User Picture

A police badge is not a license to kill

By: Charlie Grapski Friday April 4, 2014 10:50 am

A police badge is not a license to kill.

[See story here]

The attached video is indisputable evidence that an Albequerque Police Officer shoots a homeless man, James Boyd, living in the hills, as the man is obeying the orders of a handful of heavily armed (assault rifles) officers.

First, with no provocation from the man gathering his possessions, you hear one officer give a command: “Do it now.”

Next, an officer, who had been speaking with the man, while aiming a rifle at him shoots a flash-bang upon command.

No officer is within 30 feet of the man. No officer is in jeopardy of harm – let alone threatened with lethal force. And no officer is assaulted or in any other way threatened by the man.

A police dog is unleashed on the man now clearly in shock from the first rifle shot.

Then, with absolutely no provocation, as the man’s back is turned to the officers – a second and third officer fire a rapid series of automatic bullets into the man’s body.

The result – a man is dead for living in the hills.

A police badge is not a license to kill.

Please sign, share, and spread the above petition to the DA – which will send a letter to the DA’s office and thus at minimum create a public record of the people’s outrage.

 

What a Difference a Day Makes: Life on the Front Lines of Occupy Federal Hall

By: Charlie Grapski Wednesday April 25, 2012 1:52 am

Originally printed on OpEdNews.

Saturday morning the sun arose over Wall Street rousing the recent Occupants of Federal Hall. Unstirred by what over the week had become hectic routine the individuals rose to make way for the repeated ritual of power-washing the stone steps on which they successfully sought refuge from eviction from the street by the NYPD. This morning instead was quiet. A smaller police presence and no one armed with a hose to spray their roost came to the site.
What a difference a day makes.

Photo by Julian Kliner

Friday morning began in stark contrast: the Occupiers frantically rising to gather and transport their belongings amidst the chaotic herds of “suits” flocking to their Wall Street lairs. Having successfully endured another sleepless night, strictly enforced by a large contingent of police officers, they gathered their signs and other possessions and made the trek east to 60 Wall Street where a few took the opportunity to close their eyes for a few moments relaxed in the surrounding atrium. Throughout the previous nights periodic “raids” by the NYPD ensured no one remained on the steps who may have closed their eyes and potentially nodded off for a moment. The tactic of sleep-deprivation and its consequences did not go unnoticed; a few times the generally amicable Federal Park Police offered to obtain assistance and contact a shelter to provide a bed for those clearly showing the eroding signs of its effects.

While most took advantage of the brief respite from their vigil a few remained behind to symbolically maintain their continued physical presence while documenting this surreal ritual. Up and down, back and forth, and then do it again. Over and over a sole worker would slowly shift the condensed stream emanating from the hose repeatedly cleaning to a meticulous degree the steps fronting Federal Hall and facing out onto Wall Street.

BREAKING: Feds Standoff with Occupy against NYPD Eviction on Wall Street (Live Link)

By: Charlie Grapski Friday April 20, 2012 4:48 pm

This is breaking. I will try and put more info up shortly. But right now there is a stand-off on Wall Street between the Occupiers backed by the Federal Park Police and the NYPD. For a week Occupiers have camped out on the steps of Federal Hall, location of the authoring of the Bill of Rights, after NYPD prohibited them from sleeping on the streets adjacent to the Stock Exchange contrary to standing judicial rulings about sleeping as a means of protest. The NYPD has shut down Wall Street and barricaded 25 Occupiers on the steps as the two police forces stand-off against one another over the right to peaceably assemble and exercise 1st amendment speech rights.

Live video from your Android device on Ustream

Watch live: USTREAM LINK

 

Most recent live video

I am working on putting up a series of videos so you can watch what took place.  Should be up and ready shortly.

Stream (Recai): 1

Stream (Recai): 2

URGENT: Help Locate NYPD Cardona’s First Assault Victim

By: Charlie Grapski Thursday October 20, 2011 8:53 am

First Victim of NYPD Cardona Assault

URGENT COMMUNITY ACTION REQUESTED:

Please help identify and locate the woman in this photograph. On September 24th she was assaulted by NYPD Deputy Inspector Johnny Cardona in the events that led up to the notorious pepper-spraying incidents of Deputy Inspector Anthony Bologna.

The young woman wearing sunglasses, a band on her head, and a black t-shirt with the word “trip” on the front was singled out by Cardona and violently grabbed by the throat and head while she was standing behind the orange netting in which the police had kettled her.

