I was born in Edmonton, Alberta in ’66, my Dad was just hired, fresh out of McGill University, by Alberta’s Dept. of Transportation as a Surveyor. Shortly afterwards, Great Canadian Oil Sands (GCOS) lured him away to Ft. McMurray for their first large-scale attempts to exploit the vast amounts of Tar Sands that surround the area. Just in time for Suncor’s opening of their new plant in ’67.
During the opening ceremonies for the plant, Sun Oil Company chairman J. Howard Pew (then 85 years old) made remarks which still ring true:
No nation can long be secure in this atomic age unless it be amply supplied with petroleum . . . . It is the considered opinion of our group that if the North American continent is to produce the oil to meet its requirements in the years ahead, oil from the Athabasca area must of necessity play an important role.
My sister was born in Ft. McMurray, in ’68. My Dad was an avid outdoorsman and hunter, and some of my fondest memories of my Dad was when, after a long boat ride down the Athabasca River, we docked at the various piers which comprised the actual storefronts of the handful of stores of the hamlet of Ft. Chipewyan. I also remember many long frigid snowmobile hunting trips. My Dad, later in ’76, was hired by Cominco, as the Lead Surveyor, and we moved even further north to Pine Point, NWT. In May of ’76, my Dad was tragically killed in a helicopter crash, and a month later, I wound up here in the Isles. I can only imagine what my Dad would think about the current plight of the Athabascan River and the sheer amount of environmental devastation of the area…!
Folks, major facts are being neglected in all the reporting, when they keep saying the ‘vast barren arctic wastelands’ of Alberta they’re lying through their teeth, it was once heavily forested areas that were lost forever, simply from the massive amounts of strip mining that has been occurring non-stop since the early ’60s…
Folks, right now, we need to support Bill McKibben, Naomi Klein, Wendell Berry Call for Civil Disobedience on Tar Sands. We need to stop the ‘Keystone XL Pipeline’ from Canada’s tar sands straight to Texas refineries…
As you know, the planet is steadily warming: 2010 was the warmest year on record, and we’ve seen the resulting chaos in almost every corner of the earth.
And as you also know, our democracy is increasingly controlled by special interests interested only in their short-term profit.
These two trends collide this summer in Washington, where the State Department and the White House have to decide whether to grant a certificate of ‘national interest’ to some of the biggest fossil fuel players on earth. These corporations want to build the so-called ‘Keystone XL Pipeline’ from Canada’s tar sands to Texas refineries.
To call this project a horror is serious understatement. The tar sands have wrecked huge parts of Alberta, disrupting ways of life in indigenous communities—First Nations communities in Canada, and tribes along the pipeline route in the U.S. have demanded the destruction cease. The pipeline crosses crucial areas like the Oglalla Aquifer where a spill would be disastrous—and though the pipeline companies insist they are using ‘state of the art’ technologies that should leak only once every 7 years, the precursor pipeline and its pumping stations have leaked a dozen times in the past year. These local impacts alone would be cause enough to block such a plan. But the Keystone Pipeline would also be a fifteen hundred mile fuse to the biggest carbon bomb on the continent, a way to make it easier and faster to trigger the final overheating of our planet, the one place to which we are all indigenous.
How much carbon lies in the recoverable tar sands of Alberta? A recent calculation from some of our foremost scientists puts the figure at about 200 parts per million. Even with the new pipeline they won’t be able to burn that much overnight—but each development like this makes it easier to get more oil out. As the climatologist Jim Hansen (one of the signatories to this letter) explained, if we have any chance of getting back to a stable climate “the principal requirement is that coal emissions must be phased out by 2030 and unconventional fossil fuels, such as tar sands, must be left in the ground.” In other words, he added, “if the tar sands are thrown into the mix it is essentially game over.” The Keystone pipeline is an essential part of the game. “Unless we get increased market access, like with Keystone XL, we’re going to be stuck,” said Ralph Glass, an economist and vice-president at AJM Petroleum Consultants in Calgary, told a Canadian newspaper last week.
