In a few days, if all goes according to the Constitution, President Bush and Vice President Cheney will relinquish their powers, and Barack Obama will become President. So, we can all sit back and relax, because Democracy has triumphed again, right?
No, I don’t think so. The length, and width, and depths of corruption, and worse, instigated during the past 8 years will take years of determined effort by all of us to undo.
It really comes down to this: What kind of world do we want to leave for our children? For their sake, we cannot afford to bury our heads in the sand and pretend that everything will be alright.
During the American Revolution, as the foundations of our country were being hammered together by our founding fathers and mothers, someone asked Ben Franklin what kind of government they were fashioning? Scott Horton tells the story this way:
As Benjamin Franklin left the Constitutional Convention, on September 18, 1787, a certain Mrs. Powel shouted out to him: “Well, doctor, what have we got?,” and Franklin responded: “A Republic, if you can keep it.” Like many of the Founding Fathers, he was intensely concerned that the democratic institutions they were crafting would deteriorate over time. In particular, they were concerned and talked ceaselessly during the convention about the risk that, under pressures and exigencies of war, a tyrant would collapse their system into something closer to the monarchy that they had just defeated.
The whole of Horton’s article is well worth reading. Our democracy is not a self-perpetuating machine that can exist without our help to keep it. The damage to our democracy during the past 8 years has been huge, and deep. The Bush administration, quite literally, has been getting away with murder. Democracies existed in Italy, Germany, Argentina, and other places until Mussolini, Hitler, Pinochet, and others like them, subverted those democracies to seize control. And it happened one small step at a time, in each case. That is why, after Obama’s inauguration, we can’t just let bygones be bygones. Some future president might pick up the tools left by Bush and Cheney, repeating the pattern of Mussolini, Hitler, and Pinochet, unless those tools are removed and destroyed.
Arianna Huffington put it this way recently:
The night before Obama is sworn in, HuffPost is co-hosting a pre-Inaugural ball at the Newseum in Washington. Just before midnight we will have a Countdown to a New Era. It’s a new era not just because Bush will be out and Obama in, but because taking on the challenges America is facing will require a new era of citizen engagement. …The preamble of the Constitution starts with We the People. And it has never been clearer that we can’t "form a more perfect Union" without the active participation of millions of us.
The Constitution is as much a vision of how things ought to be as it is a description of how things actually are. That means we must constantly be comparing what is with what should be, as defined by the Constitution, which is a remarkably wise document that is not at all out of date.
Book after book after book has been written during the past 6 years about what has gone wrong, and who is responsible for the mess our country is now in. We have discussed most of them on FDL’s Book Salon. Amongst other things, Bush and Cheney have corrupted the Department of Justice, that once impartial advocate for The People, into a political machine designed to support the interests of the Republican party in general, and the Bush & Cheney alliance in particular.
The DOJ has served as a firewall to prevent the indictment and prosecution of administration officials (Scooter Libby being the exception that proves the rule). The DOJ has distorted the laws about torture and warrantless spying on citizens, stonewalled prosecution of lawbreakers to such an extent that it will take years of determined effort to restore public confidence in the Department of Justice once again.
As another example of what has been happening, the administration has in all likelihood been guilty of war crimes (yes, we’re talking Nuremburg here). If you don’t believe me, please watch the special 90 minute program prepared for PBS called Torturing Democracy. Please make the time to watch it. There is a website for the show, too. The program has probably not aired on your local TV, because your station managers probably think it is too "controversial." Yeah, like Abu Ghraib is "controversial."
Please be a good role model for your children and show them the meaning of citizen engagement. Their future depends on it. Democracy takes work, and it requires more than voting once every two years. Now more than ever, American democracy is in need of some long overdue maintenance. Obama can’t do it all by himself, and the last two years have shown that we can’t rely on Congress to uphold its share of the Constitutional balance of powers.
Thinking about what Ben Franklin said about our democracy: can we keep it?
Bob in HI



14 Comments




The US is a Republic; not a democracy. Getting rid of the Electoral College is mandatory. Your elections are not decided by a majority of voters. Until they are, your votes won’t give the power back to the people where it belongs.
Great post, Bob. It will be a very long, slow process to find and then destroy all of those tools. Our future depends on our success in doing so.
Fabulous post, Bob. I can’t agree with you strongly enough, we certainly have our work cut out for us! Ben Franklin is a personal hero of mine and I am quite sure that he would be appalled at the State of the Union today.
Thanks, JimWhite and nonplussed.
I especially liked the Ben Franklin quote because Horton notes that it supposedly happened on my birthday! I wonder who recorded it for posterity, Franklin, Ms. Powel, or some bystander? Given Franklin’s productivity, he may well have been the recorder (and editor) of that particular gem.
We do have our work cut out for us. Orwellian visions swirl in my head, primed by the two Naomi’s recent work (The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot by Naomi Wolf, and The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism by Naomi Klein.) I feel like we’re sliding in the direction of corrupt Rome: Bread and circuses for the masses, and happy talk about going shopping, while corruption spreads at the highest levels. Orwell saw this coming, as did Aldous Huxley (Brave New World) a generation ago. The future is now.
