I
n war a repressed and stigmatized person, be they soldier or civilian, simply wants to reach out. It is clear Bradley Manning identifies with a deeper gender identity than most people are willing to even begin understanding. The chat logs of his conversations are reminiscent of some of the same feelings that go unvoiced by the vast majority of soldiers: questioning the purpose of our mission when politics has mired us in prisons of moral turpitude. That Bradley voiced his concerns proves he was the least unstable and most moral of all the members of his team. That he happens to be gay or transgender gives our community a new hero who brings great credit to the moral force of our people in this world.
Basic lessons of military leadership compel us to listen to the concerns of our soldiers, particularly when they are caught in moral dilemmas such as Private Manning was. The moral failure of his entire chain of command is manifest in these chat logs. Our military and these new wars are significantly different from the militaries and wars of the past, in that ground level intelligence can change the course of an entire combat zone overnight. This requires commanders to give ear to the concerns of the soldiers at the ground level, and the intelligence uncovered by Private Manning is of the sort that would unequivocally sound alarms in the tactical and strategic mind of any officer trained in the ethical and moral precepts foundational for war-fighting. The moral incompetence of Manning’s chain of command is astounding.
It is time for our community to see this moral dilemma for what it is: a responsibility to stand together for justice. The struggle for Justice is not the struggle for Just Us. To speak up about Private Manning’s treatment is a moral duty that reaches far beyond one gay soldier. It affects our standing in this world, as moral citizens who stand for truth before perpetual war. It affects our soul in this historic moment, where future generations will ask us if we stopped to help end unjust wars instead of simply pontificating about them from our lecterns. It begs us to prove our mettle as Americans, as human beings, part of a larger family committed to speaking up for others and honoring their sacrifices on our behalf.
Bradley Manning is a soldier of great honor and we must stand with him in his journey to bring an abiding justice for our world. Those who fear the controversy of truth do not know the responsibility of moral living. Their moral silence is a moral disorder.



32 Comments

The moral incompetence of Manning’s chain of command is astounding.
Couldn’t agree more, Lt. Choi…! Keep up the good fight! You’re truly an inspiration to all our comrades-in-arms…!
“Those who fear the controversy of truth do not know the responsibility of moral living.”
Beautifully, beautifully stated. As a gay man, but more importantly as a human being, I thank you for your continuing courage and eloquence in the face of madness.
Thank you.
Thank you so much for this, Dan. Very moving and very true.
This lesson is one more reminder that we are supposed to stand for “equal justice.” Nothing about Manning’s experience or intelligence should in any way be less considered or taken seriously than the experience/intelligence of anyone else. This is an opportunity to show what we stand for: equality under the law and respect for all. I hope the struggle continues to be very public.
Both of you guys show exactly what American solders should strive to be you fight for the ideals America was founded on. You show a mirror to America and say stop looking using Dorian Grey’s portrait this is what you are really.
America can be a better place as long as we have people still crazy enough to take on Power.
Thanks:)
That Bradley voiced his concerns proves he was the least unstable and most moral of all the members of his team.
The army needs to do psychological screening to find more people like Bradley and you there would be a lot less angry Iraq’s and Afghans if more troops would stand up for whats right and not for example torture.
Everyone we torture or kill who was innocent has friends and relatives by being *cough* strong men of will/s we only piss people off more immorality is self defeating.
To speak up about Private Manning’s treatment is a moral duty that reaches far beyond one gay soldier.
Whats the latest on how he is being treated by the way and the status of his court case?
Dan is the WH still going to charge you with a felony? Why do you think that you are being singled out I think the last time a WH protester got charged with a felony was under President Wilson.
So why are they pulling out all the stops to get you? Is this an attempt to stop you from wrecking Obama’s chances with Gay voters? Are David and Rahm behind this overkill?
I think I’m smelling chicken shit.
