Ah the Christmas season! The time of year when the news organizations can sneak stories through that allow them to claim they are doing their jobs while assuring that the stories die with little to no coverage.
Yesterday’s (December 26) Washington Post had two front page stories that fit this template. The irony is because on the web site, they were on top of each other, with no one apparently thinking about the appearance and connection.
The first story was how the CIA has been providing Viagra to warlords to get them on "our" side. Spencer hit on this over at Attackerman but I wanted to point this little nugget out:
Among the world’s intelligence agencies, there’s a long tradition of using sex as a motivator. Robert Baer, a retired CIA officer and author of several books on intelligence, noted that the Soviet spy service was notorious for using attractive women as bait when seeking to turn foreign diplomats into informants.
What the reporter is glossing over in this story, with the "wink-wink, nod-nod" presentation though is discussion of the women who are affected by this. Stories in the last year have covered the rise on drug addiction among Afghani women. This isn’t a culture where the female spy willingly "sacrifices her virtue for the greater good of the United States." This is a culture where women are second class citizens, who have no say in how they live their lives.
Which brings me to the irony that the Post missed. The second front page story was on the exploitation and abuse of young girls around the world hired as domestics but often treated as slaves.
The International Labor Organization (ILO), a U.N. agency based in Geneva, said more girls under 16 work in domestic service than in any other category of child labor. The organization said that maids are among the most exploited workers and that few nations have adequate regulations to safeguard them.
Rights groups say rural families often send their girls off to work willingly, as a way to escape poverty, not understanding the risks of abuse. And the employers are often only marginally better off. Having climbed a step or two on the economic ladder, they can afford one of the first trappings of prosperity: a girl to do the chores.
Human Rights Watch has documented nearly 150 cases of female domestic workers from Indonesia who killed themselves in recent years in Singapore, many jumping to their deaths from high-rise apartments. In Saudi Arabia, thousands of girls and women from Sri Lanka, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations have fled abusive employers, according to the New York-based rights group.
The exploitation of women and children is a world-wide problem. Yuk-it-up stories about the CIA providing Viagra to warlords and territorial chiefs in Afghanistan, implying that all participants are willing and happily go along, don’t help things. But then, I guess that wouldn’t have allowed the reporter to have his laugh.



46 Comments







The Digg has been Dugg
Hot diggity dugg, dakine – hey folks, there are 8 Diggs on this post – digg it up for Dakine!!!
If Viagra is our strategy then we have no strategy.
Have you thought about applying for that omniscient Irony Editor position?
Thanks but I’m sure there are many more qualified for that than I am. But I’m obviously more qualified than anyone working at the Po0.
Plus, it might be a long commute. Oh, that’s right…toobz.
And also, I don’t think it has to be the Season for the media to sneak through unresearched stories.
Christmas has nothing to do with it, but, it was a clever start to your post.
Well, most folks (at least in leftblogistan) have figured out the Friday News Dump and have worked to overcome that so that the stories don’t die as easily as before.
But there’s still the “we’ll sneak story B out while everyone is distracted by story A’s bright shiny object appearance” and the “sneak stories out during a holiday period when folks aren’t watching” which is what I think they were trying to do here.
I just cannot figure out why they bother. If the news threatens their handlers then it shouldn’t be reported at all.
Well, sometimes, the “news” is the spin as they try to get out ahead of someone who would report things straight.
And sometimes, I think it’s just the cluelessness of the reporter and the editor. I can picture the reporter laughing as he wrote the Viagra story and his editor chuckling at the images and they obviously had no thought aobut who else was involved.. And of course, all the anonymous sources for the story to show how kewl and forward thinking the CIA is in this. /s
The whole viagra thingie has consequences that the boys never cared to consider like the effect on women and relationships.
hint: there is more to life than hard-ons.
where’s the outrage?
They sure as hell don’t pay the bills. The hard-ons I mean. But, a clown car, that’s a different story. They can and do, sometimes.
and, as per usual, we are NOT on the side of the angels for sure. We just provide another method for these guys to oppress women and children in their own country. Wonder how Laura Bush is feeling about this piece of information this morning?
Laura Bush feeling
These words are at odds with one another.
Yeah, I was just dumbfounded when I saw the stories on the WaPo0’s web page yesterday, with the two being one on top of the other. Part of the day, the Viagra story was on top, part of day the exploited girls was first but right there together and it seemed no one noticed how bad it looked.
