
I am going to start off with some quotes from this piece in The Guardian.
We are watching the beginnings of the defiant self-assertion of a new generation of Americans, a generation who are looking forward to finishing their education with no jobs, no future, but still saddled with enormous and unforgivable debt. Most, I found, were of working-class or otherwise modest backgrounds, kids who did exactly what they were told they should: studied, got into college, and are now not just being punished for it, but humiliated – faced with a life of being treated as deadbeats, moral reprobates. Is it really surprising they would like to have a word with the financial magnates who stole their future?
Just as in Europe, we are seeing the results of colossal social failure. The occupiers are the very sort of people, brimming with ideas, whose energies a healthy society would be marshaling to improve life for everyone. Instead, they are using it to envision ways to bring the whole system down.
But the ultimate failure here is of imagination. What we are witnessing can also be seen as a demand to finally have a conversation we were all supposed to have back in 2008. There was a moment, after the near-collapse of the world’s financial architecture, when anything seemed possible.
Everything we’d been told for the last decade turned out to be a lie. Markets did not run themselves; creators of financial instruments were not infallible geniuses; and debts did not really need to be repaid – in fact, money itself was revealed to be a political instrument, trillions of dollars of which could be whisked in or out of existence overnight if governments or central banks required it. Even the Economist was running headlines like “Capitalism: Was it a Good Idea?”
It seemed the time had come to rethink everything: the very nature of markets, money, debt; to ask what an “economy” is actually for. This lasted perhaps two weeks. Then, in one of the most colossal failures of nerve in history, we all collectively clapped our hands over our ears and tried to put things back as close as possible to the way they’d been before.
Yes we and those in Washington just wanted it to go away. Bring back the good times. Those on the right were convinced – by those with the money and power – that by getting government out of the way, the good times would come back. And a lot on the left were convinced that by the mere regulation of those that caused the situation or if enough money were to be thrown at the problems - the good times would come back. But the good times did not and now we know will not come back unless some very major changes to our economic and political system are made. So with out any other recourse left open to them, people began to take to the streets to attempt to make this very clear. That our current system does not work and has to be replaced. They do not yet know exactly how, yet but they will in time.
When the history is finally written, though, it’s likely all of this tumult – beginning with the Arab Spring – will be remembered as the opening salvo in a wave of negotiations over the dissolution of the American Empire. Thirty years of relentless prioritising of propaganda over substance, and snuffing out anything that might look like a political basis for opposition, might make the prospects for the young protesters look bleak; and it’s clear that the rich are determined to seize as large a share of the spoils as remain, tossing a whole generation of young people to the wolves in order to do so. But history is not on their side.
We might do well to consider the collapse of the European colonial empires. It certainly did not lead to the rich successfully grabbing all the cookies, but to the creation of the modern welfare state. We don’t know precisely what will come out of this round. But if the occupiers finally manage to break the 30-year stranglehold that has been placed on the human imagination, as in those first weeks after September 2008, everything will once again be on the table – and the occupiers of Wall Street and other cities around the US will have done us the greatest favour anyone possibly can. [emphasis mine]
That last paragraph is very key. For people are waking up and are aware now of how we got here and what has to be done. I know because of the conversations I have had. With the maintenance fellow for my apartment who says “Don’t believe the TV and politicians and the statistics. This depression not recession is not over. They do not see what is happening here.” Or the middle aged lady at the Occupy Cleveland gathering that said she heard about it from her daughter and came down. She had lost everything and it was hard. Be she had learned so much from being there and will remain for as long as it takes.
And I told her that the Occupy movement has already accomplished a lot. It has taken ideas that were a few months ago considered fringe and now they are becoming main stream and more and more people are taking them seriously, which is a very big deal.
And this is a good thing.



9 Comments




recommended and tweeted -thanks for the post
yes cmaukonen. The Guardian quote “. . .Everything we’d been told for the last decade turned out to be a lie. Markets did not run themselves. . .”
This is the most absurd piece from the Milton Friedman neoliberal economic tripe ever and yet millions for the past 40 years have been accepting it as the gospel. To me this as always been as absurd as the citizens in The Emperor’s New Clothes who all pretended that the Emperor was not naked.
