars in Colombia which have resulted in thousands of deaths and on on-going civil war. (Europe is no better: European heroin addiction has helped fund the Taliban as well as other Afghani and Pakistani warlords in the middle east. European cocaine addiction has turned African countries like Guinea into narco-states.)
America’s problem is not the availability of drugs. Cocaine is cheap and plentiful in Colombia yet they do not have an addiction problem like ours. Heroin is cheap and plentiful in Afghanistan yet they do not have a heroin problem like ours. The American problem is the desire for drugs. Drugs have become entrenched in American culture.
The correct way to solve these problems is through education and treatment, not incarceration. Incarceration only fuels the drug war. Addicts have no problem finding drugs in jail and drug dealers come out of jail stronger and smarter criminals with better connections for gun and drugs. The Mexican mafia, which controls a good deal of drugs on the west coast has most of their leadership in jail and their progress has been helped not hindered by their centralized leadership.
In order for America to stop the violence it is causing at home and abroad, it must drastically change its drug policies and national and international gun laws. Shouldn’t the gun makers bare some responsibility for the carnage caused by their product? We need more anti-drug messages like those commercials that present other activities and sports as their "anti-drugs." It is also past due for America to legalize marijuana, a drug that has given proven relief to many long suffering cancer patients in California and elsewhere. This de-criminalization would cut off a significant portion of the drug war and lessen the amount of gang violence and incarceration rates. By criminalizing drugs, America is putting control of an extremely lucrative business in the hands of criminals and our ineffective drug laws have led to civil wars in the third world and gang violence at home.



5 Comments




An argument can be made for de-criminalization of drugs.Portugal did it 7? years ago I think.I haven’t heard about the end of Portugese society.I don’t know what stipulations their laws have in regards to usage.There is alot of support for gun control among members of this blog.The sooner democrats realize that gun control is to their cause what abortion is to the conservative cause the better off they will be.I know every one is flushed with the democratic victories in the last few elections,but for the young voters out there,you don’t yet know just how fickle American political opinion is.If Pres. Obama doesn’t get it together soon,he and the democrats in congress will likely be voted out in decisive fashion,it’s happened before and it can happen again.The republicans are on the ropes now,but don’t kid yourself into thinking the country is going to a one party political system.Hope and pray that it doesn’t.History shows you exactly what happens when one party has ALL the power.See Germany,USSR,China,Cambodia,Sudan, Rwanda,etc.Don’t kid yourselves into thinking that the same terrible things that have happened in other countries CAN’T happen here.Does anyone trust the government enough to respect ANY of our rights if the 2nd amendment were to be,as the Bill of Rights puts it,infringed? Like it or not,the an armed public is the only thing that keeps the corrupt congressional criminals in D.C. in check.The 2nd amendment is not about sporting purposes or hunting game.It’s about hunting tyrants and the right to self defense,period.The Constitution is not an a la carte menu.It is all or nothing.Do we prosecute the business’s that make and distribute alcohol,or the car dealers that sold the vehicle to the person that kills someone with it driving under the influence? How about the person that causes an accident driving while talking on the cell phone? Do you sue the cell phone manufacturer? Where are you going to draw the line? Another unpopular fact is that the places with the strictest gun control have the highest crime rates.I was robbed in Chicago in 2007 by kid who was under the age of 21,the legal age to possess a hand gun.He had a gun and I didn’t because I followed the law and he didn’t. No hand guns allowed in Chicago.According to the FBI crime statistics (google it) the majority of guns that criminals use are stolen from law abiding owners,not bought at gun stores or gun shows,and they are therefore untraceable.How does all the profit of illegal sales get back to the gun manufacturers? Legal first time sales,yes,but it is a one time deal for the manufacturer with usually a 10% to 15% profit for the licensed dealer.As for the assumption that no government action has been taken to curb the illegal sale of guns is concerned,what about the passage of legislation to implement background checks and waiting periods.By “action” does the author mean the seizure of guns from people who obey the law? Maybe he or she would like the U.N. to decide for us.We