
"Remember Who You Are" by m kasahara on flickr
“The Democratic Party is running away from its traditional role of protecting the poor, the elderly, and the working class,” writes Congressman Dennis Kucinich. “To whom do these groups now turn?”
We turn to ourselves, Congressman. You know that. And you know I love you. But we’ve got to stop turning to people, much less parties. It’s killing us. We can work with you and all of our friends, but we’re going to have to do this ourselves. There’s nobody so poor, so elderly, so working class, so sick, so weak, or so wounded that they can’t help this country a hell of a lot more themselves than can your colleagues, Congressman, the vast majority of whom, politically speaking, aren’t worth a bucket of warm spit.
There were 54 members of Congress who signed a letter to Congresswoman Pelosi opposing cuts to Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid, and then voted against a bill to allow such cuts. Forty-one of them were in the so-called Progressive Caucus. In a close vote we’d probably have lost three quarters of them. A few others didn’t vote, and four more were not permitted to vote because they’re just given the pretense of representing imperial territories. But a bunch of death-dealing lowlifes took a public position against the destruction of what’s left of our public programs and then voted for that destruction. I’m talking about Congress members John Garamendi, Frederica Wilson, Hank Johnson, Mazie Hirono, Bobby Rush, Luis Gutierrez, Danny Davis, Stephen Lynch, William Lacy Clay, Chaka Fattah, Mark Critz, Shelia Jackson-Lee, Lloyd Doggett, and Eddie Bernice Johnson.
God damn it, I’m trying to write a book, and I have to stop everything because these and hundreds of other blood-soaked invertebrates just can’t wait to demolish our country. They can’t sit on their hands until the Bush-Obama tax cuts expire. They have to wreck everything right away. It’s urgent. It’s their perverse moral duty.
Let’s face it: the system is completely broken. It always does wrong, every time, no exceptions. We want the rich taxed. Congress cuts their taxes. We want the wars ended. Obama keeps them going and launches a few more. We want our weakest-in-the-wealthy-world safety net strengthened, so instead it’s shredded. Every time. Without fail. This is not a matter of chance. It’s a matter of legalized bribery, corporate media, gerrymandered districts, restricted ballot access, unverifiable voting machines, defunded schools, and poisonous habits of thought, primary among them the notion of giving one’s loyalty to a political party.
Fifty members of Congress with some claim to decency remaining should immediately create a new political party — or, better yet, declare themselves independents. But doing so would not fix what’s broken. We won’t get the money out of the elections, the filibuster out of the Senate, or any other reforms that might make for a functioning representative democracy through any efforts by the people elected under the current system. Something else is needed. The same something that we cheer for when we see people doing it in other countries.
We need nonviolent resistance. I know that sounds very radical, impolite, and out of the loop. But if we can sit around denouncing what this plutocracy produces as a “Satan Sandwich,” why in the hell can we not interfere nonviolently to try to stop it?
October 2011 is the 10th anniversary of the invasion of Afghanistan and the beginning of the 2012 federal austerity budget. It is time to light the spark that sets off a true democratic, nonviolent transition to a world in which people are freed to create just and sustainable solutions. Take this pledge at http://october2011.org
“I pledge that if any U.S. troops, contractors, or mercenaries remain in Afghanistan on Thursday, October 6, 2011, as that occupation goes into its 11th year, I will commit to being in Freedom Plaza in Washington, D.C., with others on that day or the days immediately following, for as long as I can, with the intention of making it our Tahrir Square, Cairo, our Madison, Wisconsin, where we will NONVIOLENTLY resist the corporate machine by occupying Freedom Plaza to demand that America’s resources be invested in human needs and environmental protection instead of war and exploitation. We can do this together. We will be the beginning.”



41 Comments

I will be there, and I will stay until we have either reclaimed our democracy or I am forced to do otherwise.
Illegitimi non Carborundum
Stay Strong
So what will be the list of demands? Your site does not convey what the protesters are demanding to happen before they leave Freedom Square. Yes some ideas are presented but no definite demands.
On one hand the message is for non-violence but most believe that violence will be unavoidable. Are the organizers making plans if violence does happen?
