Sibel Edmonds’ new book, Classified Woman, is like an FBI file on the FBI, only without the incompetence.

Photo by Cliff
The experiences she recounts resemble K.’s trip to the castle, as told by Franz Kafka, only without the pleasantness and humanity. I’ve read a million reviews of nonfiction books about our government that referred to them as “page-turners” and “gripping dramas,” but I had never read a book that actually fit that description until now.
The F.B.I., the Justice Department, the White House, the Congress, the courts, the media, and the nonprofit industrial complex put Sibel Edmonds through hell. This book is her triumph over it all, and part of her contribution toward fixing the problems she uncovered and lived through.
Edmonds took a job as a translator at the FBI shortly after 9-11. She considered it her duty. Her goal was to prevent any more terrorist attacks. That’s where her thinking was at the time, although it has now changed dramatically. It’s rarely the people who sign up for a paycheck and healthcare who end up resisting or blowing a whistle.
Edmonds found at the FBI translation unit almost entirely two types of people. The first group included corrupt sociopaths, foreign spies, cheats and schemers indifferent to or working against U.S. national security. The second group included fearful bureaucrats unwilling to make waves. The ordinary competent person with good intentions who risks their job to “say something if you see something” is the rarest commodity. Hence the elite category that Edmonds found herself almost alone in: whistleblowers.
Reams of documents and audio files from before 9-11 had never been translated. Many more had never been competently or honestly translated. One afternoon in October 2001, Edmonds was asked to translate verbatim an audio file from July 2001 that had only been translated in summary form. She discovered that it contained a discussion of skyscraper construction, and in a section from September 12th a celebration of a successful mission. There was also discussion of possible future attacks. Edmonds was eager to inform the agents involved, but her supervisor Mike Feghali immediately put a halt to the project.
Two other translators, Behrooz Sarshar and Amin (no last name given), told Edmonds this was typical. They told her about an Iranian informant, a former head of SAVAK, the Iranian “intelligence” agency, who had been hired by the FBI in the early 1990s. He had warned these two interpreters in person in April 2001 of Osama bin Laden planning attacks on U.S. cities with airplanes, and had warned that some of the plotters were already in the United States. Sarshar and Amin had submitted a report marked VERY URGENT to Special Agent in Charge Thomas Frields, to no apparent effect. In the end of June they’d again met with the same informant and interpreted for FBI agents meeting with him. He’d emphatically warned that the attack would come within the next two months and urged them to tell the White House and the CIA. But the FBI agents, when pressed on this, told their interpreters that Frields was obliged to report everything, so the White House and other agencies no doubt already knew.
One has to wonder what U.S. public opinion would make of an Iranian having tried to prevent 9-11.
Next, a French translator named Mariana informed Edmonds that in late June 2001, French intelligence had contacted the FBI with a warning of the upcoming attacks by airplanes. The French even provided names of suspects. The translator had been sent to France, and believed her report had made it to both FBI headquarters and the White House.
Edmonds translated other materials that involved the selling of U.S. nuclear information to foreigners and spotted a connection to a previous case involving the purchase of such information. The FBI, under pressure from the State Department, Edmonds writes, prevented her from notifying the FBI field offices involved. Edmonds has testified in a court deposition, naming as part of a broad criminal conspiracy Representatives Dennis Hastert, Dan Burton, Roy Blunt, Bob Livingston, Stephen Solarz, and Tom Lantos, and the following high-ranking U.S. government officials: Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, and Marc Grossman.
When Edmonds was hired, she was the only fully qualified Turkish translator, and this remained the case. In November 2001, a woman named Melek Can Dickerson (referred to as “Jan”) was hired. She did not score well on the English proficiency test, and so was not qualified to sign off on translations, as Edmonds was. Melek’s husband Doug Dickerson worked for the Defense Intelligence Agency under the procurement logistics division at the Pentagon dealing with Turkey and Central Asia, and for the Office of Special Plans overseeing Central Asian policy. This couple attempted to recruit Edmonds and her husband into the American Turkish Council and the Assembly of Turkish American Associations, offering large financial benefits. But these were organizations that the FBI was monitoring. Edmonds reported the Dickersons’ proposal to Feghali, who dismissed it.