all know how honest, forthright and effective they are.No one that has a felony or domestic violence conviction can legally buy a gun anywhere.Only illegally on the black market.Even with a spotless record,no one can walk into a store and buy a thousand AK-47’s or a thousand of any other type of gun with a credit card like I’ve read about in these “stories”.You can try that one out for yourself.These Mexican officials state that the drug gangs are armed with U.S. anti tank rockets,automatic grenade launchers,mines,grenades,SUBMARINES!!!! and all kinds of crap that no one can buy in the U.S.,anywhere.This is just a bunch of BS to cover the butts of corrupt Mexican officials selling Mexican military hardware to the gangs.But we heard it from the MSM,so it must??? be true.The gang leaders are business men and profit is their motivation.In the U.S. an AK-47 costs $800 and AR-15’s cost well over $1000 a piece.M-16’s or any other fully automatic weapon cost upwards of at least $15,000 with BATF regulation so strict VERY few private citizens own them.If you don’t believe me check out gunbroker.com or gunsamerica.com.I guarantee you they can buy these guns a hell of alot cheaper from any number of third world countries like Cuba or Venezuela,who would probably like to see a destabilized Mexico.Why would they take the risk of getting the guns past U.S. customs when they can use the same safe smuggling routes they use to get the cocaine into Mexico? The officials are already bought off.The assertion that they’re reverse smuggling from the U.S. doesn’t make sense.If illegal drugs are easily available here doesn’t it stand to reason that illegal guns will be too? If you can solve the drug problem through education and treatment and make the crime problem that goes with it irrelevant,whats the point of gun control? I haven’t seen Traffic,but the reason drug culture and violence stays in predominantly minority communitees is that many kids don’t have the parental guidance to stay in school get an education,get a good job and work hard for their money,for the benefit of their families and society.Where is the minority leadership? Ask Mr. Cosby.Criminals will ALWAYS find the means to their ends.Whether law abiding U.S. citizens have guns or not.The argument for gun control is nothing but misguided sophistry.
See new way for city to get pot of cash,
http://www.metro.us/us/article…..index.xml, and the other amazing editors in yesterday’s metro newspapes in NY, Boston & Philly
http://oxdown.firedoglake.com/diary/4298
RichardKanePA
That was the most ridicules anti gun control tirade I have heard in years.
The article was about the drug trade and the guns associated with it.
I have not seen ONE WORD about any Democratic Party’s agenda for gun control. The only people talking about that is the loser party trying to stir up the nut cases against the winners (looks like they’ve succeeded).
Go back and listen to your drug addicted leader, rush limpballs (1000 viagra where there are little boy prostitutes?); at least someone there will agree with you, but be sure to keep that loaded assault rifle close just in case some of those evil Democrats come to take your
substitute d..k. security blanket away.McBride, it sounds as though you favor requiring insurance to purchase hand guns.
Casey, thanks for a thoughtful post.
Although I would never encourage anyone to use it, I completely agree with de-criminalizing marijuana. It’s as though no one remembers prohibition and the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre.
Thanks CGM; the more exposure this issue gets the better. It’s time that our government admits that after over half a century of prohibition this isn’t working any better than the one on alcohol did.
Over fifty years of the same action and still expecting a different result? This is getting beyond stupid.
There are two groups equally profiting and therefore equally against ending this insanity; the drug dealers and law enforcement.
I said this before in a comment at FDL; drug addition is a MEDICAL PROBLEM not a criminal problem. If there was no prohibition, the only thing the black market can do is compete on price; not a very dangerous trade mode.
Prohibition has not stopped one single addict. All it does is make them criminals both for just having the drugs and having to commit crimes to come up with the outrageous amounts of money to support their habits. The cost is outrageous because it is a black market and the crooks control the prices. The more law enforcement cracks down, the higher the price gets and the more crimes the addicts have to commit to feed their habits.
The illegality also ties the hands of the medical community in how they deal with addiction.
There is really no up side to this whole system as it stands.
Any Historian or Sociologist will tell you that the only thing a prohibition has ever done in the history of mankind is create a black market. This black market is eating away at our civilization far worse than drugs ever have.