Thinking with the little head again.
So?
You are unimpressed that the much-maligned CIA can make the ‘hard’ decisions and rise, by whatever means, to the desperate needs of the time?
Remember, a bird in the hand is worth two amBushes …
Besides, this must be some small improvement on first-person torture: America cannot be held accountable for ANY misuse of its largess and whatever suffering may result is, nonetheless, good for someone’s pocketbook, as well as a blow for freedom and free enterprise (who knows, if this ‘takes off’, we might be able to try the same on the big oil-producing nations, trading one ‘addiction’ for another, as it were.)
Are the pharma companies providing this new weapon in the War on Terror, gratis, or are all of us ‘paying’ for the wisdom this ‘breakthrough’ policy represents and the success we may all be assured that it will engender?
Regardless, the ‘Murkan public is used to paying extravagantly for their security and this certainly cannot compare in cost to Star Wars …
Incidently, this new program is called “Pills for Peace”; some wags at Foggy Bottom have, cynically, retermed it “Pills for Piece”, but they are the dumb ones, and will, doubtless, soon be replaced …
My only wish is that they would make the pills, red, white and blue, that our ‘colors’ be properly represented and recognized the world over.
Note: the preceding SNARK is for entertainment porpoises only and reflects my utter contempt for what passes as ‘intelligenge’ these days.
DW
i The irony is because on the web site, they were on top of each other…
Right!
Here’s my irony nominee for the day to go with yours, dakine:
CNN’s Ed Henry thinks he’s reporting today on whether the Blago scandal will overshadow Obama’s inaugural.
But in reality, the question is, will the fledgling career promotion to White House senior correspondent be totally discredited and trivialized for Ed Henry before PEBO even takes the oath of office because Henry is reduced to reporting/stenoing the Blago controversy and trying his earnest yet pandering/gullible to RNC talking points best to provide some pretense of linkage that was pre-discredited by Patrick Fitzgerald even before the RNC hype machine could ratchet up.
What a shame…young Ed Henry had so much potential. Already dashed on the shoals of red herringdom.
(back to holiday hiatus mode….)
Actually they are third class citizens…… after the eldest male child(ren)……
Yeah. Goats and horses get better treatment.
very true…… you can always get a new wife but a high producing goat or a fine horse are really hard to replace…..
Some one said up up thread…thinking with their little head. You can f*ck a goat, but a goat can’t make you Hot Cross Buns.
That’s why I got so incensed when I saw the reference to the
line in the original piece (that I quoted above), as if the women involved are all femme fatale/Mata Hari types.
Since time immemorial, women be used. ‘Specially the pretty ones.
Read anything from the Old Testament through James Bond and beyond.
katy – actually, given some of the attitudes toward women in that society, I’m not even sure ‘third class’ status even qualifies…
Making babies is a central tenet of the rethugs world view. Once hatched they are on their own. They have married life in 1600 Pennsylvania with life in the 1600s.
Wait until the taliban figures out how to counterfeit little blue poison pills.
are the women that are collected as wives sold to their husbands or traded or go of their own free will?
Handing out Viagra is a damn site better than this sort of thing
http://www.progressnowaction.o…..acker/CQD7
I don’t think that we are replacing arms for hard-ons.
Sometimes arms are not a replacement for hards-on, but a solution.
Me thinks the solution is now ,in hand.
Bob Corker’s “Screw the Seniors” Plan
ew’s up
It ain’t just the girls:
http://www.afghanconflictmonit…..enoun.html
This isn’t a tad much? Possession/distribution of a hard-on producing substance being treated as evidence of intent to commit sexual abuse?
Are you all hysterical virgins unable to admit the possibility of sexual pleasure?
No, I’m not a “hysterical virgin.”
But are you so naive as to belief that all the women involved are willing participants? Especially given the historical treatment of women in this part of the world?
I bet you believe that the insurance companies are fully justified in paying for Viagra treatments for men while not paying for birth control for women as well.
I’m not an apologist for rape and the subjugation of women. And I don’t believe that insurance should cover Viagra and other ED drugs and not cover birth control. But are you so naive as to believe that the women involved wouldn’t have been involved except for the addition of Viagra? Afghanistan has been notable for a long time for the treatment of women as second class citizens. The idea that this deepens or contributes in any way to their position in Afghan society is ridiculous.