She had done nothing to warrant an arrest let alone the brutal force employed by Cardona in making the arrest. She was grabbed by the throat, then forced to the ground by her hair, and dragged under the orange netting into the street where she was then forcefully arrested by several police officers.

It is important to locate her to ensure (1) that she has received appropriate care and is physically and mentally doing well after this violent assault and that she has obtained appropriate legal counsel; (2) that the other victims of Officer Cardona’s brutality, in particular Felix Rivera-Pitre who was violently punched in the middle of the street during a march on Friday October 14th, obtain justice. (Rivera-Pitre is now wanted by the NYPD for arrest in this incident and is in hiding); and (3) that appropriate efforts can be taken to ensure that Officer Cardona is fully held to account for his inappropriate and criminal acts.

Should They Stay Or Should They Go: Officials Threaten to Shut-Down Florida Occupation

By: Charlie Grapski Thursday October 13, 2011 3:09 pm

Gainesville, Florida.

As the nascent Occupy movement spreads from Wall Street across America citizens preparing to occupy their local Main Street are being forced to grapple with a fundamental question of political rights.

The First Amendment recognized and attempted to protect citizens’ rights to participate in the democratic process; but what does this actually guarantee and does it still apply in actual practice?

This issue is being confronted today in Gainesville, Florida – a city of approximately 125,000 that is the home of the University of Florida, one of the nation’s largest public universities.

Photobucket

After two weeks of preparation the official occupation began at 8 a.m. Wednesday, October 12th, with a dilemma. The City of Gainesville would allow them to hold a one-day permitted 24-hour event and nothing more. Any further activities, whether of the group of even an individual person acting on their own, would be deemed unlawful and subject to citation and/or arrest. Given this ultimatum the question was put before an Ad Hoc General Assembly around noon: should they stay or should they go?

SEE THE FULL STORY HERE

Anatomy of a Deception: How a Conservative Magazine Attempted to Discredit the Occupy Movement

By: Charlie Grapski Monday October 10, 2011 4:18 pm
Howley

The Two Faces of Howley

On Saturday October 8, 2011, video was released onto the Internet showing a frenzied group of protesters outside of the National Air and Space Museum dodging a pair of Smithsonian security guards indiscriminately pepper-spraying the crowd.  Something inside the Museum, moments before, caused this chaos which led to the Museum being shut down for the rest of the day.  The events have since been used, by their portrayal in the media, to tarnish the image of the #Occupy protests emerging across the nation.

What happened inside the Museum to cause the police action has not been reported.  Only today, Monday, are reports starting to hit the major media that there is evidence of the involvement of an editor from the Conservative magazine The American Spectator at the center of what took place this weekend in Washington D.C..

Saturday afternoon when I discovered an article published by Patrick Howley on the Spectator’s website entitled “Standoff in D.C.” I immediately began to analyze the evidence in light of the events portrayed in Howley’s piece.  I found a photograph taken by the reporters from OpEdNews.com that showed Howley alongside another man in a confrontation with a uniformed security officer in the entranceway to the museum moments before the initial use of pepper-spray.  With the exception of Howley’s claim that he stood down a “300-pound guard,” the photo fit perfectly with the scenario described in Howley’s account.  (None of the guards present on the scene even remotely fit this description or even his later toned down “heavyset” language.)

Central to the story were the outright confessions of Howley that he was an active participant in the events, rather than an observer, who openly admits his intent to use the action to discredit the nascent movement.  Far more problematic are Howley’s boastful statements of openly defying the security-guard’s directives, forcing his way into the then closed Museum, being pepper-sprayed as a result and then pursued by the security forces, together with his subsequent activities in the Museum while actively seeking to evade being caught.

American Spectator Editor Admits to Being Agent Provocateur at D.C. Museum

By: Charlie Grapski Sunday October 9, 2011 1:13 am

The following photograph taken by opednews.com‘s Cheryl Biren shows a confrontation in the lobby of the National Air and Space Museum between two individuals and an officer shortly before video shows officers with the Museum’s security forces rush outside indiscriminately pepper-spraying numerous individuals.

