The history of the nation is chock full of attempts by one party to rise at the expense of another through slander, pander, and lies. The founders did it, the Federalists, Whigs, the Know-Nothings, they all did it. But the Repugnants revere slander as the last remaining arrow in their shrinking quiver.
And so it’s satisfying to observe them wading about in their own guana. But there was once an opportunity came knocking for an even more righteous retribution, and the knock was not answered.
There was a very active and voracious rightwing conspiracy in the fifties, and one proponent was named McCarthy, and he was a senator who built a career starring him as an anti-communist crusader. He fought against truth and justice in the American way, ably abetted by ratfink lieutenant Roy Cohn, one of the sleaziest morsels the right wing has produced in this country.
Cohn was a gay caballero whose love afair with a pre-Paris Hilton hotel heir, David Schine, led him to one monster overstep. But he had seem mighty men crumble before his merest innuendo, so why should he fear the Army? His head was swollen with the helium of grand illusions and a craven Congress so that it grew larger than the Capitol Dome,
He demanded his lover be granted immunity from Korea, the war then raging, and be stationed by his side in Manhattan, and also be placed on light duty. The Army did not comply, so they were de facto commies and this little rat called them on the carpet and that new teevee gadget was there to watch.
Before the hearing, Mr Joseph Welch, counselor for the Army, approached Cohn with a deal. I have on my staff a young man named Fisher whose youthful indiscretion in joining a prohibited group should not ruin his career today, and if you agree, then your own vast outrage of public deceny will also remain off the record.
Okay, said Cohn.
But during the telecast, there were certain … interchanges which may have been warning shots across the bow of the buffoon and his boy.
MCCARTHY
Will that question be reread?MUNDT
It will be reread.REPORTER
Question: Did you think this came from a pixie?MCCARTHY
Would Counel, for my benefit, define – I think he might be an expert on this – the word "pixie"?WELCH
I should say, I should say, Mr Senator, that a pixie is a close relative of a fairy. [Laughter] Shall I proceed, sir? Have I enlightened you?MCCARTHY
As I said, as I said, I think you might be an authority on what a pixie is.
In later years, Cohn expressed displeasure at this particular point-counterpoint. He had more worry when the buffoon later blew the whole deal.
Welch had made what seems a perfectly logical suggestion, and it was only through great fear that others had not stressed the perfectly obvious remedy for one possesed as he claimed of a list of communist spies within the government: Why not simply turn the list over to the FBI? It was devastatingly simple, and astonishing that some blowhard could for years claim to know about spies in the federal structure and never produce a single name.
But McCarthy took the bait.
MCCARTHY
…in view of Mr Welch’s request that, uh, the information be given if we know of anyone who might be performing any work for the Communist Party, I think we should tell him that he has in his law firm a young man named Fisher -
What followed the destruction of the career of Mr Fisher was one of the more poignant moments in teevee history, and maybe the most useful. Mr Welch lambasted the buffoon with his "Have you no decency, sir, at long last?" and McCarthy sat there like a B-movie villain with his little rat glancing at him from his side.
Just imagine the rebuttal possible from Mr Welch.
WELCH
The Senator also sought just a while ago the definition of a "pixie" and I think we can define that term and tell the story of just why we are brought here and on whose call and for what purpose should he care to glance for a moment inside his own citidel, in fact, to the little man sitting beside him at this moment.
But the revelation was left to history. Mr Welch took the high road. And so Cohn went on to become an Upper East Side celebrity who was debarred for ethics violations in later years and yet continued as a typical rightwing gay homophobe until death by AIDS in 1986. Rest in Puke.
Quotes from Point of Order! – A Documentary of the Army-McCarthy Hearings, in DVD and hardbound.




12 Comments







I comment on my own articles because they look so lonely otherwise, but -
Another reason for the lack of using all the tools in the shed is that their isn’t a field prepared for the particular hoe. As, no public dialogue on same-sex union had ever happened in America. And in the United Kingdom, innocence played a hand, as always and everywhere, as when Queen Victoria was asked why only men were prosecuted for homsexual acts, and her reply was, among women, she didn’t see how such was even possible.
On de-briefing Whittaker Chambers prior to his testimony against Alger Hiss, he was asked by Nixon’s staff if there was anything in his past for which they should be prepared. He replied, well, I used to pick up boys in Baltimore and take ‘em to cheap hotels.
That never came out either. Repugnants have always had a free hand in hypocritical hyping.
“…field prepared for the particular hoe”
The whole place was filled with hoes…..still is, imo.
This is an excellent diary, imo, with many lesson to be learned from. I’m hoping that we are not about to fall into the same pattern that the Rethugs did after the Clinton fiasco. To wit:
Should that “they all did it” be changed to “we all did it”? We could stick with substance instead of just slander, policy differences instead of pandering. We might find it much more effective.
Yes, both parties like to play in the mud. But it appears that only one is successful at making it stick on the other and making it matter. I don’t know why that is.
The Repugnants have a core audience which is insular and ignorant and hate anyone who isn’t and they only understand insult. Faux Noise and Limbo can make a good living within this sealed cesspool by name-calling and lies. They aren’t interested in programs or premises or principle or even facts, they are the cheerleaders in this little ballgame, not play-by-play analysts; they merely sell their goods to their customers.
And it must be admitted as well that some progressive personalities make a good living out of the chicanery of the chimps. Can you imagine Olbermann without Limbo or Billo or Handready or Coultergeist? The most effective example is negative, what Vonnegut called the wrang-wrang.
Thanks for commenting.
Well, I just dunno. Consider if you were within the leadership of a failed ship of state run on the schoals after the most disastrous decisions in our collective history, and also that your shrinking team had not one idea which had not been shown repeatedly as ignominious failure. Wouldn’t you agree that sniping at those who are righting the ship and pumping the bilge would be the only option? Especially if you are blessed with a constituency which might entertain the notion that a Repugnant hypocrite might have fallen due to the new captain? (Limbo apparently says the SC gov dallied due to too much stimulus or something.)
That weird orange spray-painted Boner dude stood up in the house the other day with another paper with a pompous title and no numbers which apparently proposes the great remedy for health care and everything else under the sun: tax cuts. Back to baseless insults.
Clovis, your prose is poetry! Thank you.
Thanks for your message, too. Shocking and awesome, the amorality/immorality that so often prevail
eds!McCarthy is the poster boy of blowhards. It’s awful that he ever wielded so much power. He manipulated the rules of the Senate committees so that he could pretend he was outing people in these secret meetings and drop loads of innuendo for the press waiting outside.
This exchange is of course the very famous take down of his career, finally. McCarthy was so used to attacking it never occurred to him that restraint might be an option at any time.
Funny how much Billo resembles him. Has anyone ever done a side by side comparison of the rhetorical tools they both use? any exposure in that area?
Clovis – don’t take the lack of comments to mean your posts are not fascinating to us. Sometimes there aren’t words for what in years past would have been in a bound book like other equally fascinating tomes we keep and read and re-read for years.
Nicest comment I’ve ever seen, and I sure appreciate you! Thanks for being here and taking the time to leave a blessing.
Fascinating characters, fascinating time period, in so many ways.
Thanks, Clovis.
wow! thanks, clovis.