Editor’s Note: Crossposted from Healthy Barbs. Barbara Brenner will be featured in next Monday’s FDL Movie Night Pink Ribbons, Inc.. -MyFDL Editor
There are many heroes and heroines in the world of breast cancer. You even know some of their names. One of the best-known is Dr. Susan Love, author of Dr. Susan Love’s Breast Book, the excellent layperson’s guide to breast cancer issues. I have given that book to several people, and referred many others to it, as a clear and invaluable source of information for sorting out questions about breast cancer diagnoses and options for treatment.
Dr. Love stopped doing surgery some years ago, and now runs a foundation, called — you can guess it from the title of her book — The Susan Love Breast Cancer Foundation. Founded in 1995, its mission is “to eradicate breast cancer and improve the quality of women’s health through innovative research, education and advocacy.” (On the subject of the holy grail of “eradicating breast cancer,” see Breast Cancer Action’s Cancer Policy Perspective.) According to its last annual report, the Foundation has nearly $5 million in assets.
Eradicating breast cancer was not always the Foundation’s stated mission. In 2005, its stated mission was “to end breast cancer in 10 years.” I was then the E.D. at Breast Cancer Action, and had heard similar elusive promises from others many times. But I thought of Susan as more honest than most people in the field, so I was surprised. I emailed her to ask from what year we should start counting the 10 years. She responded, “My board says when we raise all the money.” Oh yeah, the money thing. As 2015 approaches, the mission has changed. Either they didn’t raise all the money they needed or they saw that they couldn’t deliver. Surprise.
I have known Susan Love for a long time, and – despite her excellent book – disagreed with her about several things along the way. When we first “met” in 1994 at an on-line breast cancer forum, we disagreed about the value of breast self-exam. We still disagree about that. Susan says it sends women on a fearful “search and destroy” mission that doesn’t do any good. I say that discouraging women from knowing their own bodies is a dangerous thing, especially when about 1/3 of women with breast cancer find their own lumps.
But more recent events have intensified my disagreements with her. Here’s why:
Both Susan and I appear in the film that’s opening now across the country, Pink Ribbons, Inc. In that film, Susan convincingly says we have to find the cause of breast cancer and stop it. In the film, she eloquently suggests that environmental research may be the key, and that people who want to support that kind of research should be sure that’s where their money is going. It’s clear to me that this call is for more funding for her foundation.
So far, so good, right? But Susan can’t really be that interested in environmental causes of breast cancer, because, if she were, she couldn’t accept some of the funding the Foundation has accepted or establish partnerships the Foundation has established.
I suspected as much when the Foundation announced to great fanfare its “Army of Women” approach to getting women involved in breast cancer studies. The Army was launched with the help of funding and publicity from the Avon Foundation.
(An aside: I was appalled at the name at the time — just what we need, another militaristic reference in the cancer world. See some discussion of this in a previous post.)
I was also pretty sure that the partnership was a direct result of the fact that Love was serving on the Avon Foundation’s Breast Cancer Scientific Advisory Board at the time. If you don’t think this is how funding works, think again. Look at the list of who serves on a non-profit research funder’s advisory board, and see if you don’t find many of those names also on the list of the funder’s grantees.
So, what’s the problem? Avon (the corporate parent of the Avon Foundation) refuses to sign on to the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, and continues to use known or suspected carcinogens in some of their products. This corporate hypocrisy is also highlighted in Pink Ribbons, Inc.

More War Language
My suspicions about Susan’s commitment to environmental health research were confirmed recently when Susan announced with great pride that her foundation has been chosen to benefit from the Ford Motor Company’s “Ford Warriors in Pink Models of Courage” campaign. The Foundation will get the “net proceeds” (that means after costs are covered, so it could be little or nothing) of sales of things like Warriors in Pink: t-shirts, yoga pants, and sun hats, to name a few items. You can array yourself in much Ford Warrior in Pink apparel.
The Ford Motor Company is also featured in Pink Ribbons, Inc. Ford has a history of being the leading polluter in the automotive industry. And we know that some of things that are produced by internal combustion engine cars can increase the risk of many cancers, including breast cancer. Beyond that, the film includes a sequence that focuses on the elevated incidence of cancer in women who worked in automotive plastics factories, making parts for Ford. Ford’s purported concern about breast cancer is classic pinkwashing. And Susan Love is helping them do it. For shame.
Susan says in the film that she hates pink. But she partners with companies that are pinkwashers. Will the real Susan please stand up?
I invite you to join with me in calling on Susan Love to run her Foundation with the same integrity she exhibited in Susan Love’s Breast Book. You can reach her at slove48@gmail.com.