The entire October2011 site is arranged within a Left political spectrum, what about Americans that do not subscribe to the Lefts politics? What do you have to say to them? Are they invited?
What would be the process if your rally actually does cause political restructuring? Will every American be able to vote if it comes down to voting?
I think that before many Americans will show up in October there are many questions that need answered first. Call me an skeptic but I dont trust anyone who is pushing for radical change. Everyone in politics has a plan. What is that plan? You want Americans to show up in October, but there is only vague musings at the site. And the site claims that not all views are shared. Who decides what views are acceptable? The stirring committee? Who decided who was on that committee?
And since I am an American you need to gain my trust, but not just me but all Americans.
“To whom do these groups now turn?”
We turn to ourselves, Congressman. ”
I think we DO NEED leadership. If Jane and firepups are the closest thing to leadership we have atm, well…there’s nothing we can do about that. We just have to do what we can. But we do need politically experienced leadership beyond that.
I think we need the CPC to cut ties with “party loyalty”, first and foremost, myself. But first, grassroots liberals need to also cut ties with “party loyalty”, probably ahead of the CPC leadership, I think.
Amen.
On the other hand, our problem in the Senate has absolutely nothing to do with “the filibuster” – though if anyone still believes that Party line, they should congratulate Harry Reid, who is just about to succeed in doing away with the right to extended debate in the Senate that has existed since the Senate was founded, for purposes of the “Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction,” and whatever 7-12 members of that committee may choose to produce as recommended national policies this November.
I recognize that it’s basically impossible to tell where President Obama leaves off and Senate Majority Leader Reid begins, as together they conspire in secret to produce what passes for governance in the Senate today, but one thing is clear:
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada proudly and publicly took ownership today, Monday, August 1, 2011, of the Catfood II Joint Select Committee, that’s been deliberately designed to remove the voice and amending power of all but 6 members of the legislative body of which Reid presumably still considers himself a member, while acting as its untouchable, and obviously highly-authoritarian, Boss.
At about 1:00 p.m. Monday, in the hall, just after coming out of a closed caucus meeting where he said he’d been “standing for two hours,” Harry Reid read to the gathered media from a card containing his prepared remarks. When he’d finished, the first question from the media was asked off-mike and Reid replied as follows (at about 2:30 into the news conference):
["Everyone" may "know" it behind closed doors, where Mr. Reid operates, but that's the first on-the-record evidence I've seen or heard to that effect.]
With regard to what happens next in the Senate (which will convene on Tuesday at 9:30 a.m.): As I noted here, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah stated on CNN Sunday night that he would refuse consent for (but not otherwise delay) a vote in the Senate, unless Reid agreed that the threshold for passage of this deal would be 60. (Every Senator has that power, so long as Reid continues to impose the fake quorum call on the Senate Chamber. We see now that Reid will even go so far as to suspend/change Senate rules to force legislation through by – undemocratic, in this case – simple majority, before he’ll let the Senate floor go “live” again to operate by – democratic – simple majority, as the default rules provide…) Since then, a supermajority 60-vote threshold has apparently been privately agreed to by all, and sometime Monday Reid publicly received unanimous consent to schedule the Senate vote, on the House-amended version of S. 365, for 12:00 noon on Tuesday, 8/2.
So Reid will place the House Message before the Senate tomorrow morning, there will be two and a half hours available for more speeches about the final deal, but no time or provision made for amendments, and then Senators will vote on whether or not to voluntarily remove – instead of having Reid involuntarily remove, by “filling the tree” – their future ability to influence or change, or even to debate at length, any policy framework, on a wide range of subjects, that is produced in late November by 7-12 people on the time-pressed, Party Boss-appointed Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction that will be created by the “Budget Control Act of 2011.”
Just to spread some cheer and happiness around:
http://www.youtube.com/user/schmoyoho#p/a/u/0/BZnDt2wEFjk
One of the biggest problems with partisan ship at this time is “Party identification” Not folks who identify with a particular party but the many who can’t identify the parties because the labels have little to do with what’s really inside the box.
We really don’t have two parties but one Corporate conglomerate party that wholly owns the GOP and has a Majority interest in the Democratic party aside from a small somewhat scattered progressive wing.
