
"warning sign" by oskay on flickr
The Sunday edition of a dead tree newspaper is the most important edition of the week. Some people only read the Sunday paper, drawn in by the magazine section and the comics. When the editor decides to make a particular story front page of the Sunday edition, that editor is looking for maximum eyeballs on the story.
Yesterday’s New York Post, the flagship of Rupert Murdoch’s American fleet of media outlets, had a full page, front page, article with huge photo, of a heretofore unfamous Assistant Attorney General working for New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.
It exposed intimate details of her private life and did so in a way clearly intended to hold her up to scorn and embarrassment. It is clearly meant to harass and terrorize her and by example terrorize everyone in the AG’s Office, the NY County DA’s Office and the US Attorney’s Offices that might be looking into the misdeeds of the banking industry or even might be thinking of maybe looking into the crimes of the banksters.
You see, she worked on the Bank of America case brought by the NYS AG’s office while Andy Cuomo was AG. The message could not be any more crystal clear: if you mess with the banksters, they or their friends will come after you, your family, your friends, your cat.
I was a big fan of Elliot Spitzer’s tenure as AG. He was the canary in the coal mine trying to warn the American people of the reckless and criminal activities of the banksters. He used every bit of legal leverage he had to try to fight back, basically all alone.
For that, he was stalked until they found him to be, ahem, ”associated” with a skank for hire calling herself Ashley Dupree. And that betrayal of his marriage vows, which should have been a private matter between Spitzer and his family, became front page news.
I read somewhere that his wife wanted him to fight back. I wish he had, because had he done so, perhaps this tactic would have been discouraged, if not consigned to the rubbish heap. Instead, it is now back and more virulent than ever, being aimed at non public figures.
I can only guess at the horrible morale that will be wafting through the halls at 120 Broadway, at Hogan Place, or at One St. Andrews Plaza. No longer does the boss stand as a shield and defense against these kinds of attacks, taking the heat so the staff attorneys are free to do their jobs courageously. Nope, the bad guys are doing an end run around the boss, just to show him how powerless he is to protect his people from these terror tactics.
Unless . . .
Unless, you fight back. I disagree with Yves Smith. I think this young woman should sue Murdoch to within an inch of his trust fund if so much as one semi colon of that front page piece is incorrect. She may be a public employee, but that does not make her a public figure, and she does not have to prove malice under New York’s defamation law.
Spitzer should have fought back and exposed his stalkers. This AAG should fight back, and for that matter every prosecutor’s office with plausible jurisdiction should be investigating the circumstances of this “outing.” Because if they don’t, none of the staff attorneys or investigators in those offices will feel safe doing their jobs.



59 Comments

Absolutely. The only way to deal with bullies like Murdoch is to get right up in their faces until they hurt.
At best, Murdoch is the “news world” version of a hedge fund manager– he destroys others for power, fun and lots and lots of profit. I think of him as part of the bankstas constant intel operation against those that oppose their agenda. I think it’s far wiser to stand up to him.
They are also using the shame factor here — Spitzer really was ashamed of what he had done .. not only to his family but also to himself, so it made him less likely to fight back. As long as people can be made to feel ashamed, then you own them. As independent agents of change, they are finished. The AAG involved here needs to come out with cannons here and Schneiderman must do two things: first, he needs to make sure his house is in order and second, he needs to come out even stronger in terms of going after the banks. As a sort of side issue, I think that if there is any one issue that stops women from running for public office, it is the fear of someone like Stone will go out digging up something from their past that they are perhaps not terribly proud of, whether it’s sex, drugs, being fired from a job… I think women are even more sensitive to what public scrutiny and humiliation can do to their family members and I think that one thing holds many women back who can make a contribution to public life.