Given all that, you’d suspect that there’s no way the Obama administration would ever permit this pipeline. But in the last few months the president has signed pieces of paper opening much of Alaska to oil drilling, and permitting coal-mining on federal land in Wyoming that will produce as much CO2 as 300 power plants operating at full bore.
And Secretary of State Clinton has already said she’s ‘inclined’ to recommend the pipeline go forward. Partly it’s because of the political commotion over high gas prices, though more tar sands oil would do nothing to change that picture. But it’s also because of intense pressure from industry. TransCanada Pipeline, the company behind Keystone, has hired as its chief lobbyist for the project a man named Paul Elliott, who served as deputy national director of Clinton’s presidential campaign. Meanwhile, the US Chamber of Commerce—a bigger funder of political campaigns than the RNC and DNC combined—has demanded that the administration “move quickly to approve the Keystone XL pipeline,” which is not so surprising—they’ve also told the U.S. EPA that if the planet warms that will be okay because humans can ‘adapt their physiology’ to cope. The Koch Brothers, needless to say, are also backing the plan, and may reap huge profits from it.
So we’re pretty sure that without serious pressure the Keystone Pipeline will get its permit from Washington. A wonderful coalition of environmental groups has built a strong campaign across the continent—from Cree and Dene indigenous leaders to Nebraska farmers, they’ve spoken out strongly against the destruction of their land. We need to join them, and to say even if our own homes won’t be crossed by this pipeline, our joint home—the earth—will be wrecked by the carbon that pours down it.
And we need to say something else, too: it’s time to stop letting corporate power make the most important decisions our planet faces…
People, We need to act Now…!
*gah*



32 Comments

UN chief challenges world to agree tougher target for climate change
“The world should agree to limit global warming to just 1.5C instead of the current target of 2C, the United Nations’ climate chief has said, in remarks that shocked the governments of developed nations.
Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN framework convention on climate change, said: “Two degrees is not enough – we should be thinking of 1.5C. If we are not headed to 1.5C we are in big, big trouble.”
YES WE ARE in “big,big trouble”.
And I keep responding to solicitations reqarding the KeystoneXL but I don’t know that such will really have any effect given we get most of our oil from Canada and we also don’t want new nuclear(I’m not advocating such !!) and that the corporations own the government.
This from the above linked article kinda says it all from a ‘MOTU’ Pov:
“But Jörg Haas, programme director for climate diplomacy at the European Climate Foundation, said most of the extra effort would need to be made after 2020, making it easier to push for a tougher target now.”
And we haven’t see n any politician expressing concerns about the latest oceans report have we?
Tuttle you are becoming very prolific on many subjects,,, Whats going on??
Great post. Needs to be on front page.
If you haven’t clicked the top YouTube link and watched the Al Jazeera documentary, do yourself a favor and do it.
I bet Avi Lewis (Naomi Klein’s husband) produced this. It’s excellent. Thanks so much, CTuttle.
Not gonna happen, folks. Humanity will continue to poison the earth until it literally cannot do so any more. Not even regulation helps if the government refuses to prosecute rule-breakers (or even out-and-out criminal behavior).
Humanity is destined to die shitting in its own food dish.
Damn! This whole thing is so horrifying. It reminds me of Stephen King’s “The Wastelands”.
I did hear a bout some nasty leak in the pipe that gushed for over a week, I think in South Dakota, before they got it fixed.
So, I guess, regardless of what the gov does or doesn’t do, this is proceeding apace. The self-fulfilling prophecies of the patriarchy are coming true, with or w/o Jeebus.
Meanwhile, the Oceans are dying, even my non-political friend heard about THAT:
Are the oceans dying?
A new report warns that many types of fish and whales could be wiped out if we don’t do something — fast
http://theweek.com/article/index/216547/are-the-oceans-dying
Thanks for the info CTuttle.
Meanwhile, back to our regulatory scheduled corporate news on the Anthony trial
Great post. Depressing though. I wanted to get clarification on one point in your post though. You mention that there is 200 ppm of recoverable carbon in the tar sands; what does that mean? Do you mean that there is enough carbon to increase the atmospheric concentration of CO2 by 200 ppm? If so, that’s truly terrifying since we’re at about 380 ppm now and the recommendation that I keep hearing is that if we want to limit the worst of the effects we need to get down below 350 ppm ASAP.
