Has anyone ever heard of due process in Florida?
The Washington Post reported that despite all the mind blowing revelations of the last few weeks, and despite the fact that the big banks themselves admit that their litigation paperwork is sufficiently screwed up that they have voluntarily put a moratorium on foreclosures, despite criminal investigations in all 50 states of allegations of fraud on the courts; judges in Florida are still spending only SECONDS per case on uncontested cases and ignoring arguments made in contested cases regarding broken chains of title.
FORT LAUDERDALE – In a cramped, makeshift courtroom, Broward County Judge Victor Tobin was signing off on uncontested foreclosure cases as fast as a clerk could keep them coming, only a few seconds per file.
"Batter up," he said as he finished one stack and eyed the next. With scores of cases remaining on the day’s "rocket docket" earlier this week and tens of thousands more awaiting judgment in this courthouse, there was little time to pause.
He’s not reading those case files any more than the robo signers read the mortgage files.
Down the hall, attorneys for the small minority of homeowners contesting seizures pleaded their cases in courtrooms 518 and 519. The attorneys cited faulty notarizations, questionable signatures, missing assignments on the part of lenders trying to foreclose. They argued that the sloppy paperwork had resulted in a broken chain of title, that lenders didn’t have legal standing to seize homes.
-snip-
Allegations of wrongdoing in Broward Country and elsewhere continued to mount this week. A lawyer from Deerfield Beach unveiled depositions that he said showed that financial firms and mortgage servicers hired people with no knowledge of the mortgage process and installed them as "foreclosure experts" to "robo-sign" thousands of filings, paying little attention to the accuracy of the documents and at times forging signatures, backdating documents and misusing notary stamps.
The judges in 518 and 519, who had come out of retirement to hear foreclosure cases and help clear the backlog, listened to the arguments politely. They had heard these pleas before. But without definitive evidence of fraud, the judges told the attorneys, the foreclosure would go forward.
WHAT?
If we are talking about criminal investigations into robo signing at document mills by former burger flippers who might not have the savvy to understand the grave consequences of their actions, how can we ignore the conduct of judges who actually do know better?
In fairness, some judges in Florida have finally gotten a clue.
On the other side of the state, in a Sarasota County courtroom, another judge on a recent day was taking a dramatically different tack. Impatient with attorneys for lenders trying to seize hundreds of homes, fed up with their sloppy paperwork and errant practices, Judge Harry Rapkin dismissed 61 foreclosure cases in that single day – a quarter of those awaiting his approval. While the plaintiffs could re-file, it would mean hefty fees and significant delay.
And that’s the way is should work. Judges can still unclog the pipeline, simply by dismissing the faulty cases. Not only will it get rid of the current glut of fraudulent filings, and prevent horrible miscarriages of justice, it will discourage future unfounded filings preventing a new glut and allowing for the orderly processing of those very few legitimate cases that may be out there.
I’ve heard a figure of 80 percent bandied about as an estimate of how many underwater mortgages may be effected by the chain of title problems resulting from securitization and electronic transfer. If this percentage is true, those cases cannot and should not go forward unless or until some solution to their fundamental standing problems is found. The remaining 20% of foreclosure cases could go forward with plaintiffs proving their clear chain of title full complete and accurate paperwork. Those houses could be resold without the kind cloud over title that threatens to keep the housing market frozen for the foreseeable future.
The stable transfer of clear title will actually begin the healing process of the housing market, but as long as these judges continue to deny due process the public will have no confidence in the clear title of even the most perfect and just foreclosure. The robo judges are not helping anyone, even the foreclosure plaintiffs. They are making the housing crisis worse by casting doubt over the title of even the most legitimate plain vanilla foreclosure.
And they are violating their oath of office.



29 Comments




Prospect for appeals that could set a binding precedent?
Is there any action that can be taken against robo judges themselves?
Thanks for your continuing series of reports on this, Cynthia.
Could someone have standing to do a class action lawsuit?
Bob in AZ
maybe if that judge had a few hundred of his cases overturned he would reconsider :)
Still I KNOW it’s hard to get data out of a foreclosure company based in BFE or call center india or whatever. Good luck proving fraud.
Just to give you a heads up. Sarasota County is considered Franklin County, Ohio “South”.
Lots of Columbus businesses overlap in the city of Sarasota itself as well.
This may explain the difference considering what is going on in Ohio.
Due process in this country is dead/non-existant except for the rich, powerful, well connected and elites. It has been for a long time. Judges, for the most part, don’t give a twit about their oath of office, the Fourteenth Amendment or the Constitution, except as noted above. Judges, again for the most part, don’t care about precedent, settled law or anything else when they have an agenda to satisfiy. I am sure there is an exception to this somewhere but if there is I have not personally seen the exception. I have seen the system up close and personal in three western states and it is the same, in both the state and federal system. The Ninth Circuit is no better…for the average person. The justice system in this country is broken beyond repair…except for the well connected elites.
