The ever intrepid Pepe Escobar penned another barn burner of a post at Asia Times…
Real cowards go to Tehran
…It’s like a pudgy armchair action man mesmerized by a nimble lap dancer. I’m gonna make you mine, honey. It’s regime change time, gotta snuff out the owner of this joint. Otherwise, people will start talking; what kind of chicken global hegemon is this? {snip}
Baby, sanction me one more time
Let’s review some of the latest evidence. Tehran has just sent two of its warships through the Suez Canal towards the Mediterranean; they docked at the Syrian port of Tartus – no less. Not so long ago, disgraced dictator and close House of Saud pal Hosni Mubarak would have probably bombed them… {snip}
Baby, I’m coming to get ya
…So it’s Ouroboros all over again – the serpent biting its own tail. We need to bomb to get regime change, so that oily dancer will dance on our wealthy lap.
The problem is neither the Obama administration nor key Pentagon generals are convinced this is a good deal.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin E Dempsey, thinks, “It would be premature to exclusively decide that the time for a military option was upon us.”
And Lieutenant General Ronald Burgess, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told Congress last Thursday, “Iran is unlikely to initiate or intentionally provoke a conflict.” No wonder; Dempsey himself admitted that the leadership in Tehran – contrary to relentless neo-con media spin – “is a rational actor”.
Does this all matter for the neo-cons and their legion of media shills? Not really. Until they find a sucker to fight a war for them – as in a Republican US president – real cowards will keep going to Tehran, all day and all of the night, in their wettest of wet dreams.
I swear Pepe is on fire these days…!
Philip Giraldi also wrote a must read…
AIPAC Declares War
…The American people don’t particularly want a new war in the Middle East, but apparently Congress and Washington’s most powerful lobby do. Thirty-two senators have co-sponsored a resolution that will constrain the White House from adopting any policy vis-à-vis Iran’s “nuclear weapons capability” that amounts to “containment.” The senators include the familiar figures of Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, both of whom have persistently called for military action. They and the other senators have presented their proposal in a particularly deceptive fashion, asserting that they are actually supporting the White House position, which they are not. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta repeated on Feb. 16 that Iran does not have and is not currently building a nuclear device. Before Christmas, he stated clearly that the “red line” for the United States is actual Iranian possession of a nuclear weapon. Even Israel’s intelligence services agree that Iran is not building a bomb. What we are seeing play out in Congress is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) position, which is that Iran has already crossed a “red line.” The AIPAC argument will no doubt be spelled out in more detail next month at the group’s annual convention in the nation’s capital, a meeting that will be addressed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and will attract nearly all of Washington’s power brokers… {snip} [Ed:Obama to speak at AIPAC before Netanyahu meeting]
…You might well ask how the United States wound up in such a pickle. Many Americans are beginning to wake up to the fact that it is disgraceful that a small country like Israel should be able to dictate U.S. foreign policy in a key part of the world, but the current situation is actually far worse than that. This is the case of a foreign government’s lobby consisting largely of American citizens using its clout to avoid registering as a foreign agent while narrowing the policy options through its friends in Congress and the media in such a way as to make war inevitable. Some might call it treason. Such people should be denounced and marginalized before they send off another wave of young Americans to die on their behalf while beggaring the rest of us, but instead, senators and representatives will be lining up to cheer them in a month’s time. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison must be spinning in their graves.
Now, some more current news and views on Israel/Iran/Syria…
China warns of severe results for Middle East…
Russia: Israeli strike on Iran would be ‘catastrophic’
Deputy Russian FM warns Israel against striking Iranian nuclear sites, saying Israel must understand consequences of such an action.
FM Lieberman: U.S., Russian warnings against Iran strike will not affect Israel’s decision…
Peres to tell Obama: I oppose Israeli attack against Iran in the near future…
God Help Us All…!



34 Comments

Dude, you had me at “what kind of chicken global hegemon is this?”
LMAO. Very nice. I must: is this yours or did you get from somewhere else? Cause it’s bloody brilliant.
What else is there really? Seems like the time of madness is upon us. Invade Iran? Maybe we should just be lucky we’re not invading Russia. Not yet anyway. Of course that may come to pass as well.
