
The End of The American Dream
My current vehicle has hit the end of the line. The clutch and throw out bearing expired in a puff of foul smoke. This is the 5th time I have had this happen. It’s a 1998 Subaru and needs other work as well. It served me will taking me up and down I95 and around central Fl. but it’s time to let it go. The replacement will be of a similar sort. Newer but not new. I do not require a brand new car as I do not drive that much, but do need to on occasion.
As the saying goes we are living in interesting times. What Morris Berman calls the Waning of the Modern Ages. Like The Waning of the Middle Ages described by Dutch historian Johan Huizinga and the collapse of the Roman Empire as explained by Joseph Tainter in his “The Collapse of Complex Societies“ our modern capitalistic society is coming apart. And as Morris Berman says
….like our own age, not much fun to live through. One reason for this is that the world is literally perched over an abyss. What lies ahead is largely unknown, and to have to hover over an abyss for a long time is, to put it colloquially, a bit of a drag. The same thing was true at the time of the collapse of the Roman Empire as well, on the ruins of which the feudal system slowly arose.
The right knows this. The right knows that by admitting that our current free market capitalistic system is the direct cause of climate change and global warming is the death kneel of this system.
But the Right is not fooled: it sees Green as a Trojan horse for Red, the attempt “to abolish capitalism and replace it with some kind of eco-socialism.” It believes—correctly—that the politics of global warming is inevitably an attack on the American Dream, on the whole capitalist structure. Thus Larry Bell, in Climate of Corruption, argues that environmental politics is essentially about “transforming the American way of life in the interests of global wealth distribution”; and British writer James Delinpole notes that “Modern environmentalism successfully advances many of the causes dear to the left: redistribution of wealth, higher taxes, greater government intervention, [and] regulation.”
That’s right. That Green is the new Red and that the left is out to torpedo the American Dream and Free Market capitalism. And they are absolutely correct or should be because that is exactly what needs to happen.
But no…the left insists that we can have a kinder, gentler, more economically sound version of the American dream. All we need to do is to trade in our gas guzzling SUV for a Prius, replace those old incandescent bulbs with florescent or LEDs , install some solar panels and all will be fine.
IN A PIG’S EYE !
As Naomi Klein says in a piece from the November Issue of Nation:
Here is where the Heartlanders have good reason to be afraid: arriving at these new systems is going to require shredding the free-market ideology that has dominated the global economy for more than three decades. What follows is a quick-and-dirty look at what a serious climate agenda would mean in the following six arenas: public infrastructure, economic planning, corporate regulation, international trade, consumption and taxation. For hard-right ideologues like those gathered at the Heartland conference, the results are nothing short of intellectually cataclysmic.
Capitalism as we know it requires continued growth and expansion otherwise it collapses. And for the planet to survive this is what needs to happen. Klein lists 6 changes that need to be made and as Morris Berman says the end of capitalism itself.
And, I would add, the end of the arc of capitalism referred to earlier. It’s going to be (is) a colossal fight, not only because the powers that be want to hang on to their power, but because the arc and all its ramifications have given their class Meaning with a capital M for 500+ years. This is what the Occupy Wall Street protesters—if there are any left at this point; I’m not sure—need to tell the 1%: Your lives are a mistake. This is what “a new civilizational paradigm” finally means. It also has to be said that almost everyone in the United States, not just the upper 1%, buys into this.
This is the problem that we face. That as John Steinbeck observed years before, the poor and even not so poor see themselves as “temporarily embarrassed millionaires” and even the OWS movement and those that support it want to resurrect a more just and kind American Dream, which really cannot be.
This will not be easy, in fact it will be hard and messy and there likely will be sever fighting for as Berman observes this class system of free market ideals is the one and only thing that gives meaning to the lives of those on the right and more and a few on the left. But anything else will not suffice and likely be abused as well.
We know the answers already. The corporate quest for scarce resources will become more rapacious, more violent. Arable land in Africa will continue to be grabbed to provide food and fuel to wealthier nations. Drought and famine will continue to be used as a pretext to push genetically modified seeds, driving farmers further into debt. We will attempt to transcend peak oil and gas by using increasingly risky technologies to extract the last drops, turning ever larger swaths of our globe into sacrifice zones. We will fortress our borders and intervene in foreign conflicts over resources, or start those conflicts ourselves. “Free-market climate solutions,” as they are called, will be a magnet for speculation, fraud and crony capitalism, as we are already seeing with carbon trading and the use of forests as carbon offsets. And as climate change begins to affect not just the poor but the wealthy as well, we will increasingly look for techno-fixes to turn down the temperature, with massive and unknowable risks.
