I practiced employment discrimination law for about ten years. One of the lessons I learned, as a white man who has not experienced racism directed at me, is that racism (as well as other forms of discrimination) can be very hard to pin down. I eventually opened a law firm, and I had to turn away most prospective clients who called or came to my office because there simply wasn’t enough evidence to prove discrimination in court. In many cases, I would speak to someone who felt they had been treated unfairly, but could point to no tangible evidence of discrimination. Knowing that judges tend to be quite skeptical of employment discrimination cases, I was careful not to bring cases to court that would only be dismissed.
This is not to say there are no Archie Bunkers left. I represented one African-American person who experienced virulent racism. Someone in my client’s workplace used the n-word repeatedly–and admitted doing so. I don’t want to say more about the case, as I want to respect my client’s privacy, but this was a clear reminder (not that we need it) that, even in the 21st century, racism is not always subtle.
However, 45 years after the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which, among other things, prohibited employment discrimination based on race, it has become clear to me that most people don’t talk about race in simple terms any more. My conclusion is that most people, even if they have racist feelings, know better than to express them openly. Politicians have come to realize this as well– the late Lee Atwater described how Republicans used code words to exploit race. Sometimes, however, we get a glimpse of what is bubbling under the surface–when expressly racial language slips out.
This is not to say that race and racism simply relate to the way white people feel about people of color. But, because so much of what we think about race is submerged, it’s worth digging a little deeper to get at what’s really going on. I don’t think it’s good for anyone that the way people feel about race is pushed under the surface: many white people are surely afraid that, if they say what they really think, they will be labeled as a racist, while people of color have to worry that, if they speak openly about what they think, they will be accused of "playing the race card".
Lani Guinier, who knows something about race and politics from first-hand experience, argues that "all Americans, not just people of color need to be better schooled in the subtle yet complex ways that race actually works in the 21st century." Clues about what is happening under the surface come from revealing comments–when a Boston police officer refers to Prof. Gates as a "banana-eating jungle monkey", or when Sen. Jeff Sessions openly wonders why Judge Sotomayor didn’t decide a case the same way as her Puerto Rican colleague.
As Guinier observes, it is simplistic to think about events like the Gates arrest by calling the white officer a racist or by accusing Prof. Gates of playing the race card. The reality of what is going on underneath the surface is much more complicated. Everyone in the United States is immersed in race: as Guinier also points out, it is part of our history in a way that affects our present. I doubt that many of us truly experience other people in race-blind ways. When we meet someone, we can’t help but note their race, gender, age. Being white (and male) tends to be the default category–you rarely (if ever) hear someone referred to as "the talented white writer", but you frequently hear women and people of color identified as such–the noted African-American scholar, the Latina judge.
That doesn’t mean all white people are racist or that all people of color are untainted by bias, but it is vital to acknowledge these realities. Prof. Gates can rise to the top of his field, as he is, but he will always be known, in part, by his race. Judge Sotomayor will likely sit on the Supreme Court this fall, but she will always be known by her ethnicity and gender.
Where does this leave us? Making real progress on race (and on gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, and other traits) means digging below the surface and avoiding easy labels. It’s something I see as necessary: our racial and other baggage prevents us from realizing our full capacity as a nation.



10 Comments







Thanks for this Chris.
I am also a white male. During the late ’70s/early ’80s, I was in the USAF and stationed in Hawaii. Hawaii was a wonderful place (and still is) but it was also quite educational for me as it allowed me to spend a small amount of time as a racial minority and experience life as folks like Professor Gates have for their entire lives.
My experiences in no way were reflective of what most minorities have faced but even the little amounts are very eye opening (if you allow yourself to learn).
thanks dakine. Hawaii seems like a great place, and it is interesting to see what it’s like to be on the other side of things. I work in an office where I am one of a handful of straight guys–most people I work with are gay or lesbian. That has been quite interesting as well. as you say, our experience is not the same as it is for people who are in the minority, but even little glimpses are eye-opening. thanks very much for your comment
Excellent beginning, Chris. Have to agree with everything you say.