At this point in time you’d probably have better luck lobbying Republicans rather than Democrats. Obama and his boys desperately want unemployment and gas prices to go down which this project promises to do (whether true or false).
That would be correct, in that another 200 ppm would be added globally if burnt..! It’s the ‘dirtiest’ oil on the planet…! What’s also left out of the discussion is the vast amounts of methane that is released into the atmosphere, that once was trapped in the ground! Also the global warming is thawing the vast tracts of permafrost that has stored it for millenia…! 8-(
Mahalo, Jane…!
How exactly will civil disobedience work. I too am a son of a “sourdough” who surveyed (Northern Ontario in the 50′s) and things are starting to seem hopeless. There is a palpable lack of education in the halls of politicians and business and the media. Is civil disobedience the only way to increase the level of education? Even the rich don’t WANT to foul their own nest.
Jeebus CT. Great diary. Rec’d.
How aggressively is our government pursuing this project? Is this a certainty or an idea at this stage?
On edit (can we have edit back, please?!?!)
The project I mean to inquire about is the pipeline from Northern Canada to Texas.
I’m sure it’s a “national security” issue.
If this keeps up, we won’t have a country to worry about “security for.
Alberta tar sands pipeline project delayed
The Obama administration ordered additional environmental reviews before a final decision, due at the end of the year
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/mar/16/alberta-tar-sands-delayed
Here’s a bunch of info:
http://www.dirtyoilsands.org/
I wouldn’t count on your last sentence being true AT ALL. I honestly think that the rich (whether obscenely rich or just “very” rich) are so *blinded* by their greed and hubris that they’ve bought their own lying hype that global climate change is just a “liberal hoax.”
I see them as believing that by shutting themselves behind heavily forified fortresses with private security forces that they’ll somehow be “safe” and only the peons will “suffer” (and who cares about them???).
Very foolish, very stupid, very short-sighted. But I certainly wouldn’t count on the rich to “get it.”
Thanks for the informative post. I confess to be somewhat undereducated about this issue. But I confirm that they are lying about this area being a “vast barren arctic wasteland.”
Firstly, even IF it happened to be an “arctic wasteland,” that would actually mean it was tundra and NOT wasteland. The notion that somehow something is “useless” or a wasteland simply bc it doesn’t have a lot of visible flora is nonsense anyway. Tundra and permafrost are not wasteland.
Secondly, though, I have friends from Canada, and I’ve seen photos of that area when it was heavily forested… not all that long ago.
But either way: forested or tundra, it’s not a “wasteland” that can just greedily be ripped asunder with no frickin’ consequences.
Lying bastards. Unsurprised. Good luck with your efforts. I have little hope of anything making much of a difference anymore, but I’m willing to be supportive where I can be.
Great work CT, thanks.
Highly rcc’d . . . and now front paged.
Well done, hoss.
As ice/permafrost melts we’re gonna get huge releases of methane anyways, but foraging for tar sands (or drilling in the oceans) is just gasoline on fire.
LeSigh.
Hey Tuttle ya made the FRONT PAGE!!! W00TT!!! Great diary by the way☺
What beguiles me are the legions of scientists who will jump on a plane to visit a remote part of the earth at the drop of a hat…often to present findings at a conference on, oh, say, the deleterious effects of airplane exhaust on the atmosphere…
More good news from the monster corporations:
Roundup: Birth Defects Caused By World’s Top-Selling Weedkiller, Scientists Say
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/24/roundup-scientists-birth-defects_n_883578.html
OK, who are they going to sell all this energy to if they kill us all off, one way or another? Are they just mindless profit making machines, or do they have a plan to find somewhere else to bide/
Great post.
