That would have been an appropriate headline for a Washington Post article that essentially told readers that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner would focus on issues that matter to business in his discussions with Chinese leaders. The most important issue for workers in dealing with China is a drop in the value of the dollar relative to the yuan.

Photo by Michael Mandiberg
This would reduce the price of U.S. exports to people living in China and make imports from China more expensive. That would lead to more exports and fewer imports. Also, many other countries would likely follow the lead of China if it were to raise the value of its currency relative to the dollar. This would improve the U.S. trade balance overall. Economists agree that if the United States is to achieve full employment without large budget deficits or negative private savings, as we saw during the housing bubble years, this sort of adjustment is essential.
However the Post bizarrely told readers:
chief among the bright spots, according to the Treasury chief and many observers, has been progress toward closing the yawning trade deficit between the two countries. U.S. exports to China have almost doubled since the beginning of Obama’s term.
Actually, there has been zero progress towards closing the “yawning trade deficit.” The U.S. trade deficit with China in the first two months of 2012 was $45.4 billion, from $42.1 billion in 2011. This puts the U.S. on a path toward having yet another record trade deficit with China.
The piece then tells us in the passive tense:
Even the issue of getting China to stop pegging its currency to the dollar — a major source of tension a few years ago — has receded somewhat, as the value of China’s yuan has moderately increased against the U.S. dollar.
Actually, the issue doesn’t recede. Officials make a decision to de-emphasize it, which appears to be the case here.
The article then tells readers:
U.S. business leaders view this round of talks as a prime opportunity. Advocates of reform within the Chinese government are speaking up, they said, and the mood is positive following the recent visit to the United States of future leader Xi Jinping.
‘No other country presents China’s particular mix of opportunities and challenges,’ Geithner said last week in a speech to the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco. The Obama administration, he said, has made “significant progress” on its goals.
U.S.-China Business Council President John Frisbie said American companies are hoping the Chinese will agree to open discussions on a bilateral investment treaty that would allow foreign investors to take full ownership of Chinese firms.
I think that my headline much more accurately conveys the gist of the information presented in the article. Maybe the Post will correct the headline in its on-line version.



12 Comments

Then there’s this …
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/us-companies-are-furiously-creating-jobs-abroad
Yep
So we’re surprised?
Like full employment.
New math for the 21st century upside down world.
When China was issued full WTO status and Most Favored Nation trading status it was done with the full understanding that the Chinese currency would be low and stable for a long long time.
Pegged barely begins to describe the situation with China’s currencies exchange rates. You see all major currencies trade, except China’s. China’s which does not trade and thus find a price because until the last year there was no RNB outside of China to trade. Since there was no trading China was free to tell it’s companies what it would pay for the dollars their companies take when they sell us stuff.
That isn’t to say the trading of currencies is a pure free market since it is rigged, pushed, prodded and manipulated by all countries and central banks but such is sloppy. With China there is no possible outside influence on the exchange rate and this was THE great boon to the moving of our jobs offshore to there.
In other words it is far far too late in the game, 12 years, to begin to complain about this currency stuff. The “Pegged’ currency was not a bug it was THE feature of the new world order of ‘free trade’.
As far as Tim, certainly one of histories greatest monsters. The funny thing is he is just a poor schmuck with no personal wealth and held in contempt by those he has spent his life empowering and making rich. I wish him all the ill possible.
Focus, focus:
1. Who gains in the RMB is pegged to the dollar?
2. Who stands to loose if the RMB appreciated against the dollar?
China get to have cheap exports. Also China get to have cheap assets when bough in US dollars.
Those with the piles of dollars win. Who are the people with the piles of dollars? The buyers of cheap Chinese goods, or other people?
Thanks for sharing on FDL. We all need your insights and proclivity to stick it to the “business” press and other ne’er-do-wells.
Yeah, but Timmeh(!) has a good jump shot and that’s all that matters for Boss Obama. They’re such a team!
After they threw Chen to the dogs and then lied about it, what can you expect from the Administration?
Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner is a Democrat appointed to his office by a Democratic President with a heart-warming life story. And now I learn he isn’t a ferocious advocate of the workers who have traditionally been the base of the Democratic Party.
Imagine how non-plussed I am at learning this. You could knock me over with a feather, yes you could.
Geithner Decides to Focus on Business Concerns at the Expense of Workers in Negotiations With China
Shocking!
Hahahahahahahahaha…