Centuries ago, news of momentous events traveled throughout the countryside by means of beacon fires, alerting all along the route to big changes coming. September and October 2010, are shaping up to be the time of the beacon fires when it comes to foreclosure fraud.

FDL has been chronicling all the many problems with documentation of securitized mortgages, my first post published over a year ago.

In that time, we have demonstrated that the originators, servicers and trustees who make their money from fees rather than repayment of principle and interest had no reason to carefully document the chain of title of the mortgage (the interest in land) and the promissory note (the debt secured by the mortgage). Not only were the original wet ink documents lost, destroyed or misfiled; but often the ownership of the interest in land was sold to a different party than the debt holder, thereby destroying the enforcement of the debt by recourse against the real estate.

From time to time, a homeowner would succeed in breaking through a judge’s predisposition to believe that banks are great record keepers and actually win on the merits by showing that the foreclosing bank had not presented sufficient paperwork to meet its burden of proof to show it had a right to foreclose. Sadly, those cases were few and far between, tiny candle lights in a sea of foreclosure blackness, but we fixated on them, stared at them as if willing them to flare up into beacon fires of systemic action.  . . .

It’s finally happening:

If you go to the first link above, you will see that we here at FDL have not only chronicled these developments as they happened (special kudos to David Dayen who seems to have radar for finding these things as they are breaking), but we have also accurately predicted how things would play out.

So, where will it go from here? There are several possibilities:

1)            The Comptroller of the Currency may actually do his job.

2)            More class action suits may be filed—this is probably the most likely, there is HUGE punitive damages potential here.

3)            US Attorneys may get a clue, and realize the federal jurisdiction here and the fact that FBI and Secret Service actually have tons of expertise when it comes to making bank cases and they will do some criminal and civil cases.

4)            State court judges will read the newspapers, watch the evening news and find out that they have been hoodwinked and made fools of by banksters, and may finally begin putting the burden of proof where it belongs, on plaintiff banks.

5)            Homeowners in non-judicial foreclosure states (for whom I have special concern) will feel empowered to go to court to sue to stop foreclosures and evictions. I know it’s hard for you, where will the money come from for a lawyer? You bear the burden of proof; but see #2 above.

6)            State AG’s, who ought to be the heroes of this story, will get off their asses and do what Blumenthal did in Connecticut and what Brown did in California, even if they are not currently running for higher office.

7)            Banksters will finally see their peril and do the right thing (don’t hold your breath for that one).

(photo: james_michael_hill via flickr)