On Edit. Thanks Cynthia for your efforts.
Awesome enunciation. I’ll expand upon that: ‘Besides all the black box, overly complicated, unaudited supercomputer-based financial systems and the immunized high-speed telsatco systems operators “carrying water” for the crooksters, do you think all those shell companies and the off-shoring had anything to do with this greatest heist in American history?’
I’ve been thinking this will lead to the birth of a new civil rights movement.
It seems as if the MOTU have gradually come to treating us all as badly as they have ever treated any of us.
You could say that the white masses find themselves ignorant of the most basic tools with which to fight back because they’ve always been happy that the masters were busy beating somebody else.
We’re in the strange situation of needing advice from those who who’ve been fighting them for over two hundred years, Indigenous Peoples, Blacks, Women, and Labor.
I’m guessing that advice will have to be found in the historical record because it doesn’t seem as if anyone is currently engaged in an effective opposition.
The MOTU have effectively sidelined many at the moment, by encouraging their worst impulses.
Progressives may not understand exactly what is to be done, but one thing is sure, anger has never been enough, and every minute spent marching in the Koch Bros. mercenary army is a minute wasted.
Cynthia, I get confused between civil courts and criminal courts and now foreclosure courts… What is the hierarchy in the foreclosure court system? Is there a higher court that victims of rocket docket justice can appeal to or are they at the end of the line as soon as Robo Judge signs?
I know that humans are fallible and all that, but the fact that some judges do not feel bound by the rule of law, while others do, suggests a serious violation of equal protection guarantees. One’s ability to avail themselves of a fair and impartial judgement in the courts ought not to be pre-determined by zip code.
Class Action suit? oh yeah.
For a start, read here and here plus the comments.
Foreclosure courts, in most places are just regular civil courts that limit themselves to a single subject matter. Technically, the judge in that court could hear any civil matter, but the decision is made to assign only cases that fall within a certain subject, so that the judge can have deep expertise in that subject.
Hear in NY we have special subject matter courts for matrimonial cases, complex commercial cases, and now, foreclosure cases.
This just in: in some areas, attention is turning from lender abuse to lawyer abuse. That is, lawyers know there’s an increasing demand for assistance in dealing with mortgage and foreclosure abuse, so scams have been sprouting up, offering assistance but mainly milking increasingly desperate homeowners.
My wife experienced some of this in dealing with the foreclosure on her home in southern California several years ago, and sometimes it is hard to tell what is abuse, and what is merely semi-competent lawyering. For example, one tactic is for the lawyer to tell you to stop paying your mortgage, instead paying into a dedicated mortgage account for use in bargaining with the lender. Or you pay a flat periodic fee to keep them working on your case. In my wife’s case, I think the lawyer was working for a group that had become aware of some of the problems with titles, etc. so that their approach had some merit. However, the “company” they were working for had no track record and no record of accomplishment. My wife’s house, occupied by her daughter, had an upside down mortgage with no hope of refinancing, so her daughter had to find another place to live, and let the house go into foreclosure. I offer this only as an example of how difficult it is to tell whether your lawyers are honestly working your case, and what their chances of success are. There is plenty of room for scams and lawyer abuse, and how is the average homeowner to know? There don’t seem to be any standards for this category of practice, and there needs to be. For example, is there any such thing as a licensed or certified mortgage attorney, conforming to a public standard of performance?
Bob in AZ
A question for you … In other reading, I have the impression that the class action suit is a blunter instrument for plaintiff restitution than suing “jointly and severally”– what I understand to be the “Erin Brockovich” method re PG&E and their hexavalent chromium poisoning of Hinkley, California (which is still trying to recover). What are your thoughts on this?
Thanks! So, if someone feels the adjudication of their case in a foreclosure court was unfair, they can appeal to a higher state court, right? In state systems, are there three levels akin to the federal system (district, court of appeals, supreme)?
Some states may have board certifications in real estate law, but I haven’t ever heard of a specific mortgage specialty.
Of course, it’s all according to the state, so the fact that I haven’t heard about it doesn’t mean it doesn’ exist in some state.
And new specialties can be established by whatever entity governs attorneys in each state.
Something along this line could become a specialty if the problem takes a looong time to go away.
Cynthia @ 13
The Florida Rocket Docket (foreclosure) court circuit (“W”) was specially set up with a $9.6M appropriation from the FL legislature. Semi-retired judges and case managers were brought back to preside over foreclosure hearings. This is a separate, newly-created circuit. One foreclosure-defense lawyer said “that in the three years before the foreclosure court was established, his firm participated in about 100 hearings for a contested final summary judgment and never lost one. With the new court, they are 1-for-15, winning their first last week in Clay County.”
