After publishing this report I was contacted by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement). The individual involved never returned my call. Instead I heard from Brian Hale who said he had been with Director Morton at the event recently held at the University of Virginia and discussed in my report. He told me that ICE in fact had nothing to do with contacting activists, that in fact Ed Ryan (who had contacted local residents from an ICE email address) actually worked for Federal Protective Services which used to fall under ICE and still has some ICE email addresses. I asked Hale, regardless of department, why any branch of Homeland Security was using our money to contact us in a manner that intimidated people out of exercising their First Amendment rights. Hale told me to ask Federal Protective Services (FPS).
I reached Rob Winchester at FPS. I asked him about the January 20th MovetoAmend.org “Occupy the Courts” events held here in Charlottesville, Va., and around the country. He said that FPS inspectors had tried to facilitate events in order to get them permitted and make them legal. Some of the events, he said, were on federal property. The intent had been dialogue and not intimidation. If people were intimidated, he said, he apologized for that.
I told Winchester that the street corner where the Charlottesville event was held is routinely used for demonstrations without permits or authorizations beyond the First Amendment, and that we have never had a problem, but that the FPS contacts instructing people to inform authorities of their plans by certain deadlines and so forth had in fact intimidated people out of exercising their rights.
Winchester replied that at one location elsewhere in the country some people had “been pushing against the barricades.” I didn’t ask what the barricades were doing there. In another location, he said, “our folks were laughing and joking with the people there.” Mine was the first report of any intimidation, he said.
I pointed out that people who are intimidated by FPS contact do not phone in to the FPS to report that they feel intimidated. Winchester said that he understood and would pass this along as “lessons learned.” I thanked him for his apology and for understanding. But this is clearly a work in progress. Many would like to be free to hold rallies without the presence of a militarized federal force, regardless of whether that force is joking and laughing with us. Many would like to be left alone to exercise their First Amendment rights undisturbed rather than fund Big Brother to the tune of $75 billion per year, no matter how benevolent the intentions. The problem is not Ryan or Winchester but the system they have made themselves a part of.
My advice to intimidated activists is to not leave me the only person phoning in to complain. Phone in. Phone every day. Ask for a meeting to discuss the problem. Call 202-282-8000.



11 Comments




Sound like the hangman who boasts of having had no complaints…
recommended.
“Many would like to be left alone to exercise their First Amendment rights undisturbed rather than fund Big Brother to the tune of $75 billion per year, no matter how benevolent the intentions.”
Well said, Dave. Thank you for all you do for is; it will get worse, and we should complain.
“Federal Protective Services”?? yet another branch in Keeping America Safe Inc. that must justify its existence & budget by compiling data to input into its status reports, and We The People once again the unwarranted subjects.
Does anyone honestly believe that if you call and complain you won’t be further investigated and targeted?
That your job, family and more will be at even GREATER risk that it was before when you just showed up to dissent?
Folks, we are ALL on a list, and to complain about any of it is just foolhardy.
For I guarantee your complaint will NOT change a fucking thing, and will only worsen your circumstances.
I reject this suggestion, heartedly.
Any street wise person knows these things.
On the other hand, I endorse public dissent, heartily.
Larue…! You’re failing to grasp the full implications behind the concept of real citizen activism…! Yes, the ‘squeaky wheel’ will be investigated, and, yes, it probably won’t ‘change a fucking thing’…! But, somebody has to step up…! I’m certainly game tho…!
I know I’m already ‘bagged and tagged’ by the Alphabet Soup of Federales…! ;-)
Thank You
Thanks, David. Well noted.
First, let me see I basically am on the side of everything you say here. Obviously, we should be able to peacably assemble and exercise our free speech, and I strongly feel that the “permits” and “sanitation first!” approach is wrong, wrong, wrong.
That said, I wonder if this *particular* event might benefit from a historical point of view, even putting oneself in the other sides’ shoes for a moment. There might even be a generational component, given that the “incident” in question arose at a university.
What jumped out at me from your linked post is this:
“The event in question was held, as planned and publicly announced, on a street corner in front of a federal court house/>.”
The bombing of the federal courthouse in Oklahoma City took place 17 years ago now; college students were barely infants when it happened, so they aren’t likely to understand the profound shock and terror of that occasion, let alone the difference it made in attitude toward protecting the courthouses.
Having worked in a federal courthouse myself, not just as a lawyer practicing in the courts there, but as an employee for several years, I have a more visceral understanding. In fact, my courthouse here in San Antonio but was under extra protection before OKC, because it wasn’t that long before that one of our own District Judges was murdered.
That was a crime that had long been unthinkable. Even most criminals wouldn’t consider it. Once it happened, though..so we went through metal detectors every day, front door and back door, and thought a lot about security.
After OKC, the public parking that was right up close the courthouse was removed from public access, and in a couple more years, more parking was restricted. It’s a pain, even now.
I think this whole thing was triggered by the location in front of the federal courthouse, which just elicits more fear and worry on the part of those charged with protecting it and those who work there.
In that light, that letter would not have intimidated me. It was awkward, but the sender and receiver were working from different bodies of knowledge.
Without that history and visceral feeling, the recipients felt intimidated, and given the last year of reactions to Occupy, I get that absolutely.
But this may actually be a case where the cigar is just a cigar.
My two cents in pursuit of understanding.
Oh, crap, hhtml bold fail. Obviously, my attempt to turn off the tag failed. Sorry. Only the 1st 3 words were meant to be bolded.
Shit, I’m on so many lists they have to have a list of the lists I’m on. One or two more, who cares? They can kill me but they can’t eat me.