I believe that Corporate VS Progressive is a far more accurate way of accessing how to vote in your best interest than Republican VS Democrat.
Rather than “marching on Washington” as hundreds of thousands of Americans have done since the beginning of our nation–and with NO RESULTS–our time would better be spent finding replacements for these a-holes who represent their own Wall Street stock portfolios instead of the American people and also by running for office as independents ourselves. We still have a system that allows us to do this.
As for running as a “progressive”, except for a few districts in the USA–about 52–you may as well kiss your campaign good-by if you run as a progressive anything. Those who care about defeating BOTH Democrats and Republicans will run as Independents.
If being a martyr is what you are all about, then go ahead and have you peace marches and run as a progressive. You’ll get your wish.
If it is change you want, then start preparing your campaigns now to replace all elected officials who voted for the debt ceiling bill in 2012.
Stop believing their myth that it takes hundreds of thousands of dollars to wage a winning campaign and wage one.
David, you are right in saying that we should turn to ourselves. I’ll give you that much.
Liz, it’s not an either/or situation. For most people, “as long as possible” will probably be a week, at most. When they’re back home, they can then focus on campaign. Even then there’s nothing preventing the sort of demonstrations and outreaches that I consider more likely to lead to real change – small but ubiquitous and persistent and close to your home – from occurring, along with electoral political activity. In fact, the two could be wedded, together.
In FACT, I think doing any sort of activism, without either an overt electoral remedy suggested, or else an easily discoverable electoral remedy, is generally stupid. Some reforms may be of the lifestyle activism type, but that is limited. Most need the force of law to be meaningful, and you can’t do that with the cast of clowns that we typically send to Washington. Hence, it’s immediately obvious to me that issues-oriented outreach, and future electoral challengers (or the infrastructure that matches candidates and supporters, when the candidates appear) should be joined at the hip. Most activism leads nowhere, electorally. Therefore, it’s not surprising that most activism leads nowhere, period.
IIRC, you have a website. Would you please post it, again, and tell us what facilities it has for accumulating contact info of potential supporters of independents, who can be contacted when candidates in their district emerge?
Also, do you have any plans to attend the October protest in Washington, and distribute flyers encourage independent runs?
I’ll see you there!
We need each other’s trust. A growing movement shapes its demands as it grows. Many are involved. Get involved in that work at http://october2011.org
Moving post David: recommended.
I agree with metamars, we need to do both; fight the battle (excuse my violent metaphor) on all fronts. I will do everything possible to show up Oct 6th. As Liz said in one of her post, “we are not Egypt”; we are much more diverse and have 300 million people com pared to their 80 million.
If You think old FREEDOM FROM ALL is a “stick in the mud”, you should meet my flag waving (no voting) truck driving brother-in-law!
About 40% of America’s population want things to stay pretty much just as they are. Face it, “they are here, their not so queer and we have to deal with them at some point.
In any relationship be it group or individuals, how can two parties be diametrically opposed and still find common ground?
Anyway, David I am a big fan: keep the words of wisdom coming.
The Fifteen Demands
1. Medicare for All.
2. Restore the Highest Tax Bracket to 90%.
3. Reduce Pentagon Spending by 50% and then Cap It.
4. Outlaw Nuclear Power and Fracking.
5. Tax All Carbon Fuel Consumption More Every Year.
6. Hire Millions for a Civilian Environmental Corps
7. Build a Renewable Energy Infrastructure Everywhere.
8. Double the Minimum Wage and Add Automatic Cost-of-Living Increases.
9. Bring All Troops Home from Afghanistan and Iraq Immediately.
10. Arrest and Prosecute All American Torturers.
11. Arrest and Prosecute All Perpetrators of Bank and Investment Fraud.
12. Re-Regulate the Banking Industry.
13. Abolish NAFTA and All Anti-Regulation Trade Agreements.
14. Pass the Employee Free Choice Act.
15. Release and Reward All Government Whistleblowers.
Ummm, no.
Sorry, Liz, but you’re way off this time. Go here, click the red arrow at the bottom right corner of the photo, and then c’mon back and tell me about how protesting produces NO RESULTS.