Are we sure that murdoch isn’t still tapping phones?? I remember a peice by empty wheeler on how they caught Spitzer…It’s like they are daring use to figure out how they get this info…my bet is that the phone system is how they are getting it. No private Eye…This has been what the republicans have been using since Clinton. (I have no proof…my gut says that this stuff is always true, valid…and it’s the info is always WAY inside info.) I think that we have got to crack down on Murdoch and quickly. He is the tool being used to keep us back from stopping the finance industry from taking over the world.
Oh, yeah.
I want to know how much of the information on her was obtain through a phone hack?
It would so temping to walk down Wall Street and whip that Bull.
I agree. That is a great comment. It would make a great lead for a post on the matter.
I would encourage her to sue as well. Somebody has got to put a stop to this private life intrusion to stop their work and work ethics.
This has been going on for a very long time and it’s time to stop it. JFK was hounded about his affairs, Jimmy Carter had to admit that he lusted, Bill Clinton was hammered, and many Dem congress members. If I was not a long term unemployed person I would be in NY this minute walking Wall Skreech. I would encourage all the people to skreech louder and harder than they do about investigations, taxes, transparency, and their needs for bailouts. I would also yell that home foreclosures on unemployed persons when this economy is not producing jobs should be halted. It is beyond barbaric to throw families into the streets when there is no ability to gain employment in a country that is not making anything!
PUT MURDOCH,AILES and all their spawn im the GRAYBAR HOTEL,forever
http://www.financialsense.com/financial-sense-newshour/guest-expert/2011/09/14/william-k-black-phd/why-nobody-went-to-jail-during-the-credit-crisis
I wonder if Murdoch was hacking her phone.
It sounds like she was suspended because she might have broken rules of her employment. If she was wrongly suspended then maybe she should sue her employer.
But let’s face it: it’s dangerous to have a career as an important attorney in a public office and also to be a paid sex worker. These two careers do not go well together. If she’s not making enough money as a lawyer then maybe she should become a full-time dominatrix, or even get a job in the corporate world.
My take on Spitzer is that he was a major bully. From what I heard he really enjoyed making a public spectacle of people who had supposedly done something wrong. I assume he prosecuted Martha Stewart not because she’d done anything horrendous, but because he could get maximum publicity out of her celebrity.
As far as I’m concerned, it’s only poetic justice that his whoremongering was found out. If the allegations hadn’t been true you can get he wouldn’t have resigned.
So, call222, if I found out from someone who conceivably tapped your phone that your sexual morals weren’t up to snuff in my view, that should give me cause and full right to discount anything and everything else that you might have to say about, say, sports, or food or thieving banksters, was a lie. Too fucking bad you missed the point of the discussion.
I lived thru JFK’s presidency and I don’t remember any hint at the time that he was a compulsive womanizer. Maybe the DC gossip circuit talked, but I don’t remember any of that getting into the public space.
I agree with your post but your use of the word skank to refer to a young woman was unnecessary. You could have called her a singer and call girl, or any number of things. What’s the point of being offensive about people you don’t know, who could very well be reading FDL. We’re trying to attract people to our point of view (oh, let’s say, peace, love and understanding, economic justice and liberation for all) and pointless and crude behavioral judgements don’t help.
“Instead, it is now back and more virulent than ever, being aimed at non public figures.”
For this reason alone, the USAG should go after Murdoch’s US operations with a vengeance. If he doesn’t take the shot while he’s got the chance, he’s stupid. After all, what’s to stop Murdoch from going after him at some point in the future? If he’s not stopped, absolutely nothing.
Hey AG Holder: Does the term “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act” mean anything to you? If you’ve got any brains, you’ll use it.
Mr. Obama has offered this to the GOP:
to allow the U.S. Government to accept competitive bids from pharma cos. in exchange allowing some of the huge tax breaks running to the uber-wealthy, borrowed from China, and financed by the middle class and its children and grandchildren to lapse.
So think about it.
The GOP does not want the U.S. Government to accept
competitive bids for Medicare Part D.
So how is that a bone in return for allowing some of the huge tax breaks running to the uber-wealthy, borrowed from China, and financed by the middle class and its children and grandchildren to lapse?
