Just last year, when Barack Obama was running for president, we were deluged with stories about Obama’s connection to Rev. Jeremiah Wright and former Weatherman Bill Ayers. CNN, NBC, (of course, Fox) and the rest couldn’t get enough of this. In fact, we’re still hearing about this nonsense.
The funny thing is that candidate John McCain had his own Rev. Wright–two of them, in fact: the Revs. Parsley and Hagee. McCain was proud to accept the endorsement of Rev. Hagee, who claimed the Koran teaches Muslims to kill Christians and Jews and that Hurricane Katrina was an expression of God’s wrath against gay pride parades. McCain called Rev. Parsley his spiritual advisor, even though Parsley claimed America was founded in part to destroy the "false religion" of Islam and dabbled in some serious anti-gay rhetoric of his own.
McCain even had his own answer to Bill Ayers: convicted felon G. Gordon Liddy. Liddy, who at one time plotted to murder a journalist, called McCain a "close personal friend". McCain accepted Liddy’s financial support for a decade and appeared on his radio show, the same show Liddy used as a platform to discuss the best way to shoot and kill federal agents.
I think it’s safe to say that anyone who was following the presidential campaign knew who Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers were. I doubt that many people ever heard about McCain’s connections to Parsley, Hagee, and Liddy. It’s not exactly clear why the media ignored McCain’s ties to radical figures, ties that were far more substantial than the Obama connections they harped on incessantly, but it could be that media types personally liked McCain and/or, by their own admission, gave McCain a pass on some issues.
The double standard continues. Elected Republican officials like Sen. Jim DeMint recently stood side by side with wackos accusing Obama of being a terrorist and a Nazi. Sen. DeMint called these extremists a "cross-section of the population" and suggested they were "freedom fighters". As Steve Benen observes, elected Republican members of Congress were also proud to address the "How to Take Back America" conference in St. Louis. One activist, Janet Folger Porter, who co-chaired the event, believes President Obama took office as a part of a communst conspiracy. She has also claimed that the Obama administration is setting up internment camps to hold conservatives. As People for the American Way notes, the event included workshops on "How to Recognize Living Under Nazis and Communists". Kitty Werthmann, a speaker at the event, argues the United States is becoming just like Nazi Germany. Reps. Michelle Bachmann, Steve King, Tom Price, Tom McClintock, and Trent Franks, as well as presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, agreed to speak at the event and lend credibility to these off the wall crazies.
Right wing rhetoric in the United States today isn’t just crazy, it may be dangerous. Murderers have shown they are willing to act on the twisted "logic" that underlies the hateful bile spewed by the right.
The media still seems to think this is just politics as usual–David Gregory asked Bill Clinton yesterday if there is a "vast right wing conspiracy" against President Obama. Gregory will insist he was merely quoting Hillary Clinton’s own description of the right wing from 15 years ago, but using this language is telling. Gregory is suggesting that people who see extremism on the right are either conspiracy theorists, or playing partisan politics, or both. I know the media sometimes has trouble calling out craziness, but they seemed to have no problem delving into Obama’s supposed ties to Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers. Will they ever pay the same amount of attention to elected Republican members of Congress who are standing shoulder to shoulder with certified wackos, or will we have to wait for another instance when right-wing rhetoric turns to violence for the media to pay any attention at all to the extremism that marks today’s right wing and today’s Republican party?



44 Comments







The media does seem to be bending over backwards to cover matters the right wing thinks are important: http://www.washingtonmonthly.c…..020146.php
I found that quote interesting. The same could be said of the Democratic appeasers in congress. Not pursuing sensible policy because you’re afraid the Righties will call you liberal is pointless — they’ll call you liberal no matter what you propose, so you might as well just BE liberal.
quite right. This is a point that Democrats in Congress and moderates in the media don’t seem to grasp.
Maybe I’m just a cynic, but I submit that even after the crazy rhetoric turns to violence the media will ignore the ties – it will be universally projected as simply one bad apple that “nobody could have predicted.”
sadly, I don’t think you’re being cynical. You may well be right–that’s been the general approach on other violent acts (e.g. murder of Dr. Tiller). Unless it involves ACORN or the president’s sinister plot to indoctrinate the nation’s school children, newspapers and cable news don’t seem to care.