Then Edmonds discovered that Jan Dickerson had been forging her (Edmonds’) signature on translations, with Feghali’s approval. Then Edmonds’ colleagues told her about Jan taking files out of other translators’ desks and carrying them out of the building. Dickerson attempted to control the translation of all material from particular individuals. Dennis Saccher, who was above Feghali, discovered that Jan was marking every communication from one important person as being not important for translation. Saccher attempted to address the matter but was shut down by Feghali, by another supervisor named Stephanie Bryan, and by the head of “counterintelligence” for the FBI who said that the Pentagon, White House, State Department, and Congress would not allow an investigation.
Had Edmonds understood the truth of that statement, it might have saved her years of frustration and stress, but it would have denied us the bulk of the revelations in her book. Dickerson threatened Edmonds’ life and those of her family. Edmonds lost her job, her reputation, her friends, and contact with most of her family members. She watched Congress cave in to the President. She watched the government protect the Dickersons by allowing them to flee the country. She listened to Congressman Henry Waxman and others in 2005 and 2006 promise a full investigation if the Democrats won a majority, a promise that was immediately broken when the Democrats took control of Congress in 2007. Edmonds was smeared in the media, and her story widely ignored when media outlets got parts of it right. The Justice Department claimed “States Secrets” and maneuvered for a cooperative judge (Reggie Walton) to have cases filed by Edmonds dismissed. The government classified as secret all materials related to Edmonds’ case including what was already public. The Justice Department issued a gag order to the entire Congress.
And Congress bent over and shouted “Thank you, sir, may I have another?”
As less confrontational approaches failed, Edmonds became increasingly an activist and an independent media participant and creator. Her story and others she was familiar with were rejected and avoided by the 9-11 Commission. She worked with angry 9-11 widows and with other whistleblowers to expose the failures of that commission. Disgusted with whistleblower support groups that only offered to help her when she was in the news and never when she needed help most desperately, Edmonds started her own group, made up of whistleblowers, called the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition. She started her own website called Boiling Frogs Post.
When an unclassified version of a report on Edmonds’ case by the Justice Department’s Inspector General was finally released, it vindicated her.
Edmonds has received awards and recognition. Her story has been supported (with rhetoric, not action) by Congress members and backed up by journalists. It appears in this forthcoming film.
Coleen Rowley, another FBI whistleblower, one who was honored as a Time magazine person of the year along with two others, told me: “What I find so remarkable is Sibel’s persistence in trying every avenue and possible outlet in trying to get the truth out. When going up the chain of command in the executive branch and Inspector General internal mechanisms for investigating fraud, waste, and abuse went nowhere, she sought judicial remedy by filing lawsuits only to be improperly gagged by ‘state secrecy privilege’. Along the way she also sought congressional assistance, testified to the 9-11 Commission, and engaged with various media and other non-governmental organizations. It’s somewhat ironic that Sibel herself demonstrated such enormous energy and passion throughout this decade quite the opposite of the ‘boiling frog’ idiom she uses for her website as a warning to others. If her book can inspire readers to summon even 1/100th of the determination and resolve she has modeled, there’s hope for us!”
Yet, thus far, no branch of our government has lifted its little finger to fix the problem of secrecy and the corruption it breeds, which Edmonds argues has grown far worse under President Obama. That’s why this book should be spread far and wide, and read aloud to our misrepresentatives in Congress if necessary. This book is a masterpiece that reveals both the details and the broader pattern of corruption and unaccountability in Washington, D.C. Edmonds has not exposed bad apples, but a rotten barrel of toxic waste that will sooner or later infect us all — not just the whistleblowers like Sibel and the thousands of people in our government who see something and dare not say something for fear that we will not have their back.
Let’s have their back.



43 Comments

Very recommended.
No one could have anticipated that. That is anticipated that the FBI would cover up 9-11.
Kudos to Edmonds. I have been following this for a long time and am truly amazed at her persistence. She is a national treasure.
But why?
Here is someone you could ask, her supervisor.
Someone has some explaining to do, but these people are always protected somehow.
I picked up that Feghali is one of the bad guys, but am wondering why. Just to get a budget increase? That would truly be the banality of evil.
I’m thinking there’s something much worse going on.
What the Feghali!
Both Edmonds and Rowley are stand-up women. If the FBI and CIA weren’t so intent on guarding their own turf, Rowley’s August 10, 2001 warning RE: Moussaoui would have been heeded, as would have Kenneth Williams’ similar warning in July of 2001. (I actually did a “what could have been” timeline showing all the points at which 9/11 could have been stopped, had key Bushies and other folks given a damn.)