We’ve seen big increases in members, volunteers, email, and facebook participation in direct proportion to the assembling of Washington’s most recent shit sandwich, and thus far our efforts have been largely passive. We’re just getting warmed up.
The Progressive Party of 1912 was the most successful third party in our nation’s history. Rather than running from the word simply because neolib enablers stole and trashed it, we’re restoring it to its rightful, revered place.
By accepting neolibs’ tarring of the word and running away from it, you disrespect the work and sacrifice of millions of Americans of EVERY political and socioeconomic persuasion who rose up against corporatists a century ago, just as you are advocating we do now. They fought and in some cases died (yes, in protests, like Haymarket Square) in their struggle to secure the eight-hour workday (that’s a result); women’s suffrage (protests for that too, and looky! Results!), the progressive income tax, and many more victories representing our bedrock beliefs.
By gathering broad support, recognizing that they were engaged in a class war rather than an ideological one, and being willing to TAKE TO THE STREETS, our first Progressives ushered in profound social change – without their parties (the Populist and Progressive) ever electing a president.
I mostly agree with you and love your enthusiasm, Liz, – but as Santayana said, those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Suggesting that protest is futile is just flat-out wrong.
A Progressive Party has to be the defender, not only of the poor, the elderly and the working classes, but of the vast swath of the middle class that is now under attack from the right, a right that includes O and the power brokers of the Democratic Party. It has always been the game of the right to split off the middle class from the poor and vulnerable.
We shouldn’t allow it to happen.
Understanding and using the psychology of what makes people join together to create large, mass movements is crucial. Whether the goal is simply to march and occupy a strategic place like Tahrir Square or Freedom Plaza, thereby using symbolism to send a message to political leaders, or to create a political force that will succeed in electoral politics, stirring people emotionally is absolutely essential. That’s where the October march being planned could have a very important impact. Metamars is right, you have to do both the marching and political organizing. Each impacts and stimulates the other.
Another important function of this protest could well be simply educational. As many here note, the majority of Americans who get all their news from corporate media are woefully ignorant of what is going on. Several generations of Americans have been lulled into quiescence and passivity by corporate media and the cornucopeia of toys (iphones, etc.) they distract themselves with. If enough people joined this protest so that it got covered by MSM, it would cause untold millions to at least notice something was going on and to ask why. (Hope I’m not being too idealistic about this.) This would have to help on the political organizing front.
It’s a matter of building emotional momentum by setting a dynamic going whereby an array of actions each galvanizes all the rest. The result will be a movement far stronger than any of the actions taken in isolation would be.
They should all lose their seats.
Yup. Electoral efforts and ‘non-violently fighting it in the streets’ can feed on each other.
African-American ‘progressive’ politicians’ no-matter-what loyalty to Obama, when black unemployment is nearly 20%, is both immoral and deeply disloyal to the voters in their Congressional districts and to most African Americans.
Who will even touch that roadblock to progressive change? (Besides me in my next diary.)
Well said, Cathy, and the momentum has been building for a long time. Protests do not happen spontaneously except in rare cases. Cindy Sheehan did one last summer (very small), Chris Hedges another last winter (a little better), and now this. We will get there – it’s a process.
The problem is the capitalist system. It engenders all of this with its insistence in the holy right of private property and Capital to have unbridled sway. The state rises on this social-economic structure.
Go to the roots. The whole system must change. Call if Marxism if you will. Ideologies are one thing, social facts are another. And these are the social facts.
Conyers did last week.
The CBC had its chance to turn away from its famous penchant for corruption and cowardice. Like the others, they failed and they’ve provided indisputable proof for the record.
thanks
ain’t no way everything’s staying just like it is
if we’re not busy being born we’re busy dying
How can we make that happen?
We have to start by stopping it. Then we can build. Hope to see you there!
Amen. While Conyers’ comments are what’s needed, they don’t excuse the CBC’s tolerance of this charlatan.
Conyers praised and did not criticize his fellow CBC members.