As the world warms, the reigning ideology that tells us it’s everyone for themselves, that victims deserve their fate, that we can master nature, will take us to a very cold place indeed. And it will only get colder, as theories of racial superiority, barely under the surface in parts of the denial movement, make a raging comeback. These theories are not optional: they are necessary to justify the hardening of hearts to the largely blameless victims of climate change in the global South, and in predominately African-American cities like New Orleans. – Naomi Klien
This is the fight we face and we MUST face it or condemn ourselves and those after to a world becoming increasingly uninhabitable.



52 Comments

I suppose the old Chinese curse “may we live in interesting times,” applies to our near and long term attempts to solve the question of whether or not we have indeed “outsmarted ourselves.” We’re at the end of growth, running out of planet. Never was enough growth for everyone anyway, we’ve just globally shared some the last couple of decades.
Agree, our dilemma is soon at hand. Southern EU is being ‘shock doctrined’ by the latest version of the Chicago boy’s ideological song “killing me softly,” called neo-liberalism.
What the EU countries didn’t know (they didn’t think Argentina applied) was that they were dealing with financial loan sharks (another form of mafia) that will bankrupt your country, and take its assets at fire sale prices instead of breaking your legs. Leaving your people in financial ruin, is a ‘fergetaboudit.’
These financial fascists are a new breed of smart, and it looks like their going to pull off the heist of the EU southern tier and get away with it like they did to us.
There an old saying “you can’t fight city hall,” well the banks have bought city hall, so if we take the financial system down, I don’t see how we don’t go down with it. Catch 22.
Good stuff cmaukonen. Rec’d
This brings up something else that’s been going around in my head. Kind of a law of unintended consequences where people are beginning to take the austerity talk to heart personally. That in addition to those who cannot afford to make purchases, there are also those who are choosing not to. And both groups are beginning to come up with their own solutions to their problems and quietly telling the capitalists to shove it.
Good post.
Don’t you think, that the system that can’t be corrupted, does not exist.
What needs to change, more than the system, is what people think is most important. I don’t know how that can happen.
I used to hear radio broadcasts by a woman who spent time in Ladakh, and held it out as an example of the way things could be. Can not remember her name.
“For centuries, Ladakh enjoyed a stable and self-reliant agricultural economy based on growing barley, wheat and peas and keeping livestock, especially yaks, cows, dzos (a yak-cow cross breed), sheep and goats. At altitudes of 3,000 to 4,300 m (10,000 to 14,000 ft), the growing season is only a few months long every year, similar to the northern countries of the world. Animals are scarce and water is in short supply. The Ladakhis developed a small-scale farming system adapted to this unique environment. The land is irrigated by a system of channels which funnel water from the ice and snow of the mountains. The principal crops are barley and wheat. Rice was previously a luxury in the Ladakhi diet, but, subsidised by the government, has now become a cheap staple”
wikipedia
Well you can count me as one of that bunch that is slowly getting ready for the meltdowns. Financial then climate. I think there are too many variables to know the timing or turn of events, but the Republicans are right about one thing: Its going to be a “your on your own” economy to some degree that will continue to intensify.
Heck, this “austerity syndrome,” which has likely already come to a backyard near you, is giving time to prepare many that otherwise couldn’t adapt quick enough. Maybe a silver lining?
I think we’re on an economic glide path, waiting for something. But I don’t think the lower classes are going to be singing “happy times are here again” for a long time.
This “come hell or high water” attitude of the PTB to play the capitalist trump cards until there is no more game to be played, kinda befuddles me. They are now cannibalizing western countries, turning them into third world for profit. I don’t see how they think they can get away with it. They must believe that they can go somewhere and wait the chaos out if they overplay their hands. Maybe they can if they can get their hands on the gold.
OTOH, I think they would at some point mint those trillion dollar coins that letsgetitdone talks about, to salvage as many of their electronic dollar bills that they can. If currency maintains enough residual (albeit inflated all to hell,) value to keep a basic economy functioning, then maybe we’ll be able to hang around with negligible growth to see what the climate does to us and how fast.
here she is:
“Helena Norberg-Hodge is an analyst of the impact of the global economy on cultures and agriculture worldwide, a pioneer of the localisation movement, and the articulator of the core ideas of Counter-development. She is producer and co-director of the award-winning documentary, The Economics of Happiness and is the founder and director of the International Society for Ecology and Culture . Based in the US and UK, with subsidiaries in Sweden, Germany, Australia, and Ladakh, ISEC’s mission is to examine the root causes of our social and environmental crises, while promoting more sustainable and equitable patterns of living in both North and South. Its activities include The Economics of Happiness, The Ladakh Project, a Local Food program and Global to Local Outreach.”
her lectures are outstanding.