Thanks for that, Frank.
(Of course, Horowitz’ Front Page mag is quite happy with the neocon/Likud/Washington Concensus plan for the Middle East, so the idea that people of Middle Eastern descent might not be too thrilled about being ethnically cleansed sticks in his craw.)
Why are so whistleblowers women? Not only Edmonds & Rowley in this case, but 3 of them in the Enron case, including the Fortune reporter who figured it out from Enron’s financial reports.
I’m not sure “giving a damn” is what was missing.
Many thanks, Dave, for the synopsis of her book; some of us may not get to read it.
Your diary is at washingtonsblog.com, too. Nice.
And I hope Edmonds understands how highly we regard her; Rowley, too.
We are occupied by Israel, and their agents act with impunity at the highest levels of government. Wolfowitz (pre-World Bank mafia presidency), Feith, Perle, Grossman, Chertoff, Zelikow, Rabbi Dov Zakiem, AIPAC spies, all the rest of the PNAC neocons.
9/11 was their work, beyond all reasonable doubt.
Israel and Turkey had a close relationship until this story started leaking out, and the flotilla massacre was the last straw, to some extent. The American Turkish Council was largely an Israeli front:
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/article/2009/nov/01/00006//
9/11 WAS A TOTAL INSIDE/ISRAELI JOB!!!!!
Who’s Afraid of Sibel Edmonds?
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/article/2009/nov/01/00006//
Israel did 9/11 – ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD
http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5367
Excellent post and comments!
I’ve been a supporter of Edmonds for years now, ever since I read about Hastert’s role in selling out the U.S. to foreign interests. But David, let me suggest a little better proof reading as this confuses the issues: “Dennis Saccher, who was above Feghali
Saccher attempted to address the matter but was shut down by Feghali”
How does someone who is ‘above’ another get shut down from ‘below’?
In any event, anyone who has followed what John Perkin’s has written would recognize the corruption and perfidy that our foreign policy and State Dept. has exemplified over many, many years.
If anyone would like to read what Ms. Edmonds has to say in regard to Mr. Swanson’s review of her book checkout her blog:
http://www.boilingfrogspost.com
I’ve been a frequent visitor to her site. I greatly admire and respect this woman. BTW, in early Dec., 2011, Ms. Edmonds was the one who broke the news that several hundred US troops were diverted from flying from Iraq to Germany and placed on a plane and sent into Jordan – my surmise is that they were JSOC troops. Nary a word from our MSM – Pentagon blackout? Were they to be involved with the Syrian resistance forces?
Thanks David for your post!
Her invaluable Boiling Frogs podcasts, among other things, are also available at peterbcollins.com.
Can we get her for the FDL book club?
Probably because so many Men play the game to get ahead not that I do but then again I’m not ahead. Being denied the lure of power might lessen the chance to be corrupted by power.
The author of “King of the Mountain ” might have more insight on that thought.
Just how can it get worse than when Bush and Darth ran the WH? I am not disbelieving I am very curious about how.
Good question. I remember when women were definitely the moral backbone of this country, and it still may be so.
Maybe they don’t have families to support. The kind of blackmail is a powerful tool against men.
Oh, I’d guess just the opposite.
Living as a second rank citizen probably makes women a little more in tune with issues of injustice. Just a thought.
And also women are probably a lot less invested in keeping up their place in the hierarchy.
Wonder how this fits with the new Obama message: “Forward.”
The two accounts are not mutually incompatible. Both at work, I think. It seems pretty clear from the posts above that men were being targeted for blackmail.
Mainly I think women don’t need what Kissinger needs for an aphrodisiac. Also, women hugely love Lauren Bacall’s great moment in To Have And Have Not.
Is US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald in the book’s index?
There was one congresswoman who was being blackmailed for a lesbian tryst, IIRC.
Before Rep. Curt Weldon would testify about Able Danger, all the potentially incriminating evidence had been destroyed.
Will Sibel Edmonds’s revelations have any probative corroboration after this week?
why do you ask?
The Agent
Did the C.I.A. stop an F.B.I. detective from preventing 9/11?
by Lawrence Wright
Full July 10, 2006 New Yorker article here
Thanks so much for the synopsis, David. Great post.
I bow very low to Ms Edmonds for what she did. For her courage and tenacity and willingness to keep blowing the whistle against all odds.