The Overton wondow of acceptable public discourse is constantly moving to the right.
Because we have a liberal media.
in some ways, it’s not even a right-left thing. I might say the Overton window has moved in the direction of “crazy”, to the point that someone can compare a modest attempt to provide more people affordable access to health care with Nazism, and it hardly elicits a yawn. The Obama-Hitler comparisons have become commonplace and are hardly remarked on. Elected Republicans stand side by side with the crazies and pay no political penalty. I think the real divide right now is between crazy and sane–well, I guess there’s also another divide between the few people willing to call extremism by its name and the many who remain silent. We’re witnessing a failure of mainstream media, a failure of whatever moderate Republicans may remain, and a failure of many Democrats to express outrage at the outrageous.
We had a troll yesterday who used the “boy” word on Obama.
A number of us jumped on his/her case, and were promptly accused of
“playing the race card.”
This is the position many people are forced into:
by pointing out obvious racists/sexist/nativist language,
we are guilty of bringing up those very issues.
Quite clever, really.
a Republican congressman fif the same thing last year–if I remember correctly, he was from the South
What did he call using the word “boy”? Are you supposed to act like you are as stupid as he pretends to be? Ask him if he thinks it will be okay for us to bring guns to events the next republic president is going to attend? Because you know, we have guns too.
guns aren’t good either way! no violence…
I agree completely, should have used my snark tag. I just want to ask one to see what they have to say about it.
When did it become acceptable discourse in our country to call the opponents NAZI? I’ve heard the N-word “lovers” and other terrible things…but that was more cruel insult than crazy rage, maybe. The fringe is becoming mainstream, it seems.
right you are RevBev. Remember the outrage when a unnamed contestant in a MoveOn video contest compared Bush with Hitler? That was just a few years ago, and no reputable Democratic politician dared to stand with the videographer (MoveOn denounced it, rightly, and removed it from its site). The key turning point seems to have been sometime shortly after January 2009…what was happening around then? Must be a coincidence, but I seem to remember a change in administration around that time.
The fringe is indeed becoming the mainstream
When you have lunatics carrying guns to an event the president will attend and the media doesn’t jump on the republics with the batshit intensity they covered the lewinsky scandle with it’s pretty obvious what side their bread is buttered on.
Don’t expect someone to have an opinion their paycheck depends on them not having.
yep–they seem more charged up about ACORN or the plot to indoctrinate American schoolchildren through song than they do about extreme, over the top rhetoric, endorsed and given credibility by elected Republicans, that has sometimes provided a twisted “rationale” for violence
But they would never condone violence…. I keep thinking what would the republics do if it were dems acting as insanely as those whackjobs on the right. If a dem carried a gun to an event a republic president was going to attend I guarantee you that person would not still be alive and breathing today. I’m sick and disgusted with the state of the country.
The lefties that showed up wearing tee shirts the righties didn’t like were snatched out of the room and interrogated.
Here’s a bumper sticker I saw on a late model pickup truck for the first time today:
I’ll keep my guns, freedom and money. You can keep the “change”.
Quotes around change are as depicted.
It was perfectly ok for Dubya to war spend us into oblivion and then double the expected deficit with the Goldman Sachs, AIG, and auto bailouts in the last sixty days.
Those are obviously Obama’s fault because Obama is black.
The freedom they covet, I have no idea what they’re talking about. What freedom are they missing that Dubya hasn’t already taken away?
Has Obama taken away their guns?
Seems to me that Obama hasn’t done a thing about guns. They have created their own paranoia.
yeah, there’s a racial element–Obama is seen as alien, sometimes literally (e.g. the birthers). It goes back to Palin’s idiotic “he pals around with terrorists” line. It’s a not too subtle way to mark Obama as “not one of us”. sometimes it’s explicit racism, as you see in some of the signs waved at the recent wacka-palooza in DC
I’m no fan of the centrist, Republican-lite Obama. His warmongering, ie: Iran; continued domestic spying; covering up crimes of Bush/Cheney; Union Busting; Eric Holder; Geithner, Summers, Cass Sunstein; continued war profiteering; status quo kowtowing to lobbyists; Rahm; Robert Gates; continued Faith-Based Initiatives; continued NCLB, DOMA, DADT; Mountaintop removal; Big Oil, Big Coal; weak tea on Global Warming; and more.
