
Ever wonder what happened to the fiery young people who used to march and protest in the 1960s ? You know the ones who knew all the words to Phil Ochs songs and Country Joe and The Fish and The Jefferson Airplane’s Volunteers ? Bruce Levine has some ideas why today’s young people seem so passive. He is a clinical psychologist and author and writes for the Huffington Post as well as Alternet.
How exactly has American society subdued young Americans?
1. Student-Loan Debt: Large debt—and the fear it creates—is a pacifying force.
Today in the United States, two-thirds of graduating seniors at four-year colleges have student-loan debt, including over 62 percent of public university graduates. While average undergraduate debt is close to $25,000, I increasingly talk to college graduates with closer to $100,000 in student-loan debt.
When you are in hock up to your eyeballs, it is very difficult to rationalize taking part in anything that might keep you from getting a job. This is especially true these days where a degree is no longer a guarantee you will be employed. So you play it safe and keep your head down.
2. Psychopathologizing and Medicating Noncompliance.
In 1955, Erich Fromm, the then widely respected anti-authoritarian leftist psychoanalyst, wrote, “Today the function of psychiatry, psychology and psychoanalysis threatens to become the tool in the manipulation of man.” Fromm died in 1980, the same year that an increasingly authoritarian America elected Ronald Reagan president, and an increasingly authoritarian American Psychiatric Association added to their diagnostic bible (then the DSM-III) disruptive mental disorders for children and teenagers such as the increasingly popular “oppositional defiant disorder” (ODD).
In short drugged into submission. Like in Girl Interrupted meets One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest. Instead of actually parenting their children and talking to them and seeing what the problem is, they are medicated into compliance. And these are the kids of boomers and before who somehow forgot that rebellion and anti-authoritarian behavior is part of growing up. So as to keep them from being disruptive.
3. Schools That Educate for Compliance and Not for Democracy: Upon accepting the New York City Teacher of the Year Award on January 31, 1990, John Taylor Gatto upset many in attendance by stating: “The truth is that schools don’t really teach anything except how to obey orders. This is a great mystery to me because thousands of humane, caring people work in schools as teachers and aides and administrators, but the abstract logic of the institution overwhelms their individual contributions.”
And oldie but a goodie. But this has been the case – at least in primary education – from the get go. This country still engages in the Elizabethan concept of Children should be seen and not heard. And seen as little as possible. Schools have become more like penitentiaries than they were when I was young. And this incident where a simple prank gets a HS Senior 8 years in prison is one of the best examples of just how paranoid this country has become.
4. “No Child Left Behind” and “Race to the Top”: The corporatocracy has figured out a way to make our already authoritarian schools even more authoritarian. Democrat-Republican bipartisanship has resulted in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, NAFTA, the PATRIOT Act, the War on Drugs, the Wall Street bailout, and educational policies such as “No Child Left Behind” and “Race to the Top.” These policies are essentially standardized-testing tyranny that creates fear, which is antithetical to education for a democratic society.
Training grounds for The Hitler Youth. What can I say.
5. Shaming Young People Who Take Education—But Not Their Schooling—Seriously. In a 2006 survey in the United States, it was found that 40 percent of children between first and third grade read every day, but by fourth grade, that rate declined to 29 percent. Despite the anti-educational impact of standard schools, children and their parents are increasingly propagandized to believe that disliking school means disliking learning. That was not always the case in the United States. Mark Twain famously said, “I never let my schooling get in the way of my education.”
I have to admit I tolerated school mostly. I would set in the back and pay just enough attention to the teacher as to not get in trouble all the while reading Popular Electronics, Electronics Illustrated, Radio TV Experimenter and any other magazine on radio and electronics I could get my hands on. School for me was at best breath takingly boring. it was still mostly rote memorization of disconnect facts most of which seemed to be propaganda.
6. The Normalization of Surveillance: The fear of being surveilled makes a population easier to control. While the National Security Agency (NSA) has received publicity for monitoring American citizen’s e-mail and phone conversations, and while employer surveillance has become increasingly common in the United States, young Americans have become increasingly acquiescent to corporatocracy surveillance because, beginning at a young age, surveillance is routine in their lives. Parents routinely check Web sites for their kid’s latest test grades and completed assignments, and just like employers, are monitoring their children’s computers and Facebook pages. Some parents use the GPS in their children’s cell phones to track their whereabouts, and other parents have video cameras in their homes.
