Foreclosure fraud is not just a disaster for homeowners who may be losing their houses to banks that lack standing. It’s a gigantic land mine as well, one that can blow up the entire world’s economy and send us all into the second “V” of a double-dip recession.
Alan Grayson sent a letter (pdf) which explains the problem well:
Dear Secretary Geithner and members of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC),
The FSOC is tasked with ensuring the financial stability of the United States, which includes identifying and addressing possible systemic risks. There is a well-documented wave of foreclosure fraud sweeping the country that presents such a risk. Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase have both suspended foreclosures in 23 states where that fraud could be uncovered and stopped by the courts. Connecticut has suspended foreclosures.
I write to encourage the FSOC to appoint an emergency task force on foreclosure fraud as a potential systemic risk. I am also writing to ask the members of the FSOC to use their regulatory authority to impose a foreclosure moratorium on all mortgages originated and securitized between 2005-2008, until this task force is able to understand and mitigate the systemic risk posed by the foreclosure fraud crisis.
So far, banks are claiming that the many forged documents uncovered by courts and attorneys represent a simple ‘technical problem’ with foreclosure processes. This is not true. What is happening is fraud to cover up fraud.
The mortgage lending boom saw the proliferation of predatory lending and mortgage fraud, what the FBI called at the time ‘an epidemic of mortgage fraud.’ Much of this was lender-induced.
When lenders – many of whom are now out of business – originally lent money to borrowers, they often did so knowing that the terms of the loans could not possibly be honored. They sought fees, not repayment. These lenders put people in predatory loans, they induced massive amounts of fraud, and Wall Street banks misrepresented these loans to investors when they moved through the securitization chain. They were stealing money from investors, and from homeowners.
Obviously these originators and servicers didn’t keep good records of who owed what to whom because the point was never about getting paid back, it was about moving as much loan volume as possible as quickly and as cheaply as possible. The banks didn’t keep good records, and there is good reason to believe in many if not virtually all cases during this period, failed to transfer the notes, which is the borrower IOUs in accordance with the requirements of their own pooling and servicing agreements. As a result, the notes may be put out of eligibility for the trust under New York law, which governs these securitizations. Potential cures for the note may, according to certain legal experts, be contrary to IRS rules governing REMICs. As a result, loan servicers and trusts simply lack standing to foreclose. The remedy has been foreclosure fraud, including the widespread fabrication of documents.
There are now trillions of dollars of securitizations of these loans in the hands of investors. The trusts holding these loans are in a legal gray area, as the mortgage titles were never officially transferred to the trusts. The result of this is foreclosure fraud on a massive scale, including foreclosures on people without mortgages or who are on time with their payments.
The liability here for the major banks is potentially enormous, and can lead to a systemic risk. Fortunately, the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation includes a resolution process for these banks. More importantly, these foreclosures are devastating neighborhoods, families, and cities all over the country. Each foreclosure costs tens of thousands of dollars to a municipality, lowers property values, and makes bank failures more likely.
I appreciate your willingness to assess possible systemic risks to the country, and would again encourage you to suspend foreclosures until this problem is understood and its ramifications dealt with.
Sincerely,
Alan Grayson
Member of Congress
These lazy, stupid, greedy idiots may have blown up the world’s economy.



37 Comments




One could argue that they blew it up years ago. Had it not been for the USG backstopping the disaster, this same group of criminals would already be out of our misery. Instead, the government prolonged the disaster and in covering up for their bankster chums have drained the treasury trying to keep them afloat while the rest of the economy has completely stalled out. Maybe this time, the government will have learned from its mistakes and will reallocate our resources into more productive channels.
Grayson nails it in 1 sentence. And this fraud is on an epic scale.
Cynthia, what’s Grayson talking about here?
I keep wondering about what Elizabeth Warren said at Netroots Nation this summer, about how the 2005 Bankruptcy bill set up the Lehman bankruptcy to be a run on the bank by the crooks, if I’m paraphrasing her right:
(my transcript and my emphasis)
“a little provision that had no sponsor” — that sounds like the bill from nowhere with no identifiable votes that snuck through the House and Senate that Obama just pocket vetoed (HR 3808). Has Grayson or Marcy Kaptur spoken about that bill? Has Elizabeth Warren said anything about suspended foreclosures? Lots of dogs not barking, or barking at [the wrong thing?]. Then again, I miss a lot.
My reaction to Obama’s refusing to sign the out-of-state notarization bill was that it was a good indication the bill was not that important.
