The NYT did some heavy-duty he said/she said reporting on the issue of gas prices and energy production. It devoted an article to President Obama’s efforts to counter Republican complaints about high gas prices.
The article told readers:
“The president said that the United States is producing more oil now than at any time during the last eight years, with a record number of rigs pumping.”
President Obama did not just say this, it also happens to be true. There are reasons that people may not be happy that the United States is producing more oil (anyone hear of global warming?), but it happens to be true.
The article then went on to tell readers that:
“But Mr. Obama warned that no amount of domestic production could offset the broader forces driving up gas prices, chief among them Middle East instability and the ravenous energy appetite of China, which he said added 10 million cars in 2010.”
This is also a statement that can be verified. The United States currently produced around 6 million barrels a day. The world market for oil is a bit less than 90 million barrels a day.
It is the world market that determines prices, not domestic production. We’re going to say that a few more times just in case any reporters are reading this.
It is the world market that determines prices, not domestic production. It is the world market that determines prices, not domestic production. It is the world market that determines prices, not domestic production.
The point is that we can only affect the price of gas in the United States if we can affect world prices. See, if we had lower prices in the United States than the rest of the world, oil companies like Exxon Mobil and British Petroleum would export oil from the United States to the rest of the world.
This is known as “capitalism.” Companies try to make as much money as possible, which means that you sell your products where they can get the highest price. This means that the price of oil in the United States can only fall if the price of oil in the world also falls.
Okay, so now let’s get back to domestic production. Suppose we drill everywhere — underneath Yellowstone, the Capitol building, your backyard and favorite place of worship. Let’s say we can increase domestic production by 2 million barrels a day, or roughly one third. This would increase the world supply by approximately 2.2 percent.
Under normal assumptions of elasticity of supply and demand, this would lead to a drop in prices of around 6 percent. That might be nice, but it won’t get us from $4.00 a gallon gas to Newt Gingrich’s $2 a gallon.
Furthermore, we will not be able to sustain this higher pace of production for long. The Energy Information Agency estimates that total U.S. reserves are around 20 billion barrels of oil. At the current production rate of roughly 6 million barrels a day, this stock will last around 10 years. If we upped production to 8 million barrels a day then we have around 7 years supply. That would mean that production would have to slow sharply before the end of President Drill Everywhere’s second term.
In short, President Obama was making assertions about gas prices and energy that are true and can be proven. The NYT obviously assumed that readers have more time than its reporter to go to the web and look these things up, but that may not always be true.
Addendum:
The Post committed the same sin, telling readers:
“Obama’s position reflects the White House’s belief that gasoline prices are subject to cyclical spikes due to forces largely outside its control, including the rise in Chinese and Indian oil demand.”
Yes, the White House believes that, “gasoline prices are subject to cyclical spikes due to forces largely outside its control, including the rise in Chinese and Indian oil demand,” in the same way that it probably believes that the earth goes around the sun and gravity causes things to fall down. This happens to be true.
###
Economist Dean Baker is co-founder of Center for Economic Policy and Research and writes regularly on CEPR’sBeat the Press blog, where this post first appeared.



7 Comments

I mentioned the 90 million number in a post a few days ago that commented on how the US military use of 0.4 million a day has near zero affect on Iran’s wealth, and now Krugman picks up on the number.
I swear FDL has great readership!
Thanks for the heads up on the Krugman article.
This type of passive lazy reporting — “which Mr. Obama says…” is endemic at NPR as well. I listen to it on the way home from work and frequently talk back to the reporter — “well, IS it true? this would seem to be a verifiable fact.” One of the worse examples was when the president was speaking at a school and the reporter stated something along the lines of “this school, which Mr. Obama says was built in the ’60s”
not sure how to fix it other than to keep pointing it out to the reporter, editor and ombudsman
Well Proffessor Baker, I am not an academic, not even an academic accomplishee.
I am not even a person with much knowledge.
So with that we can say, that to my way of thinkin’ you are what I think of as a guy who is in the way of… somebody who makes a living by bull shitting other idiots, because they might be dumn enough to believe the crap you sells.
I don’t believe it, I see right through all that crap!
The “Econonomics” industry/professionall horse crap thing… is pathetic, and you, sorry to tell you now in this late date, you are on the wrong side!!, you should make a life’s choice and drop out of that bogus enterprise… and come clean… tell it like it is, if you even know enough to do so.
You should drop out of the phoney bogus faux artifax of so called… “economics?”, a complete jack phoney enterprise.
yeah, I pretty much meant all of what of what I said there///
I don’t mean a word of it
so mabee that there was all these fuck fase s out there/// so, well
Oh come on there Geoie, “Don’t be so mean, you’re hungry, you always gets mean when you’re hungry…”
Hungry for some gadamned reality and what we used to regard as valore or integrety, or WTF,
What a pathetic race this is, ( as a visitor from a distant galaxy probably might say, upon a cursory inspection of… things).
The life vs Thanotos equation, so who is on first… “Abbot and Costello”.