Photobucket

It appears that one of the two in the confrontation with the security officer is Patrick Howley, Assistant Editor of The American Spectator.  [See the following photograph in which Howley's Facebook Profile Photo is side-by-side with the person pictured at the Air and Space Museum]

Photobucket

Immediately after the incident began hitting the newswires Howley published a “Breaking News” story with The American Spectator online in which he reveals that he had consciously infiltrated the group on Friday with the intent to discredit the movement.  He states that “as far as anyone knew I was part of this cause — a cause that I had infiltrated the day before in order to mock and undermine in the pages of The American Spectator — and I wasn’t giving up before I had my story.”

According to Howley’s story he joined the group in its march toward the Air and Space Museum but the protesters on the march were unwilling to be confrontational.  He states “they lack the nerve to confront authority. From estimates within the protest, only ten people were pepper-sprayed, and as far as I could tell I was the only one who got inside.”

He claims that upon arrival at the Museum the group of approximately one hundred protesters split into two factions with the smaller of the two “rushing the doors,” the majority “staying behind.”  Howley then admits in his piece that he snuck past the guard at the first entrance in order to “infiltrate” the building and then confronted another guard.  He then “sprinted toward the door” at which time he was first hit with pepper-spray.

As he describes his next actions “I forced myself into the doors and sprinted blindly across the floor of the Air and Space Museum, drawing the attention of hundreds of stunned khaki-clad tourists (some of whom began snapping off disposable-camera portraits of me).”

Fully inside, despite the orders of the security guards that the Museum was closed to the public, Howley made his way upstairs – to the location where a banner was unfurled protesting the Museum’s exhibit of unmanned drone weapons.

“I strained to glance behind me at the dozens of protesters I was sure were backing me up, and then I got hit again, this time with a cold realization: I was the only one who had made it through the doors. As two guards pointed at me and started running, I dodged a circle of gawking old housewives and bolted upstairs.”

He then found himself “stumbling around aircraft displays with just enough vision to keep tabs on my uniformed pursuers. “The museum is now closed!” screamed one of the guards as alarms sounded. “Everyone make your way to the exits immediately!” Using my jacket to cover my face — which I could feel swelling to Elephant Man proportions — I ducked through the confused tourists and raced out the exit. “Hey, you!” shouted a female guard reaching for my arm. “Get back here!” But I was already down the steps and out of sight.”

Howley  refers to the Museum as “the scene of my crime.”  In light of his detailed description of his activities today the fact that they clearly document the commission of the crime of trespassing on federal property, if not the intent to incite a riot there, these admissions should not be taken lightly or ignored.  As a result of Howley’s activities  a large number of people were subjected to pepper-spray attacks including journalists and tourists who had nothing to do with the protest.  Given the negative light that the press is attempting to spin this incident with regard to the ongoing occupations, from Wall Street and D.C. and now spreading to Main Streets across the country, the presence and admitted activities of this self-proclaimed agent provacateur should be brought to the attention of federal law enforcement officials.

It is highly likely that the events that occurred would not have taken the turn they did if it were not for Howley’s admitted adventure in an effort to discredit the Occupy movement.  So before the public, the media, and officials turn their attention negatively towards the protests and the protesters there needs to be a critical eye turned on the role of the  American Spectator and the role played in these events by its editorial staff.  If arrests were made at this incident, and even if none were, the admissions of Howley published brazenly in the pages of his Conservative magazine and bragged about on his Facebook page should lead to an official investigation into his role and that of his employer in the events in Washington D.C. today and should be seen as at least part of the causal nexus that led to the inappropriate use of force that along with Howley negatively affected many who were innocent of any crime other than being at the wrong place at the wrong time.

Ironically Howley concludes the story of his adventure mocking the lack of courage of the protesters, who he admitted did not seek – as he did – to confront the authorities, by praising the courage of the guards who twice pepper-sprayed him.

“As I scrambled away from the scene of my crime, a police officer outside the museum gates pointed at my eyes, puffed out of his chest, and shouted: “Yeah, that’s right. That’s right.” He was proud that I had been pepper-sprayed, and, oddly, so was I. I deserved to get a face full of high-grade pepper, and the guards who sprayed me acted with more courage than I saw from any of the protesters. If you’re looking for something to commend these days in America, start with those guards.”

The admissions of Patrick Howley, published in The American Spectator for all to see, require those across the country, both the public and its officials, to take a closer and more critical look at today’s event’s in the Nation’s capital.  Who was really to blame for the chaos and disruption of a Federal Museum?  Who should be held responsible for those who were harmed in the melee that took place after Howley admits he defied the orders of the legal authorities and stormed into the building?  And how should the story of today’s events unfold in the Nation’s media over the next several days?