Don’t count on it.
Obama used a pocket veto. So, it aint dead yet.
Wait till after the election.
They’ll tweak it here and there but the premise will remain the same and he’ll sign.
Our financial resources are not constrained until we reach full use of our productive capacity. There’s a silver lining in the banks possibly going broke. This time there will be a lot of opposition to any bailout. Instead the resolution authority in the new finreg bill will be used to take them down. That puts the Government in charge of running the banks which would 1) eliminate their political power and ability to buy off Congress, opening the way to more comprehensive finreg; and 2) allow the Government to ensure that loan funds flow to businesses again. In fact, insofar as the credit card companies are owned by the banks, the Government could see it to it that usurious interest rates end and credit card interest is limited to 6 points over prime. This move alone would create substantial demand, encouraging businesses to use loan funds to expand.
You may ask where the loan funds will come from if the banks have collapsed? The answer is that banks can always borrow money to make loans at the Federal Reserve Discount window, which operationally means that the Fed just marks up their Federal Reserve accounts so they can write those loan proceed checks. The Fed is unlimited in the amount of “marking up” it can do for this purpose.
Agreed, but I would still call $2 trillion a drain on our treasury — especially given that it is was entirely unproductive.
LOL — I’m not ; )
I’m not exactly sure what Grayson is specifically referring to when he references the Dodd-Frank bill.
I would disagree with your self assessment that you miss things, you don’t seem to miss much at all
Cynthia–
They’re “entitled” to those bonuses, ya’ know!
The details aren’t important.
Ecuador could help open our eyes to what we are facing. Democrats’ willful failure to learn from contemporaneous events is the real shame.
Rafael Correa, President of Ecuador, is the President we hoped Obama would be:
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=5713
Must See report, 9:29min.
Again!?!?
Nice try.
My reaction to Obama’s refusing to sign the out-of-state notarization bill that got passed as surreptitiously as possible on a voice vote and unanimous consent was that it was a good indication the bill was very important to a lot of banksters but got too much attention and drew fire from the rest of us and like Clemenza @ 6 says will reappear after the mid-terms.
WHOA! Thanks.
I figured the “no-bankruptcy bill” Bush signed was setting up the regular people for getting screwed and was I ever right.
From your transcript, it also sounds like it was setting up hostile takeovers in plain sight.
If the MOTU get another whack a America, we’ll go down and so will Europe…then the IMF can step in and completely get rid of all those horrid socialist ideas/programs Europe still seem to cling to….those commies.
But, somehow we’ll still have money for WAR
I watched Bush over 8 years sell America out from under US and now, everybody seems to have forgotten what those bastards did. It’s like the whole presidency went into a black hole and the people think it all started with Obama.
On March 7, 2008, I reported the economic collapse, a full six months before it was accepted as consensus reality. But now that is has been our reality for two years, our Government is powerless to deal with it unless we all admit that we have a collapse problem; and stuffing a few more cards into the house of cards (again!) won’t help.
Unless………….they are finally waking up to the mortal danger the banks have put US ( and the world) in and give a shit.
I guess it all depends on how poor the MOTU want to make the rest of us.
I think they will go too far, if they can and get more than they bargained for. Greed IS an addiction, you know. They can’t help themselves unless there’s intervention.
I’m hoping the pendulum is swinging back a bit as even the IMF is warning about too severe austerity measures……
I’m not interested in helping you rehab Obama’s or the IMF’s image among the “professional left.”
AND?
I believe the MOTU already have gone too far and with few exceptions, if any, the BIG banks are insolvent.
The relative silence from the White House and the media about this catastrophe is deafening. Either no one understands the big picture here, or everyone is pretending that it’s no biggie and studiously attempting to nonchalant it to death.
Meanwhile, back in the jungle that passes these days for our government, I’ll bet everybody is freaking out and trying to come up with a way to paper over the problem as they feather their own nests and the economy floats out of control down the Abyss river ever closer to the Falls.
The MOTU have managed to dial the economic crisis back to September, 2008, and all of the bailout money has been to no avail.