Bob
Digg here pups!!
Stand against the lies, greed and corruption.
True patriots log in here at FireDogLake.
Thank you, Bob in HI
Yeah, but what, exactly are you proposing? We’ve been on the horn to our congresspeople and signed petitions and canvassed for Obama and others.
I can’t do parties and protests like I did in the 60’s & 70’s.
I believe all we can do at this point is keep a close watch on them and scream our heads off when they try their crap. There will definitely be losses but we will have successes too.
bluebutterfly mentions the electoral college ( which is a stupid institution. But what about wresting our elections away from the privateers, too? And getting MSM out of the moderator chairs; bring back the League of Women voters for that?
I don’t see anything happening until we at least demand and accomplish that.
It’s like we’ll have to re-create this whole thing and I wonder if it’s EVER been a Democracy/Republic? Doesn’t seem like it.
What I am proposing is that defending the Constitution must be in the “present progressive” (sic.) tense– not something you can dismiss as “been there, done that, got the T-shirt.” When Franklin responds, “A Republic, if you can keep it,” I consider that verb to be in the present progressive tense.
I think our congresscritters in general, and Speaker Pelosi in particular, failed their oath of office on a massive scale during this last Congress.
Democracy is an ideal, something always to strive for. Perhaps it is a Sisyphean task, but the lives of our children, as well as our own, will be better if we do not shirk this task.
Thanks,
Bob in HI
Very well said, and you’re right.
Citizen engagement or lack thereof I think depends alot on the spirit of the times. I think we’re going to see it building up in the coming years.
Love the post. To the front page, please!
Bob, this is good stuff, I got to agree with most everybody responding. The Bush Crime Family has gone to new lows in absolute power, that would make Reagan, and Nixon green with envy. I also agree with Gore Vidal, even Lincoln became a dictator, totalitarian, what have you. Even the popular ( so called ) democratic president Jackson in my opinion was an abomination of an executive wing public servant, trashing any integrity us learned European forefathers may of ever had. The Bushies have just perpetuated their grandfathers fears of the upper class trust babies of the 30’s being scared by the middle class getting { Social Security } when another power brat has a tee-pot dome scandal, and runs the country into a depression. Mr. Obama is one smooth operator who I feel has already put both parties to shame or, the one big property party of this country [ in reality ] on its ear. When the man takes office, the outgoing party will soon look terribly un-American, if the party he’s accepting the duty from ever was connected to the people of this country.
Incidentally, Congressional Republicans are very interested at this juncture to scrap the Yoonitary Executive system built for Cheney.
Pinochet was one of our murderous bastards. Kissinger, an early version of Dick Cheney, masterminded the Chilean coup that ousted the democratically-elected Salvador Allende. The criminal Kissinger feared that Allende would attempt to improve the lives of the common citizens. Verboten according to right-wing idealogy.
Right on, Bob! When this topic comes up, many people often get overwhelmed and look for guidance on “where to start.”
For me, it’s whatever anyone can contribute at any given time. There is no one thing. Everyone brings different skills and life history to the table, and we need to engage any way we can. One Liberal’s cause may not mean much to another Liberal, but that doesn’t matter. Get yourself out there and like-minded folks will start attracting to you and next thing you know…you got a movement no matter how small or big it may be.
Often, this is easiest and fastest on a local level, so any action that fights for truth and justice is good locally, and for the collective whole.
The key is going for it. More action, less talk. Now let’s do this.
Local level is right! And that’s the motto of Democracy for America,
.
Neighborhood boards are a good place to start, too. If you’ve lived in the same place for at least 5 years, you probably know as much about your neighborhood as anyone. It’s not a glamor job, but you can devote yourself to making your neighborhood a better place– and what’s wrong with that?
Bob in HI
Like it or not, what you’re saying is the republic doesn’t work. What’s more, it can’t. Take the perspective of FDL as reflected by posts. We’re liberal, whatever that means, and we believe without much to back it up, that 70% of the people are more or less with us. I hope so, but there is no way of knowing, just as there is no way to eliminate the ambiguity that comes with the present system.
There are really two choices. We can continue along republican lines-by that I mean republic, not the republican party, or we can try for something like electronic democracy. I grant that sounds like an impossible dream and what’s more many people won’t support it-the mass is too ignorant and disinterested to exercise real power (these were Tory arguments against representative democracy), but that’s the only alternative to representation. How we might manage that on the internet is a problem we should be discussing intently. I have some ideas, but I still have no idea how we might have a computer moderated discussion amongst millions.
As for local action (your #13) it sounds better than it is. I served on our local Board of Finance about ten years. I had no idea what the people wanted. The thing about government is that all government expenditure is “good”. A town with a marina is better than one without. Two cops, theoretically, are better than one. Expenditure is unlimited, but that requires taxes. Do the townspeople want whatever item is on the table? I never had any idea. As for public education, I think it a huge ripoff and not worth much, but that is another topic altogether.