Pass the popcorn. If she’s going down, might as well get a good seat.
Those were Pepe’s choice words, tambershall…! ;-)
‘….so that oily dancer will dance on our wealthy lap’….OMG, Pepe. But…I did like ‘So long, towel heads’ just a couple notches more. ;o)
Looks like quite the star-studded line-up at AIPAC on May 4; wonder if John Hagee of CUFI will be there, doing his reverbed mic performance as G*d? Wait a minute; they didn’t mention Hillary? Always love to watch the videos of her performances their…that zeal, that True Believer fire….oooh, la la…
But wait! There may be some Uninvited Guests! Will Bibi bring his own security forces with him?
http://mondoweiss.net/2012/01/occupy-aipac-now-has-100-orgs-behind-it-and-neocons-try-to-block-its-appeal-to-jewish-liberals.html
Pretty fun, CTuttle. Rec’d.
Bibi’s revenge: Israel attack on Iran equates to $6 gasoline plus a tailspin recession; a weak and weakened Obama loses in November.
Just saw that Brent crude is at its historical high just on the ‘fears about Iran’. Wouldn’t take much these days to be a market behavioral psychologist, would it now?
Thank you. I look forward to a day when ‘agents of a foreign power” (read Israel) are not able to gain a foothold here in the USA. Lieberman’s resolution was signed by two of my State’s senators: Gillebrand and Schumer. It is a declaration of war against Iran as it disallows a policy of containment, much less a policy of tolerance. AIPAC fully deserves to be censured and dis-incorporated as a non-profit political organization. We need to sanction aggressive, threatening behaviors whether they are from our friends (read Israel) or from our unfriends. Israel receives 3 billion of our precious tax dollars each year. Maybe we need to reduce or remove their foreign aid “allowance”. If Israel and the USA are ‘married’ wouldn’t this be a good time for an ‘amicable divorce’????
Signatories to the Lieberman Resolution on Iran:
Senators U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), Joseph Lieberman (I-Connecticut), and Bob Casey (D-Pennsylvania), introduced the resolution with: Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), John McCain (R-AZ), Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-TX), Jim Inhofe (R-OK), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Susan Collins (R-ME), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Ben Nelson (D-NE) Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), John Cornyn (R-TX), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Bob Menendez (D-NJ), Ben Cardin (D-MD), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Mark Udall (D-CO), Jim Risch (R-ID), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Scott Brown (R-MA), Chris Coons (D-DE), Dan Coats (R-IN), Rob Portman (R-OH), John Boozman (R-AR), John Hoeven (R-ND), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), Dean Heller (R-NV)
Bibi’s a coward. So’s Avi Lieberman.
Neither is going to have Israel make any sort of move on its own unless the odds are overwhelmingly in its favor AND the chance of retaliation is nonexistent. And neither of these conditions obtains nowadays, which is why the Likudnik Wing of the PNAC Platoon’s been trying to bait the US into doing it — and that’s not gonna happen as the second the US attacks (Shiite-majority) Iran for any reason, the Shiite truce in Iraq and elsewhere ends and it’s open season on US “contractors” as well as the troops in Afghanistan. (Yes, kiddies, Iraq is now Iran’s ally and best bud, just as Ahmad Chalabi and his Iranian paymasters planned from the start when he was sent to bamboozle the PNAC Platoon with ‘flowers and candy’ talk.)
Forgive me for being a Cassandra, but I see an announced WWIII coming out of this little military endeavor if cooler heads cannot prevail.
China and Russia will jump in and that will be that.
The unannounced WWIII the US and allies have been waging will become to hot to handle as “spreading democracy”
Nice writing and put together, Tuttle.
BbbbbbRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr………
Any excuse will do………
You really have to wonder anymore if any of our “leaders” are sane enough to govern
Don’t you wish we had some correspondents like ol’ Pepe at the WH daily press briefing? (I admit that I miss Helen Thomas.) Pepe is indeed on fire and I love him for that.
Thanks, CT, for staying on the story of this godawful clusterfuck.
