“Goddamn it, we told you so.” Or so, the Grey Lady had recently reported…
Jihadists’ Surge in North Africa Reveals Grim Side of Arab Spring
As the uprising closed in around him, the Libyan dictator Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi warned that if he fell, chaos and holy war would overtake North Africa. “Bin Laden’s people would come to impose ransoms by land and sea,” he told reporters. “We will go back to the time of Redbeard, of pirates, of Ottomans imposing ransoms on boats.”
In recent days, that unhinged prophecy has acquired a grim new currency. In Mali, French paratroopers arrived this month to battle an advancing force of jihadi fighters who already control an area twice the size of Germany. In Algeria, a one-eyed Islamist bandit organized the brazen takeover of an international gas facility, taking hostages that included more than 40 Americans and Europeans…
…The mayhem in this vast desert region has many roots, but it is also a sobering reminder that the euphoric toppling of dictators in Libya, Tunisia and Egypt has come at a price.
“It’s one of the darker sides of the Arab uprisings,” said Robert Malley. “Their peaceful nature may have damaged Al Qaeda and its allies ideologically, but logistically, in terms of the new porousness of borders, the expansion of ungoverned areas, the proliferation of weapons, the disorganization of police and security services in all these countries — it’s been a real boon to jihadists.”
… Yet Colonel Qaddafi’s fall was only the tipping point, some analysts say, in a region where chaos has been on the rise for years, and men who fight under the banner of jihad have built up enormous reserves of cash through smuggling and other criminal activities. If the rhetoric of the Islamic militants now fighting across North Africa is about holy war, the reality is often closer to a battle among competing gangsters in a region where government authority has long been paper-thin…
The Grey Lady goes on to name Mokhtar Belmokhtar, as the main purveyor of strife in the Sahel…!
But, Pepe Escobar, quickly shredded that nonsense…
…Timing – as in the expansion of the Global War on Terror (GWOT) – is everything. Carefully choreographed Libyan blowback in the Sahel could not be a better replacement for NATO raising a monster white flag in Afghanistan. There’s no Goooooood morning, Kabul! anymore; there’s just the sorry countdown to see the last NATO helicopter leaving Bagram – Saigon 1975-style…
I’m your bogeyman, turn me on
Inevitably, that most convenient of bogeymen – al-Qaeda – is once again back in fashion, the whole nebula of Salafi-jihadi groups and sub-groups promoted by the French-Anglo-American triad as the root of all evil in Northern Africa (but not in Libya, where they were exalted as “freedom fighters”).
Mokhtar Belmokhtar, one of the founding members of al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), is for all practical purposes an easily digestible Osama bin Laden remix. Belmokhtar was a classic “Arab Afghan” – part of that multinational legion trained by the ISI/CIA axis to fight the Soviets in 1980s Afghanistan. When he was back in Algeria in 1993 he joined the local jihad, as part of the Salafi Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC).
AQIM since 2007 was very close to the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), whose fighters were also trained in Afghanistan by ISI/CIA. And all the time LIFG was always conveniently manipulated by the CIA and MI6 against Col. Muammar Gaddafi.
After the targeted assassination of Gaddafi, AQIM was duly weaponized by LIFG, and even presented with scores of jihadis. Thus, unsurprisingly, there were plenty of LIFG fighters involved in the In Amenas raid. On top of it AQIM is also very close to the al-Nusra Front in Syria, which Washington branded as a terrorist organization (but not the eternally bickering “coalition” which wants to topple Bashar al-Assad).
The key point is that Qatar is financing all these people – AQIM, the splinter MUJAO, Belmokhtar’s brigades and the Salafist Ansar Ed-Dine, a bunch of Wahhabi takfiris who have absolutely nothing to do with tolerant Mali culture…
To be sure… Mali, France, and chickens – As in: come home to roost…!
Let’s delve ever further…
How Washington helped foster the Islamist uprising in Mali
…While the media have provided abundant descriptive coverage of the course of events and atrocities committed in Azawad since the outbreak in January of what was ostensibly just another Tuareg rebellion, some pretty basic questions have not been addressed. No journalist has asked, or at least answered satisfactorily, how this latest Tuareg rebellion was hijacked, almost as soon as it started, by a few hundred Islamist extremists.