12 Comments

Oh dear, another one of my idols with feet of clay.
I met Susan in 1994 and we shared a lot of intellectual ways of looking at the world. Hers in medicine, mine in economics, but same general principle. (Ask & I’ll explain if anyone’s interested.)
I lost touch with her several years later bc our paths ceased to cross.
BTW when Komen hit the news, I looked at Love’s website and didn’t find corp donors. I admit my look-see was cursory, so I might have missed Ford.
This is just more of the reality that all aspects of our culture are owned and operated by for profit business that not only has no compassion they have no conscience.
I have not only suffered from breast cancer I spent a significant portion of my working life doing cancer research as an element of the NCI collaborative programs.
I have chosen to not wear my cancer in a pink ribbon nor contribute to any of the private programs. Partially out of personal preference but partially out of observing the private programs become more corrupt, even those who started with good intentions, and sadly to say what was once good academic science becoming as corrupted.
Little other than some advances in technology has improved in the field of cancer treatment since the deluge of private money into the so called research programs.
I wish I could now shift to suggestions and optimism. The only solution I see is a radical organizing in small groups patients and professional bedside care takers simply to keep alive models of the ill and those who succor out of compassion — simply to be voices in opposition to profit, small as their sound may be.
That was a while ago. People can change.
Doubt that Susan has changed. Prolly gave into economic realities. Susan had a new injection system that she was developing back in the 90s. I haven’t heard word one about it since then, so suspect it didn’t work out. If that were the case, then she’d have much more need for bucks for a research do-over.
Just speculating. Since I lost touch I haven’t any real clues.
I should email her, just to see what response I get. Perhaps Komen is the entre. I’ll think about it overnight.
Having said all that, Susan is one of one or two people I’ve ever met in my life with whom I felt such an intellectual affinity. Strange it should all come back in 2012.
Hi eCAHN. I wouldn’t cast a friend aside lightly. Is there any evidence these corporate contributions are influencing her research agenda? Is the fairly limited publicity that the corporations get associating with her foundation allowing them to escape scrutiny? I doubt it.
So what if it’s blood money. From Ms. Brenner’s post I gather the foundation uses it effectively to help women. I note Ms. Brenner invites us to encourage Ms. Love to reject the money without proposing alternate sources.
Personally, I admire people who are willing to get their hands dirty to achieve noble objectives. In fact, it’s hard to think of noble objectives that are achieved any other way.
I think that it’s whistling in the dark to believe money is not corrupting or that any of are totally immune to it’s corrupting influence, and I include myself. That’s why I quit.
“If Hitler invaded hell I would make at least a favorable reference to the devil in the House of Commons.”
Winston Churchill
Good night all. I hope this discussion gets the attention it deserves.
Gotta turn in. Thanks for the feedback.
Will consider how to get back in touch with Susan.
The sad sad truth is that breast cancer is such a huge problem that it will take corporate level money to get anywhere. First of all, we all know the sad truth, that if someone found that you could cure breast cancer with pineapple juice, or something easily obtained, the big for-profit cancer industry would buy up all the pineapples, have it genetically modified, eradicate the medicinal ones, and call it a hoax. Or if the cure was mixed up in a lab by a little independent doctor, he would be villianized, professionally destroyed, charged with criminal charges and threatened with real time etc. That’s what they did to Stanislaw Burzynski.
Whether you believe he is a quack or not, the FDA revealed itself as being the protector of Big Cancer and not allowing any kind of innovation in the area. They lost over 7 law suits against him refused to acknowledge his treatments until they finally just stole his patents. There is a documentary you can watch for free and it reveals that big cancer is business that will protect cancer from the cure because it is their golden goose.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Be1ihuZNg84
Im guessing Susan Love decided to cash in from the beginning or along the way realizing women will never win against the cancer biz that sees them as cattle to fleece with a terrorizing disease.
Some may think this sounds crazy. Go ahead. Some know the truth. Some have read enough studies and info to know that this is what is going on. Sure there are good people that work in these businesses that don’t know and would scoff. But the controllers know and so should you.
Protect yourself. Stay away from polluting industry. Do you really know what you are downwind of? etc. Pollution is where you should focus your efforts. Know your area and your work area. Live far from heavy traffic. Know what actually goes on in those big corporations with names that mean nothing. Like Syntex or Tamco. These names tell you nothing and there’s usually a reason.
This is so sad for me to read.
The effect of big business targeting those who are ill for monetization is having a devastating effect, not only in inhibiting any chances for prevention and or cures, but in making the public ignorant of the science and the challenges.
We don’t need more money flushed down the toilets of obfuscation and P R. We need a collective commitment to be of service to and to care for each other — not to profit from each other.