I have been representing several landowners in Minnesota and Wisconsin whose lands were appropriated by Enbridge Energy to install the Alberta Clipper Pipeline and the Southern Lights diluent pipeline. Part of this included filing comments trying to convince Hillary Clinton to address the overall environmental impact of tar sands mining just impacted by the increased oil that would be shipped by the Alberta Clipper. None of the public officials or courts want to see any official estimates of the environmental impact of the tar sands. (You might say they have their heads in the tar sands.) The only one to come close was a 2010 Canadian court decision which forced one Canadian agency to redo its environmental statement to take into consideration the greenhouse gases for just one new mine being proposed by Suncor, I believe. It’s obvious to me from my experience that there are no elected or other public officials in North American willing to confront officially the realities of climate change resulting from human causes.
congrats on getting front paged at fdl tut
you are right, this is horrifying and i didn’t know the why before. my stars, this needs more attention. thank you for bringing it to mine. i hope you will continue to report on the effects of tar sand extraction and the ways that we can force a change.
I’d go with the former, rather than the latter: mindless profit makers. I think they believe their own stupid hype & lies.
I think your last sentence sums up the situation. No one gives a sh*t, as long as they’re raking in big buck$.
Hil & Bil Clinton’s daughter, Chelsie, may one day have some kids. Do Hil & Bil give a sh*t what life might be like either for Chelsie or their potential grandkids?? Don’t think so. The siren song of the CHA-CHING as addled their greedy senses.
Mahalo for that input, jonerik…!
Alberta is like Texas in a lot of ways, the Conservatives hold all the provincial levels of power and with Harper as PM there’s no Federal oversight of their exploitation…! 8-(
I almost dropped my coffee mug this morn, Suz…! ;-)
http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/06/chris-hedges-global-revolution-must-begin-in-america/
http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=15837
http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=3672
Good post Mr. Tuttle. These links are worth the time it takes to read them. They relate to your post although they are not about oil but the people who own it in the end and how we are so very screwed on a daily basis. My only agenda is to inform. I am no longer affiliated with what passes as political parties. Their agenda, along with the bankers et al who run them is to divide us. Your fight up in Canada is a call for unity. We are more powerful than they. Our only problem he says with a laugh is to unite…not so easy but so very necessary
B-bu-but … every Albertan gets $400 from AlSands …
Excellent Post, CT … Highly Recc’d !
The one thing I get from most posts on the environment is 1.)people are against a particular issue, in this case tarsands and pipelines
2.)And talk about issues such as global warming. The one thing I see very little of is what actions are being taken to change the dynamic. I am for pushing hard on clean energy, solar, wind and other renewables. I am for a smart grid and for new energy efficient materials. Think of the possibility of an advanced engineered nano material that could potentially reduce power loss on the grid by 99%. That would cut the need for power plants by almost half at present. New energy efficient construction could cut exponentially again. And new modes of transportation would reduce it even more. In ten years time coal plants and oil fired generating stations would become extinct. If we could reduce oil consumption by half in ten years with new technology that would be a great accomplishment.
Politicians love to talk the talk…they get elected and don’t walk the walk. To me the solution is to create a clear and present danger to their careers. I assure you they do not want to lose all their perks. We need to figure out a way how to “buy” them and displace big banks and corporations as their sponsors. The only way to do that is threaten them with a vote and pound the heck out of them so they will have no other choice but to dance to the drum of a new economy and a clean environment. But the majority of citizens must become educated on the perils and the “solutions” and that will unite a majority around a common cause. There can not be a left leaning progressive approach and the right should be cut out of the picture entirely we need to go straight down the middle, straight up and straight out. One thing the average Joe understands is how rotten the economy is and how high gas and oil prices are. It wouldn’t take much to get them to rally on the basis of new jobs.
If you watch some of the MSNBC programs online, you get treated to this Exxon ad ad nauseum. He means the pipeline is groovy, and that ‘we’ll be able to produce these oil sands with the same emissions as many other oils’. Booyah!
http://www.youtube.com/exxonmobil?x=us_showcase_59
Nebraskans are pretty pissed about the pipeline; wish I had time to hunt down a link. One of the Reps told one group freaking out about the poisoning of aquifers, “There are aquifers EVERYWHERE HERE!” We call that Bullshit.