Non-residential investment grew at a 16.3 percent annual rate in the third quarter, accounting for 1.54 percentage points of the 2.5 percent GDP growth in the quarter. Consumption growth was weak at 2.4 percent, but considerably better than the 0.7 percent rate reported for the second quarter. Growth for the quarter was depressed by a sharp decline in inventories. Final demand grew at a somewhat more respectable 3.6 percent rate.
The investment performance in the quarter was both a continuation of the healthy growth rate in equipment and software investment, which rose at a 17.4 percent annual rate, and a 13.3 percent growth rate in non-residential structures. The acceleration in the growth rate for equipment and software investment in the quarter puts it somewhat higher than its 10.0 percent rate over the last year. Some of this are likely erratic factors with the timing of investment, but equipment and software investment is likely to remain healthy. At 7.5 percent of GDP, this component is only modestly below its 8.0 percent pre-recession share.

The growth in non-residential structure investment is impressive because it followed a 22.6 percent growth rate in the second quarter. While these sorts of growth rates will not be sustained, it is likely that the downturn in this sector is over. In future quarters, non-residential construction will be edging higher.
Cars and health care were especially important for consumption growth, adding 0.31 percentage points and 0.61 percentages to growth respectively. The strong car sales were largely a jump back from the second quarter when they subtracted 0.42 percentage points from GDP growth. This was explained in large part by a shortage of car parts resulting from the earthquake and tsunami in Japan. The growth in health care, which accounted for almost 25 percent of the quarter’s growth, indicates the continuing bloat in this sector. It is consistent with the sharp uptick in health care employment reported for last month.
Trade was a small positive in the quarter, adding 0.22 percentage points to growth, approximately the same as in the last quarter. Import growth was a relatively weak 1.9 percent. This is directly connected with the running down of inventories. Inventories are likely to stabilize in the next quarter, which will imply more rapid growth in imports. Until the dollar declines further, which will likely happen if and when the euro zone situation stabilizes, trade is likely to be a modest negative in the growth data.
The government sector was flat in the quarter after subtracting from growth in the prior three quarters. The biggest factor keeping government out of negative territory was a 4.7 percent rise in defense spending. This will likely be reversed in the fourth quarter. Government has shrunk at a 2.4 percent annual rate over the last year. It is likely to continue to be a drag on growth through the next year — although, perhaps somewhat less than in the last year. Most of the cutbacks at the state and local level have already taken place.
There continues to be no basis for concerns about inflation. The GDP deflator increased at a 2.5 percent rate, while the core consumer expenditure deflator increased at just a 2.1 percent rate, down from 2.3 percent in the last quarter.
The economy is settling into a pattern of sustained weak growth. Investment growth is likely to remain relatively healthy as equipment and software investment stays strong, while structure investment becomes at least a small positive in the growth data. Housing has bottomed and will likely be a small positive going forward. Consumption growth is likely to be in a 2-3 percent range. Consumers still have not fully adjusted to their loss of housing wealth (at 4.1 percent, the saving rate in the quarter was well below the 8 percent pre-bubble average), so consumption is likely to trail income growth.
Given the depth of the downturn, this pattern of weak growth is grossly inadequate. At this pace the economy will never return to full employment since it is just keeping pace with the growth of the labor force. However, because many analysts had raised concerns of a double-dip, this growth is likely to be viewed as good.
Contrary to business complaints, the data show investment is healthy.



9 Comments

I love your work and have been a fan of yours for several years now. The Conservative Nanny State is great and I have it as a permanent featured link on my website. For those who haven’t read it, here is the link to the free e book:
http://deanbaker.net/index.php/home/books/the-conservative-nanny-state
Yes the rich are boosting the GDP with their investments. I hope that more Americans become aware of this and aren’t trapped into the BS of thinking that just because the GDP is up that it mean much of anything to the 99%.
Main Street’s fortune is disconnected from Wall Street’s fortune.
If anything we can use Wall Street’s good fortune as an indicator for how poor Main Street is doing.
The GDP was never designed to be used as a measuring stick for the economic well being of the individuals in a nation or to necessarily indicate that they are enjoying a good life.
For a real concrete and personal example:
My Congressman, Pete Sessions, from 2008 to 2009–an economic time period when over 2 million Americans lost their jobs–had this to report to the FEC
Rep. Pete Sessions, 32 District Texas increased his wealth from $3,376,000 in 2008 to $4,904,000 in 2009 — over a million dollars. How is Mr. Sessions good fortune representative of the people in his district? It is not.
None of my friends on the main street in my community, the district that Sessions represents, made over a million dollars that year. In fact, because of interviews I did in 2010, I know of no less than 30 people in Sessions district who lost their jobs between 2008 and 2009.
There is no connection whatsoever between the millionaire politicians in Washington and the constituents they purport to represent.
“because many analysts had raised concerns of a double-dip, this growth is likely to be viewed as good”
It may not be a “double-dip” but one unending unforgiving unyielding “single dip,” which doesn’t feel any better than getting dipped again.
The problem is that this will lead to few if any new jobs as any new companies that may form will likely be even more automated and require fewer employees that the older ones do. Since they will invest in the newest technology.
The sad fact is that our advances in technology are putting people out of work under the current capitalistic model.
Here if you don’t believe me. http://fractals-ibois.epfl.ch/wiki/images/4/42/3D_CAD_CAM_Rapid_Prototyping.pdf
3D prototyping with a desk top 3D printer. I know a guy that is doing this right now and making his own special stuff.
It’s the old saw about technological advance/change outstripping cultural ability to assimilate. And as the bio-nano-info singularity gets closer and closer, the choice of massive death or new economic system will be presented to mankind and the corporations.
You don’t have to believe it if you don’t want to. But it is already happening, like it or not.
One oddity.
The single greatest need for our economy is INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT. Replacements for old bridges, reservoirs for urban growth in Texas, replacements for slowly-eroding break waters.
That’s government spending.
That jackass Perry didn’t spend a dime on new reservoirs during his years as Governor of Texas. Now the existing reservoirs are committed to the cities — killing off the cattle industry, killing off 10,000 miles of irrigated agriculture.
Stupid man thinks he’s a genius.
Texas needed to spend $1.5-billion to expand the artificial lake system. They spent $0.
Stupid man forgot the parable of Joseph and the Pharoah. Seven fat years and seven lean years — seen as cattle in the Pharoah’s dreams.
Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat… for those who skipped the Bible.
These graph lines reflect our national commitment to no-information slogan-driven political lunacy.
Remember this one ??? “Democracy is not the solution to our problems. Democracy is the problem.” That’s been the Republican mantra for 30 years.
FINANCIAL CAPITALISM is not at all the same system as PRODUCTIVE CAPITALISM.
Still, the managers of the productive companies have fallen under control of the financiers. Either they follow orders or they get ridden out the door.
Investors, per se, are powerless against the management class inside the financial sector.
This is a horrible situation.
We got much-advanced technology… so life for the bottom half got worse from 1950 to 2010.
Upward mobility was strangled.