Liberal groups have been organizing protests of the looming “grand bargain” (a bargain between two political parties aimed at saving us from the fictional “fiscal cliff” by giving more of our money to the super-rich and the war machine). But they’ve been doing so only in Republican Congressional districts and with messages placing all the blame on “the Republicans,” thus telegraphing the message that all shall be tolerated if labeled “Democratic.”
We’re supposed to be against a bargain, but only against one of the two partners to the bargain. Any bets on how well that’ll work?
Meanwhile Obama’s senior advisor David Plouffe hypes the danger of the “fiscal cliff,” calls for lower corporate taxes and cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, but says not one word about military spending. He also claims to want to end tax cuts for the wealthy but is much more passionate about the danger of ending those cuts across the board, suggesting — as did Obama’s statements and silences at his first post-election press conference — that the White House will not in the end refuse to extend the “Bush” tax cuts for everyone, including the multi-billionaires — just as it’s done before. At the same press conference, Obama volunteered that we need “deficit reduction that includes entitlement changes.”
Liberal groups have written to the president politely suggesting what they’d like, but with nothing in the way of consequences if they don’t get it. And what they’d like is slightly higher taxes on the super-rich, and no cuts to Social Security or Medicare or Medicaid. Or else . . . or else . . . they’ll be sadly loyal until death do them part.
Neither Plouffe nor Obama nor any liberal activist group mentions that half of discretionary spending goes into war preparations. None proposes to raise corporate taxes, restore the estate tax, remove the cap on Social Security taxes, tax financial transactions and capital gains, tax carbon emissions, massively and urgently invest in green energy jobs, or cut the $1.3 trillion war preparations budget in half.
We are not broke. We are being robbed.
I get emails every day now on the “This isn’t what we voted for” theme. “TPP is not what we voted for.” “Drone kills are not what we voted for.” As if you can ignore the candidate’s platform and vote for your own fantasy under his name, and then “pressure” him to become what you fantasized even while swearing your allegiance to his party come hell or high water or hurricanes. Well, guess what, the Grand Bargain is what Democrats and Republicans voted for. But that doesn’t mean we have to stand for it. Having voted against it wouldn’t have stopped it. Only getting out of our houses and nonviolently resisting it now will stop it.
The peace movement is ready to take to the streets and the suites, but worried that it doesn’t have the size to do the job. Of course it does have the size to start something big if it merely finds the determination. But imagine what could happen if Tahrir Square inspired us all again and more seriously, and with four years rather than two years to work with before the next debilitation by the latest “Most Important Election of Your Lifetime.” Imagine if liberal organizations and labor unions openly recognized where all the public money is (in the war machine) and demanded it for useful purposes.
The peace movement is in favor of everything they’re in favor of: the right to organize, civil liberties, an end to for-profit prisons and drug wars and racism, affordable housing, a living wage, education, healthcare, and a sustainable environment. The enemy of these things is the military industrial complex, and if it remains beyond challenge, a just society will remain unachievable. When Dr. King opposed “racism, extreme materialism, and militarism,” he didn’t mean for us to ignore the third one. He didn’t mean for us to imagine that the three were separable and that we could oppose one or two of them effectively without opposing the combination.
Let’s stop obediently opposing the worst bits of a Grand Catastrophe and begin denouncing and resisting the whole charade, replacing it with a grand vision of our own devising. RootsAction.org, created just last year, is already approaching 200,000 active members, and has been flooding Congress and the President with this message:
“Here’s a grand bargain we want: expand Medicare and Social Security, invest in green energy, raise taxes on the rich and corporations, and cut military spending back to the level of 12 years ago.”
The message is editable, meaning that you can and should add your own comments. I encourage everyone to do so, to ask friends to do so, and to be preparing for serious nonviolent action.



6 Comments

I keep telling my Repub buddies Obama is one of them and stop whining…I tell my Dems buddies Obama is a Repub and stop wishing and hoping! I voted green and glad I did. for the ones who know the truth the question is always what can we do besides signing petitions or making calls? where is the movement leaders? and so on…
What are the chances that the peace movement could instigate poll sampling programs to ask people their opinions about the various alternatives to “the Grand Bargain” without the filter of the mainstream media fagans? When I tune into Cable News all I hear is we have to come together and cut the social safety net for our kid’s future. Chris Mathews characterizes the impending fiscal cliff as potential hell unless we can get a bipartisan agreement. It does seem bleak for the anti-militarist factions. Unless pressure is brought to the Democratic Senate leadership, who will need to get re-elected, the steamroller will not be stopped. There all in on it, even Benedict Durbin.
The blood is on the hands of all those fools who voted for Barack Obama and the Democrats. Soon they will commence their customary whining and blaming. Soon they will be distraught and furious – lashing out impotently, belatedly and all to no effect. Fingers will be pointed in all directions. But they will have no one to blame but themselves for the destruction of the social contract. They voted for it.
After the debauchery of health care “reform”, in which every American was sold into perpetual serfdom to a murderous and parasitical financial cartel, it was quite clear that the Safety Net was living on borrowed time. How little time that turned out to be, surprises even me.
Anger was the only leverage and only defense against further betrayals at the hands of the Democrats, and the Democratic voters gave it up so willingly. The burden of facing a political system that had taken their jobs, their homes, their chosen leaders and their dignity away from them to enrich a tiny circle of financial elites was too much to bear. You can’t cheat an honest man, as the saying goes and dishonesty of the Democratic voter is about to pay off bigtime. They have lied to themselves about their true situation for a very long time. They were too proud to believe they could be taken for granted and sold out, too lazy to remember and reflect on events and the duplicity of their leaders, and too easily scared by the threat of the Republicans. They were too lazy to hold their leaders accountable (after all, the threat of beware what the Republicans will do! always rested implicitly on another threat: that the Democrats would do nothing to get in the way). They were too busy and too lazy to think and get angry. They wanted to elect a Messiah and receive deliverance from the whip hand of Capitalism on easy credit. Now they will get what they deserve, the reward for years of laziness, cowardice and misplaced trust. Unfortunately the rest of us will get it too.
not a bad idea
takes money
amd takes persuading a pollster to go against their main funders
A thoroughly excellent post that ought to be front-paged, as both it AND the FDL community deserve no less.
Thank you, David Swanson.
Recommended to everyone at FDL … including those who suggest that concern (to be fair, “panic”, was the term used, an “emotional” slight) about the Great Betrayal is akin to whining about “creeping sharia law” …
If those who supported Obama are “good” with the gutting of the social safety net and not severely cutting the military budget, including the use of drones, of not increasing taxes for the wealthy, or corporations, and for financial “transactions”, then, by all means, let them stand up and be counted, out loud, let them shout from the rooftops that “this” is not a “democracy” … but a “business”, let them try to convince us that they, and ONLY they, have a clear, reasonable, and effective grasp, that Obama is doing what is “necessary”, and that the “alternative” is, somehow, worse, or simplistic pie-in-the-sky sparkle-pony thinking. Ought to be … “interesting”.
Especially if it might be done civilly, reasonably, and without recourse to false argument … even without personal, ad hominem, attack and other logical fallacies.
DW
You know, there are probably a number of talented graduate students in poly-sci or sociology that could probably devise a legitimate sampling program without much financial expenditure. Call it the People’s Gallup Poll. I wonder if factions of Occupy might be amenable to assisting the project?