First off: one is a career, the other is a job.
Your “take” on Spitzer is unimportant.
Cheney was, is, a bully with visions of grandeur far exceeding his human worth. He ordered poor souls out of their minds and bodies because he could get “maximum publicity” and American wealth redistribution out of it.
Some people, yes I said that, appear to be masochists. That’s all I can think of. Why else come here with that?
Here’s Schneiderman’s website for contact. http://www.oag.state.ny.us
I wrote to them to recommend that the entire office should all dress in leather, studs and heels this week, and that I would start a sympathy pageant in my town if they did. Back me up people!
I think I understand the points she was trying to make, but just don’t see it the same way.
You might have a point there, with all the names I’ve been called on this site.
Democrats it seems never fight back. the victims of Breitbart’s scam videoer should all sue too. but have them. no. instead the act like that guy Cheney shot and who then apologized to Cheney.
Might there be an inquiry into the source of the information about this attorney? Murdoch’s empire now has a reputation of illegal tapping of phones and getting complaisant police officers to tap phones.
A culture of invasion of privacy to settle political scores and obstruct justice?
I completely agree that peoples private lives should be private, BUT – I think Spitzer was an idiot to have regular hookups with a hooker. Stupid behavior. Some people get off on playing dangerous games. He clearly did.
Despite the clear guarantees of the Constitution, there is no privacy in the U.S. anymore. If anyone should know that, it is law enforcement pros. They know better than most that we live in a total surveillance state.
I hope that the woman in question DOES pursue every legal avenue to find out if she was illegally surveilled. But again, if she was doing what was alleged, she was playing a very dangerous game. I think stupid, but if stupidity were illegal, we’d probably all be in jail.
I think Schneiderman should subpoena the newspaper, find out who did the dirty work, and go after them. It only takes one take-out of this kind to force the PTB to clean up their act.
…the clear guarantees of the Constitution….
You wanna set forth just what those are these days?
’cause I’m a lawyer and i sure as hell don’t know.
…find out who did the dirty work, and go after them.
Rupert would just say he doesn’t know who’s responsible, and go back to sleep.
There’s no comparison. Spitzer evidently had too much money in his deep and hot pockets, and paid extortionist rates for beauty &c, most of it for the assurance that his secret would remain a secret. (He probably resigned and ended it there lest much more embarrassing stuff would follow.)
This NY Post story is for suckers, it’s not man bites dog or John Foster Kane caught in a Honey Trap. It’s a chihuahua nipping at an ankle unable to break the skin. What the state government attorney did on her own time is not unlike US Senator Arlen Spector’s after-hours gigs when he did stand-up at the Comedy Club.
I used to believe the 4th amendment:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons,[etc]shall not be violated”
but that belief is SO B.C (Before Cheney.)
Then you will remember, too, that the concepts of personal and family privacy were very, very different from what we have, generally, today. Radio, print, and television media is absolutely awash with people telling their stories, or other people trying to uncover those stories, and still others attempting analyze them (both the person and the story). Nowadays there can be social (real or electronic world) capital to be gained in getting your story out there, and making it as consumable as possible. Just consider for a moment some of the extraordinary topics that you’ve overheard when listening to loud cell phone conversations – on the bus, waiting in line, at the office, etc.. And, I bet you did not even have to strain your ears to heard it. It is a sorry state…and more than a little bit scary.
fight back??
what a quaint notion.
why, that would require being aggressive –
THE cardinal sin in dem politics.
that would require being persistent and committed to an outcome.
it would require being disruptive,
it would require being a decisive democrat.
it would require being demanding of explanations from republicans for the rhetorical bullshit with which they have saturated the public discourse since 1996.
I think we should pay lawyers like this more so they can afford to stay in public service if they choose to do so and aren’t forced to go into corporate work or to take on extra work – of any kind.