Oh absolutely. Our who value system and attitude is completely out of whack. Like Dmitri Orlov says here, upside down.
But you are correct, changing attitudes is very difficult but it can be done. You have to start small though, sometimes just one person at a time. By example like 12 step groups do. Get people to think it was their idea all along.
BRAVO! Excellent post! You make an incontrovertible point: Capitalism must expand in order to survive. What happens when capitalism can no longer expand? It dies. The system collapses. And we are well on our way, though the Collapse can unfold slowly and tragically over several generations if it is allowed to do so.
Globalization is the final phase. Unless something truly sci-fi happens, like the discovery of a Star Trek like warp drive(though Roddenberry’s Star Trek was clearly far more socialist than capitalist), or Harry Turtledove’s alternate universes with multiple Earths where no humans had evolved are readily available for exploitation, our current system is simply doomed.
It is inevitable. It is our destiny. We may as well embrace it and come up with something else that will work for most people for a few generations, anyway. That something else need not be perfect, but it need not be horrible, either.
I also agree with your point about those on the left who think that capitalism can somehow be “fixed.” It can’t. It’s very nature rewards greed and exploitative behavior, which the planet can no longer afford, and punishes a balanced society, which is desperately needed.
I think humanity is facing a crisis of existence the likes of which haven’t been seen since before agriculture was invented.
I don’t think that human beings are capable of coming up with an incorruptible system. You are right.
But we CAN come up with a system that works better than the one we have now. If we don’t, well, some future intelligent species that evolves from I don’t know what may well wonder what motivated the civilization that created all of those interesting ruins.
There are alternatives to capitalism that can be used, you know. At least as a starting point. But that won’t happen until most people realize that capitalism has failed.
Actually Barbarian, they have come up with a concept for Warp Drive – a loop hole in Einstein’s theory.
But it has a few little problems though. First even the best design requires tremendous amounts of energy. The only way known so far is using anti-matter. But matter/anti-matter reactions give off primarily cosmic energy, which are extremely high energy photons. And we do not know yet how to make that useful. IE convert to electricity.
And there is very little of this stuff – anti-matter – around.
I think the conversion part can be solved, it’s just finding the right stuff to do it. But finding enough anti-matter would be more difficult.
No problem. Find that alternative antimatter universe and the power supply is limitless!!!!
Excellent, if sobering, post cmauk. I liked what Ohio Barbarian said, as well:
I’d like to think that we are evolved enough as a species to recognize this, and plan a, as James Lovelock called it, powered descent. I’m not hopeful, however.
I’d recommend multiple times, if I could.
I am serious about some of this. The comic rays to electricity part at any rate. There is already people researching to make photo voltaics work with ultra violet rays so that they work on cloudy days.
Cosmic rays are higher than that, but getting those photons to do the same thing I think can be done.
Point of this in regards to my diary – that kind of research can only happen in a non-capitalistic environment. It would not produce any results for a while.
You are refering to multi layer PVs which capture a wider range of wavelengths. They are in use on the Mars rovers but cost millions to produce but that could change with new processes. Only when they become profitable do the Capitalists take over.
Precisely my point.
cmaukonen you’re rowing upstream, on FDL, where the driving theme, driven particularly by DDayen, has always been to stimulate the economy and bring back the good old days. We need to whine and whine some more about the terrible cards we’ve been dealt, and then maybe with all the whining some miracle will happen, the clouds will roll away and the sun will shine just like it used to.
Horsepucky. This is not your father’s recession, this is a new economic world, and as a few astute observers remarked above, we’d better learn to live in it. It’s actually a better world, in terms of the environment, as per the title:
The Earth vs The American Dream. At least one of them must go.
That a cheap as shit shot at Dayen DB.
And misconstrued all to hell.
DDay is NOT our problem, donbacon. Surely you know that.
BTW, great post.
The front page of FDL has to maintain some air of respectability or FDL on the whole will be consigned to the ranks of supermarket tabloid.
x2. You work with either the tools you are given or the tools you can make. FDL is a given one. No point in bitching too much about it, or it becomes Captain Dunsel.
