
Introvert (image: h. kopp delany, flickr)
I am generally quiet and thoughtful. I generally do not enter into conversations unless I feel I can add something. A different prospective or maybe humor to lighten things up.
Not fond of parties in general preferring quite get togethers.
I like reading and building and making.
Going about my business without so much talk
In short, I am an introvert.
And though we’re not much fun at parties and have a difficult time expressing our thoughts and ideas at times, we are necessary.
These researchers have made exciting discoveries aided by the latest technology, but they’re part of a long and storied tradition. Poets and philosophers have been thinking about introverts and extroverts since the dawn of recorded time. Both personality types appear in the Bible and in the writings of Greek and Roman physicians, and some evolutionary psychologists say that the history of these types reaches back even farther than that: the animal kingdom also boasts “introverts” and “extroverts”, from fruit flies to pumpkinseed fish to rhesus monkeys. As with other complementary pairings – masculinity and femininity, East and West, liberal and conservative – humanity would be unrecognizable, and vastly diminished, without both personality styles.
Take the partnership of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr: a formidable orator refusing to give up his seat on a segregated bus wouldn’t have had the same effect as a modest woman who would clearly prefer to keep silent but for the exigencies of the situation. And Parks didn’t have the stuff to thrill a crowd if she had tried to stand up and announce that she had a dream. But with King’s help, she didn’t have to.
We live in a world of extroverts for these are the ones who are fun and risk takers and make business hum along. But all too often the introverts get the fuzzy end of the lolly pop.
We live with a value system that I call the Extrovert Ideal – the omnipresent belief that the ideal self is gregarious, alpha and comfortable in the spotlight. The archetypal extrovert prefers action to contemplation, risk-taking to heed-taking, certainty to doubt. He or she favours quick decisions, even at the risk of being wrong; works well in teams and socialises in groups. We like to think that we value individuality, but all too often we admire one type of individual – the kind who is comfortable “putting himself out there”. Sure, we allow technologically gifted loners who launch companies in garages to have any personality they please, but they are the exceptions, not the rule, and our tolerance extends mainly to those who get fabulously wealthy or hold the promise of doing so.
Introversion – along with its cousins sensitivity, seriousness, and shyness – is now a second-class personality trait, somewhere between a disappointment and a pathology. Introverts living under the Extrovert Ideal are like women in a man’s world, discounted because of a trait that goes to the core of who they are. Extroversion is an enormously appealing personality style, but we’ve turned it into an oppressive standard to which most of us feel we must conform.
But it has been the introverts that have come up with some of the best ideas.
But we make a grave mistake to embrace the Extrovert Ideal so unthinkingly. Some of our greatest ideas, art, and inventions – from the theory of evolution to Van Gogh’s sunflowers to the personal computer – came from quiet and cerebral people who knew how to tune in to their inner worlds and the treasures to be found there. Without introverts, the world would be devoid of Newton’s theory of gravity, Einstein’s theory of relativity, WB Yeats’s The Second Coming, Chopin’s nocturnes, Proust’s In Search of Lost Time, Peter Pan, Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, The Cat in the Hat, Charlie Brown, the films of Steven Spielberg, Google (co-founded by introvert Larry Page) and Harry Potter.
As the science journalist Winifred Gallagher writes: “The glory of the disposition that stops to consider stimuli rather than rushing to engage with them is its long association with intellectual and artistic achievement. Neither E=mc2 nor Paradise Lost was dashed off by a party animal.” Even in less obviously introverted occupations, like finance, politics and activism, some of the greatest leaps forward were made by introverts. Al Gore, Warren Buffett, Eleanor Roosevelt and Gandhi achieved what they did not in spite of but because of their introversion.
But as introverts we are oft time the subject of bias and discrimination. Having to live in a world made for extroverts and this can have negative consequences.
Yet many of the most important institutions of contemporary life are designed for those who enjoy group projects and high levels of stimulation. As children, our classroom desks are increasingly arranged in pods, the better to foster group learning, and research suggests that the vast majority of teachers believe that the ideal student is an extrovert. As adults, many of us work for organisations that insist we work in teams, in offices without walls, for supervisors who value “people skills” above all. To advance our careers, we’re expected to promote ourselves unabashedly. The scientists whose research gets funded often have confident, perhaps overconfident, personalities. The artists whose work adorns the walls of contemporary museums strike impressive poses at gallery openings. The authors whose books get published – once a reclusive breed – are now vetted by publicists to make sure they’re talk-show ready.
If you’re an introvert, you also know that the bias against quiet can cause deep psychic pain. As a child you might have overheard your parents apologise for your shyness. Or at school you might have been prodded to come “out of your shell” – that noxious expression that fails to appreciate that some animals naturally carry shelter everywhere they go, and that some humans are just the same. “All the comments from childhood still ring in my ears, that I was lazy, stupid, slow, boring,” writes a member of an email list called Introvert Retreat. “By the time I was old enough to figure out that I was simply introverted, it was a part of my being, the assumption that there is something inherently wrong with me. I wish I could find that little vestige of doubt and remove it.”
Now that you’re an adult, you might still feel a pang of guilt when you decline a dinner invitation in favour of a good book. Or maybe you like to eat alone in restaurants and could do without the pitying looks from fellow diners. Or you’re told that you’re “in your head too much,” a phrase that’s often deployed against the quiet and cerebral.
Of course, there’s another word for such people: thinkers.
So lets here it for the introverts. You just might be setting next to another Einstein.