All I can say is this is horrible. When ever I read of something like the school board that was snooping on some kids computer, it just makes my skin crawl. But it does not surprise me. I was lucky as I grew up in the country and romped about all over the woods and elsewhere. Biked to where ever I please and nobody checked up on me. Do that now and you get your sorry ass locked up someplace.
7. Television: In 2009, the Nielsen Company reported that TV viewing in the United States is at an all-time high if one includes the following “three screens”: a television set, a laptop/personal computer, and a cell phone. American children average eight hours a day on TV, video games, movies, the Internet, cell phones, iPods, and other technologies (not including school-related use). Many progressives are concerned about the concentrated control of content by the corporate media, but the mere act of watching TV—regardless of the programming—is the primary pacifying agent (private-enterprise prisons have recognized that providing inmates with cable television can be a more economical method to keep them quiet and subdued than it would be to hire more guards).
I was never that big on television. I liked the science shows and science fiction like Mister Wizard and Science Fiction Theater. Saturday morning cartoons but spend most of my time in the summer out doors and in the winter in my room doing radio stuff. Beside the TV was my parent’s domain for the most part. How this would turn out now, I do not know. But I still watch very little TV.
8. Fundamentalist Religion and Fundamentalist Consumerism: American culture offers young Americans the “choices” of fundamentalist religion and fundamentalist consumerism. All varieties of fundamentalism narrow one’s focus and inhibit critical thinking. While some progressives are fond of calling fundamentalist religion the “opiate of the masses,” they too often neglect the pacifying nature of America’s other major fundamentalism. Fundamentalist consumerism pacifies young Americans in a variety of ways.
This is so true. There is a book out called Amusing Ourselves To Death by Neil Postman. Where he thinks that we are headed to a Huxleyist society of non-thinking drug and gadget addicted automatons who willingly do what we are programmed to do. Combined that with religion – hey people…there is no magic man in the sky or happy place when you die. Dead id dead. Deal with it. But we drug ourselves with drugs and technology and some long disproved mythology. What is worse we are doing it to our kids. Talk about child abuse.



37 Comments

An excellent post, cmaukonen. John Taylor Gatto was a strong influence in our decision to homeschool.
I’m close to finishing Gatto’s The Underground History of American Education. What an eye opener it has been.
cmaukonen, have you watched Mike Wallace’s interview of Huxley? Talk about presient.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGaYXahbcL4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUTEOY1hre4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iDPnwkU9DA&feature=related
Good post and recc’d. But have you ever noticed that mainstream media culture constantly broadcasts that actually LIKING school is “uncool.” It’s been that way most of my life. The cool kids are the Ferris Buellers and the Fonzis and the ones with attitude. Look at “The Breakfast Club.” Classic.
The kids who actually like school and want to learn are uncool nerds. It makes sense if the people promoting that stuff actually want an ignorant population, which they do. Easier to control.
Graffiti in the UCF Library mens room. “Orwell was wrong. Huxley, now there’s a prophet for you.”
Great videos.
Thanks
Oh yes and that is consistent with the teabagger right’s view toward the educated but it is also non sequitur since they also want their kids educated.
– George Carlin
Nice post. Thank you.
As a former young person, I’d say the lack of viable progressive organizations are/were a huge problem. I joined up with a few ‘political groups,’ but there wasn’t much ‘oomph’ there, (back in the early ’90′s.) Most of us had to take the alternative route, and learn to live in a different manner, mostly on own – There certainly was a lot of energy in the AA/personal-help arenas, and thank dog, but as far as good institutional organizations to get involved with, they just didn’t exist…
And so a lot of budding progressives I knew couldn’t swim that hard against the tide, and pretty much got swallowed up by the mainstream…
Maybe what we’ve been seeing on the internet will continue…More and more folks meeting up and seeing what’s going on and maybe we will really turn ourselves into a living, breathing movement…Can’t say there are many other alternatives…I, for one, am getting pretty tired of just watching unbelievable travesties day after day after day…
Oh,um,maybe, cause the fruit don’t fall far from the tree?