Look at the tyranny of party — at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty — a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes — and which turns voters into chattles, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction; and forgetting or ignoring that their fathers and the churches shouted the same blasphemies a generation earlier when they were closing their doors against the hunted slave, beating his handful of humane defenders with Bible texts and billies, and pocketing the insults and licking the shoes of his Southern master.
- “The Character of Man,” Mark Twain’s Autobiography
Regarding replacing congress critters: I would not spare my congressperson (Jim McDermott) even though he voted against it. The so-called Progressive Caucus should have been out in front of the White House doing press conferences every day since this (and all the other) fake crisis started.
Just voting doesn’t isn’t enough, as we know only too well.
1) Educating the public via ubiquitous, frequent, and engaging street actions. See Status Quo Busters: How FDL+DK+DU progressives can “cross the beams” and revolutionize politics and How squeegees can help save America, and your sanity; going beyond blogging to the choir.
FDL and other blogs are rich in content, but basically do nothing to engage their readership to spread the word via dead trees. Go figure. Hardly anybody outside of the FDL community knows about the Veal Pen. You can often read clever lefties cry a river, on blogs, about right wing control of airwaves. That’s not much of a plan, though, is it? Crying about privately owned media, that serves it’s masters well, and that you and I can do little about. Versus pursuing education strategies that actually have a prayer of success.
2) Developing a candidate pipeline, so that the question of “who can I replace my Congress person with?” is easily answered, in minutes, via the internet; also, non-dedicated $$ warchests could be hosted there (kind of like ActBlue, but such that you can park $$ in an account, before a suitable candidate appears; a large potential warchest will help attract candidates who are only interested in “serious” runs; you only release your funds to a candidate when and if you like them, enough)
3) A Full Court Press consisting of minimalist candidates, who can hold down a regular job and not have to beg for money to perform their FCP duties. An FCP candidate expects to lose, and will aim to leverage his/her campaign for education and organizational purposes. The FCP candidate of today may becom
There is also the fact that more and more people by the day are having a difficult time feeding their loved ones, or providing access to health care, in the wealthiest nation on the planet.
That tends to focus your attention.
“Stocks plunge as Wall Street realizes debt deal will hurt the economy” (by John Aravosis (DC) on 8/02/2011 03:37:00 PM EDT)
Food for thought (thanks Americablog) What a committed ‘minority’ can accomplish!
Science news: The “tipping point” for ideas—if as few as 10% of a social network’s members are “intransigent,” those ideas will go mainstream
http://www.americablog.com/2011/07/science-news-tipping-point-for-ideasif.html
I had lunch with Chaka Fattah some years ago to discuss housing, mortgages, redlining, home ownership. Not much has changed in two decades. He was a terrific person then, as now.
This is perfect example of the bully power of the leadership of the Party–just one more reason to not associate with them. The fear of “not belonging” forces a lot of party member into lock-step.
The people who are in leadership positions in the Democratic party are ALL Wall Street corporate centrists. We all know this and yet some of us still act as if this is not a bare-assed fact and are always surprised and outraged by their votes–again and again and again. This is just one more time that they have showed us their ugly bare asses. How many more times must they expose who they are before it sinks in on the rest of us?
A Democratic Corporate Wall Street Centrist is no different from a Republican. They are one and the same. Until more non-Wall Street Centrist Democrats realize that and start acting accordingly, nothing of any significance will change for the Democratic Party. These are NOT our people–not if you belong to the 80% of Americans who earn less than $100,000 a year.
I read their demands. They are very centrist, moderate, and reasonable. Even mild. The fact that those same demands are considered radical is what should be alarming.
“Who will even touch that roadblock to progressive change? (Besides me in my next diary.)”
I did weeks ago – “Democratic” Poverty Pimps and Corporate Whores to the Rescue – http://my.firedoglake.com/binquick/2011/07/07/democratic-poverty-pimps-and-corporate-whores-to-the-rescue/
ghjzbn
flagged as spam
haizi
spam
Nothing about the CBC, no names named. Just sayin’. Anyway, can’t complain, haven’t written my diary yet. If I were to do so, it would include “I’ll never criticize Obama” Sharpton’s appointment to a talking perch at MSNBC, and name the names of the “He’s African American so there” fan club.