John Suler, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Science and Technology Center, Rider University, outlined some concepts of internet psychology in an online text titled, The Psychology of Cyberspace. In the article is a section called The Online Disinhibition Effect, with the following subheadings:
The Online Disinhibition Effect
You Don’t Know Me (dissociative anonymity)
You Can’t See Me (invisibility)
See You Later (asynchronicity)
It’s All in My Head (solipsistic introjection)
It’s Just a Game (dissociative imagination)
We’re Equals (minimizing authority))
Personality Variables
True Self?
Self Constellations Across Media
Altering Self Boundary
While the article, produced originally in 1996 may be old for the purposes of citation in a PubMed/Medline peer-reviewed, evidence-based current article, I find it fascinating and relevant today, when I study myself and my online behavior. Scanning the list above, I think I have done them all.
I recently related some observations that I made of people during a time in my life when I spent time sitting on a curb, observing and judging people, in an article titled, Embracing Bohemianism. Sometimes, sitting in front of a screen, I find myself doing exactly the same thing. Why is this?
For one thing, despite massive evidence to the contrary, I still look for evidence that ‘those things’ happen to ‘other people.’ Those Things can be anything from the real traumatic horror of a murder in the family to an unfortunate event that cascades. I often drive up and down the streets of the internet looking for the car wreck to gawk at, not involve myself in, and then gloat about how wonderful I am for rubbernecking but not quite ambulance chasing.
When I was a kid I learned about sticks, stones and words. But later, I found out that words do hurt. For a while there, everything hurt. Words. The lack of words. Expressions, body language, tone. The interesting thing about the internet is that, although it is just typed words on a screen that I am looking at, I fill in with body language and tone that is not there. Perhaps this is where I get into trouble.
I grew up, went to college, entered the workforce, experienced life, pain, prison, long-term unemployment and a bunch of other stuff that comes with age, maybe a few more bumps than some and less than others. I try to boil it all down from time to time. This may all change with time, age and more life, and I do not always do this just right, but here is what I have learned in a nutshell:
-Never assume anything.
-If it’s not one thing, it’s another.
-Those things that happen to those other people can be these things happening to me at any time.
To put the online experience into perspective (and keep the migraines at bay) I find solace by taking walks in the woods and along the creeks. The Great Blue Herons and the turtles and the birds and fish must collectively groan seeing such a pathetic creature practically running toward them each day for comfort. They take it in stride. I bring them crumbs and snacks, which they don’t need, but sometimes accept, because they are gracious.
Running to the woods for a nature fix has worked for me since I was a kid. Even though we now have virtual woods to visit online, the virtual woods are too clean, and they lack a breeze, a smell. They lack chemistry in much the same way that a virtual conversation is missing something. Some of the best conversations I have had have been silent and in person.
With this all in mind and re-examining the categories above, I can negate nearly every one. You don’t know me but you do. You can’t see me but you can. It is all in my head but it isn’t. Such is the nature of community.



18 Comments

Two stories I think might apply.
Wealthy patrons invited Ikkyu to a banquet. Ikkyu arrived dressed in his beggar’s robes. The host, not recognizing hin, chased him away. Ikkyu went home, changed into his ceremonial robe of purple brocade, and returned. With great respect, he was received into the banquet room. There, he put his robe on the cushion, saying, “I expect you invited the robe since you showed me away a little while ago,” and left.
And..
The Prime Minister of the Tang Dynasty was a national hero for his success as both a statesman and military leader. But despite his fame, power, and wealth, he considered himself a humble and devout Buddhist. Often he visited his favorite Zen master to study under him, and they seemed to get along very well. The fact that he was prime minister apparently had no effect on their relationship, which seemed to be simply one of a revered master and respectful student.
One day, during his usual visit, the Prime Minister asked the master, “Your Reverence, what is egotism according to Buddhism?” The master’s face turned red, and in a very condescending and insulting tone of voice, he shot back, “What kind of stupid question is that!?”
This unexpected response so shocked the Prime Minister that he became sullen and angry. The Zen master then smiled and said, “THIS, Your Excellency, is egotism.”
Our judgement and our egos…always there to get us into trouble.