Who woulda ever thunk that intentional idiocy would be a virtue??
That being stupid and proud of it would be an upwardly mobile aspiration?
Come again ?
The Teabaggers want their kids educated THEIR way, which isn’t very much
For example, they tell their kids they want the damned gubmint to keep its hands off their Medicare.
What’s really scary is that I work with some of those people, AT A GOVERNMENT AGENCY. They don’t see the contradiction and think that God will not allow anything to happen to them.
I don’t need acid. All I have to do is go to work to go on a trip!
It’s Biblical, I think. Related to “By their fruits shall you know them.” I could be wrong.
Haven’t the young always been docile? From your post, you apparently are a former 1960s protester. But you good people who got into the streets in the late ’60s, early ’70s, are an aberration in history. It’s a reason why I admire your generation (I’m 48). Correct me if I’m wrong, but young people have always been less interested in politics and more interested in dating, mindless entertainment, sports, looking “cool,” grooming, being insecure as hell (lol), etc. Also, the possibility of being drafted to Vietnam helped fuel rage in your generation.
Ah…
But I wonder why the possibility of being destitute doesn’t fuel something with the youth today ? But even before the 1960s war thing there were rebels and agitators.
I’m with you. Huxley was the prophet. For years I have been reading about how the U S is devolving into a 1984 society. Each time I think, no, no no; you need to read Huxley.
Have you studied technocracy? There was an organized movement toward that in the US during the 20s, 30s and 40s. It fizzled out by the late 40s. It seems it may be seeing a revival. Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages (1976) is about America’s role in the Technetronic Era. I read it about 10 years ago. Here are a few quotes:
“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”
In the technetronic society the trend would seem to be towards the aggregation of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens, easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities effectively exploiting the latest communications techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason.”
(Facebook & Twitter come to mind, along with the “professionals” and “experts” in the media)
“Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites … [Whose] ties cut across national boundaries …It is likely that before long the social elites of most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook … The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty… Further progress will require greater American sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorable American position.”
It seems we are perilously close to Brzezinski’s futuristic perspective.
As an aside, are you still in Central Florida? I lived in Windemere from ’75 to ’93 and Winter Park prior to that.
Yes but not for long. Moving back up north.
Technocracy – yech !! And this comes from a life long geek.
Because being poor by its very nature grinds you down.
When you’re on your knees begging for scraps, praying to the magical man in the sky that you finally get some food today, you ain’t thinking about anything else.
That’s why hunger is such a powerful tool. At a certain point you kick into animal mode. Pure survival and base thoughts of food and shelter. That’s why they use it.
Now of course French revolutionaries were also hungry.
But that was a different type. Because by then, there were 3 classes, and the poor made up one hell of large percentage.
Whereas now, the poor don’t make up the percentage, and the majority of the population think they deserve it and are “losers”/”welfare queens”. It’s partly a numbers game. You get enough poor people, AND you push them enough, then you will see action.
The vast majority of Americans aren’t there yet.
But when they do get there…….
Please allow me the liberty of adding the next few lines from Carlin’s education routine. They couldn’t be any more appropriate than they are today with the shameful passing of the Debt Ceiling Bill.
“And now they’re coming for your social security money. They want your f**king retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street.
And you know something? They’ll get it. They’ll get it all from you sooner or later because they own this f**king place.
It’s a big club and you ain’t in it”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jQT7_rVxAE
“By their fruits you shall know them.”
My take on this is that you judge a person by their accomplishments (deeds not words). Nietzsche talked about this in Beyond Good & Evil.
It is my understanding that this biblical phrase was intended as a warning about false prophets. So, I think you are very much onto something because this definitely applies to Obama.
None of this cliche-filled post is accurate. Monitoring the Future and the American Freshman both show youth today took substantially more medication, both prescribed and unprescribed (particularly depressants and stimulants) in the 1960s and ’70s than today. Surveys by the American Association of Secretaries of State show volunteerism and presidential voting participation by age 18-24 peaked in recent years, as have more liberal political attitudes. (Protesters then were an anomaly. Few remember that polls in the ’60s showed young people were just as pro-war as older ones.) Nielsen surveys show older people watch substantially more TV than do youths, and Pew and other surveys indicate young internet users tend to be more activist than non-users. During the ’80s and ’90s, lower youth participation may have been driven by increasing proportions of new immigrants, but in the 2000s, these populations have become more politically active.
