Lizz Winstead and Sarah Silverman: Corporations are People and Other RomneyLogic |
|
| By: Cleon Polifonte Tuesday October 23, 2012 5:29 pm | |
And people are just empty vessels through which Facebook expresses itself.
Glad we’ve finally got that straightened out….
But while I’ve got you here, can Sarah Silverman organize a reverse Great Schlepp where old people go to their grandkids and ask them to defend Social Securitiy?
Just thinking out loud here, people.
About MyFDL
MyFDL is the community site of progressive political blog Firedoglake. Anyone can participate by writing a diary, commenting on others’ diaries, or joining groups to find other people in your area. Content posted to MyFDL is the opinion of the author alone, and should not be attributed to Firedoglake.
News. Community. Activism.
Firedoglake is a member-supported organization.
Help us continue our work for as little as $45/year.
Tweet
9 Comments
Anybody know how Sarah Silveman’s “Scissor Sheldon” proposition is turning out?
I know, I know. Image be gone.
Thanks, Cleon. And this
is a *great* idea (full disclosure — I am 63 but have the good sense to live in Canada).
Thanks, HotFlash. I liked it too.
And on the eighth day ‘god’ created the corporations.
Funny how that little tidbit didn’t make it into the ‘good book’.
Oh well, ‘god’ sure works in mysterious ways.
tweeted and recommended with thanks cleon
Thank you, Cleon.
Recommended.
I like Liz and the Daily Show. Sarah’s cool too.
As an older who isn’t that much hip with the nowadays pop, I’ve noticed her before, but I really like her political commentary.
Thanks a bunch for sharing this.
LOVE my Lizz Winstead!! She’s da bomb diggity.
Ah yes Mitt and the current “SJC,” doing face plants in while embracing the same stinking pile of camel dung masquerading as logic, utilized by Taney to declare Scott inferior, therefore property? Most unfortunate Americans have been conditioned into not realizing the threat to liberty corporations represent. Especially when the rule of law is rigged in favor of the one percent, as was the case for Mr. Scott.
Today the overt protection of the “undue influence of corporate money” in politics, the “monied interests,” is a threat to this republic’s welfare as was Taney’s Scott decision, protecting slavery and ultimately leading to civil war.
Both Parties act like corporations are not only people, but the people who own government.
But, sure, let’s get all caught up in sound bytes. Because, apparently, the really important issue in elections is which of the two major parties has the worse sound bytes.
Let’s not worry about the laws they enact and sign or the administrative rules they promulgate.