Baby, sanction me one more time
Let’s review some of the latest evidence. Tehran has just sent two of its warships through the Suez Canal towards the Mediterranean; they docked at the Syrian port of Tartus – no less. Not so long ago, disgraced dictator and close House of Saud pal Hosni Mubarak would have probably bombed them… {snip}
Iran could be asking the West to attack Syria and use that as a reason to attack our warships first. Iran would be stupid to let America attack first.
…The American people don’t particularly want a new war in the Middle East, but apparently Congress and Washington’s most powerful lobby do. Thirty-two senators have co-sponsored a resolution that will constrain the White House from adopting any policy vis-à-vis Iran’s “nuclear weapons capability” that amounts to “containment.” The senators include the familiar figures of Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina,
We should target all of them with $10 a gallon gas ads as well as them wanting another war which will be paid for with more SS and Medicare cuts.
This would force them to identify how they will pay for the war.
Ask the GOP who except for Ron all want war with Iran how they will pay for the war they all except for Ron want.
Israel has 200 nukes how does Iran getting one nuke become a threat? I think every post on Iran needs to mention this.
Today, an editorial in Israel, says if Israel strikes Iran, that it will be OUR fault because American did not “stop” Iran:
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/if-israel-strikes-iran-it-ll-be-because-obama-didn-t-stop-it-1.414245
Rational much?
I should have said that ‘in Euros’ it’s at an historical high. It’s worse here, in that energy prices are so high, while reserves are high since consumption is down…down. Ian Welsh explains that when Americans are without jobs for so long, they drop out of the consumer economy because they must…and so consume less energy. Not that ruling elites give a damn…they don’t have to in the short run, because with fracking on the increase, the US can become an oil exporter again. Arrgh.
He links to this page that shows the trends as to oil, oil products, and other energy sources. Pretty interesting.
http://www.goldismoney2.com/showthread.php?28967-It-s-Not-Just-Gasoline-Consumption-Tanking-It-s-All-Energy-Charles-Hugh-Smith
But meanwhile, supply and demand don’t have much to do w/ energy costs, nossir. ;o)
Because ONE nuke on Tel Aviv or Jerusalam would effectively destroy the country. Israel is small, you take out one of those two cities and they may not recover.
The better question is that with israel having AT LEAST 200 nukes, why they aren’t considered the threat.
I try to make sure that every post I make on this subject points out that Irans has no weapons grade material, is not set up to produce weapons grade material and we would KNOW quickly if that changed. I also sometimes point out that Iran has exactly zero capability to reprocess plutonium from fuel rods and is not making any effort to do so.
Boxturtle (But always remember: It only take one nuke to ruin your entire day)
That Bibi and Joe Lieberman are hanging onto the Christian Zionist CUFI in spite of the fact that it is an anti-Judaic organization is beyond comprehension. One can only conclude that the Zionists will sleep with anyone at this stage of the IP conflict, where they continue to seek the Holy Grail, the Greater Israel dream. When that happens (is happening), the next phase of the conflict will emerge, hopefully less clouded by MSM censorship.
It is unclear how a country can practice Apartheid in the dark. South Africa couldn’t, but I’m not certain about Israel. New (old) propaganda lines will certainly cast the Palestinians living in Apartheid as terrorists, needing to live behind the Wall and allowed in and out of their cities and towns through military checkpoints.
Thanks Tuttle for keeping everyone apprised of the ongoing horrors.
“It only take one nuke to ruin your entire day”
And that’s just what Israel wants everyone to believe, that Iran will attack them with nuclear weapons. How absurd, and they know it. Israel actually wants the US to do their dirty work in Iran, just as we did in Iraq.
But Obama, unlike the major GOP presidential candidates, is clearly not buying into it. As it turns out, Obama’s reelection may be the only event that will save us at this point.
Iran has not initiated combat with another country in their recorded history.
Otoh, if you’re going around whacking their scientists, causing accidents at their bases and encouraging other countries to be evil towards Iran, perhaps you should worry about how Iran might respond.
Obama does seem to not want to hit Iran at this time. But I sure had a different impression last year at this time. And I wonder how quickly things will change if Obama either needs a war or the election is over.