I have never ceased to be amazed by the number of people who at least claim to believe the nonsense of markets adjusting themselves. Anyone who believes in “free market” nonsense (and this includes about 99% of Congress, Obama, and all of his administration) are either liars, certifiably insane, or perhaps mindless followers who don’t stop five seconds to allow one or two synapses to fire.
Markets do NOT adjust themselves. They are manipulated by crooks on Wall Street like those from Goldman Sachs commodity index who in 2008 manipulated the price of wheat (by buying and buying and not selling, thus creating the false effect of scarcity in the wheat market). These shenanigans have a real life effect on people. In 2008 millions more than normal starved to death than usual because they could not afford to purchase wheat. At the end of 2008, which incidentally was the year of the largest wheat production in 100 years, the surplus wheat was sold to livestock corporations. In my opinion, Goldman Sachs, its CEO and all executive members should be tried for crimes against humanity for this.
We need to remove the quality of “faith” from politics and replace it with “reason.”
To believe that “markets adjust themselves” or that “corporations are people” is no less a “leap of faith” than the one that Kierkegaard referred to in the context of religion. In order to be a true believer in any religion one must cross that bridge to faith to get to the other side.
Faith is appropriate for religion. Myths are appropriate for entertaining stories. Neither are appropriate for politics and certainly neither are appropriate to form the basis of a stable economy that serves the majority.
I’m cross posting this comment on my sight along with a link to yours.
You got me started, cmaukonen and it’s not even 8:00 am here in Dallas! With you, who needs coffee!
next to last sentence while I am cross posting to my “sight” I am also cross posting to my site as in website.
and as long as I’m speaking of “sight”. Let me once again take this opportunity to highly recommend Margaret Heffernan’s book: WILLFUL BLINDNESS -Why we ignore the obvious at our peril. It is one of the best and most enlightening books I’ve read in at least a year.
(No I don’t know her personally. No I don’t get a dime from her or anyone else from what I write on my website. Like one of the lucky 99% I have another unrelated job and still work for my living.)
here is the link to what you inspired: http://iflizwerequeen.com/2011/10/18/leaps-of-faith-are-appropriate-for-religion-not-politics-or-economics_q_12612.html
Excellent post!
Rcc’d!
Nice read and great excerpts from The Guardian.
#Occupy has already changed things, it’s already succeeded.
All that’s left now is to let it grow and see if it continues to change and influence things to the extent we the people will benefit . . . and changing the balance of power, wealth and control the 1% hold on us all is what is at stake.
For now though, let #Occupy Run Unfettered From ‘Concerns’ about it’s inevitable failure . . . for as sure as shit, that ‘concern’ can doom #Occupy as surely as the PTB want to doom #Occupy.
Again, thanks for the read. Bravo.
The PTB are desperate to kills this ASAP. They’re trying out different methods now. Boston and Denver they just smashed it and then sat back to watch. In NYC Bloomberg is hovering like a cat watching a room full of mice. He’ll pounce when the moment presents itself. IMO they will treat this whole thing like a fire drill. In other towns they’ll just wait out the whole thing and hope winter will do it for them. What they all absolutely positively won’t do is CHANGE a friggin thing. Why should they? They have the upper hand, don’t they? They have the $$ the jobs the Orgs. the armies and thugs, the Intell. troops and sop on and so forth. They’re not going to allow a Spartacan revolt to happen on their watch. This is just the curtain rising on hopefully a new era of dissent. We have to up the ante and soon. Having bongo sessions and human mic nights, somking pots and chanting all of it interesting but none of it really goes anywhere.
The politicos though are treading on thin ice. The last polls show that 60-70% (depending on the poll) support for OWS.
If they don’t do something to stop it, it will grow but if they do do something they can kiss their candy assed carriers goodby because they will have a hard time getting elected dog catcher.
About the only act that is left is for some trumped up emergency/terrorist threat they can use to enact some kind of draconian curfew and/or round up.
Great post!
“There was a moment, after the near-collapse of the world’s financial architecture, when anything seemed possible.”
Alas, 0bama, the Trojan toady of the Oligarchs took the helm. He’s not the only one, but he is one of the most prominent who has failed us, the world, and a generation.
It is surprising that this movement has gone through such a long time, and now continues, and has in other countries start responding. Power of the people who should consider whether the public is?