I rarely watch TV. I try to catch Maddow when I can. Last night I happened to catch the opening of the Ed Show. I was pleased to see Ed interview a vigorous Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR). Both of them “named,” the “Grand Bargain,” for what it is a remorseless, greed-on-steroids, pillaging of the 99%.
By name, they held Obama, Durbin accountable. The GOP was not the enemy, it was vichy Dems. I rarely recall seeing any criticism of Obama on any MSNBC show. Ed in particular vigorously defended the “Big Three:” Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Rep. DeFazio was excellent on the political landscape and echoed everything I’ve learned from David Dayen’s posts. In light of the elites’ almost total control, the best result for liberals and progressives looks to be letting the Bush tax cuts expire. That takes authority away from the lame duck Congress and puts legislation into 2013, when Congress is slightly less tilted to the right.
Later, as DDay had predicted, The Norquist Rebellion Not Actually News Maddow and Lawrence both went with the elite’s talking points. On individual topics, to retain their liberal progressive audience, these MSNBC show occasionally do excellent work. Jane’s been on Maddow and Rachel’s covered Scott Walker’s Recall, the BP Oil Spill, Bradley Manning and given a slough of other stores sunlight they desperately needed. Her mere presence is a plus for the LBGT community. In a larger framework I do not mean to discount how important the audiences of these shows still are to holding back the elites. The “spin,” of their content, however, is ultimately determined by suits higher up the corporate food chain.
Tonight I tuned into Ed, hoping for more FDL-like content. Instead I got Bait and Switch. Dick Durbin and Obama are now heroes for “taking Social Security off the table.” Tonight, liberals and progressives are willing on “entitlement reform.” From reading FDL, I know that’s elite code for “chaining the CPI (consumer price index).”
Chained CPI Not Only a Social Security Benefit Cut, but a Regressive Tax Increase. Social Security has “worked,” because it automatically rises with inflation. “Chaining the CPI,” turns Social Security into welfare. Every time Grandma wants a “raise,” to keep up with inflation, so she doesn’t have to eat more catfood, she has to ask Congress. It’s win win for the wingnuts. They defund people who do not vote for them and they can use that new leverage to bargain for even more “welfare for the rich.”
In one of the FDL threads in which I commented today, bearman (apologies if I butchered your handle) mentioned MSNBC had axed Ed and he was on his way out. Jane’s amazing Has Google Destroyed the Fourth Estate is relevant here. It lays out how the elites’ control over the media is more centralized than ever. My guess is that the “bait and switch,” is also exercised between MSNBC’s shows, they all take turns breaking legitimate stories to keep their audience.
If someone has access to video of last night’s Ed’s show, particularly the first segment, I’d appreciate if you could put a link in the comments. When Ed, or whomever takes his place, and Maddow, and Lawrence start using talking points aimed right at liberals and progressive for the “Grand Bargain, I will try to write a diary in which I highlight the contrasts.
All of this underscores how vital Firedoglake is to our democracy. More than anyone else, Jane, DDay, and the rest have the sources, skills, and courage to stand up to the vichy Dem’s veal pen. Increasingly FDL looks to me like “Last Stand Hill,” for truly independent reporting. The less FDL has the resources to cover, the more all the other pretend libs and progressives can “cave” to the elites without losing subscribers and what little remains of advertising revenue.
Among so many issues, this fight will also extend to climate change/global warming. The Greatest Debt to Our Children and Grandchildren Is a Climate Debt The elites will try and soak us for providing solutions to the global warming they enabled and profited from. Finding scientists who are objective about the solutions we consider will be extremely difficult.
There are many ways to support FDL beyond donating money. Posting diaries and intelligent comments help. I use my Twitter feed to send FDL content to my followers. If that’s not 100% helpful, it would be nice if someone could let me know.
If you can afford it, I hope you will consider donating.



14 Comments

I should add this MSNBC ‘catfood’ promo, today, Tweety was in awe of Simpson’s all-knowing ‘wisdom’… Go big or go home…! Meow…! 8-(
Tweety bromancing Alan the Senile again? Ugh.
Agree! This site gets better and better. Crossing fingers, writing posts and donating (but only if buying Bradley Manning t-shirts is donating, which I don’t think it is).
I stopped watching Ed Schultz when he let Lanny Davis on to push the Heritage Foundation plan which later became the affordable care act and Schultz’ bleating about the “public option” was just that: pointless bleating. To add insult to injury, he allowed Davis to call himself a “Progressive”, which is probably the most absurd thing I’ve heard on that show. Ed’s good sometimes but he has no convictions or at least none that he won’t abandon very quickly when he feels like he needs to.
Recommended.