We also have to defend our ability to communicate.
http://pages.citebite.com/g8m7g0e0dnol
Thank you for this and for all that you do. I served in the U.S. Army July’65 to July ’68. I kept my head down and did what I was told and never (after enlisting) volunteered for anything. As luck would have it I was never in country. I was a laborer, an ammo humper, one of the thousands of men who moved, stored, and moved again the ordinance used against the people of South East Asia. If I had known then what I know now I would have chosen Leavenworth. This veteran salutes Pvt Manning and I piss on his “superiors” all the way up to his commander in chief.
“That Bradley voiced his concerns proves he was the least unstable and most moral of all the members of his team.”
Well said. Too many others remained silent or even went all with all the lies.
…or even went along with all the lies.
“The army needs to do psychological screening to find more people like Bradley and you there would be a lot less angry Iraq’s and Afghans if more troops would stand up for whats right and not for example torture.”
The irony is that the army screens in the opposite manner as shown by the fact that Manning was corresponding with Lamo while awaiting a discharge for inability to adjust.
“That Bradley voiced his concerns proves he was the least unstable and most moral of all the members of his team. That he happens to be gay or transgender gives our community a new hero who brings great credit to the moral force of our people in this world.”
Well said, Choi.
“One tin soldier rides away . . .”
Bradley Manning is what we all should have,courage & conscience in the face of lies & deceits.
Hooray!for Bradley Manning,horah!,horah!Bradley.
The moral incompetence of Bradley Manning’s chain of command was nearly matched by the incompetence of media reporting on his story. PBS tired to locate the center of the story in Manning’s bumpy adolescense and in his sexuality, for god’s sake. That was an outrage and a disgrace. (No more tote bags or coffee mugs for me, thanks.)
That made me laugh.
Conversely, PBS which has been usurped by Republicans for at least a decade, did not touch Jeff Gannon, (fake reporter, top gay prostitute with balls out web site and somebody’s BFF in the Bush White House) or Karl Rove’s gay father’s frenum ladder with a ten foot pole.
Yes a huge double standard funny how Gannon got past the FBI check only Bush, Cheney or maybe Karl had that kind of pull. I assume after 9/11 WH FBI checks got even more through and mandatory.
As somebody who has lived through the service with gender identity disorder, I can only say that he has my respect and my sympathy. Thanks Dan.
Thanks for this and for all you do, Dan.
Thanks Dan, we owe you and Bradley Manning much for standing up for actual American values.
Thank you for everything you are doing and have done to bring the truth forward, Dan. The more we stand together for justice and true morality, the better for all of us.
You have taken the difficult path but the correct one. Bradley Manning deserves our respect and support.
By choosing to release classified information Manning decided he alone should be the arbiter of what is otherwise is confidential information. This was potentially injurious to both our nation and his fellow soldier. That does sound too democratic nor patriotic to me. I feel for Manning as a human being who was going through a difficult emotional time but condemn the act . . . as I’m sure will his court-martial. I tend to chose my heroes for their acts of selfless courage, Army Sergeant First Class Leroy Petry, not because of gender identity crisis.
Oneday this nation will be restored to sanity. On that day a list of heroes to the republic will be called out and on that list will be Manning and Choi.
They’ve already charged him. His trial is scheduled for August 29, here in Washington DC.
I wrote Dan an email when the chat logs were released, sent him a link and asked him what he thought. He sent an email containing that line, and I wrote him back and told him that needed to be a post. Extremely eloquent & profound.
Thank you, Dan Choi, for your brave and moral defense of our military.
I’ve been in awe of your strength. Thank you.
“Our military and these new wars are significantly different from the militaries and wars of the past, in that ground level intelligence can change the course of an entire combat zone overnight. This requires commanders to give ear to the concerns of the soldiers at the ground level, and the intelligence uncovered by Private Manning is of the sort that would unequivocally sound alarms in the tactical and strategic mind of any officer trained in the ethical and moral precepts foundational for war-fighting.”
Dan, this deserves highlighting, particularly for those of us with no military experience or no recent military experience. Could it be that the moral thing to do may now be the militarily right thing to do?
Thanks for your eloquence, your commitment, your truth.
Sorry but Manning had no right to determine that wikileaks was an acceptable organization to leak to. Why does he get to make that call for the rest of us?
Right on Lt. Choi *fistbump*
Best to you in your own efforts as well.
Rcc’d.