Manhattan DA Cy Vance has indicted a bank, a very small bank, for mortgage fraud. The first bank to be indicted in the foreclosure crisis is Abacus Bank, along with some of its executives.
From the press release:
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictment of ABACUS FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK (“ABACUS” or the “Bank”) and eleven of its former employees in a false document mortgage fraud scheme resulting in the sale of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of fraudulent loans to the Federal National Mortgage Association, commonly known as “Fannie Mae.” The District Attorney also announced that an additional eight former employees have already waived indictment and admitted their guilt in connection with this conspiracy.
FINALLY, we get a prosecutor with a working set of gonads. You can watch the press conference here.
I realize that this is a teeny tiny bank so you may be asking yourself, “What’s the big deal?” Let me explain: By bringing this case, the Manhattan DA’s Office (actually New York County DA’s Office) is demonstrating that all that bullshit nonsense that POTUS and Geithner have been spouting about “sloppy paperwork” and non criminal lack of best practices is a lie. It also shows up the Preet Bharara excuse that intent is too hard to prove.
Knowing how small the investigative staff at the NYC DA’s office is, I think it is very prudent of them to take on a small bank that cannot overwhelm them with truckloads of paper and armies of lawyers. This is closer to an even fight, though the bank still has many more resources than the DA’s Office. I think it is also telling that the bank is literally a neighbor of the DA’s office, so investigators and DA’s can walk to their target.
The indictment, representing the culmination of a two-and-a-half-year investigation, charges that ABACUS, its employees, and its managers engaged in a conspiracy involving the regular and systematic falsification of residential mortgage application documents. The defendants falsified these documents so that they could earn commissions and fees by ensuring that otherwise unqualified borrowers would receive loans, which ABACUS then sold to Fannie Mae pursuant to an ongoing agreement. After purchasing these fraudulent mortgages, Fannie Mae repackaged them into mortgage-backed securities and sold them to outside investors. As a result of the hundreds of millions of dollars in charged fraudulent loans, ABACUS earned many millions of dollars in loan origination, purchasing, and servicing fees over the five-year period covered by the indictment.
They were aided in this investigation by two agencies you might not expect: FHFA, the Federal Housing Finance Agency and, of all folks, the IRS.
Where is the FBI? Well actually under resourced according to Bill Black, the man who cleaned up the Savings & Loan mess. He blames the bank regulators most of all for failing to do the preliminary work and for failing to file criminal referrals. According to Black, Office of Thrift Supervision has made zero referrals, the Comptroller of the Currency has made zero referrals, the Federal Reserve has made zero or 3 referrals, depending on which spokesperson you talk to, and the FDIC refuses to even answer the question.
You MUST watch this amazing Bloomberg news interview with Bill Black who does the best job I’ve seen so far of explaining why DOJ is not bringing criminal cases. He explains all the institutional wheels and cogs that are not turning in the bank regulatory system and in the criminal justice system. It’s 15 minutes of “must know” information.



51 Comments

I’d love to think more banks will be prosecuted but I can’t help but think that Abacus is just a sacrificial lamb so the PTB can say they did something.
Thanks, Cynthia. That interview with Bill Black was wonderful.
Agree with bilzo.
Cyrus Vance Jr. Really. Born & bred to the PTB. Even his wiki warns that the language is self-promoting, as indeed it is.
….a small bank that cannot overwhelm them with truckloads of paper and armies of lawyers…
- OR -
…a small bank that cannot overwhelm them with truckloads of bribes and threatening phone calls from the PTB…
Abacus, the Scooter Libby of banks.
If you watch the Bill Black interview, he thinks there will be an indictment f a TBTF bank right before the election. An October Surprise?
Jim, winning the internets so far today. .
I’d say the only way a TBTF band is indicted is if they fail to give enough in campaign contributions. I know, I know, I’m just sooo damn cynical.
I’ve met Vance Jr several times, but don’t know him well. He has never been shy about talking the talk you hear around FDL. Now he has apparently been the first to wlak the walk.
I knew Vance Sr. better serving as Counsel to a Blue Ribbon Panel he was a member of. Vance Sr. twice resigned in protest from two different presidential adminsitrations. He resigned frombeing Dep Sec Defense in the Johnson administration when he became opposed to the Viet Nam war and
later resigned from the Carter Admin when he was Secy of State.
The first time I met Vance Jr, he told me he was more proud of his father for the resigning from those positions than the attaining of them.
