Every now and then, I seem to run across news articles and/or headlines that seem to be just a bit of an understatement even as they are quite factual. Usually it seems, we get things like this one from NBC News yesterday:
New jobless claims take surprise jump
New claims for unemployment benefits took an unexpected jump in the latest week, raising more concerns about the struggling job market and providing further incentive for the Federal Reserve to jump in and help the economy.
As I have written before, it surely does seem as if the economist are ALWAYS surprised. Which still makes me wonder how they manage to keep their jobs as in most career fields, if you are always surprised by what happens, pretty soon you’re looking for a new career.
A couple of days ago, I saw this piece from Alison Linn at the Today show with the headline:
Many in middle class say they are doing worse financially
The Great Recession and weak recovery have left slightly fewer Americans feeling like they are part of the middle class, and many who do still identify themselves as such say they are now worse off.
A new and comprehensive survey on how the middle class feels, released Wednesday by Pew Research Center, finds 42 percent of people who identify themselves as middle class say they are in worse shape financially than before the recession began. About 32 percent are in better shape, and the rest either don’t know or see no difference.
I am part of that 42% though in fact, I have been forced to accept that by income, I am no longer remotely close to “middle class.” I am poor.
NBC News had this piece last night that is very much a companion to the Linn piece:
Stronger economy delivers smaller paystubs for most of us
With recoveries like this one, who needs recessions?The average household income has fallen steadily for nearly everyone since the start of the economic expansion in June 2009, with average income dropping 4.8 percent in the three years since the upturn began, according to a report released Thursday.
High unemployment, outsourcing of jobs and generally slow economic growth have restrained income for households during one of the weakest and most prolonged recoveries on record, according to the report from Sentier Research.
Last summer, I wrote this post about the interconnectedness of the global economy. Today, the NY Times has this article on how China is now having to deal with surplus inventory:
GUANGZHOU, China — After three decades of torrid growth, China is encountering an unfamiliar problem with its newly struggling economy: a huge buildup of unsold goods that is cluttering shop floors, clogging car dealerships and filling factory warehouses.
The glut of everything from steel and household appliances to cars and apartments is hampering China’s efforts to emerge from a sharp economic slowdown. It has also produced a series of price wars and has led manufacturers to redouble efforts to export what they cannot sell at home.
This actually does make me wonder how long this headline from CNN will be true:
Romney: ‘Big businesses are doing fine’
It is a global economy and eventually what happens to one piece of that global economy WILL trickle down to the rest of the globe. Meanwhile we get to see pics of Prince Harry acting like a single, 27 year-old man visiting Las Vegas.
And because I can:
Cross posted from Just A Small Town Country Boy by Richard Taylor



24 Comments

You forgot to mention that Europe is also heading into another recession as well.
From Calculated Risk:
More at CR at the link above.
Yay recovery!
TradMed of course will cover this story in about 18 months…
Hope springs eternal.
Lots of Mittens news. He has the Mittens Blind Trust to avoid taxes. It is a ruse, says Mittens.
There is lots of tax cheating, revealed in the Bain documents.
And Mittens makes a “Birther” joke.
Yep. And my landlord just increased my rent by $75/month for the coming year due to “rising maintenance expenses”. My phone bill was increased $15/month, just because (higher profits needed for investors, I imagine), my electric bill will increase 16% in January, my grocery bill goes up every time I shop, and my care has gone from costing me $27 to fill up to $42 to fill up in the last 6 years.
My income? Well, this will be the 7th year without a pay increase and only “minimal” increases in insurance and retirement costs. My boss touts that as something cool and prideful.
I don’t think I can qualify for lower middle class anymore either. I’m now among the working poor, with 3 college degrees. Ah, America!
Yep. And my landlord just increased my rent by $75/month for the coming year due to “rising maintenance expenses”. My phone bill was increased $15/month, just because (higher profits needed for investors, I imagine), my electric bill will increase 16% in January, my grocery bill goes up every time I shop, and my car has gone from costing me $27 to fill up to $42 to fill up in the last 6 years.
My income? Well, this will be the 7th year without a pay increase and only “minimal” increases in insurance and retirement costs. My boss touts that as something cool and prideful.
I don’t think I can qualify for lower middle class anymore either. I’m now among the working poor, with 3 college degrees. Ah, America!
And this raises the question of how economists can claim that there is almost no inflation. It’s not just the “volatile” sectors of food and energy that are going up, EVERYTHING is rising in price. The official inflation statistics are clearly not correct.
I seem to recall this number represented the approval rating of the outgoing Cheney/Bush cabal when they left office. This represents the hardcore right-wing benefitting from finance capitalism, i. e., cronyism and outright theft.
“With recoveries like this one, who needs recessions?”
Yes indeed. It’s no wonder that income inequality has grown worse under Obama’s 4 years than George W Bush’s 8:
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/04/growth-of-income-inequality-is-worse-under-obama-than-bush.html
“Many in middle class say they are doing worse financially”…and they are….not just the “middle class” but the entire 99% have had their pockets picked!
does it really havet to be this way?
No.
In addition, the cost of health care, education and even basic necessities continues to rise adding additional burdens to families suffering reduced income levels.
Yet the so-called 1% is thriving.
The average household income has fallen steadily for nearly everyone since the start of the economic expansion in June 2009, with average income dropping 4.8 percent in the three years since the upturn began, according to a report released Thursday.
How can we have an economic expansion in a Consumer economy when average household income has dropped? Are we perhaps exporting so many goods that export numbers overcome the drop in household income? If so why are there no jobs?
Unless someone has a different theory I will say that the numbers behind the economic expansion are FALSE!
Don’t forget to thank Benron for printing all that money. It’s made the things the 99% buy (food, oil, etc.) more expensive and the things the 1% own (stocks, bonds, silver, gold, etc.) more valuable.
Good job, Ben. Mission accomplished.
My SWAG is that business “expansion” was based on squeezing down wages and benefits and forcing increased productivity as much as increased ‘expansion.’
I.e., false economies
Absolutely. I saw that clearly when I was in a very, very big tech company 98 – 04. Every time we turned around, and just as we thought they couldn’t find something else to take away, they did. Got a seminar lunch invite that said, in 6 point type, “Bring your own lunch.”
The profit gains under Clinton were at least 70 percent employee take aways. But, then, this has been going on since the early seventies. The lower class took the first stiff hits.
I doubt economists are surprised. But by pretending we are surprised allows us to pretend that things like rising jobless rates are an aberration. In other words, it permits us to imagine that anything other than economic progress and growth are flukes, so there is no need to fundamentally alter the status quo. To say we are surprised enables us get out of responsibility and keep a shit economic system rolling along, largely for the benefit of those who own things like the newspapers that inform us of economic “surprises.”
Book Salon up with Kim Stanley Robinson’s 2312 (novel) hosted by Siun
If nobody is buying stuff I still fail to see how cutting wages could result in increased profits at the level we see on Wallstreet.
So I will stick to my idea Wallstreets numbers are phony.
Wall Street profits stem from stock prices not, oddly enough, production or purchases. I know this seems like a contradiction as the stock should respond to the other two yet, in large part, it does not. Stock prices reflect cuts in wages and benefits, reduction in standing inventories and other such “economies”.
Hi DakineO!.
fyi
Some beautiful pie charts broken into age related sections, showing job losses and %s of each age group gettting re-hired: some evidence of age discrimination.
HERE.
Oh of course there is age discrimination; it is just almost impossible to prove