Sorry, this reply to cmaukonen at #1
This totally reminds me of world-class violinist Joshua Bell in the DC metro subway stop. Because he was clad in jeans and a baseball cap, his performance goes ignored by the same passing public that pays top dollar to see him on stage, apparently.
Have a look:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnOPu0_YWhw
Things are not always what they seem.
No they are not.
“He was pretty good, that guy. It was the first time I didn’t call the police.”
$12.17 for 43 minutes of world class violin artistry – except for a twenty from the one women who recognized him.
Capitalism must stop.
Absolutely amazing.
“Sometimes, sitting in front of a screen, I find myself doing exactly the same thing. Why is this?” Let me venture a thought. Or some. Is a judgment the same as having an opinion? The ego/identity comes from a perspective of “me and the other” and is a natural process of self definition which the ego/identity seeks as a sheer function of brain evolution. Or all that I just wrote could be nothing but crap.
Or it could be one’s way of judging oneself as long ago I realized that anything I see in others exists in me and that in “condemning”(negatively judging) others I was only condemning myself. Which gets back to setting a ‘boundary’ of ‘who am I?’, a seemingly natural expression of homo sapiens.
And that ties back into the creation myths, such as Adam and Eve.
“They lack chemistry in much the same way that a virtual conversation is missing something.” ; The ‘retreat to nature’ that helps you reflect this (afaic): ““The goal of life is to make your heartbeat match the beat of the universe, to match your nature with Nature.”-
Joseph Campbell quote
For your reading pleasure
For your listening pleasure
Thanks for the stories. I hadn’t heard any of them, keep it up!
Boxturtle (Been too busy worrying about Snooki, I guess)
I am so sorry BoxTurtle, my heart really goes out to you. Thank you for stopping by during a very difficult time.
Judgment vs opinion. I am not so objective here, because the judge in my legal case used his personal opinion to issue a judgment. He completely ignored the facts and made up his own, to fit his judgment. Out of this experience I try to look at facts, before forming an opinion or a judgment. In the online environment we are bombarded with preformed opinions. Often, a partial set of facts, or cherry-picked facts are used. Seems to be common in the campaigns, for example.
I guess that judgment has a certain finality to it that raw opinion does not. But that is just my perspective at this moment. Thank you for the reading and for the beautiful music and video!
I’m not exactly sure where you were going with this, C-S, but from where I sit, it seems best online to be as close to one’s everyday self as possible, and I suspect that isn’t often the case.
I also fill in at least faces sometimes, then am surprised by the voices of internet friends, make new mind-pictures (voices are extremely important and telling for me. Meeting in person is a whole n’other adjustment. Whoosh; I’m almost always wrong in my ‘assumptions’ or images, or find I’ve extrapolated the wrong person from what they write, at least on the boards. The best experiences are when all three communications (or four) mesh well and honestly.
Think I said all that right, lol!
I have always been interested in groups and have a good deal of experience being in them in various settings. I am not really going anywhere in particular. I lurked on the long thread for a while, but did not know what to contribute really, so I searched a bit for information about online communities. I came across Dr. Suler’s work and found it fascinating.
Remember, this is all kind of new to me! I did not really grow into it over time, and I remember when I first joined Twitter, for example, I felt like Jim Carrey’s character in The Mask…I mean, I felt just…buck wild for a while there!
Ha-well. What you see with me is pretty much what you get, except that in real life I am a complete hermit. Not shy, just more of a loner. I do believe, though, that tone, expression, body language, timing…all that is missing from any given internet encounter. So, it got me thinking, just how important are the intangibles in our communication.
Thanks for sharing some of your experience!
It also might be just another distraction that sucks people in.
I wonder how many people who post here and elsewhere would actually say to someones face what they type in a blog ?
Well, exactly. Part of the insulation of the online setting is that faces are removed. Excellent point. The distraction? Yup, happens to me, sure does. Like, where did the hours go? Amazing.
Just put up a diary on distractions a while ago.
http://my.firedoglake.com/cmaukonen/2012/03/21/distractions/
(Shameless self promotion)
LOL! Big Pimpin.’ A really nice article, thank you.
Can’t speak for anyone else but I would.
I would as well.