But face it: no one cares what the best information shows about youth or youth trends. Every older generation uses young people as free-fire zones and pawns, making up our own “facts,” to complain about what we dislike about modern culture. If you want to explore dangerous degenerations in attitudes and behaviors (including explosions in drug abuse and conformity to right-wing values), look at aging Baby Boomers, not their kids.
Nice read, thanks.
Rcc’d.
As a frame of reference, the Mike Wallace interview of Huxley took place 53 years ago – May 18, 1958.
Huxley talks much about overpopulation. His brother, Julian, was a biologist heavily involved in the eugenics movement.
Anti-intellectualism has been a strong strain in our culture for a long, long time.
Interesting reply.
Sometime in the late 1970s and early 1980s I was in a situation where I was in contact with a few people who were…what I would call drop outs from the Counter Culture. They had become totally dis enchanted with it and the intelligentsia and academia. Feeling as though they and their beliefs had been betrayed and that academia was just another manifestation of the establishment. (which it is, but that is beside the point)
Their rhetoric sounded very much like what you here from libertarians these days. Which also sounds very much like the anarchists as well.
I don’t think that kids are docile at all. Maybe they have little direction but that is different. Who can blame them? They have heard all of their lives that the planet is fucked. Where are they supposed to go with that information? Plus, their parents are not home cause they are both working.
Good post.
As for #1, Sometime back I went to a Chris Hedges event.He said if students in France are ever to go into debt for college, they will shut the whole country down. My friend’s wife who is Danish said the same is true in her country too. Only in the “world’s greatest nation evah”, we accept onerous student loans as a given. Just like we accept usury by banks, for-profit murder-by-spreadsheet health insurance, bottomless pit of money for military adventures etc.
Glad to see someone writing on this. I found Bruce Levine’s latest book very illuminating and highly recommend it.
Schools are holding tanks so the young entrepreneurs have to wait until they “graduate” so they don’t flood the job market. “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance” has some interesting points on today’s education, those in the back of the class etc, are the ones that really know what’s going on and those perfect A students are more mirrors of purging rhetoric…..or something like that…..
Flouride in the drinking water is an interesting point of view. Giving pregnant rodents flouride results in hyper-active babies…..giving little ones flouride after birth results in the “too docile” to care mode. Worth a peek and maybe an additional search into the topic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLgKeHOgneQ
As well as this link which was posted on FDL awhile ago : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3ARhMPVu-A&NR=1
I think you need to look at what we put into your bodies, food as well, if we’re to look at what we’re doing to our population and ourselves……all for the sake of profit? Omnivores Dilemma is a good book….
Another fun factoid, today’s generation, by the time they reach 60 years old, will have watched TV for 15 years!! HAAAAA!!!
The drum beats on……
Sorry, wrong second link on youtube, check out Dr. Russell Blaylock, retired neurosurgeon, and what he has to say about flouride and a few more hair raising issues, : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjNzFoLEJUs
Also, recommended….. haaa…
I think it’s a great list.
“2. Psychopathologizing and Medicating Noncompliance.” Remember years ago, when dozens of large cities’ water supplies tested positive for pharmaceutical contamination? It seems like even those who don’t want the drugs are subjected to second hand exposure.
I spent most of my school years in home study, and have always been grateful for it. School felt like prison since a very early age.
Why should the young be strong when their elders have happily allowed corporate fascism to steal the future? Where would this strength come from?
You missed one – - Obama.
When someone motivates young people by promising “Hope & Change”
And then delivers the most politically bought administration in history –
Is it any surprise that young people are profoundly cynical?
Obama has been one of many, I am afraid.
top of my head reply to top of my head reading of the title:
Q: Why Have Our Young Become So Docile?
A: Learned Helplessness.
I definitely care-and I’m glad that you spoke up. I’ve liked your work for quite a while and thought you made quite a bit of sense.