
Amnesty International Supporters Petitioning to Close Guantanamo Bay (from casmeron on Flickr)
Recently, I had the privilege of attending a screening hosted by Amnesty International. The film was called “The Response” and, at the time, all I knew about it was that it involved Guantanamo Bay and had Aasif Mandvi from the Daily Show in it. Watch this movie!
My jaw dropped when I watched the thematic representation of Guantanamo Bay tribunals. The movie is set up like a courtroom drama, and broken into two parts. The first part is a near verbatim re-enactment of an actual Guantanamo Bay military tribunal (Combat Status Review Tribunal, or CSRT), based on legitimate transcripts released by the United States military. Aasif Mandvi plays a detainee claiming to be wrongly accused of being a terrorist and a bomb maker. Sig Liebowitz produced the film. This is a brief synopsis:
For his screenplay, Libowitz used numerous transcripts from the Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRTs) (months of research yielded several hundreds of pages of additional tribunal transcripts which were used in the creation of the screenplay) and fashioned them into the fictional story of one particular detainee — Al Aqar, a Ph.D. engineer who has studied in the West. The government has accused Al Aqar of being a terrorist and a bomb maker. Shackled and chained to the floor, the detainee is questioned by three military judges — Colonel Richard Jefferson, Colonel Carol Simms, and Captain Joshua Miller — who must decide his fate.
(Taken from the film’s website)
The second part of the film, a short period of maybe 10 minutes, consisted of scripted dramatization of the deliberation between the three officers present at the CSRT who will ultimately decide the prisoners fate. Constitutional rights form a deliberative conundrum with the United States’ fear of terrorism, and this film is a personification of this conflict. . . .
Why am I mentioning this? Well its a good question considering the movie came out in 2008. I was unfortunately just recently introduced to it, as opposed to when it came out. Watch the film, especially the first segment which is based primarily on actual transcripts from a real tribunal. The lack of a fair trial is an understatement when referring to the detainee in the film. A brief quip from the film’s website gives a bit more detail on just how these trials are conducted.
While the officers see the classified evidence, the detainee does not. While the officers know who has accused the detainee, the detainee does not. In response, the government counters that to release such classified information could assist the terrorists and undermine U.S. national security
The Response has been shown not only by Amnesty International screenings, but by screenings to places such as the United States Congress, the Pentagon, the Department of Justice, and several other high-profile foreign policy bodies.
I was sparsely educated on the proceedings and procedures that occur at Guantanamo Bay before this movie, but now it has sparked my interest. It opens your eyes and brings you inside the stingy courtroom of a Gitmo tribunal, and displays firsthand the injustices of that particular legal system.
Check out the movie if you haven’t, I highly recommend it.



11 Comments




Chuckie, thanks for this. As witness to violations of their constitutional rights committed in federal court in Dallas against charitable workers at the Holy Land Foundation, I am also aghast at how security is substituted for law in dealings with anyone fingered as a terrorist, not matter how far-fetched the accusation.
Exactly. Its a shame that our country is associated with such rights violations as these. The fact that so much of this time, money, and insecurities are invested in terrorism is ridiculous.
The movie you really need to see is “Rendition”, about the kidnapping and rendition of an American citizen for questioning under torture due to a wrong number call he receives while at a conference overseas. It reminds me of the Canadian we did this to and continue to deny him access to the courts and justice. I expect that they made it an American so that the audience could better identify with him.
Thank you for your post! I will *definitely* review this material.
In general, I don’t think the public was ready to deal with this in 2008 but I think that has all changed now give the recent events and broad public realizations of what the existence and activities of the TSA really mean.
Its only about 30 minutes long, but very revealing. Thanks!
Thanks for the recommendation on that movie, I’ll see what I can do about checking it out.
We could go one step further and talk about folks not even having to go to the law-free zones called airports or bus terminals or checck points set up on transit point of any common carriers inside the US and who get picked up and disappeared *within* the US for interrogation and torture. This is not conjecture but fact. Check it: “Guantánamo at Home” by Jonathan Hafetz [attorney with the National Security Project] for the ACLU.Org, posted: Mar. 18, 2010 (link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-hafetz/the-big-lie-about-guantna_b_504047.html )
Correction:
We’ve got 2 posts here to be separated out with the correct dates and the correct, working HTML links and both articles are worth reading–
1. “Guantánamo at Home” by Jonathan Hafetz [attorney with the National Security Project] for the ACLU.Org, Oct. 8, 2008 (link: http://www.aclu.org/2008/10/08/guantnamo-at-home )
2. “The Big Lie About Guantánamo Lawyers” by Jonathan Hafetz [attorney with the National Security Project] for the ACLU.Org, posted: Mar. 18, 2010 (link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-hafetz/the-big-lie-about-guantna_b_504047.html )
I found the trailer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdBoIAzMNNA ) and an outtake (link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_80oXEX5o14&feature=related ). I don’t think this will be a waste of my time in my efforts to be educated about these issues.
Good catch!
Thanks!
I was getting ready to write a message on a related matter.
Last night, I watched an otherwise forgettable movie,”The Expendibles”, a typical Sly Stallone shoot-em-up. One scene involved a woman being interrogated by the bad guys, all ex-CIA types. The method of choice involved the woman face-up, laying on a table with a cloth covering her mouth and nose while water was poured on the cloth. We know this as waterboarding, but it hasn’t been depicted in popular films that I know of.
The director could have chosen any of hundreds of styles of rough handling, but he chose this. And it was the bad guys doing it. There is a political message there. I just don’t know how many people will get it.
ON a related note, Guantanamo used to be known for being a place of beauty. That was back in the day, before our long journey into night.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmyQOq4MAdY&feature=related
Jose Feliciano “Guantanamera”