American Banker has an article out that is a must read. It is chock a block with so much information that I could not relay it all to you and still stay within the bounds of Fair Use. Some of the highlights:
1) “In February, the Florida state Supreme Court set a new standard stipulating that before foreclosing, a lender had to verify it had all the proper documents. Lenders that cannot produce such papers can be fined for perjury, the court said.”
2) The Florida Attorney General has opened an investigation into ”whether Docx, an Alpharetta, Ga., unit of Lender Processing Services, forged documents so foreclosures could be processed more quickly.” Docx and Lender Processing services are document mills, ahem, I mean, mortgage servicers.
3) “Lender Processing Services disclosed in its annual report in February that federal prosecutors were reviewing the business processes of Docx.”
4) Judge J. Michael Traynor, “a state judge in Florida ordered a hearing to determine whether M&T Bank Corp. should be charged with fraud after it changed the assignment of a mortgage note for one borrower three separate times.” [emphasis added].
5) “In Florida, Georgia, Maryland and other states where the foreclosure process must be handled through the courts, hundreds of borrowers have challenged lenders’ rights to take their homes.”
Firepups, we’ve been waiting for the villagers to take to the streets with torches and pitchforks. Instead they have taken to the courts with legal defenses and counterclaims. They are rising up against their banking overlords.
You know, if banks had just dealt honestly with people about modifying the mortgages to reset the principle to reflect the post bubble value of those houses, and the post bailout interest rate, a whole slew of home owners could have been kept in their homes, with a payment they could afford. By doing this, using the money that the TAXPAYERS gave them for this very purpose –Hello, remember TARP?—housing prices would have stabilized, neighborhoods would not be in freefall and bankers, and the investors in those mortgage backed securities, would be enjoying a steady stream of income for years to come. The pittance they will get for the house at foreclosure auction is a tiny fraction of the amount they would have collected over the life of those modified mortgages.
What really gets me, is the audacity of the greed. The entire system is set up to generate fees, rather than income from the repayment of the mortgages. So, not only is the homeowner suffering, but the municipalities and pension funds that foolishly invested in those mortgage backed securities are losing, too, because the trustees and others who owe them a fiduciary duty are ripping them off for more servicing fees and foreclosure costs instead of taking proper steps to secure an ongoing, though somewhat diminished, income stream.
That’s the next rebellion I’m hoping to see. The revolt of the pension fund managers.
If the banks think they have it tough now with the swarms of Lilliputian pro se defendants standing up to them, think about how it’s going to be when sophisticated pension funds and their large law firms come after them. Oh, yeah, and let’s not forget those prosecutors with their open criminal investigations, yum.
[Earlier posts in this series and related links at FDL's Foreclosure Fraud Resources]




18 Comments




Thanks Cindy – huge story – recommended.
And can I just say that bankruptcy lawyers were talking about cramdown in December 2007?
“Rent seeking generally implies the extraction of uncompensated value from others without making any contribution to productivity, such as by gaining control of land and other pre-existing natural resources, or by imposing burdensome regulations or other government decisions that may affect consumers or businesses.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent_seeking
OT, but cap and trade is the new mortgage security. Our economy is so screwed up.
Love your stuff, Cynthia. Thanks for another good one.
Cyunthia
This is interesting and unusual
Orange County California Courts Case Access
Click on->Accept Terms-> Case Number=30-2009-00293748, year filed=2009
This person seems seriously angry with MERS, Aurora loan Services, Homecomings Financial, Quality Loan Services & Amstar Mortgage Corp.
I can’t see the case details, but the players indicate that it a California Equivalent of the Judicial Foreclosures you have been referring to in your prior posts.
Just another data point.
Cynthia. Thanks for the post. How’s those balls? (:))
Er, say what?
Badly hit California sadly has laws that favor the banksters.
Minorities are the most likely victims with little advocacy.
Thank for this researched report.
OT http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/18/shake-up-at-bp-as-hayward-steps-back-from-spill/ Tony Hayward had to step aside. Thank goodness.