I’ve worked white collar investigations with NYC DA’s office back in the day, they have VERY FEW resources for these kinds of cases. Which dictates the kind of target they can go after. Moreover, it is better in this instance to start with a case you have decent chance of winning. To try nad fail will give everyone else cover to continue to do nothing.
I think NYC DA was very shrewd to start with a managable target.
Something else, the Chief Deputy DA is a guy named Dan Alonso. Before joining the DA’s Office, Alonso was Chief of the Criminal Division at USAO EDNY. While in EDNY, Alonso oversaw some hard to get a handle on white collar cases such as the Computer Associates 35 day month case, where contracts were backdated to trigger bonuses for upper level executives and some medicaide fraud cases involving phony drug treatment chains.
He is no stranger to “follow the money” cases and cases involving compnaies manipulating their own files. The same techniques that will be critical in this prosecution.
If you watch the Bill Black video, it is clear that Black thinks 9and so do I) that they used the drug gang/mafia investiagtion model of flipping lower level people–>who have already pled guilty, which means plea deals<–to get at higher up. Black thinks they are trying to flip this credit manager to get the "C" suite (CEO, COO, CFO, etc) executives. I hope they do.
Too many people in law enforcement and in bank compliance and AML have been sneering at the idea of using that investigative model. If Vance does so succesfully, it makes it harder for the rest of them–you know the guys who have bank examiners on their staffs?< to continue to deny the feasabilty of such investgations.
That's what this tiny bank is, a feasabilty study.
Vance Jr for State AG!
I hope that your narrative pans out and that this is just the first in a bottom-up type investigation and a feasibility study. I really really really want that to be the case.
Thanks for the post, Cynthia. PLEASE keep updating on this topic, as there is so little posting or reporting going on about the mortgage fraud mess and the many different aspects of aftermath of this whole thing.
No, I menat that this investiagtion itself was a bottom’s up investigation. They cut plea deals with lower leel employees to get testimony they need to convict upper level employees.
I did not mean to imply that they would start with small banks and work their way up to big banks. Unless they get ALOT of outsaide manpower they lack the resources to take on maga banks by themsleves
DDay posts about it almost every day. I tend to post only when something of legal signifigance happens, like an indicitment, or when I think I have figured out something about the inner workings, or when I think I see soemthing coming on the horizon.
So, I’m less news, than analysis. DDays more breaking news.
Thanks. It’s nice to get some good news in these dark days.
Vance for NY AG sounds good…
But Kouril for NY AG sounds much better!
Ah, I see what you’re saying now. Thanks for the clarification. Me be slow :)
With respect to resources, if Vance is successful on this one, I wonder if he might consider crowd-sourcing bigger investigations. If I could rub a magic lantern I think I’d wish for the world’s biggest pro-bono action to provide Vance’s office with a huge cadre of volunteer lawyers, accountants, securities analysts, etc.
(Please excuse the above; I’m not fully awake yet — late night — and must still be dreaming.)
This is good, but I think it’s time we stopped using “gonads” or “cohones” or other references to male anatomy/physiology to signify courage. The old term “guts” is be a suitable euphemism. Kamala Harris (CA Atty Gen) and other women also have plenty of that, although Harris apparently caved on the mortgage deal with the banks along with Schneiderman. I suspect there will be some higher level mortgage banks’ & servicers’ execs brought to trial …after the election …maybe.
Wonder what (do-nothing but special-sounding) task force or special panel the Administration can create that needs Vance’s expertise and/or leadership?
Kamala Harris has guts? The only thing Kamala Harris has is ambition. She’s a huge Obot fraud and sellout.
And as for prosecutions after the election: no chance, Lance. No fucking way.
You just don’t get it: President Pinocchio is of the 1%, by the 1%, and totally for the 1%.
You would have a hard time doing it with lay volunteers b/c of Grand Jury secrecy rules.
Watch the Bill Black video all the way through. The way it’s SUPPOSED to work is that the regulators do the bulk of the initial invesitgation, when they think they have enough evidence of a crime, they do a “criminal referral” to the FBI ot most often directly to a prosecutor.
When I was at DOI part of my function was 1) to figure out when the investigation was fully cooked and ready to refer, 2) package it up and sell it to one of the NY prosecutors. This often involves a dog and pony show called a “presentment”. If they recommending a case for prosecution is called a criminal referral. No prosecutor has to actually take the case just b/c it is referred to them, but they do have to review it and then do a formal declination if they don’t want to proceed with it.