But Obama is no Socialist, no Nazi, no control freak, no anti-gun zealot, no atheist, and etc.
He is black though. I gotta give em that. /s
I saw a pushy, obnoxious guy wearing that emblazoned on a hat at the VA the other day. Curious, considering I read of a guy being arrested over refusing to leave the premises at a VA Medical Center simply because he was wearing a Veterans for Peace shirt. In his particular case, political apparel was against the rules.
This is why I was so appalled by NY Times Public Editor, Clark Hoyt doing a mea culpa about not covering the ACORN story ealier and more often. ACORN is a minor story compared to the crimes committed by the defense contractors from Halliburton to Dyncorp to Blackwater and so on.
ACORN did not get anyone killed by their stupid actions of giving advice to some (well financed) con artists dressed as a pimp and prostitute — and the larger story in the NY Times should have been the UTTER HYPOCRICY of the politicians to go after defunding ACORN and not the defense contractors that have actual convictions on record! Really . . . where is Hoyt’s sense of proportion here. ACORN has gotten a mere pittance from the government while these defense contractors have reaped billions.
Instead, Clark Hoyt has his panties in a bunch because the NY Times did not ask when and how high to jump when the right wing noise machine brought down their wrath on ACORN. Soon I bet we see a puff piece on Liz Cheney in the NY Times with nary a critical sentence about her — whoops, already happened today!
right–what a surreal, bizarre fit of anxiety–better make sure the extreme right wing isn’t offended!
I think part of the problem here is the “extreme right” is now more or less synonymous with the “right.”
that is a fair point
wife is calling me–must go but thanks for the comments
Chris,
No doubt about your facts. But I really see it this way.
Republicans nut cases, outlandish behavior etc. IS MORE ENTERTAINING
And I’m sure it is done with 100% intent. As analytical Democrats, we tend to look at the content of the news and analyze it. But all this buffoonery on the Right’s part is strictly for CONTEXT sake. You can analyze all day long…they don’t care, the average Joe American doesn’t care.
1. The more news time spent looking at the Right the more Right the average rhetoric in all media thus pushing overall media coverage TO THE RIGHT. Which includes FDL.
2. The more outlandish the behavior the higher the impact to the overall average of the rhetoric.
3. UNTIL THE LEFT GETS IT WE WILL NEVER GET MORE AIR TIME THAN A FRICKIN TEA BAGGER
4. The more outlandish they are, the more entertaining they are.
How to counter it. Let’s get a Luntz-of-the-Left to come up with counters to “Government Takeover of Healthcare” and the new/upcoming “Luntz’ American Dream” .
Then, have someone like Al Franken screaming out on the Senate floor “FREE POT FOR CANCER PATIENTS!” and back it up with good hard facts. Predict what the Right’s reaction will be and counter it, and counter it again and then once again.
Before you know it a lot a people will be going “Hmmm… Ya know, that Franken may be a little nutty but …he might have a point there…Why not have marijuana for cancer patients… maybe not free, but at a discount at least!”
(sorry Al to use your name, just trying to make a point)
Oh it’s quite clear why McCain’s connections to Parsley et. al were ignored.
AJC quoting Mike Huckabee: “It’s time to get a jackhammer and to simply chip off that part of New York City and let it float into the East River, never to be seen again!” Huckabee said, inspiring a standing ovation. “It’s time to say enough of the American taxpayer’s dollar being spent on something that may have been a noble idea, but has become a disgrace!” said Huckabee. “It has become the international equivalent of ACORN and it’s time to say enough! Let’s end the diplomatic excesses that these people enjoy. Let any country that is willing to spend the money that the United States is hosting–let them have it. Give it to the Saudis and let these diplomats suck the sand out of the Saudi desert for a few summers and see if that’s where they’d like to go, and make their ridiculous speeches.”
I suppose the Times and Post are dutifully and impartially reporting on this whackjob the rethugs have now proclaimed their presidential frontrunner?
lovely. It is apparently no big deal to talk about destroying a piece of NYC…even as a “joke” that’s in very bad taste, obviously. But Huckabee just’s so folksy!