She was likely an entertainer, not a sex worker. I don’t understand why reasonable and enlightened people should be interested in holding public officials to a higher or a puritanical sexual standard if it doesn’t affect their day job and it’s not illegal.
Public officials engage in insider trading which isn’t even illegal if you’re elected, the same thing Martha Steward had to go to jail for. Why do we allow double standards like this?
All types of officials have conflicts of interests where they pawn off no bid contracts to friends, colleagues and even themselves when they travel through the ever rotating door.
This is piddly, really.
What exactly makes it dangerous?
Was she was advertising? Would we also fire the the guy who got spanked? Maybe he needed it and she was doing a public service. :-)
They can’t do that. They have to maintain a professional appearance and demeanor while doing some of the most important work for the people of this country right now. There’s probably some way to support pigs like Murdock and Bankers PI staying out of peoples private lives and panties.
Do you have a link?
Professional escort, call girl, working girl, paid companion…
Yes, I do. I was responding to PeasantParty’s remark that JFK was hounded for his affairs. He was not. Nor was Lyndon Johnson.
Don’t forget how the banksters paid rep/thugs went after Elizabeth Warren. Scolding her like an office temp not answering the way she damn well better. It was as bad as watching thugs in a cheesy movie, except it was real.
You know for a fact that the attorney at issue is a paid sex worker? I assume you know no such thing. I’ve gotten a fair amount of exercise jumping to conclusions, myself, but in this case, you’re revealing much more about yourself than you seem to realize. Your post reeks of purse lipped disapproval. Sex, my god!
Eliot Spitzer has a reputation as a major bully. I would call him reflexively belligerent. He did have the internal resources to take on some bad actors in the world of big finance who were accustomed to scaring/buying off lesser regulators and prosecutors. Cynthia is also looking past an illegal contribution from his father during his AG run. But I understand why she admires Spitzer, because he took on some incalculably disgusting characters who have since, in the absence of any oversight, ruined millions. Whole nations. Spitzer’s sins, his hypocrisy, seem minutely small potatoes by comparison.
I believe Teddy Kennedy should have been treated as any ordinary schlub would have been for the accident that left Mary Jo Kopechne dead. I could not have voted for him. And I can tell you, I’m not the one to be casting stones on any number of lesser transgressions.
Spitzer and many public figures are difficult to deal with on a balanced basis. My own thought is that had they been brought up sharply short at the first sign of trouble, some of them might have gotten onto a higher road. But they’re so often indulged, and excused, and on-the-other-handed, by the time they run completely off the rails, their lives are histories of rule breaking. DSK is a perfect, and wretched, example. As far as I know, Spitzer was never in that league.
“Skank” is uncalled for. If she’s a skank, what’s he?
“For that, he was stalked until they found him to be, ahem, ”associated” with a skank for hire calling herself Ashley Dupree.”
Skank? Really?!! So she is a skank because she worked as an escort? Well, if that’s the case then you are just a fucking bitch.
And you’ve never sent an email with an unfortunate choice of words that may have been misunderstood by others or been just plain wrong, written in the heat of getting a story on virtual, “paper?”
I was wondering when Spitzer’s story first came out if that escort might not have been in on Spitzer’s take-down, an agent for the MOTU, so-to-speak. Certain descriptors could possibly apply.
And now I get to press that horribly labeled button that speeds this message to the FDL servers. The same command given by the assistant attorney to her clients on her own time…
Cynthia, I have to agree with Laura G. Calling Ashlee Dupree a “skank” seems sort of nasty. If two consenting, competent adults choose to set up a financial transaction trading goods for services, and no one else gets hurt, that’s their business and no one else’s. Just because something is against the law doesn’t mean it’s necessarily immoral or “skanky,” whatever that means. If the point of your post was how the corrupt banksters come after a critic guns blazing, you actually weaken your own point by so casually throwing garbage on someone you don’t even know.
Laura, I’m with you 1000%. That descriptor really weakens the author’s entire point, IMHO. (See comment below).