The thing is that the houses all have value. There is something of value at the bottom of this pit. I pray that the illegal fees imposed go away and that people are left with mortgages that they can pay back. I don’t think people understand the full court press that was put on people to “force” them into foreclosure. Things like forced homeowners insurance when people already had insurance and sent their proof over and over again. Bogus fees from one missed payment could be so substantial that a person could not recover or get out of debt the minute they were 30 days late. Fees for checks to process electronically with no info given to the person imposed on. Outrageous legal fees. This part of the equation still has been hush hush, because it means that many people lost their homes illegally not only because of the forging documents and lost documents but also because of these behaviors by the banks. This was a premeditated plan to foreclose on people right and left because this is how they made money. The didn’t care about the effect on our economy or anything else.
Hamp allowed those behaviors to continue. Basically these banks just repackaged the fees so that these loans would foreclose eventually as well.
My apologies, Kass. I went back and read several of your previous posts and realized my perception of you was mistaken. I don’t believe in the possible beneficence of Obama or the IMF and don’t countenance defense of either. Again, I’m sorry for assuming that was your intent. I realize now you were merely being hopeful.
oooh oooh pick me, pick me
Remember when we were all screaming about the glaring omission of TBTF in their big phat FinReg bill ?
and they would always come back with a tut tut tut, ‘there’s a resolution authority in the bill that allows for ‘careful, responsible’ “unwinding” of these entities’
and then folks like Yglesias pointed out it was all so groovy, Paulson his own self said he’d wished he’d had it for the Lehman debacle …
that’s why folks like Karl Denninger**, Brad Miller, & Grayson have been so snarky about it – it was the MOTU’s answer to TBTF – ‘we didn’t expect ya to actuallly use it !!!!’
this is kinda like how Title IX came in to being – a trick, that could now blow the f up in their faces
I’m gonna go back to see what I can find from FDL’ers about this at the time FinReg was being debated
** Denninger has been advising Grayson on this issue for some time now
Yes, but the problem with “drain” is the implication that we’re running out of money. That’s what the deficit hawks and Obama want us to believe, so they get less pressure to bail out Main Street and solve all of our other problems. it’s not true! We can spend as much as we need to to solve our problems. And it’s way past time that we did that.
epic indeed
I cop to getting caught up in the adrenaline of just following the developments of this story
and then I remember it was Teachers, Firefighters, State Employees, IOW Main Street, that lost their pensions over this shit
Don’t count on the Financial Reg bill to do jack shit.
And don’t count on any of them giving a crap about our outrage
against another bailout. They’ll make some of it up by dismantling programs like SS and Medicare to pay off the bankers debt.
Ben is already planning another QE (printing more money to save the criminal banks and saddle us with paying it back) after the mid terms.
I admit I’m still clutching my little wild bouquet.
I disagree. People know what Bush did.
The problem with Obama is he ran against the Bush presidency but hasn’t skipped a Bush beat on anything, including the same path of financial terrorism.
here’s a Dayen post that includes Resolution Authority
helpful link here: Making Resolution Authority Credible
credibility an issue because this is an “unproven” solution :D
GREED KILLS
Nixon, Reagan, Clinton, the Bushes, and, more recently, Obama, have all sold the people of United States down the river.
There are a lot of people who are going to mis-understand your characterization as hyperbole, it’s not.
So many people, make the mistake of thinking that the rich and powerful are orders-of-magnitude smarter than the average American, they are not.
so many people make the mistake of thinking that these folks are only reaping the well-deserved rewards of that intelligence, they are not.
These people are exactly what you’ve called them, and their principal advantage is being willing and able to lie, cheat, and steal, coupled with having enough money to both afford good lawyers and influence politicians.
The stupid part comes into play when you consider that they do all these things with total disregard for the eventual outcome.
How do you figure we’ll have to pay back the QE? I’ll bet you also think we have to pay back the national debt.
What great comments about the sins of the back-room sellers and profiteers of derivatives, etc. Unfortunately, some of the other forums think the banks should pay back the initial borrower – ? That makes no sense to me. The whole predatory loan thing in ridiculous. I am a real estate broker and I witnessed how buyers ran through several no downpayment/no income verification/adjustable mortgages. These borrowers are heavily guilty in getting in on the greed wagon. Foreclosures should not be reversed, but banks, financial “wizards” who processes and salesmen who sold all this garbage should be in jail and fined.
They WERE stupid idiots and I am sure afraid of consequeces (from who? NO oversight during Bush years!!!) but the lure of money and profit drove them forward – to the brink of OUR disaster — NOT theirs–they are on their yachts sipping Mojitos!!!!
I suspect Grayson’s letter might be the occasion of her first major test as Presidential Assistant.
Bob in AZ
‘sawright, Kass– we all need a little something to hold on to.
Bob in AZ