It’s fishy the way these rocket-docket judges rule without even viewing the case files. Matt Weidner wrote that most of the plaintiff lawyers don’t even bother bringing their case files to court with them. That implies that the ruling is a foregone conclusion.
……
I’m working on a theory that the entire MBS is a Ponzi scheme, which is the only framework within which all of the odd facts and bank actions make sense. The rocket foreclosures don’t make sense if one thinks banks don’t want to take 70% losses on them, and be saddled with millions of REOs. But maybe that’s not the issue for the bank managers who enrich themselves running the scam. Maybe mass foreclosures are necessary to wind down, generate more cash (in the absence of new borrowers)(foreclosing stops the need to transmit money to the ‘MBS’), and continue to cover up by transmitting payments to the ‘MBS’, which don’t exist, the mortgages never having been conveyed, but rather existing only on a MERS excel spreadsheet, you know, like Bernie Madoff’s fake transactions.
All MBS are a Scam
Adding the unstated part for ya, Cynthia….
I really appreciate these articles of yours. It makes my head nearly explode reading them, so I can imagine what it’s like for you doing the research to put them together.
Head exploding again.
It’s horrible. People are losing their cases even when they can prove bogus balances and fees. There is a political connection in all of this.
What’s next?
A new wave of privatization for building new debtor’s prisons on the horizon? Replete with Blackwater contractors for prison guards?
I appreciate Ms. Kouril’s contributions to this issue, and the foreclosure situation overall. She has helped bring truth out to the uninformed masses.
Enthusiastic cheers!!!
I must also say that I have been doing this research out of necessity, in defense of my own property from a foreclosure filed in December of 2007. I have, again out of necessity, been litigating pro se, or representing myself. It is just recently, this year in fact, that there have been much in the way of competent and knowledgeable counsel available. These few competent counsel are loathe to pick up a case already in progress.
As for your head exploding at the mere reading of this “stuff” imagine learning the law, learning the rules of procedure, researching case law, preparing pleadings, participating in oral hearings, and all of this with the imminent threat of loosing your home, equity, stability, self respect, respect of peers, community, family, AND FURTHER ALL OF THIS AGAINST THE BACKDROP OF A COURT THAT REFUSES TO RULE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FACTS AND LAW AND DEMONSTRATES AN UNMISTAKABLE BIAS AGAINST HOMEOWNERS, BIAS AGAINST CITIZEN DEFENDANTS AND BIAS AGAINST PRO SE LITIGANTS!!
OK, I said it. And Ms. Kouril said it as well. Or maybe even something better – Robo-Judges. I love it!!
I’ve been litigating 3 years at this point and while I have been presenting the arguments relating to defective notarizations, fabricated documents/evidence and perjured affidavits/testimony for the past 2 years my court (and many others acoss the country) have simply refused to look at anything resembling truth. I anticipate litigating another 2-4 years.
The courts/judges behavior… Well at first I thought their behavior was based on ignorance. I’m beginning to think it is more akin to complicity. And that scares the s*** out of me. What are we left with if we can no longer turn to our courts for justice, for protection? There is no potential answer to that question that I like.
And for the record I’m not the exception here. I’m the rule. I have close to 1000 thousand people in my “foreclosure fighters” network of friends and to a person we have similar circumstances in terms of court bias and inappropriate rulings. Now put into perspective that more than 95% of foreclosures are not defended at all and recall how many foreclosures have occurred in the past three years. The voice I am speaking in is the voice of millions.
Can complaints with the Bar Association be filed en masse against these judges?
What about legal actions against these judges themselves?
Optimist!
An amuse-bouche, ultimately via Naked Capitalism. I’m sure it will all turn out to be a simple misunderstanding.
Fron Karl Denninger @ The Market Ticker:
There are judges’ commissions or similar governing bodies in each state to which ethical violations can be reported. You’d have to check in your own state to see what yours is called – include the words “judicial conduct” in your search terms.
In any class action suit, it would be interesting to use discovery to determine the reason behind the Bank’s insistence that there be no cramdown in bankruptcy for residential mortgages.
Also to find out if there were collusion by the banks in opposing the residential mortgage cramdown provisions.
It puts the lobbying and success of the lobbying against the cramdown into a very different perspective. Their success removed mortgage from the careful review of the bankruptcy courts, who examine the validity of liens and loans and have expertise in these matters.
Just speculating. Be nice to ask some hard questions, and get the email trail, it would do wonders towards providing evidence for proving intent in the fraud allegation.