This was a headline post on FDL, not an email, not that Laura G’s name calling is any better than Cynthia Kouril’s. I commented earlier on the use of skank, which jumped out at me because it was symptomatic of an important issue confronting “left, progressive, green” politics, that it is identified with a moralizing and pious strain in our culture which is turns off many working class people. I live in a rural area, and the NASCAR loving, hunting, speedboating, hard living folks I often work alongside are some of the most generous, decent, helpful people anywhere, even though their politics are ignorant. People do what they have to do to get by, and calling them names because they make choices you wouldn’t have is not the way to build alliances.
No one seems yet to have pointed out the irony of the right-wing NY Post assisting the Obama adminstration in its intimidation campaign against Schneiderman and his office.
All I meant was, dangerous politically or careerwise, even if that isn’t how it should be in the best of all possible worlds.
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with being into alternative sex scenes, though.
I don’t have a problem with her being into an alternative sex scene at all, but it seems a little naive to think that if you’re going after powerful enemies they won’t do things to try and probe your weaknesses. I wasn’t trying to convey prudish disapproval . . .. No, I was just relying on the Yves Smith post. Thanks for acknowledging Eliot Spitzer’s problematic demeanor. Also, of course, I didn’t call Spitzer’s call girl a skank.
“Public officials engage in insider trading which isn’t even illegal if you’re elected, the same thing Martha Steward had to go to jail for. Why do we allow double standards like this?”
I don’t know why, but I thought what he did with that was extremely cynical and bullying.
I know you didn’t. I was cramming everything into that post.
Yves’ post did not assert that Smith is a sex worker, just noted that her sexual activities are well known. In some circles, I should think so. Wish I was plugged into that gossip network. Nothing like that ever happens in mine. I feel like I miss all the good stuff.
Murdoch mucking about in Italy; predictably S&P down grades the country.
“Murdoch offers £3 million payoff to Dowlers” (TheHindu.Com, Sept. 20, 2011)
Exactly!
This crap has to be dealt with or morale in all prosecutor’s offices will suffer to the point where nothing gets done.
You miss the point.I agree that her actions are totally non seismic, which is why there is ZERO REASON to put her on the front page of the Sunday edition, except to SCARE the crap out of every prosecutor in town.
I am a fucking bitch, and always have been.
I would agree with you, except that after the bust, she went on every show that would book her and did front page cover stories and milked it for all it was worth.
She tried to capitalize on the hurt she helped cause to the Spitzer kids. If she had shown one iota of class or concern for anything but herself, I would have used the term sex worker.
But she helped to maximize the pain caused to the wife and kids and seemed to relish piling it on and publicly dishing every icky detail.
THAT is why she is skank, not because she had sex for money.
If the purpose of the expose of Spitzer’s infidelity was to punish him for going after the banksters, she did more to exacerbate that punishment than anyone except Murdoch.
I don’t think they are doing it as favor to POTUS, I think they are doing it as a favor to banksters.
I thinks is someone coincidental that it supports the federal gov’t's bullshit position of unilateral disarmament in dealing with the banks.
Thanks for the defense, but I actually thought long and hard before I decided to use that word, b/c it is a word that greatly offends me.
Her conduct after the Spitzer thing broke was so reprehensible that I was stuck for a word to convey my utter contempt for her.
I could care less if she was a sex worker. I happen to theink that that prostitution should be legalized, unionized, regulated and taxed.
She did everything in her power to keep that story front page and make sure that every emotionally scarring detail got as much coverage as possible.
That behavior was detestable. And I was looking for a word that would convey my utter revulsion at the sight of her dark, heartless character. She is the exact opposite of the hooker with a heart of gold.
I have nothing against sex workers. I do have disdain for those who consciously and gleefully inflict emotional pain on innocent children and their betrayed mother.
Right. I meant the irony of shared agendas; did not mean to imply direct cahoots.