I’ll be arrogant enough to say thank you for the compliment. But no need to rip David Dayen.
I perceive the world quite a bit differently than Dayen does, but at least he and I see the same world. IOW, he usually gets his facts straight.
Unlike some other posters I shan’t name who live on the other side of the Atlantic and think they can understand America better that I, Dayen, or you can.
I think. Your profile does not say. Do you live in the United States? Seems like you do from your posts. Yes, it DOES make a difference.
Thank you for this post! rec’d.
Great post, thanks
I put a library hold on Berman’s “Why America Failed”
Recommended, but I fear that the corporatocracy has already won.
Americans are way too busy posting and watching TV.
If they ever do leave their homes, they will be shot down like rabid dogs.
Just think about how many federal, state and local employees are armed.
And then there’s the Homeland Security people in every major city.
You remember the teleconference Homeland Security had with 18 mayors from Boston to Oakland–mostly Democratic, btw–just before police in those cities started landing occupiers in the hospital when they refused to disband by the deadline set by the Mayors, right?
And, when the backlash came, all the mayors with the exception of the loon in Oakland suddenly changed their tunes.
And that was a peaceful occupation.
“…and even the OWS movement and those that support it want to resurrect a more just and kind American Dream, which really cannot be.”
You do like to keep saying that, but I think that the movement behind the scenes is showing that’s just not true. Plenty of socialists are giving talks to many different General Assemblies, as well as presenting other cooperative economic models.
But then I’ve argued that with you a number of times before. And yes, most Occupy adherents know that the American Dream was another ad campaign for ‘continual growth and expansion or else a company dies’ belief, and promoted gross materialism as happiness.
Myself, I think present circumstances are forcing the issue for many of us in terms of discovering what we truly do value, and that includes relationships with our families, neighbors, and even helping others get through the hard times, as well. Sharing begets sharing, and loving acts do the same, almost exponentially it grows, imo.
Dunno if this will work, but Mark McHugh has this Velocity of Money chart up (via washngtonsblog) He says: ” Velocity of money is the frequency with which a unit of money is spent on new goods and services, explains why GDP is pretty useless a measure of economic conditions, as we know, and why current conditions are worse than the Great Depression.
So…people are slowly waking up, and capitalism seems to be taking some hits, and so is a government in thrall to serving the needs of elites.
Well, the American Dream as defined by the Chicago School of Economics.
There are other definitions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Dream
I like what they suggest here. Doing it ourselves.
Tech notes:
The warp stuff discussed above is somewhat dated. New theories cut down on the mass-energy requirement by several zillionfold. Indeed, the basic principle can be tested without using exotic matter at all.
A minimalist warp drive core is being constructed and tested at NASA… now.
As for growth, don’t confuse the insanity of eternal-growth capitalism with the possibility of both growth and a better life for all on Earth.
Given sustainable energy sources, there is enough slack in the Earth’s heat balance for double our current population to live using a per capita energy budget over twice that of top-of-the-line Denmark (yeah, that socialist hellhole
) and the Earth would still begun cooling.
http://focusfusion.org/index.php/forums/viewthread/1048/#9788
That amount of available power would solve a lot of problems.
It wasn’t the use of power that caused the ongoing catastrophe… it was the disposal of carbon in the atmosphere.
The OWS movement is ill-defined, like it or not. Sure, it has some real socialists, and I think it is the beginning of the American people waking up to the fact that capitalism has failed them.
But it also has people who think that capitalism can be successfully be reformed to work for the majority of Americans again. I think they are the ones CM is talking about. I might be wrong. I’m not a telepath, so I can’t speak for him.
The irony here is that both you and CM believe in many of the same things. I think you have more in common than you have differences. Maybe I’m wrong there, too, just my impression.
Precisely.
We need to abandon their fiat money game for something else.
Fascinating, as Mr Spock used to say. And I understand the Europeans are getting pretty close to containing a fusion reaction, which could generate LOTS of virtually free power.
A power source like that is antithetical to capitalism precisely because it IS almost free. It’s one reason capitalist-controlled governments don’t like to fund research like that.
I’m all for research. I’d love to see practical interstellar travel. I’m not so sure about our governments, though. After all, they’d lose control now, wouldn’t they?
“I think it is the beginning of the American people waking up to the fact that capitalism has failed them.” I disagree. The American people are like fish . Fish don’t question the water they swim in. Americans don’t even see the system let along understand it.