In short, the world’s media have failed to explain the situation in Azawad. That is because the real story of what has been going on there borders on the incredible, taking us deep into the murky reaches of Western intelligence and its hook-up with Algeria’s secret service.
Azawad’s current nightmare is generally explained as the unintended outcome of the overthrow of Libya’s Muammar al-Qadafi. That is true in so far as his downfall precipitated the return to the Sahel (Niger and Mali) of thousands of angry, disillusioned and well-armed Tuareg fighters who had gone to seek their metaphorical fortunes by serving the Qadafi regime. But this was merely the last straw in a decade of increasing exploitation, repression and marginalization that has underpinned an ongoing cycle of Tuareg protest, unrest and rebellion. In that respect, Libya was the catalyst for the Azawad rebellion, not its underlying cause. Rather, the catastrophe now being played out in Mali is the inevitable outcome of the way in which the Global War On Terror has been inserted into the Sahara-Sahel by the US, in concert with Algerian intelligence operatives, since 2002…
It’s funny how our current AFRICOM CinC, Gen. Ham, bemoans the civilian carnage, however belatedly…
Gen. Ham: US Failed to Train Mali Troops in Ethics – US Never Taught Troops Not to Execute Civilians
…Gen. Ham says that the US provided considerable training but focused “almost exclusively” on tactics and technical matters, without spending enough time teaching troops that they shouldn’t massacre civilians.
Rights groups have repeatedly reported that Malian troops have captured and summarily executed civilians in frontier cities, targeting ethnicities which are accused of being pro-rebel and capturing anyone without ID cards as “infiltrators.”
Mali’s Justice Minister had cited the US military’s own tortures and executions when presented with evidence last week, saying “no army in the world is perfect.“
The French are certainly not perfect:
Revealed: how French raid killed 12 Malian villagers…
Now, if you’re still not convinced, Andy Morgan wrote a book on the AQIM… Guns, cigarettes & Salafi dreams: the roots of AQIM…!
Folks, let’s look at some more real facts…
Africa pushed aside in Mali peace effort
…If only the French had backed an African-led resolution to the conflict, their soldiers wouldn’t be waging war on the ground today.
French jets are zipping past northern Mali, bombing the region and with it, a participatory framework that had thus far allowed African states to troubleshoot what is first and foremost a regional political crisis. France’s aerial assault and imminent deployment of ground troops is a volte face from its original plan to offer “logistical aid” to African peacekeepers in Mali. For all of French President François Hollande’s promises to treat Africa as a partner and friend, his government’s military intervention in the Sahel is proof that Françafrique is alive and well…
…The military intervention in Mali is France’s desperate attempt to rejuvenate its waning clout in the Sahel, an area that Paris considers to be within its “sphere of influence.” Mr. Hollande could have harvested the many chances that came his way to not only engage this crisis, but also promote African-led conflict resolution. France now bombs Mali knowing that its actions will be met with no resistance — and maybe even support — among other permanent members of the UN Security Council. African states, playing catch-up, need to support the intervention or struggle to stay relevant in this conflict. The collateral damage from all this remains the same: local or regional armed forces stay ill-equipped to tackle such crises without training or financial support; UN peacekeepers continue to play second fiddle as they are delegated to clean up the trail of destruction left in the wake of this assault; militarised alliances like NATO strengthen their grip as the world’s policemen. As in the past, the cure to Africa’s ungovernable malaises will come from foreign shores. Which is another way of saying that there will actually be no cure?
My, my, what a Wicked Web we’ve woven…!
*gah*



36 Comments

For a different perspective from Patrice Ayme:
“The present situation in Mali was greatly caused by from the USA. The USA trained five units of the Malian army, and four of them defected to the invaders, with their brand new weapons and newfound skills.
The French (counter-)attack followed, within hours, the attempt to seize the rest of Mali: 50 French special forces dropped on the ground next to Konna, were supposed to help planes find their targets. They found themselves in combat as the Malian army retreated.