Gonads refer to either the testise or the ovaries.
I would not be shocked of somebody who is critical to this inestgation or trial suddenly gets ask to screen for a federal judgeship. LOL
This is akin to sacrificing the morally deficient, mentally challenged National Guard members for the torture at Abu Ghraib.
Cynthia –
Noticing quite a few typos in your posts today. Are you getting help typing from your kitty-cat? (Around FDL that’s usually the reason.)
Not a very informed statement in.re. prosecutions after the election, when the campaign slogan is “Forward”. Of course we all remember Obama’s prosecution of the Bush/Cheney administration for war crimes and the lauding of Bradley Manning and other whistle blowers for bringing the promised transparency back to the government. That certainly made us all “proud to be Americans”./s
Book Salon up with Mike Magner’s Poisoned Legacy: The Human Cost of BP’s Rise to Power hosted by Greg Palast
Cynthia, you are truly magnificent! Not only have you kept us abreast of the cutting edge of knowledge in the whole mortgage mess for years, but you also render needed anatomy lessons when required. I bow and scrape at your feet in awe, respect, and gratitude. ((((((cynthia))))))
When I read “a very small bank,” I immediately thought, “Woopty doo,” whereupon you (Cynthia) laid out a set of very clear and concise reasons why this action merits more than just a simple, dismissive “Woopty doo.” For example,
Excellent piece, Ms. Kouril. And go Cy Vance. And Bill Black? The Real Deal.
Indeed, that’s part of why the PTB want to starve the government — then their crimes can go unpunished.
Thanks be to God! Thanks Cynthia for bringing this exciting news to us and for giving us both videos.
Here in Sacramento we are hoping to get a joint resolution of a Homeowners Bill or Rights reported out of committee and on to the next step. It appears that we activists have won on several critical issues, thanks to the hard work of CAL PICO, ACCE, Sacto Occupy, and others. I’m happy to forward your post to reps of these groups.
Bless you for your ongoing work on this and other issues at FDL!
It still boggles my mind, that I have been victim to such obvious fraud. Fraud that at least 10 lawyers saw, witnessed and validated, that a bankruptcy judge witnessed it and admitted his frustration, threatened the bank, that my family, and friends have been privy to hearing and seeing my statements…and yet…despite corroborating evidence…the criminals have yet to be charged. It’s unfathomable to me! At times, I feel like I must be living in a nightmare.
Hi Cynthia, emptywheel had a post on how FBI allocates its resources: Why The DOJ Can’t Prosecute Banksters: Map of Clemens Investigation — see the map and the key:
(93 agents to go after one guy who lied to Congress about using steroids? Compared to the 55 that might someday (…tick…tick…tick…) get staffed to mortgage origination/securitization/foreclosure fraud?)
What Bill Black said on Bloomberg about limited resources and dog-that-won’t-bark regulators:
I knew Cy Vance, Jr., personally and professionally back in Seattle during the 90s when we were both criminal defense attorneys. He was very honest, and smart; a gentleman’s gentleman and he worked very hard for his clients. I liked him and he was a consummate professional.
I have a lot of faith in him and I think he’ll do a top-notch job.
He ain’t no Eric Schneiderman.
Would exposing the regulators to Obstruction of Justice prosecutions for not issuing the referrals be a path toward getting the necessary referrals? I vaguely recall one agency shredding documents pointing to criminal activity.
I’ve always maintained that this was a clear and coherent Conspiracy to Defraud involving the regulators as well as the banksters, and that the whole gang — several thousand individuals — should be tried in a big courtroom, like Yankee Stadium, under the Conspiracy and RICO statutes. But then, I also think such a prosecution would look like the Chicago Ten conspiracy trial in ’69. (Payback — Get used to it!)
No cat, just a terrible typist
You are living a nightmare. I recently hosted a book salon about the foreclosure crisis and Paul Kiel’s book included a tale about a family who paid their mortgage faithfully and on time, and had the cancelled checks to prove it. Yet, because thier servicer misapplied a payment, they were thrown ito this death spiral that resulted in them being foreclosed o.
Talk about moral hazard. They did everything right and lost their house anyway due to robo signed forgeries.
It’s not the homeowners who are at fault. The very few instances of homeowners taking out more mortgage than they could afford washed out in the first year of the crisis and involved the super duper predatory loans made just before the bubble burst.