In a sense there is a vast right wing conspiracy, except that it’s right out in the open for anyone to view. It consists of a network of think tanks, media organizations, trained speakers and talking heads, ope-ed writers, columnists, policy writers, authors, AM radio shows, etc, all well-funded by right-wing foundations and philanthropic conservatives. In short, it is a communications infrastructure that greatly influences and even controls the terms of the debate. It is very effective and progressives have yet to create its equal. Until we do, the media will favor conservatives and the right-wing viewpoint.
I suspect Republicans know better than us just how dangerous these unthinking right wing zealots are!
Woah, Nellie Belle! Don’t you know the Righties in their nighties are righteously pissed? They ain’t takin’ it no mo!
http://www.americanthinker.com…..o_set.html
Gosh darn them dirty hippies that think they are in the majority! Why don’t lefty libruls just admit defeat and go back to their communes and commune… or something. And not only that, but ALSO! So there!
Well maybe the author has a point here. The out-of-control part is this tendency to let this date-rape-bipartisanship deter America from the changes it needs to make… Like an awareness of the world around us. Like a commitment to provide medicare-like benefits to folks other than seniors. Like maybe a little incentive to innovate and reduce our carbon footprint on this Earth. Before the Earth says Fuck You you humanoid fuck-ups!
So, yes,…
Power is the people. And the people have spoken. We, the People defend the Constitution — including those pesky Amendments the Reichtards so blissfully penned away. Well folks, they’re baaaak!!!
So take a drag on your newly restored freedoms Reichtards. And how about a round of applause for the real patriots here — Jane! Christy!! Emptywheel!!! Their pens have exposed the machinations of ideological conservatism and the damage done to our institutions. In spite of it all… The rule of law will prevail! Not some jerk-off Brooks Brothers imitation lawyers caterwauling at the gate. Let ‘em eat their own hubris. Let ‘em suck on their own marginality.
I could go on…
Well, please do.
OK but I don’t want to blow any fuses… yet!
watertiger is upstairs at the Mothership!
Late Night: A Passel of Petrified and Pathetic Pinheads
Republicans… obdurate to the bitter end:
Whitman, Fiorina reject California GOP ’straw poll’
http://politicalticker.blogs.c…..traw-poll/
We knew Republicans were mythologists of the first water (no “coloured” stones). But College Republicans… misogynists of the highest order.
I’m proud to be called a ‘purist’ sometimes for Single Payer advocacy, demanding an actual end to Bush/Cheney’s failed, illegal, immoral and expensive occupations, restoration of the Civil Rights this country was founded upon, prosecution of felonious acts known and admitted, you all know the list.
Charmingly, we purists are often also derided for being naive, since ‘we don’t have the votes’ and the Democrats are ‘keeping their powder dry’ or Obama is a master of 11 dimensional chess and ours is not to wonder why, etc.
But let me just gently say that it is a little naive to think that, in this day and age, the corporate media of the USA is going to ‘play fair.’ Fair is not even on their radar, they can’t find it on a map, no one they know has ever been there, what is it, like, a county fair where they pick prize-winning hogs? No sir, they are in another business alltogether.
its like the inimitable Chris Rock says “that tiger didn’t go crazy, that tiger went tiger!“
so, lamenting media unfairness is a fine exercise of some sort, but it is like expecting the Democrats to end Bush’s wars – its not in the cards, its not what they do, it verges on magical thinking.
We can indeed wish that the media would be more fair, but there is no structural reason anyone should expect it.
agreed–I expect nothing of the clubby insiders masquerading as journalists. I do think it’s worth pointing out when they continue to abdicate their responsibility, but I don’t expect them to wake up tomorrow as the re-incarnation of I.F. Stone
USE your remote to help the cause. Let them lose ratings, and eventually their bottom lines will drop!
David Gregory is a right-wing TOOL, (and also a FOOL), and none of us should give his show any ratings. I stopped watching MTP when he became host. No show he is on is worth watching. I now have given up on all Sunday mornig political programs, preferring instead to watch reruns of “The Sopranos!” Finally, I can relax on Sunday mornings. Let their ratings drop to the floor, which they eventually will, until the brass getS smart and inserts someone who can be fair. David Gregory is definitely NOT that person!
So the libs are complaining about unfair media coverage? Welcome to our world Chris. We have had it for the past 50 years.
Grow up!!
Welcome to Firedoglake.
A friendly reminder that we we ask you to link to your own site just once per day.
Thanks.