In addition, traditional Afghan society is pretty unlikely to either import or export women as domestic labor. So the issues are COMPLETELY UNRELATED IN ANY CAUSAL SENSE. Maybe that’s why WaPo didn’t see the “irony”. Because there is no actual irony. That’s why I missed it.
Lastly, how does this have anything to do with anything?
As it happens, the Soviet spy service was notorious for a LOT of really terrible stuff. Trading Viagra to a man so that he can have sex with his wives (note that the Viagra doesn’t cause the polygamous paternal society) is not morally equatable with using women as bait.
The line about the Soviet Spy Service was a direct lift from the WaPo0 article on giving Viagra to the warlords, so they are the ones who drew the parallel there.
The irony is in the yuk-yuk-yuk tone of the Post reporter about giving Viagra to gain cooperation at a time when Afghan women have no say in how their lives are handled. And the irony of a story on Viagra as a tool at the same time it sits next to a story about exploited women and children. You obviously don’t perceive it as irony. I do.
My point is that the example of the Soviet use of women as bait doesn’t draw a moral equivalence between the Soviet practice and the U.S. practice. So it doesn’t really “prove” the egregiousness of our practice.
I didn’t perceive the article as having a yuk-yuk tone, so maybe that’s why I don’t see the irony. Again, the dispensation of Viagra to Afghan chieftains is not a cause nor an exacerbation of the poor condition of women in Afghan society. Instead I read the the article as having a tone of appreciation of the resourcefulness of the officers in the field to get the chieftain to work with the NATO forces.
Your assumption is that the chieftain with a newly revived boner is out finding new women to oppress. My reading of the article is that he’s got a batch of wives, so their situation isn’t changing remarkably one way or the other, in which case there’s no change in the overall situation of women in Afghanistan.
In the end, if this tactic helps prevent the return of the Taliban to power, then it would be a positive contributor to the betterment of their condition, given that the Taliban prohibits all education of women and aids and abets throwing acid at women with the temerity to try to go to school.
Finally, there is no parallel between women who live in an admittedly patriarchal and oppressive traditional society and women who are kidnapped and kept as domestic slaves. I wouldn’t want to live in a society like Afghanistan, nor would I want my daughter to decide (cf. John Walker Lindh or Adam Gadahn) that she wanted to become part of a society like that. I have friends who have worked to help educate and provide job training for women there and have donated to organizations that do the same mission. But again, a repressive male-dominated traditional culture is still different from international kidnapping and slavery. That’s why I don’t believe there’s a parallel between the articles and therefore no irony.
To me, the reporter bringing in the analogy of the Soviet Spy, since it was superfluous to the actual information being reported, is part of what moved the article from straight reporting “see what the CIA is doing in Afghanistan” into the yuk-yuk-yuk, nudge-nudge land. The info WAS superfluous other than to try to make a prurient connections.
I would imagine those warlords will remain our “friend” just so long as the supply of blue pills holds up.
And the irony is the subjugation of women and children to the patriarchy, whatever guise it takes, whether as one of multiple wives or as domestic slaves. It is just different sides of the same situation.
No, I absolutely belief that paying for birth control is a good idea and have no inkling why they should pay for Viagra. But that hasn’t a damn thing to do with demonizing dicks.
Assuming Afghanis will become Viagra-crazed rapists is even dumber than assuming that they’re all terrorists.
Welcome to the Cheney Ladies’ Auxiliary! No proof needed to join.
I’m not saying that Afghanis are or will be “Viagra-crazed rapists.”
What I AM saying is we don’t really need to be celebrating the CIA providing Viagra in an area of the world where women have limited to no rights on how they are treated, which is pretty much how this article presents the information. And when the reporter brings in how the Soviets used women as spies, there is a mis-direction that implies that women DO have control over themselves in Afghanistan.
Or do you think that women have freedom to live their lives as they wish in Afghanistan? Do you believe that a woman in Afghanistan has the right to say no to the warlord? And what would happen to the woman who does “just say no?”
We bring freedom to the Middle East? T
Sorry
We bring freedom to the Middle East? The Freedom to own slaves Perhaps?
Bush Millions for Viagra but nothing for Condoms! Sexually transmitted Disease rates should go up.