From
http://patriceayme.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/mali-usa-ought-to-fuel-france/
and the next essay:
Abstract: The USA has to realize that enforcing civilization, worldwide, is a matter of security, not just high principle.
Yes, it was uncivilized for the USA to attack Afghanistan in 1979 and Iraq in 2003. However, it’s civilized to help the French as much as possible to defend the secular Malian republic and the Malian People.
As far as fighting a long war, the USA itself was born no earlier than 1776 from a conflict that had started earlier than 1756. Rolling back fanatical invading Islamists since 721 CE, and other invaders before that (Huns, Goths, Vandals, etc.) has been Francia’s main business. Not for the pusillanimous, right! If civilization is not strong, civilization is nought. From
http://patriceayme.wordpress.com/2013/01/26/mali-lesson-iii/
“Another immediate goal should be to make sure the black Malian forces do not exert reprisals against the white, Tuareg or Arab “Malian” rebels. That is where pacifying officers from the West could help.”
“More subtle, but long term necessary, is giving the Tuareg a state (“Azawad”?), or secure autonomy (but say, Algeria, Morocco, will not like it).”
…However, it’s civilized to help the French as much as possible to defend the secular Malian republic and the Malian People…
Airborne Refueling Stations, is certainly the proper thing to do, eh…?
As a Realist had noted recently…
“French, Malians secure Timbuktu in rebel-held north”
…This is an example of what professional and skilled troops can do against guerrilas in country as "open" in topography as Mali, Niger, Chad or Libya. The populations in these African countries are small, and the towns are few. This greatly simplifies the task of clearing the handful of towns in the desert. The same sort of speedy result would have been possible against Qathafy's forces if the opposition to him had been other than undisciplined and untrained guerrilas themselves.
It is nevertheless true that the post offensive situation in Mali or any of these places will require a continuing French presence at some level for a long time to prevent the return of the Islamist guerrillas. The Malian Army is no more capable of defeating insurgencies on their territory than are the armies of Iraq or Afghanistan. pl
The Andy Morgan piece is well worth the effort to read.
The Pambazuka article should have reversed the order of Hollande’s motivations. Domestic politics always is the first driver of foreign policy.
The Standard article likely reflects a common African perspective. I would bet that you would find similar articles in the newspapers of other African countries. The Standard is just more easily accessible to US readers.
Put Pepe Escobar’s analysis with that of Andy Morgan. Escobar is onto something in this conclusion:
The wicked web is the conflation of military action with foreign policy. There are other possible foreign policies. The “Munich-Pearl Harbor” PTSD continues to be played by the MIC to discourage the achievement of real national security.
Thanks for continuing to birddog this information, CTuttle. Rec’d.
… The “Munich-Pearl Harbor” PTSD continues to be played by the MIC to discourage the achievement of real national security…
We’re on the same page, Tarheel…! ;-)
Remember Rummy, eleven years ago:
–SecDef Donald Rumsfeld, Jan 8, 2002
Teach ethics in war? Might as well tell a serial killer to be selective.
West Point ethics class:
In my 20 years of service, I was fortunate enough to never having to test my ethos…!
But, it must be noted that all those that have had to serve recently, a grisly toll is racking up, with 16(or more) Afghan/Iraqi vets committing suicide everyday…! 8-(
The US failures in the Middle East and Afghanistan supposedly led to a US policy shift to a new Asia-Pacific policy. It is to be “America’s Pacific Century.” Don’t believe it. Africa is where it’s at.
Of twenty-six (26) US “National Emergencies” Africa has 8.
Cote d’Ivoire
Libya
Zimbabwe
Somalia
Liberia
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Sudan
Zimbabwe
Mali hasn’t made the list yet, but it will, as will others. On Jan 23 SecState Clinton told a congessional committee that the United States cannot allow Mali to become a safe haven for the group Al Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), warning of the risk of AQIM attacks on the United States itself. And recently,
MS. NULAND, Jan 25, State: “Well, let me just commend to you some of the comments that the Secretary made during her Benghazi hearings with regard to the challenge that we are all having to confront, not only in Mali but in the entire region.”