As a person on Social Security, I am only too aware that Obama (NOT Bush) was the first President to ever prevent cost-of-living increases for SS recipients. He did it every year of his Presidency except Election year. Now that the Election is over, he is certain to go back to disallowing the increases.
Rec’d.
I’ve never seen anyone at MSNBC (except for Chris Hayes) present anything negative about Israel and seldom anything negative about Obama. Tweety’s man-crush on Obama is obscene.
Nevertheless, I happy to have them around. All of them, especially Rachel, do a pretty good job of busting the Republicans on their bullshit. But for real news coverage, I watch The Young Turks almost every night. I find it cathartic to see Cenk rage on, so I don’t have to. Or at least, so I know that WE are not alone.
A week ago, Michael Calderone had a pretty good article about MSNBC at HuffPo.
My impression is that they are going after Medicare and Medicaid (&later Social Security), after years of softening the targets by calling them “the main drivers of the deficit”. We know that the economic depression is the source of any deficits and that the deficits cost us less in interest than ever before, but the official story is crisis, crisis, crisis……(Price controls for providers, hospitals, medical services and medical supplies and devices are unspeakable, inconceivable to these corporate sell outs who run this joint.) Instead, TPTB focus on reducing taxes for corporations, expanding taxes for the middle class, and shrinking the capacity for government to provide social insurances. “Entitlement reform” is code for any cuts made to any of the big three.
Durbin appears to be demonstrating “double-speak”, the ability to hold contradictory opinions at the same time. Next week, he will be back to the other half of his double self, dining with CEOs and Bowles&Simpson, Stern, secret dinners which do not disturb digestion, conspiring to destroy our social safety net. This week, Durbin gives close-up video performances to show how much he appears to care for persons on Medicaid.
The corporate controlled Media have done their best to convince the public that social insurance programs serving hundreds of millions of people, which have the overwhelming support of Americans, are really frivolous ‘extras’ protected by extremist minorities and disparaged by media pundits, as ‘special interest groups’. The corporate controlled Media have specialized in creating “everyday guy” images for people who have placed out government under siege: oligarchs, CEOs, millionaire Senators, and a bunch of other well-connected, government-hating people like President Obama.
Only corporate controlled media has been able to enable a campaign of creating fear of taxes increasing for the middle class, while obscuring that the programs which those revenues would go to support, are under attack by the same folks creating fear of taxes increasing. The President is going out to campaign against tax increases while simultaneously offering cuts to the big three social insurance programs. The corporate media will amplify his every talking point.
I stopped watching MSNBC altogether when I ditched Crime-Warner Cable and went to free over the air TV. Not that I wasn’t already disgusted by the shameless pandering to the Democratic Party I had seen from both Maddow and Shultz.
That said. Good post. And I really should put some money where my mouth is. I’ll donate once I recover from paying onerous and userous court costs from a minor traffic ticket to the Fascist Municipal Court to the East of the Great State of Cuyahoga.
here is the link about Ed
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/14/ed-schultz-report-replacement-media-garbage_n_2129140.html
I watched part of his show last night with Chris Van BSer. I don’t know if Ed is hanging on for hope Obama and Dems will change or just a cheerleader.
While I am at it. I watch Thom Hartmen on RT and he does the same the Repubs are evil and Dems are great stuff. He is misleading his watchers.
here is another link about Ed
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/12/ed-schultz-ezra-klein-msnbc_n_2116267.html
This is the one I read about Ed getting canned. Also recall Cent getting canned for not being Obama/Dems friendly enough and Dylan R didn’t get canned but left on his own;\. I watch RT Abby, Max and others
tweeted and recommended with thanks boo.
Schultz is a pretty centrist pro-labor (the institutionalized bunch) guy. There are guests that he has to have on to please his bosses. There are guests that he has on to demonstrate his ability to tolerate different opinions. There are guests that are friends of his. And Congressional guests are always welcome to put the stamp of “serious people” on his show.
My guess is that Lanny Davis was a “please the boss” guy. Durbin is closer to Schultz’s way of thinking IMO. De Fazio is “for the lefties”. It doesn’t matter who he puts on; he will be effusive as hell and make you think he agrees with the 100%–unless they are guest who is there to put a little conflict on the show.
He is a commercial radio-TV guy, not a pundit. He’s making a good living at the closet thing to wingnut welfare to the left of William Buckley.
Thanks for the links.
What prevents me from watching Ed Schultz is that he poses that he supports organized Labor, yet he is also (usually) a very staunch supporter of the President. The same President who doesn’t speak out against the killing of Slaves in Bahrain and South Africa.
If the President and Ed Show Schultz were serious supporters of Labor, they would go beyond what they haven’t done: They would first speak out against the killing of Slaves. Then, they would speak out against the institution of Slavery itself in those two countries and others.
By refusing to speak up, they [Obama and Schultz] condone and endorse the Slavery paradigm.