Yesterday, Lorraine Brown, the founder of DocX/LPS, was scheduled to plead guilty to conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud at 1 PM EST. I found out about it around 2 PM from the wonderful Lynn Szymoniak who has nagged and noodled the US Attorney’s Office about this case 4-evah (she really is the unsung hero of this development, but Lanny Bruer managed to leave her out of his self congratulatory press release).
So, I start making calls to the press liaison at United States Attorney’s Office Middle District of Florida and the Office of Public Affairs at Main Justice. No one would confirm that she had in fact completed her guilty plea and that the judge had accepted it. What most of the non-lawyer press does not realize is that a plea agreement is only a contract of intent between the USAO and defendant, it is not binding until the defendant actually goes into a courtroom and pleads guilty in front of a judge – and the judge makes a ruling that the allocution (confession of the specifics of the crime) is legally sufficient to support the guilty plea, that it seems credible, and that it is not coerced or the result of some physical or mental impairment (such as being stoned).
So she could have changed her mind at the last minute, I’ve seen it happen. Or the judge could have found fault with the plea allocution, I’ve seen that happen, too. Then you have to reschedule and have a do-over on another day.
So you can understand that despite having read the Plea Agreement and Criminal Information, as well as the written version of The Facts she would be giving in her allocution, I was loath to hit “publish” on my backstage draft until I had confirmed that it had actually completed.
So I called, and I called back and I called back some more. Oh, “OPA is working on a press release.” “ No, I can’t confirm that her court appearance has concluded.” “No, I can’t confirm that her court appearance even initiated.” “Don’t worry, press release will be emailed to you any minute.” This went on for hours until that magic moment at 5:01 PM EST when the press release arrived and there was not one word on it that could not have been written in advance of the plea appearance with “send” hit once the judge banged the gavel.
Soooo, why would it take so long to get out this simple plain vanilla press release? Let me put on my tinfoil hat for a minute. You know how they dump news that is bad for the stock markets late on a Friday afternoon, so there is time to digest the news and not cause a sell off panic? What’s even a deader time to do that? Right before Thanksgiving. A lot of newspapers have a 5 PM deadline for getting a story into the next morning’s print edition. Yes, if you have a story in draft and are just waiting for some last little detail, they will let you file late, but if you first learn about a thing after 5 PM, it’s doubtful you can get it in unless it’s so momentous at to rate a “stop the presses” moment.
Most reporters have filed their pieces for the day and are closing up, heading out. Many will not see that press release until they get to work this morning, which means they will write their stories to file by 5 PM today, after the markets close at noon for the holiday. Holders of big bank stock who desire to engage in a panic sell off will need to do so via foreign exchanges. Of course most won’t even know about it in time to panic because Thanksgiving is hardly a day for reading the newspapers, especially the financial news. So, maybe I’m reading too much into the timing of this press release, but I do know that the DOJ press operation is more than sophisticated enough to understand story deadlines and timing of news releases, so it sure looks to me as if they were afraid the news would spark a panic selloff of bank stock and were trying to avoid that.
Photo by Ginger Me under Creative Commons license.




21 Comments

Ah, you look very fashionable in that tinfoil hat, Cynthia.
I appreciate your series of posts about Lorraine Brown’s plea, and what it all might mean.
Any “excursion” off into the “weeds” that you might wish to lead us on, is more than welcome.
Frankly, your speculations seem precisely spot-on, even though the Banks and the Big Executives are safe and the DoJ has, apparently, covered its backside as you relate in earlier posts and comments.
Thank you, Cynthia, and keep on keepin’ on!
DW
Ah, Maitre (I love the Quebec title), thank you and the intrepid Ms Syzmoniac for keeping after this swindle.
Possible panic selling, eh? I asked a q on bmaz’ thread earlier, which I copy here:
Only part of your writing that I don’t follow – how is it bad “for the markets” if this woman does or doesn’t accept the plea bargain? In either event, it is perfectly clear to those who plunder and loot any and all forms of wealth held by the people who are of the Middle Incomes, that very little will be done to disturb the system as it is.
So in fact, for the Global Elite, it is good news all around. They just all contributed a turkey or two to the local church or food bank, and now they can rest content, knowing that Obama and his DOJ is serving them as well as Mittens would have.
Yep
Oh, and a big rec for the article. Thanks for your time and effort on it.
I do think that the Powers that Be like to minimize the public getting to see the full picture. And your article sure does prove that point.
As I understand it, with the guilty plea, Mr Market might lose confidence in the banks (banks might be in legal very bad spot wrt mortgages and MBS’s, as Cynthia thinks/hopes) and want to get rid of their stocks, which would depress the price for said shares. If I understand the article correctly, Cynthia is saying that Ms Brown had, in fact, plead guilty some time this afternoon, but the news was held (by DOJ or OPA or some combination) until too late for today’s morning papers, and tomorrow is Turkey Day and US exchanges are closed. Therefore, clued-in (or perhaps notified) people would have 30+ hours to unload some of their bank stocks in non-US markets before the news got around and the prices dropped.