U.S. Africa Command held 14 major joint exercises in 2012.
“National emergencies” in the rest of the world?
Asia (except ME) has 3, ME is 6.
Correct me if I am wrong CTuttle, but isn’t the whole idea of basic training to learn to kill on command and learn to stop killing on command as well. So the ethic is fundamentally “Obey your superior officer”. That’s how I read Gen. Ham’s complaint. And, the complaint is just as telling as McChrystal’s whining that he didn’t have enough troops and resources. A bunch of weinies still trying to prove that we won the Vietnam War is what it seems like to me. In character as Custer-like as we can come in this century.
As for the consequences of Bush’s frequent rotation and tapping of the National Guard, from the point of view of the military that is an improvement over Vietnam in which PTSD was increasing fragging instead of suicides. Maybe Saxby Chambliss wants to tell us how Max Cleland caused those current rash of suicides.
Considering that France leads the way for the US in Africa, current French troop levels:
Mali 2,150+ (increasing)
Djibouti 1,900 (US strong here)
Gabon 900
Senegal 350
Chad 950
Central African Republic 450
Côte d’Ivoire 450
also, Dec 24, 2012
Army brigade to train African anti-terror teams
WASHINGTON — An Army brigade will begin sending small teams into as many as 35 African nations early next year, part of an intensifying Pentagon effort to train countries to battle extremists and give the U.S. a ready and trained force to dispatch to Africa if crises requiring the U.S. military emerge. (3,000 total)
The US also has troops in Ethiopia, Somalia, Djibouti, and other countries in East Africa, and in the west has a headquarters in Burkina Faso. Nigeria beckons with Boko Haram on the loose, and the UN has 18,000 “peace keepers” in DR Congo.
The pivot to Asia likely gives European nations primary responsibility for Africa. That’s not an uncommon division of the globe in trans-national corporations. And there seem to be some people in the defense community beginning to question the geographical command area-of-responsibility model. There seems to me to be structural incentives for ambitious generals (Gen. Ham for example) to create trouble in order to advance their careers. And that’s without taking into account the mischief that the intelligence community can invent to justify its continued funding.
Killing in combat is normally a personal decision, with top consideration being (1) accomplish the mission and (2) protect your buddies and yourself. So normally a soldier, scared out of his skin, won’t leave anything to chance and will kill anything that moves.
factoids:
– the U.S. now imports roughly the same amount of oil from Africa (Nigeria and Angola) as it does from the Persian Gulf.
–Six of the world’s 10 fastest-growing economies between 2001 and 2010 are in Africa. The International Monetary Fund says that between 2011 and 2015, African countries will account for 7 of the top 10 spots.
– trade between China and Africa has grown on average some 33 per cent per year since 2001. Africa may become China’s largest trading partner by 2017 or 2018 surpassing even Europe or the United States.
General Ham is leaving, presumably a victim of Benghazi (he wanted to send relief).
The big deal in the Pentagon currently is AirSea Battle (ASB) – a comprehensive concept to counter emerging anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) challenges — i.e. China’s asymmetric military capabilities that include anti-ship ballistic missiles, cyberwarfare capabilities, anti-satellite weapons, and more-conventional submarines, warships and stealth aircraft.
It’s a budget thing — getting bucks for the Navy and Air Force which have been sidelined by COIN.
How very true, and I still thank my lucky stars that I never had to make that decision…! *g*
Interesting observation, but I think it sells short the fraggers who were suffering from stupid policy not mental problems.
THE COLLAPSE OF THE ARMED FORCES
By Col. Robert D. Heinl, Jr.
Armed Forces Journal, 7 June, 1971
“During the years of 1969 down to 1973, we have the rise of fragging – that is, shooting or hand-grenading your NCO or your officer who orders you out into the field,” says historian Terry Anderson of Texas A & M University. “The US Army itself does not know exactly how many…officers were murdered. But they know at least 600 were murdered, and then they have another 1400 that died mysteriously. Consequently by early 1970, the army [was] at war not with the enemy but with itself.” Rough figures for “fraggings” are indicated in column a. below.