Gives me chills just to read the excerpts. Well Richard Clarke always said that 9/11 was either at the worst something engineered in cahoots with those in power in the USA, or at least, willfully *ignored* by BushCo for whatever “ends” they had in mind.
What Edmonds details is very chilling, esp considering that we taxpayers are paying dearly for this kind of corruption, which is ongoing. Yikes.
from the wiki:
“In 1994, Fitzgerald became the prosecutor in the case against Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman and 11 others charged in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.[9]
“In 1996, Fitzgerald became the National Security Coordinator for the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. There, he served on a team of prosecutors investigating Osama bin Laden.[10] He also served as chief counsel in prosecutions related to the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.”
And so on…
Thanks DS the book is on the way
So Far, no one has attempted to malign any so-called 911 Conspiracy Theorists on this thread. That’s refreshing. Perhaps there exists now sufficient information which stands contrary to the Official Bullshit Narrative. A tipping point?
thanks much
I was told by a friend that his child went the whole FBI agent route in college and became an agent about 6 months before 9/11. They quit that job a few months later. It seems that for weeks before 9/11 the FBI and Secret Service were in a panic about where to put W on 9/11.
I have had doubts about the story (although not the person who told me), but this 100% dovetails with what he told me.
The really strange thing is I was told the same thing from a young age about Pearl Harbor and Roosevelt from a family friend that was working in the White House at the time. That proved to be 100% confirmed.
Last week, on a crazy hunch, I googled “Jonestown Jews”.
OMFG.
Just a little more (thanks to all those who had a link with even more info., looking at you occupygaza and others of course)
http://www.justacitizen.com/images/Gallery%20Draft2%20for%20Web.htm
http://letsibeledmondsspeak.blogspot.ca/2008/01/sibel-names-names-in-pictures.html
http://antiwar.com/news/interview.html
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_better_w_080522_sibel_edmonds_vs__th.htm
“According to the 1st article in the series, January 6, “For sale: West’s deadly nuclear secrets” , Edmonds says senior members of Congress and high-level Pentagon and State Department officials took bribes and arranged security clearances for Turkish and Israeli spies to be planted in academic and military institutions doing nuclear weapons research- and that secrets they stole were sold to Pakistan and resold thru AQ Khan’s nuclear black market network. The US officials were part of a network that was also involved in arms and drug trafficking, and money laundering. The Sunday Times said they knew, but weren’t publishing, the name of one particular ex-State Dept. official who featured prominently in Edmonds allegations, including arranging for the deportation of 9/11 suspects so they couldn’t be questioned. His response to their seeking comment for the article was that the allegations were outrageous. The name of this official is said to be former State Dept. official and current lobbyist Marc Grossman, by 2 bloggers who’ve been following the Edmonds case and investigating the circumstances- Luke Ryland and Larisa Alexandrovna.”
repost occupygaza link:
http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5367
Hey, do you know this story? I read something on Sibel Edmonds once and I’m afraid to go googling for it now. She was trying to talk without saying stuff she couldn’t, so there was dancing. She was pointing to I think [East Turkestan?] and that region as being hugely important in understanding the genesis of 9/11, like when the truth comes out we’ll be looking there. I’m almost afraid to type that, because if that’s the name I remember, when I looked that country up back then on wikipedia my computer bombed. (Could be coincidence, my computer is pretty rickety. Still.) What I remember her saying was that the United States alone recognized that country’s puppet president, who was in fact a dual citizen/American, it was that ludicrous. Sibel had a webpage, a gallery of bad guys (my phrasing), where she posted pictures of guys but not their names. I think she was gagged from saying their names. Surreal.
Trying to give the FBI and CIA a leg up if you are an outside source is near impossible – first it is get some Congressional folks to request the meeting, and then it is “you need more Congressional firepower before we will consider your proposal/information”.
It is amazing they accomplish as much as they do – a tribute to the value of over-staffing by a factor of 10.
Sibel is a treasure but at best will get some airtime on Russia’s RT TV in the US – the operation that the NY Times put down as not news – just conspiracy theories. RT.com pod casts are becoming the only source for many kinds of stories in the US as all those liberal reporters find their stories killed or edited into he said/she said with little or none of the information one can get via google or more easily, by reading FDL.
The legacy types running media are second in lack of ability to do their job to those in Homeland Security and Wall Street, but they are a close second.
Hell of a review and update, thanks so much, highly rcc’d n bless Mz. Edmonds, her family and all whistle blowers.