Newt Gingrich is supposed to be one of the right’s intellectual lights. What does it tell you about the right’s standards when Gingrich says something like this: "There should be no mosque near Ground Zero as long as there are no churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia. The time for double standards that allow Islamists to behave aggressively toward us while they demand our weakness and submission is over."
There’s so much wrong with this — it’s hard to know where to start. Does Gingrich think the government of Saudi Arabia (an ally of ours) "demand[s] our weakness and submission"? Does he believe the U.S. can set its standards for religious liberty according to Saudi Arabia’s example? If we are justified in denying religious liberty because Saudi Arabia denies it, are we also justified in holding gruesome public beheadings and crucifixions because Saudi Arabia does so? Should we follow Saudi Arabia’s lead when it comes to equal rights for women?
Human Rights Watch reported last year that "Saudi officials continue to require women to obtain permission from male guardians to conduct their most basic affairs, like traveling or receiving medical care…" In March 2009, a Saudi woman was arrested simply for driving. Are we justified in following suit? Would that show the "Islamists" we’re not a bunch of wimps? (Gingrich ended his bizarre blog post by declaring "No surrender." Surrender to who, exactly? Does Gingrich think we’re at war with Saudi Arabia?)
Gingrich, who is often talked up as a Republican presidential contender in 2012, seems to think he’s in a Rambo movie. There is one reasonable thread to be extracted from his loony tapestry–we should certainly express outrage over Saudi Arabia’s terrible human rights record. But the way to do this isn’t, as Steve Benen observes, by lowering our own standards. On Gingrich’s logic, the U.S. could have argued it was justified in continuing de jure race segregation as long as the apartheid regime reigned in South Africa.
As Benen aptly puts it, we’re supposed to be better than this. We ought to lead by example when it comes to religious liberty and other fundamental rights. We should certainly push other countries, especially allies like Saudi Arabia, to meet high standards. But the way to do this isn’t by lowering our own.



10 Comments




Gingrich is a knucklehead and thank you for pointing that out. The statement about the mosque is a bilious grotesquery.
Gingrich probably thinks that we’re at war with people infused with some of the odious societal/religious ideas that have come from Saudi Arabia.
I think that Newt, if he runs, has a good chance to be the R nominee. I really hate to say that but it’s true. The Baggers aren’t much into Mormons and the others are just nuts.
It’s pretty certain that the Republicans are going to have to nominate somebody, it ain’t gonna be the Gingrich.
Newt’s just running for Pres. and needs the Muslim haters of the Tea party.
yes, I think you’re right, though he certainly should be a lot clearer about what he means!
the R field does seem to leave a lot of room…Palin is a media star but certainly has more than her share of problems. Romney may have trouble rallying evangelicals. perhaps there is room for Gingrich.
Eh – what does the Bush family have to say about this? It’s well known that the Bush family is extremely close to the Saudi royals. Gingrich wants to run, I’m sure, but he’d better watch what he says.
right–this exposes fissures on the right. Bushies and others have close ties to Saudi Arabia that have prevented needed criticism of the Saudi regime. Gingrich is right to identify serious problems in the Saudi system, to say the least, though he’s wrong to conclude this gives us license to adopt their standards–and he’s also running the risk of alienating the Bushies and others, as you note
And anyway, why should we adopt the Saudi system or they, ours?
What a lot citizens either forget or don’t know, though, is that the original predominate funding for Al Quaeda came from Saudi, not from either Afghanistan nor certainly not from Iraq (say what you will about Saddam, he cracked down on Al Qaeda, never funded or supported them).
The Saudi’s are the “friends” of elites world-wide, but they are no “friends” to peons anywhere.
right. there are very real reasons to be concerned about Saudi Arabia, but I don’t think Gingrich is asking the right questions.