Security code is invalid (it says)
Just a reference to something I said to her a loooooong time ago.
Hey, Moll. How’s your Friday evening? Trying to get my son to go down to the pool with me. Soon, mom, I’m in the middle of something.
I need the exercize. Oops, the activity. It prolly won’t cool down for a cuppla hours, so maybe I’ll wait ’till the mister gets home.
I spent a lot of years in the banking arena, and I remember watching the shift in the 1990′s as the principal source of American banking income went from the loan business, making loans and collecting principle and interest in return, to fee generation.
Quite an amazing shift. But, if you recall, it was back in the early ’90′s that your personal checking account terms started getting smothered in $30 overdraft fees, etc. Since the mid-90′s, American banks’ profitability has been upwards of 75% fee-based, not based on interest income.
You articulate something that is continually underreported:
This isn’t your mom and dad’s banking system any more. That system made money by lending it out at interest. Interest income, minus costs, was a bank’s profit. Banks meticulously documented those loans and kept most of them, booking them as assets. That sort of lending required rules, oversight and judgment, because it depended on lending to a finite number of creditworthy borrowers amounts that they could repay on time.
Banks’creditworthiness – and their executives’ compensation – depended on those loans being paid off over time in the manner and amounts agreed, with as few defaults and refinancings as possible. Fees were secondary. High fees were a measure of too many bad loans, which meant loan officers or their bosses weren’t doing their jobs. Bank boards took notice and imposed consequences.
Today, that’s old hat. Banks make more money with a different business model, one built on fees instead of good loans. Fees are immediate and, until now, consequence free, no matter how rapacious they are. Bank managers make giddy amounts of money from it. Their subordinates need less experience and judgment, and thus can be hired more cheaply or their work can be outsourced to often unregulated mortgage sellers.
That model allowed – it required – banks to lend to those with no or poor credit and to lend too much money to good credit customers. Bank profits and management careers no longer relied on good loans being repaid, so managers didn’t care who the borrowers were or how much they borrowed. Raw loans alone, the more and bigger the better, were what generated fees and apparent profits.
Blight set in that makes chestnut blight and Dutch elm disease (which emptied the landscapes of American towns) look harmless. The value of loan assets – predictably – speedily declined. Disaster threatened. Bankers whined that the sky was falling and the taxpayer bailed them out.
The system they corrupted remains corrupt and largely unreformed. These cases in Florida are a breath of disinfectant and fresh air. We need much more of it.
Cynthia, great news…..
Also, specifically in the case of Florida real estate, unless Congress and the president re-enact a National Flood Insurance Program (it expired 5/31/10) one can’t sell or buy a home, unless paying cash, since banks won’t grant mortgages without flood insurance.
There’s a story in this, I think. The original program expired in 2004 and Congress renewed it through 9/30/08 (how prescient). In November 2009 it was extended (and pretended?) for only 46 days. Several brief extensions limped though until it was allowed to lapse at the end of May. This lame attitude to me smells like it may not ever (especially after the BP blowout) be brought back to life. Austerity reigns now. And property values along the Gulf of Mexico and other coastal areas to be affected by the oil will eventually plummet further.
The folks along the Gulf, the fishermen and shrimpers, crabbers and oystermen (and -women) can’t even sell their homes, should they decide to move elsewhere to start over. And if there is flooding from a hurricane they no longer have insurance.
According to this article, the NFIP renewal had been included in the bill to extend COBRA, which was just voted down. The deficit hawks are to blame.
———-
Clearly the US government is caught in the talons of the extraction industries: banking and oil. The acceleration of greed among bankers, for whom interest isn’t enough any more….it’s like the end stage of a bad drug habit.
Try
http://www.occourts.org/online-services/case-access/
click-> Civil Case & Document Access.
Cookies problem I believe
I’m sorry to write this, but the National Floor Insurance program is responsible for building in places that should not be built upon.
Galveston Island comes to mind.
Yep. We can’t afford global sea level rise insurance much less hardwood for everybody on the coasts.
LOL
I keep getting case not found