Wow. That’s an incredibly arrogant statement. Sounds a lot like a political strategist working for one wing or the other of the ruling Fascist Duopoly. And I know you’re not.
That’s what the likes of Romney and Geithner think. It’s what Reagan cultivated.
Underestimating the American people is foolish. At least Isoruku Yamamato would agree with me.
Yeah. Well, the flying fish are telling them about air. Anyway, self-defeating simile. Equates Americans with capitalists.
C’mon, comrade, it’s much worse than that. The capitalist fraud has long been perceivable; the exploitation was barely covered by America’s crapitalist golden age.
“he irony here is that both you and CM believe in many of the same things. I think you have more in common than you have differences.”
~LOL! But then, this is not a dating service. ;o)
What to address in limited time? I guess I’ll start with the fact that Morris quoted Klein in the piece. He also said that those quotes were a sea change for Klein, even after having wade into the toxic garbage of neoliberalism for so long.
He, and also by way of rather confused vehicle of Klein quotes, calls out both The Left, and of course, OWS.
I would submit that Green Economics has been authored and put into practice by no ‘Left’ that I know of, but corporatist Dems who can convince enough of the Red Team to buy into the scam that it is, and the insane danger it represents cuz too few study what *really* happens in the ‘green’ switches (decimating forests, for instance, in favor of plants for biofuels), and other tricky bullshit.
I would also submit that in my opinion, OWS is not solely a Lefty movement, though many are heading that way in terms of direct democracy, employee-owned businesses, union advocacy (workers’ rights in general), debt jubilee and resistance, and policies that effectively redistribute wealth.
Yowl away, but imo, as long as people keep referring to the democracy movement as strictly progressive, or leftist, whatever the hell meaning they have any more, it will close out the many of the 99% who are realizing that everything’s rigged against them in terms of their futures: meaningful or enjoyable jobs paying a more than ‘living wage’, health care, healthy food and enough of it, a home, no matter how no-frills, but with affordable utility bills due to energy-saving programs.
Even worse to me, is misunderstanding the movement and pissing on it, when it’s been the single biggest force of energy that even has brought these new discussions to the conversation. What too many forget is that our old fogey time is over except in aid of the new generation’s dynamic refusal to accept the status quo. My guess is that they’re studying hard, many are experimenting with new models locally, seeing if they might scale up…or not.
But it would seem that the notion of what’s needed to effectively ‘reign in capitalism’ is necessary to figuring out how to re-imagine what comes next. I can see a beginning more mixed economics leading eventually to more socialistic programs and economics, which in a way, I believe is what Naomi may see. Sometime soon, people may be more interested in What Works and What’s Fair, or closer to it, without even the labels like Socialism and Marxist Economics, etc. attached. Please remember those are dirty words to many Americans who don’t understand their meanings (I am just a newbie, of course). But in a more direct democracy there will be a lot of different ideas floated, some will play better *at first* than others, I think.
Ah, bugger; there was one more thing, but as so often happens…I’ve forgotten. ;o)
Oh, yes. Abjectly pissing on OWS with little understanding (like the guest piece Rall featured and C put up) is seriously negative to me; the Dark spreads, imo.
In passing, I often find myself wondering how C can paste whole swathes of someone else’s work into his posts, while others of us get moderated for it. Mojo, I guess.
I’ve been thinking about an alternative, but some means of exchange is essential. Gold can’t do it.
What if we go ‘all in’ on fiat money; mint the $60T coin and quit paying the Fed interest on our Treasury bills. A financial system reboot, all risk nationalized, (the banks only want us to accept their risk of loss, screw’em,) buy a national asset with it, a high-speed and local light rail network on the scale of our interstate system. Jobs for everyone.
If the Communists can do it, why can’t we? Has our “exceptionality” become stupidity?
Complain….complain…complain. If you ever liked anyone’s diary that didn’t echo your own, I would faint dead away.
LOL! I even like some of yours, CMaukonen. But parts of a few recent ones: not so much.
You know what Mencken said.
The good news is that it’s possible to live without constant growth. We did it for many millenia. Whether or not we can do so with our technological society intact is up for debate.
I wish people would stop saying it’s the planet that will die. The planet won’t die. Many species of life, both plant and animal will die off, but the planet will still be here. Earth doesn’t give a fuck how hot things get. Humans certainly do, but rock does not.
