Cross posted from Pruning Shears.
One of the biggest threats fracking poses to the environment is the way it endangers the water supply. It does so in several ways, one of which has large-scale implications. Global impact like that is a little unusual; environmental issues are more likely to be local. Whether it’s fracking, lead paint/asbestos in old buildings, or a Superfund site, once you get a few miles away from it the greatest hazard is usually mitigated.
Fracking permanently removes water from the hydrological cycle, though, at which point it may as well be on the far side of the moon for as much use as it is. This goes beyond competition for scarce resources during a dry season, though the oil and gas industry is well positioned to elbow everyone else aside (via) if it comes to that. It is about the slow draining of the amount of water available for human use.
There are still the usual local concerns, though. Since fracking is exempt from the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act due to the Halliburton loophole, communities are left to do the work that the EPA is theoretically in charge of. I suppose an open abdication of responsibility – thanks, Dick Cheney! – is better than maintaining the charade that a worthless regulator is ostensibly on the case. Either way, though, there is no cop on the beat.
While the industry is supposed to provide an adequate amount of transparency (speaking of charades), there is no substitute for a little local activism. Much of the posting I’ve done on fracking so far has focused on more public and contentious settings. Going to a council meeting to encourage representatives to be responsive to public sentiment, or going to an industry sponsored dog and pony show to to provide a little push back – those can be fairly high profile and emotionally charged settings. Not everyone is up for that.
For those who oppose fracking but are deeply reluctant to put themselves in a potentially confrontational situation, there are other options. Like getting over their reticence. Do you think any of us LIKE doing that, for God’s sake? No normal person wants to pick a fight. Those of us who have spoken out so far have done so because we sincerely believe our quality of life, and perhaps even our ability to live in our communities, may be threatened. We feel like the industry has backed us into a corner and that we have no choice but to fight back. I can’t speak for any of my fellow activists, but I for one would rather be playing Portal 2.
There are other ways to get involved, however, and the Sierra Club has one that is perfect for any able-bodied individual who needs quieter options. Called the Water Sentinels program, the group makes simple water testing kits available to those who want to monitor the quality of their systems. The idea is simple: record some basic metrics about your water supply – or any nearby source – as a base line, then follow up every month or two with additional tests. Increase the frequency of the testing if fracking (or some other potentially significant event) occurs.
Here are stories about the testing being done in Colorado, Illinois and Ohio. I accompanied an activist on a recent test, and there really wasn’t much to it at all. Here is what the measuring instrument looks like:
Take it and a glass jar to a water supply, then fill the jar:
Use the instrument to measure the basic water quality:
The power of this is not in a single test, though. It’s in the accumulation of tests, with the eventual creation of a database in mind. If enough people in enough areas are able to do this kind of monitoring it will be much easier to make the case that, say, toxic fracking waste from a nearby well has poisoned a local waterway.
It isn’t one hundred percent certain, obviously, and the industry will surely look to discredit such testing should it ever feel threatened by it. But if done well and diligently, it could provide a powerful common sense argument against fracking. It also gives even the most painfully shy introverts a way to be involved – and maybe just persuade their neighbors.
The Sierra Club’s Water Sentinels site is here.




16 Comments

Help spread the meme:
Supporting Fracking = Denying Climate Change
Hearing about the fact that the Sierra Club is handing out water testing equipment is absolutely perfect for my household’s needs.
Thank you for your entire article, and especially for pointing out how there is NO liability to the big fracking companies, as the loopholes that Cheney’s 2005 “Energy Act” brought about, and also that the fracking is terrible in terms of outright destruction of our water, and also may have blowback even a decade or two later.
And no one is geared up to fight these fights. Jerry Brown’s government in California is reeling udner the implications of Cheney’s decimation of traditonal accountability.
One of the problems with fracking is the promise of jobs. In this economy, it is hard to get people to think years ahead about the water supply when jobs are held out as a carrot.
Just look at what can and does happen with the waste water from fracking… Toxic Wastewater Dumped in Streets and Rivers at Night: Gas Profiteers Getting Away With Shocking Environmental Crimes: http://www.alternet.org/fracking/toxic-wastewater-dumped-streets-and-rivers-night-gas-profiteers-getting-away-shocking
It’s even more important than you think
Check this out
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/05/18/and-this-tiny-sphere-is-all-the-worlds-water-that-we-can-use/
What I don’t see mentioned anywhere here is that fracking has begun to cause earthquakes. In Texas, they have been experience tremors where none have been recorded in the past. All of these quakes have been occuring in very close proximity to sites where wastewater is being re-injected into the ground.
I know this sounds like a wonderful way to monitor the effects of fracking but people should know that the Sierra Club has taken $26 million from the natgas industry.
Waving bottles of polluted water after the damage has been done may feel good but will do little to stop fracking.
And yet we had a Dem majority in the House and Senate since Jan 2007.
And a Democratic President in the Oval Office. The fact that our Environment is now a patient needing to be in the ICU shows that BOTH PARTIES have failed us and the planet, miserably. While getting their assurances from industry about both the “safety” of fracking and the fact that “If you are good to our industry, the revolving door between industry and government will be good to you.” .
Book Salon up with Michael Grunwald’s The New New Deal: The Hidden Story of Change in the Obama Era hosted by Michael Hiltzik
Sorry Danps, it seems i killed your thread. It’s a shame that good ideas like water quality testing have been hijacked by groups like the Sierra Club who are a major supporter of fracking. If people can stomach the idea of a BP funded test kit they can still use it to test their streams for other pollutants from other sources. They might want to ignore the fundraising request that comes with the kit.
Most of the US enviornmental movement sold out to big oil some time ago for cash and access.
I stipulated at the end of the post that it isn’t a 100% guarantee and that any testing results might end up challenged in court. I still think it’s a good practice even with those caveats. Baseline testing seems to me to be a good and useful thing.
Do you have any links showing the Sierra Club’s support of fracking?
This kind of information is just a click away at Google and our own lovely Jane Hamsher wrote an article on the subject at HP.
Sorry, fail. It’s not on me to back up your assertions. I’ll put you down for “no supporting evidence” then.
You are not serious are you danps, you don’t consider Jane Hamsher as a reliable source?
When people make assertions I think it’s fair to ask for a link. If your response to a request for a link is “Google it,” fail.
I give up danps you got me on a technical foul, disregard everything i said. gah