The Air Force is getting it’s ‘bang for the buck’, these daze, Don…! They’re training more Drone Pilots than actual Fighter Pilots…! Sez it all right there…! 8-(
But in another sense you’re correct. Volunteers, by definition, must suffer for there own decision and they can’t (they believe) take it out on others.
Therein, lies the rub, Don…! With the switch to the all-volunteer army, which I served under, the problems have been largely hidden from the Public purview…! 8-(
Right, but the really big bucks are in procurement, like the trillion-dollar (program cost) F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter. The F-35 needs 24 million lines of software to operate. That includes 10 million on the plane itself. As the Government Accountability Office notes:
In nine years (2001-2010) F-35 costs increased by more than 50 percent, with the current estimate of program cost $382 billion. At that rate of increase by 2039 the F-35 program would cost well over a trillion dollars with a unit cost increasing from $115 million to $500 million.
Can we deliver it to your home? By ground — it won’t fly.
Well hidden or not they’re much worse, with mentally wounded people being sent back again and again. To cover it, there is the Praise The Troops hooplah at many public/sporting events to honor Those Who Protect Our Freedom, yellow ribbons on steroids. Those poor mentally and physically fucked-up kids have no choice. Dead end.
*heh* Ya left out the best part, Don…! New £150million combat jet is banned from flying in bad weather because it could EXPLODE… Fancy that, eh…?
CTut – It happened again — you have dropped off the FDL “recommended diaries” list in favor of Pass The Cat etc. and so I have to go on an extended hunt to find your diary and then I only find it by chance. Am I missing something or is that the common FDL system? Are there so many diaries FDL can’t list them all? And what could be more important than a CTuttle diary?
I like the comments from the F-35 maintenance chief at Eglin AFB.
I always check the underside of the tires on my Toyota pickup also. You can’t make this stuff up!
…And what could be more important than a CTuttle diary?
*heh* Flattery will get ya everywhere, Don…! ;-)
Btw, it is mighty funky when I’m at the top of the myFDL rec list, but, as I’m hosting lln, it’s not even registering on the FDL rec list…! 8-(
Highly recommended from here, so maybe we won’t have o hunt it down for a few hours.
Where’s the Africa Queen when we need her?
The F-35 is the wrong aircraft at the wrong time for a mission that will never exist.
The F-22, the 787, the F-35: all indicative of an aerospace industry that has become too complex and tied to considerations outside of flight itself or of mission to understand WTF is supposed to be accomplished with a new design.
*heh* An A-10 Warthog would be the best package these daze, ET…! ;-)
Hey i know i don’t have a clue about fighter jets. Does the F-35 stand for the Ford Edsel-35?
*heh* Close enough, homeroid…! ;-)
It’s too early to play a video here, but at another site I saw this video being lauded as ‘this is speaking truth!‘ (or close).
Ding. Ding. Ding.
The whole enterprise is a budget thing as far as the brass and Congress are concerned. It’s the libertarian jobs program.
It appears Mali is such an obvious graveyard for imperial ambitions that even WaPo is forced to admit the truth. Today it ran a short AP report in which a U.S. State Dept. official, on the record, admitted that reclaiming Mali from the bad guys would take “years.”
“French Rafale Versus USA Corruption
TAXES FOR STEALTH CORRUPTION? THE F-22, F-35 SCANDALS.
The F22 Raptor is the USA air superiority plane. It cost too much and proved too fragile. In USA style stealth, sharp angles are used because only reflections in discrete directions come back. So the USA style stealth plane acts as a diamond: a bright radar flash is followed by nothing, as the plane has moved slightly in the next sweep, and the sharp reflection went far away.” at
http://patriceayme.wordpress.com/2012/08/12/5483/
has more to say about this.
from Patrice Ayme’s link:
The Raptor is very hard to spot on radar, but it’s big, and it’s hot. An enemy can pick up a Raptor from about 50 kilometers away with infrared sensors and then fire heat-seeking missiles.