And as for huge changes in societal structure. Good luck with that. As long as it’s primarily bored college kids and intellectuals pursuing this change, nothing will ever happen. It’s in large part why that supposed revolution in Iran a few years back never took hold. The working class wasn’t on the side of the “revolutionaries,” who were, in that instance, bored college kids and intellectuals. OWS consists of pretty much that same group, plus some dead-ender hippies.
There’s only one way to overthrow an entrenched power, and Americans just aren’t willing to go there.
Great, haunting photo, btw, cmauk.
I have two hesitancies about your piece, cmaukonen.
First one is: “…Capitalism as we know it requires continued growth and expansion otherwise it collapses…
You did put in ‘as we know it’ there, so I’ll not fullout go ballistic, but really I think the problem is in defining the terms ‘growth’ and ‘expansion’ far too narrowly for me. Those terms can include other things besides getting bigger and destroying limited resources. They can include innovation, cleaning up the putrid environment, putting people to work in helpful ways like staffing clinics, more facilities for education, smaller classrooms hence more teachers, things like that. Growth and expansion can be expansion of ideas to do more with less, to develop a sustainable food cycle that enriches the earth while it grows things, more people involved in doing the necessary work the social fabric needs.
That’s the growth we need; that’s the expansion.
Second one is: “…the poor and even not so poor see themselves as “temporarily embarrassed millionaires…”
I think I fall into the ‘not so poor’ class, as bless me, I seem still to have a home to live in. So, as a member of the above group I say, very politely – horse hockey! We don’t want your millions, mister – don’t you remember that one? Nobody going out and living in a tent in freezing weather and having what little they had swept into a police garbage truck has dreams of being a millionaire – nobody! Heavens to Betsy, what a low opinion you have of people, sir.
What is it about making the world a better place to live in you don’t like? Yes, it’s a lovely photo, so let’s hire folk to go clean that beautiful place up and make it livable again – and let’s elect people who want to do that instead of just go jet to the Riviera.
Ah, I see I’ve convinced you. Happy Sunday, then!
I know you don’t mean this.
I am referring to economic growth. That is generating more money/product than debt. (public, private, etc.) Capitalism and it’s financial basis is debt based.
As I reported in an earlier post, “temporarily embarrassed millionaires” is a misleading misquote of Steinbeck, one that favors Morris’ jaundiced view of A-merkins. Steinbeck said “temporarily embarrassed capitalists”, meaning that A-merkins were only temporarily embarrassed by the consequences of their materialist devotions – they were only rainy day proletarians. This applied to most “so-called Communists I met [who] were middle-class, middle-aged people playing a game of dreams.” Derisive, but not quite Morris’ derivation.
Second, capitalism uses the rhetoric of growth to subvert the dissension from the inequality it generates. Capitalists use war (including class war and war on terror) to subvert dissension as well. Perhaps capitalists could broaden “growth” to be some continual progression to sustainable heaven (though it’s not likely that “growth” will be the appropriate label) but then we would have to ask why we need capitalists for that.
And I’m just saying, cmaukonen, that the PTB version of the American Dream doesn’t have to be ours. I’m trying to point out that a narrow definition of capitalism is (you are correct) the neoliberal version – but it doesn’t have to be the only definition. Job creation can proceed along the lines I described, and there will be a different kind of capitalism in that, money earned and circulated, not everyone at the same level, granted, but laws in place to prevent monopolization and uberwealth.
We did have that once. And that means it is possible. We did overreach and were restrained. That means that is possible. I’m not talking about some utopia, and there will always be glitches, but we’re at a glitch now that is taking down the planet, and there I most certainly agree with you.
This is the most horrible moment in human history. So I know, you want the same thing I do. Sorry for being facetious above. I went to bed tonight thinking about this, and I had a thought – at present, you could say we have a service economy for the uberwealthy, da? Well, what we need, what we must have, is a service economy for the planet. Not for us humans – for the planet. To me, that would be the dream today that Martin Luther King would be on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial speaking about “- I have a dream that my children and their children’s children will have a planet to live on!”
So, it’s the same economy (maybe minus all those derivative thingies and banks back to being just what they do, be banks not casinos) but the direction of wealth is towards the Big Kahuna Homeland, Planet Earth.
Let’s make her wealthy.
Let’s make her the 1%.
Let’s be in debt to her.
Sorry if I was abrasive.
We did have it once and I mentioned that point in a post on another blog a number of years ago. But that was per-industrial revolution. That is if you ignore slavery and the massacre of the Native Americans to steal their land.