Disclaimer — all I know about markets I learned here and at Naked Capitalism.
Excellent coverage, Cynthia. It seems to have flown under the radar elsewhere, even on the blogosphere.
Thanks much.
Yay Cynthia! You just keep rocking on this topic.
your suspicion and the explanation sounds absolutely correct.
So, did the judge approve this stuff or not?
Heh. Twitter-fied.
OT– Re Jeremy Hammond:
Thank you Cynthia, I have been following what you’ve written about this and I wonder: do I read correctly that all foreclosures in progress that have been doxied by DocX/LPS will be dismissed if the injured parties show that the paperwork went through DocX/LPS and got forged?
That seems too good to be true!
And, did the judge approve the guilty plea?
The guilty plea was accepted.
The admission that there are a lot of forged instruments in the chain of title is a real problem for future foreclosures. As to past foreclosures, there is some division of opinion.
The fascinating thing is the effect on the trusts which supposedly hold these mortgage loans. If the paperwork transferring them is forged, the possibilities for fighting off foreclosure increase. It also opens the door to liability for a whole new group of entities, including the Trust Companies that are supposed to have made sure that the transfers of the mortgage loans were properly documented, and in the case of foreclosures, title companies that insured good title to buyers after the foreclosure.
I hope a bunch of good lawyers are taking a long hard look at these possibilities.
It could have been bad for bank stocks if it had happened on a Monday morning on slow news day.
The reason is, if all/most of the documents purpoted to have transferred the notes and mortgages into the pools of RMBS are forgeries, nothig got transferred. This means the theory I advanced many many moons ago, and which has been adopted in at least one RMBS securites holder’s litigation, is that pretty much all of the RMBS are big empty bags of nothing.
Alot of RMBS are hled by banks themselves. Other RMBS are held by pension funds and muicipalities, entities that have the means to take on the banks in court, and win.
Plus there is an army of homeowners out there, not just the ones in foreclosure, but every person who has DocX/LPS documents invovled in their real estate file, now have clound on their title.
Which means title companies can sue, and millions of hmewowners can sue. it would be a nibbled to death by ducks event for the banks.
News with those kinds of implications could tend to drive you stock prices off a cliff.
Not just for insiders and those who pay close attention to unload, but actually to prevent the panic in the first place–which BTW is not exactly irresponsible– when bad news about a stock or sector gets big breathless play in the press, there is sometimes an initial panicked sell off. But if the news is around over the weekend while the markets are closed, there is less hysteria.
I’m not saying that DOJ did bad thing if they were trying to avoid a merkat panic. What I am saying, is that the timeing if it suggests they feared a market panic, which reinforces my original notion that the guilty plea is itself a profoundly important event, if people recognize it and use it is properly.
The judge apparently accepted the guilty plea, since DOJ issued the press release.
It’s not as automatic or as guaraneteed as you make it sound. Homeowners will still have to do some heavy lifting in court. But they now have irrefutable proof that DOcX and LPS documents are foregries (with a very few exceptions). The burden ought to shift back to where it belonged all along, to the banks to prove the authenticity of their docuemnts.
I know this may seem cynical but how might this decision be used to Foam The Runway for the banks? Everything that looked like it was designed to help homeowners so far has been used to actually help the banks so why should this be any different.
I think your reasoning in this post is spot on.
Why does the DOJ want to bury this news? Why did this process get scheduled for after the election? And what does this mean for the handling of the MBS scam and foreclosure fraud for the next four years?
More kicking the can down the road and working hard to ignore the problem?
The issue of forgeries and perjuries in foreclosure defense cases has just been given a huge upgrade in credibility. The foreclosure defense bar has a lot of work to do. We have to abandon our choice of delicate language and use the right words: forgery and perjury. Many judges have tried to duck the issues but we cannot relent. Past foreclosures on forged and perjured may be reopened at any time as being VOID. Present foreclosures must be raise the forgery/perjury issue in all instances where the evidence exists. The DOCX business plan is no different from the “servicers’” own offices.
The DOJ manual requires that any case that might have an effect on the outcome of an election should, if possible, be timed to not do so. So, holding until after election was appropriate.
Holding until after the markets closed for a long holiday weekend, maybe also appropriate if you don’t want a market crash, but it suggests how important this might be.
I saw a file, with an affidavit from a servicer, signed by a name know to have been a robo signer, claiming to be a foreclosure specialist working for the servicer, signed in 2011!
So, is he working at a new doc mill? or haas he in fact been hired directly by the servicer?
The affidavit purported to put into evidence a bunch of documents under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, but didin’t allaege the requist foudation knowledge to actually gget them into evidence.
More tot he point though, doesn’t this plea allocution essentially gut both the business rcords exception in all foreclosure case???? And the presumption of regularity in offered documents?
That would mean the banks would have to haul people into court to testify, people who are scattered all over the country. No bank could afford that.