I’ve been reading a lot of websites with comments since the Gates arrest; many sensible even sensitive, others, way too many – just appallingly ignorant. People don’t really like to look inside themselves to find the unconscious racism and root it out. Or even to listen to themselves.
btw, the rooting-out process is ongoing and lifelong. I’m a white woman who was a child and teen during the height of the civil rights movement. That, and a specific workshop my church sent me to that examined the movement through documents, witnesses, and discussion, made a huge impression on me. Made me different than I otherwise would have been.
And I still discover myself making surprising snap judgments and having to back up and reassess. The people making these appalling commeents have never done that, don’t want to, and don’t think they need to.
I don’t know how we counter that, but we have to keep working at it.
Thanks for your post. Hope you follow up.
I really appreciate your comment. It is very hard to look inside and be honest about these things–I’m just scratching rhe surface here. It’s also hard to avoid generalities, but I still think it’s worth trying to think about all this. I agree that this is a life-long process. I heard someone (an African-American minister) describe himself as “a recovering racist, a recovering homophobe, a recovering sexist”. That really stuck with me–an interesting way to think about these issues. I think we all make snap judgments–some people admit that, I guess some don’t. My strong feeling is the only way to make progress is to speak openly about what is really going on, about what people think about each other, especially what they don’t reveal. I will look to follow up–your comment is much appreciated.
You gotta understand: We’re hard-wired to be wary of difference. In the pre-intelligence days, different could be dangerous. I struggle with prejudice all the time, even though I have close, long-term friends who are black, Asian, Latino, gay, lesbian, women, men, whatever. It gets easier over time, but it never seems to quite go away.
I think the key word here is “struggle”. The problem, IMHO, is with those who embrace this fear and mistrust. I have only met a very few people who exhibit no sign of any prejudice, and I’d be willing to wager that most of them are like me.
You’re right, it’s something we have to work at to overcome.
well said–thanks Elliott
yes, I completely agree. That’s part of my point–we all have these prejudices and biases in us, but no one wants to admit them. That’s what the minister I mentioned was referring to when he said he’s a “recovering racist”–this means we all have to grapple with the biases inside us, all the time. I think you’re absolutely right that the key word is struggle. You’re also right that some people embrace fear and mistrust–worse still, some exploit fear and mistrust for political purposes. That needs to be fully exposed. As I said, generalizations are hard, but I feel the same way as you–I know there are prejudices and biases in me, and I doubt many people are fully free of this. I even have prejudices and biases that apply to me–I’m Jewish, and I have absorbed anti-Semitism along with other biases. as a kid, I was often ashamed to be Jewish. I felt like I had to make clear I did fit the stereotypes. another generalization, but I suspect (and have heard this from some people) that other people–black, Hispanic, gay, white, straight, women–similarly absorb stereotypes that apply to them.
It is only appropriate to refer to a person’s race if it’s germane to the topic. You can’t tell the Gates-Crowley story without identifying the race of Gates & Crowley. But it is seldom proper to refer to a person’s ethnicity when race doesn’t help clarify a story, e.g.: “Edelson, a respected white science writer, has just completed a new book on astronomy.” It doesn’t help in conversation, either: “My black neighbor Dorothy has a beautiful rose garden,” a sentence which, by the way, sometimes comes out like this: “My neighbor Dorothy is black BUT she has a beautiful rose garden.” (Don’t tell me you haven’t heard Grandma say something like the last cringe-inducing example.)
The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com
Excellent points CW. I think the reality, however, is that people often (constantly?) think in terms of race when they think of/interact with other people. I suspect it’s close to inescapable in today’s American society. Your example of Grandma’s cringe-worthy comment represents an extreme, but my suspicion is that many people think things like this without saying them. As I’ve said before, generalities are problematic, and sorry for making them here. I don’t claim to know with certainty what goes on in peoples’ heads. But I think that, the express references to race/ethnicity/gender that do slip out sometimes are evidence of much more that is going on beneath the surface.
We have a gap between our ideals and our reality, I believe. Most people agree it’s not right to assess people based on race, gender, age etc.–but what if many of us do this with some degree of frequency? It’s also possible that many of us, while consciously/subconsciously sizing people up in terms of race, are also able to get past this. One may think of someone in terms of their race while also being able to put that aside. I think it’s worth talking about this though–rather than simply agreeing (as most of would) that it’s wrong to see people in racial terms, it’s worth talking about how often we do this, how this plays out, whether we do this even when we try not to. It’s complicated and I don’t claim to have all the answers. Thanks very much for discussing this and raising these points.