Boxturtle (Bullys don’t like it if victims aren’t helpless)
Let me express once again my ever grateful admiration for bringing this to our perspective.
“what kind of chicken global hegemon is this?” expresses perfectly the insanity of the situation.
This came from a person who is as perplexed as I am as to how this situation got so hot: The writer alleges that Iran has a new arsenal of middle range rockets that threaten Israel cities.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30606.htm
I have no way of verifying the allegations.
Gareth Porter debunks the Parchin military site controversy here: He gives the history of past inspections of this site and puts the whole process in the context of the last five to seven years:
http://consortiumnews.com/2012/02/23/tempest-over-an-iran-military-site/
I’d read that excellent Gareth story earlier, but, it was b at Moon of Alabama who originally debunked the initial IAEA false assertions about Parchin…
On “Nuclear Iran” Allegations: Nanodiamonds Ain’t Nuclear Bombs…
At first I’d wondered if he was related to the infamous Neocon, Frank Gaffney, but, it’s been no secret that Iran has indeed been upgrading all their conventional Ballistic missiles, one reason, amongst others, that the US has been pushing so hard on the European Missile Defense systems, and, the neocons have been pushing that meme for the Oil Embargo and sanctions…! I would add that Mark really hits the mark…
We must rally to prevent such a war. Peace activists must now marshal every asset for peace that we possess. The American people need to know the truth. This is a phony crisis. Yet the danger is very real. Now is the time to speak out with all of our strength. Tomorrow could come too late.
Heh, two of MY favs, CT.
As to DOING Iran, how many phookin times do I or Pepe or anyone have to remind ya?
China
Russia
India
Pakistan
France
German
Britain
Ya know?
That’s a lot of deterrence hoss. ;-)
Enuff to deter even the 1% facist corporate and the whackaloon erected offals they own.
Jist sayin, again, and again, dude.
;-)
I’m not sure why everyone is so convinced that an attack on Iran and/or gasoline at $6 would signal O’s defeat.
Hello, Iraq?
I just don’t think the anti-war vibe, even with economic issues, is that pertinent in this country. I cite Iraq as the example and the ensuing economic issues.
I wish I could be so nonchalant about it, Larue…! 8-(
It wouldn’t be just the huge spike in gas prices(and $6/gallon is definitely low-balling it), but, in fact, how many other dominoes would be toppled over enroute to WWIII…! All the sane voices clearly point out that we’re at the same precipice as WWI’s Archduke Ferdinand’s assassination…
Remember, Russia will be pulled in by responses from Georgia, Azerbijian, Syria, etc…! 8-(
The other thought is that the relative hand full of gods collectively known as the Oligarchy are more than willing to see Israel end in a fireball, and bring on WW III. Their financial system by which they control us is melting, and soon the hordes will be at their door. They need to overturn the chessboard. Genocide aka ritual human sacrifice is one of their sacred rites. It’s what marks them apart from ordinary men who couldn’t conceive of such a thing. Morality is the concern of the human cattle, or targets.
Their system is coming down fast, so the push is on to get this war going before their monetary house of cards falls.
http://larouchepac.com/node/21720
As Einstein once said, “I don’t how WWIII will be fought, but, WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones” *gah*
Although I don’t disagree with the horrible potential, if the question is specifically O’s reelection, I don’t think war with Iran will hurt his chances. It will, IMO, help him.
Even some Rs will say “I hate that guy, but we’re at war, he’s our prez, so I support the war and him”. Some Rs meaning the sheep who have been so confused by the propaganda war is good and O is bad, that they will have to pick. I think they will pick someone doing what one of their own would do, ie. attacking Iran.
Besides that, I don’t know if Russia and the others will choose to intervene. My take, IMO, is that the Russians and Chinnesse are run by 1%ers who could care less about Iran. All they care about is profits. And I think, IMO, they will split up the loot after it’s all over.
That’s my personal take. It’s more of a 50-50 thing. Your assertions are certainly plausible and I don’t disagree. But for me the question is which one is more likely. So I say 50-50. Of course, what the hell do I know. Let’s hope it’s not WWIII.