Jack Nelson, a long-time reporter for the Los Angeles Times who covered the civil rights movement and incurred the wrath of J. Edgar Hoover, died on Wednesday. I noticed a couple of interesting things in reading the obituaries summarizing this man’s impressive career and life. First, to the simpletons who suggest Obama is compiling an enemies list only they can see, here’s a reminder of what it really means for a journalist to end up on a government enemies list: “Longtime [FBI] Director J. Edgar Hoover sought to have [Nelson] fired” [Hoover spread a lie that Nelson was an alcoholic].
More importantly, Nelson was a journalist who understood the difference between objectivity and false balance. As he noted “A reporter likes to pride himself on being as objective as he can, and…tell both sides of the story…Well, there’s hardly two sides to the story of a man being denied the basic right to vote…There’s no two sides to a story of a lynching, a lynching is a lynching.”
Well said. Today’s press corps would be well served to ponder the applicability of Mr. Nelson’s words to current “discourse” involving death panels, euthanasia, and the impending threat that the Obama administration will institute a totalitarian state.



5 Comments







A newspaper that has actual journalism as its goal appears to be a dying breed. LAT has been decimated by its new economic aims, and I really can’t imagine that under present executives a Jack Nelson would be free to write news that offended major powers. The McClatchy papers were the only media organ to dig into the truth in our Iraq invasion. The newspaper that carried the truth in Whitewater, WaPo, has suffered extensive overturn in the executive and highest editorial personnel. Presently, that has produced rank supply-siders who cannot print the truth without upsetting inside powerbrokers. When will another Jack Nelson work his way to the top in that miasma of propaganda enablers?
yeah, I don’t mean to romanticize the past when it comes to papers, but it does seem like financial considerations are crowding out investigative reporting of the type Nelson did.
When giants walked the earth.
Instead of such integrity in the news media, we are now subjected to the major networks rising to defend Fox from being shut out by the WH of an opportunity to interview pay czar Feinberg.
How far we have fallen.
well said–Ken Rudin (?) on NPR feel for the bait re: Fox, I noticed http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910220009