By now everyone knows that almost all of the big banks (except Wells Fargo) have admitted that there may be issues with the documentary evidence submitted in court by servicers when seeking mortgage foreclosures. Some banks have instituted 50-state moratoriums on foreclosures while they “review” their documents and procedures.
Ally Financial said Tuesday that its GMAC mortgage unit has hired legal and accounting firms to conduct independent reviews of its foreclosure procedures in all 50 states.
We know that the phony litigation documents were created to cover up the fact that the banks don’t really know what they own and the failure to properly transfer the documents into the trusts underlying Mortgage Backed Securities (RMBS).
That’s not a problem one can “fix." The banks understand this and have been communicating this to their investors during analyst conference calls. Why go through the sham of a review that will only tell them what they already know?
Two possibilities come to mind:
1) The reviewers will issue some bogus report indicating that most of the foreclosures are good and there have just been some sporadic errors. Nothing to see here, move along; the cover up would continue.
2) More likely, the banks will actually confess at the end of the review that their documentation is a mess. They do what Goldman Sachs did with Frabrice Tourre; they’ll state this is not the fault of the chief executives and other Masters of the Universe but the fault of the quants and lower level, young, over-compensated whiz kid financial engineers who designed and implemented the RMBS.
It’s likely the banksters at the very top are setting up their Sarbanes-Oxley-style defense; viz, the crime was committed by lower level employees despite the proper level of oversight and internal controls by the company management.
Such an announcement would likely lead to a huge market crash.
If the banks were to announce this right before election day, President Obama will be caught flat footed — which might lead one to wonder if the White House is being "blackmailed."



16 Comments




I think it is #2 .
It may be combined with #1 to generate more scapegoats- but mostly #2 is in operation. #2 also provides fodder and positioning for criminal plea bargaining which is being planned for as a contingency.
Aren’t there provisions in Sarb Ox that once suspected wrong doing/fraud is discovered; that appropriate investigation and reporting occurs?
As in: “We have just discovered that there may be some problems here!”.
“We think it might even have happened more than once!”
“We are making every effort to find out what happened.”
“We are already paging for all employees with the last names Goat, Hook and Bag.”
Regulators and stockholders are “shocked” at these new developments.
LEAKED PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION RESULTS FROM BIG DOC MILL (wholly owned subsidiary of REALBIGLENDER):
“We believed the conspiracy began at the Subway located in the Walmart in (REDACTION). This is where many of our management staff either worked or waited for their rides prior to being hired by BIG DOC MILL.
This plot was in operation before the employees were hired. …”
yes, MOTUs are trying to cover their butts. Randy Wray outlines what to do.
that’s a very effective stimulus (while we’re at it).
On a single transaction, yes. On contracts with outside companies, and thousands of transaction in every state of the Union, thousands of employees, and hundreds of millions of dollars in expense and fees, not so much.
Two words: Vicariously Liable.
and what documents are they reviewing? Retainer agreements?
Two more words; Forseeable risk.
Gonna take a mighty big TARP to cover all those big MOTU butts!
Endo recessiono…
Thanks Cynthia for informing as fast as it comes out on the out side of the fan. Great work !!!!!
Oh, they’re “reviewing” them, alright
And sorting them into 2 piles
SHRED and DON’T SHRED
Have any of the 50 state AGs put a notice on the miscreants that all files are to be maintained and subject to search and discovery? I forget what they call that.
Randy is one of the best thinkers about stimulus. He’s one the big three in Modern Monetary Theory, along with Warren Mosler and Bill Mitchell.
I think what the “review” is designed to do is to come up with a “fix” that can be sold to the public. If it weren’t for the 50 State AGs nipping at their heels, they’d come up with another “extend and pretend” package that they’d force Geithner to accept. But I don’t think the 50 State AGs are going to permit that.
Of course, the Banksters will threaten *Catastrophe!!!* unless they are allowed to continue screwing homeowners. Like I wrote at the outset, their task, during the “review,” will be to come up with a way to do that that sounds reasonable and that can satisfy enough of the state AGs and pension fund managers.
Bob in AZ
On top of all of your work and Emptywheel’s on this subject, The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission has been at work, too. MortgageGate has been in their sights. In September, they conducted a hearing in Sacramento. One of their conclusions: Florida led nation in mortgage fraud, federal commission says. Another hearing a few days later was covered at Huff Po, New Proof Wall Street Knew Its Mortgage Securities Were Subpar: Clayton Execs Testify (First Posted: 09-25-10 06:56 PM, Updated: 09-25-10 09:46 PM) During this hearing, little-known Clayton Holdings, a Connecticut-based firm that analyzes home mortgages for banks, hedge funds, insurance companies and government agencies, provided its data Thursday to the Financial Crisis Inquiry. Most of the substance of the testimony will not be new to anyone following your and EW’s reports, but it does give the FCIC sound data, and a platform on which to stand in its December report due to Congress. Clayton Holdings felt obliged a few weeks later to submit a 4 page letter to the FCIC in which they distanced themselves from the testimony provided by Keith Johnson, the firm’s former president.
With all the news on the mortgage front, there will be pressure on Congress to hold more hearings, and that is good. At the same time, they will be getting the FCIC’s recommendations: A report of the Commission’s findings is due to the Congress, President and, most importantly, the American people on December 15, 2010. This will give them something of substance to serve as the basis for legislation. One major question is if enough of their recommendations will get to Congress during the lame duck session to do anything before the new Congress is seated.
[Crossposted at http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/10/15/how-much-more-foreclosure-fraud-is-under-seal/#comment-259504
Bob in AZ
Anyone else starting to worry that the Congressional response is going to be to find a way to retroactively legalize all the MERS title follies? If they systemically fix that root fraud, then much of the rest of the damnably interrelated network of problems heals itself. The notarization-recognition bill would have done the trick, don’t forget, and very very nearly became law; surely that won’t be the Banksters’ last and best shot at recapturing their Paradise Nearly Lost. So I guess I’m seeing all the time and talk being spent on the foreclosure moratorium concept as potentially just buying time for new bills to be written to legalize MERS, reaching back into the past. Wouldn’t exactly be our first retroactive legalization experience, now would it?
In the state of Nebraska MERS has been granted the right to foreclose despite not having the proper paper work. This is an outrage…and this is the state I live in. Interestingly one of the most RED states in the nation.
http://nysbar.com/blogs/RPLS/2007/06/mers_held_to_have_standing_to.html
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ne-supreme-court/1016162.html
Look, people have to believe me that me and my lawyers have tried to win against these folks in numerous ways. It’s been so frustrating to try and explain that they have stayed one step ahead of us over and over again.
I am not very hopeful about my loan…now I have equity…since I have hung on as long as I did. The foreclosure mess started in 2004. My chapter 13 is up and it means I cannot get cram down now.
I can sue for the bogus amount on my loan, but many people have lost these cases!
That was very helpful, Bob, thanks for that comment chockful of details.
I’m going to put some of it to use shortly.
Good! I’m glad someone can put that to good use, as I’m sure you will.
Bob in AZ