The loans you are seeing gong bad now are because folks lost their jobs.
Thanks for this Cynthia. Gives a much better picture of how the system works.
You sound optimistic about the possibility of an indictment of a TBTF bank, but Black later in the interview seems to walk that suggestion back. For one thing, he complains that the regulators aren’t cooperating, they aren’t filing the necessary criminal referrals, and, presumably, aren’t even investigating adequately. For another, the likely lead prosecutor would be Schniederman’s new hire (no?), and she wouldn’t have the time to get up to speed and prepare the indictment before the end of the year – even IF the regulators had filed a referral regarding a TBTF bank. He explicitly says this is *not* a test case.
In short, what it does is put the lie to the administration’s claim that the mortgage debacle was caused by merely shoddy-but-legal practices. It does not constitute an opening to going after the big players.
Not that I want to throw cold water on the suggestion, it’s just my hopes that the wheels of the justice system would start turning have been dashed again and again…
Putting a lie to the claim that it is shoddy paperwork, not crimainl fraud is THE critical first step to creating a political climate that forces action.
I did a book Salon a year or so ago for a biography of Ferdinand Pecorra. The banksters were winning the influence to government war until the Pecorra Hearings. By the end of hte hearings, the mood in the country had changed so dramtically that the banks ASKED to be regulated.
Up until now, the banksters have been winning the influence the government war, the gov’t has staked out this “shoddy not criminal” position. If this case takes the foundation out from under that position, it may create the same shift in dynamics that the Pecorra Hearings did.
That the bankster fear this to be true will become evident if you see a new theory of why the gov’t should not prosecute begin to emerge in the next month. You will also know if they fear this is you see some sex scandal or other similar nonesense suddenly materialze at the DA’s office.
Don’t forget, John Lui was trying to put together a group of Comptrollers to use the threat of pulling their bank accounts from TBTF banks unless those banks started helping homeowners, then blam, he’s got a fundraising scandal.
Spitzer pissed off the banks, blam, he’s got a hooker scandal.
So, they will figure out who is crucial to the prosecution of the case and then try to buy that person off with an appoitntment, like they did with NYS AG, or frame/entrap them with a scandal.
I am hoping NYC DA is 3 steps ahead of them in this chess game.
Look, it’s not a guarantee that this will lead to the big prosecutions justice requires, it’s just this is a critical precurser. So without this, the latter can’t happen. With this it might.
So, it’s a step in the right direction, not an ultimate victory, but I’ll take any prgress inthe right direction over no progress at all.
Okay. Got it.
A last question: when do statute-of-limitations issues start to kick in? Are we already there?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_gonad
“Gonad” is non-gender specific so it is perfectly appropriate to this circumstance. Anyone who believes that females do not produce hormones that facilitate assertiveness and persistence . . . well, they haven’t been dealing with females.
Great post and count me again as one who appreciates the window you provide us on this laborious but vital uphill battle.
It is also great to hear of 1st hand experience coming from you and Masoninblue as to the integrity of Mr. Vance. I get so tired of the unrelenting cynicism from myself and others.
Also, is it possible that I could get a suggestion from you regarding a project I am working on concerning my family? It is not a legal question, but an historical one about something that happened to them back in the 30′s in New York. Do you know how long trial transcripts are kept on record? Are they destroyed after a certain amount of time? This was a VERY high profile case, a criminal trial and I am having difficulty getting past the phone voice-menu when I call the court. I just though you might know of an avenue I could pursue or proper offices to contact. I’m in California and would fly back if I thought it would facilitate the process. Thank You, Grant
Yes! I have been hearing this scenario spoken of as exactly that, “Obama’s October Surprise”.
Thanks for this excellent report and the Bill Black video. I hope to hear more about this case.
From the NYT report:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/01/nyregion/abacus-bank-charged-with-mortgage-fraud.html
“Indicting a business can lead to its demise, a reason that many investigations into large corporations end with deferred prosecution agreements and fines. That trend has been a political hot point in the wake of the financial collapse, with many saying the companies and executives who profited from mortgage investment schemes were afforded undue leniency.
Mr. Vance said he had seriously contemplated the potential “collateral consequences” of indicting the bank itself. But he said the problems were too pervasive and the bank’s cooperation was “too little, too late” to warrant not prosecuting it. ”
Grant, you can email me at cynthiakouril at g mail dot com
and give me the details and I’ll see what I can find out