21 Comments

Some people aren’t either one or the other; it’s kinda one of the problems with tests like Meyers-Briggs, don’t you think? Different days, different responses to the questions? For me, anyway.
Saw that piece at the Guardian; wonderful graphic, too. Edit suggestions?
*perspective* for *prospective* (different meaning) Think it’s *extroverts*.
I fixed extrovert but generally leave the original text alone. Spelling and all.
I have always come up INTP on Myers Briggs.
Not necessarily, it’s sort of built into the test. For example, introversion and extroversion are part of a spectrum; it’s not a binary thing. Many people probably feel like they fall inbetween introversion and extroversion.
For instance, I am extremely introverted (I scored something like 90 out of 100). But on the Sensing/Intuition scale, I’m practically in the middle, but lean toward Sensing. So I frequently feel like I’m inbetween ISFP/INFP.
A good point you raise is in education.
I always hated group study, and in some discussion/seminar courses many times I got marked down because of “lack of participation.” I never felt like I learned anything by sitting around talking, or listening to others talk.
At times the discussions were interesting, but that’s not necessarily learning.
Very interesting, it would be nice if the classrooms and work situations were more introvert-friendly! I hid under my desk in the fourth grade. Hm. But then I learned to be an adequate extrovert, it’s just that I never wanted to be one. I couldn’t wait to leave early, go home, change my clothes and read, no matter what the social situation.
I was never a good reader in school but I do remember sitting in back of class and reading Radio TV Experimenter, Popular Electronics or some Ham Radio magazine.
Paying just enough attention that if I was called on, I had an answer.
Well, blimey, jest. It’s been so long since I took the test a couple times that I’ve forgotten the scales were built in. I just remember musing and having trouble digging out clear responses. Never could want to play by the rules, I guess. ;o)
Aron et al reconfigured Introversion into HSP or Highly Sensitive People. While she found that among HSP, introverts predominated, 30% of her HSPs were extroverts, highly social and sociable.
As found here:
http://www.junginstitute.org/pdf_files/JungV8N2p11-44.pdf
Supposedly Johnny Carson was an introvert. I am a therapist with lots and lots of clients and I love doing groups. I love giving speeches, making people laugh. However, when I want to re energize, find myself, I spend time alone reading a book, or meditating. I need my alone time. I am an introvert, but most people would probably guess that I am an extrovert. I am good at being social, but just because I am good at it, doesn’t mean that this is my most comfortable place. I think this is another important point. You can be the gregarious person at the party, and be an introvert. Introverts find their energy by being contemplative, by spending time alone. Extroverts find their energy by being with people. It’s not about whether or not you like people, or even about whether or not you are (good) with people.
Very well said.
Excellent points:
along with the emerging awareness that what we have at play in our economy is a competition to see who can be the biggest sociopath in the room. Who wants to be sane in an insane culture?
Glad you brought up the issue about pod-style learning
within the same post as a mention of MBTI (Myers-Briggs) – which has been ‘debunked’ even in Jungian circles as well as in statistic wonk circles. The construct validity (and reliability), especially for the last two scales (feeling/thinking and sensing/judging) is heavily context dependent. We all feel and think. And the sensing/judging scale is about spontaneity v. planning. It’s not rocket science to see how culture can influence planning. We all know planners, but even the best laid plans…
Which is why pod-style learning is noteworthy. In the pods, as in social circles, we notice certain *tendencies*. Part of human adaptive capacity is being able to respond to environmental circumstance. If we stick with early pod-styled roles, we wind up with arbitrary, entrenched leadership models. Fortunately, the upcoming generation seems to be wise to the idea of permanent ‘leadership’, especially as based solely on surfacy, stereotyped notions of extroversion.
To me the problem with MBTI as with all such ideas is that far too many people tend to jump on a bandwagon with it. As some simplistic be all end all and It’s not. But I use it as just another bit of information together with other information. Sometimes useful sometimes not.
INTROVERTS UNITE!!! Oh, wait . . .
I had 4 children – I home schooled each for about 6 of their 12 years of education. Each one, when they entered the public school, resulted in one of those parent/teacher conferences, wherein I was told, in one way or another, that “Jonny/Susan is shy. We really have to work on that, because it will cause problems for them.”
I personally hate that label. Its disingenuous. I am not shy. I am reserved. Thoughtful. Considerate of varying points of view. Sometimes simultaneously. My husband is the same way. I would make this comment, and usually followed it up with, “To tell me that my child needs some kind of remediation for being reserved is much like telling a parent, “your child is short and we really have to fix that.”
I doubt I was ever the most popular parent with any teacher.
I’d of broken their collar bone.
LOL. Well, I can’t say it didn’t cross my mind.
I was just telling Ron this morning, “I like people, I just don’t like being around them too much.”
Children and Young Adult Personality Type Characteristics
http://www.paladinexec.com/blog/category/education/
It’s a common description of me in my family – “oh, she’s just peopled out”.
I lead inspirational discussions in classes, sing solos in church,
have been an autodidact(thanks eCAHN)all my life,
and have been on a personal “Walden” for seven years. I will come out of the shell to be civially disobedient soon.
I crave company yet spend most of my time alone. Go figure.
Sounds like my childhood. Teachers, especially, thought I was a nitwit and slow witted (both female and male teachers) just because I wasn’t the obnoxious one and was generally lost in my own thoughts. Now I realise they were the slow witted ones for not recoginising a condition that has been around for thousands of years.
Introverts rock!