Almost five years after the start of the recession we still have close to 25 million people who are unemployed, underemployed, or who have given up work altogether. Given that this is ruining the lives of millions of workers and their children we might think that this is the country’s most important problem. Fortunately, we have National Public Radio (NPR) to set us straight.
NPR presented a segment this morning that is largely based on the views of Nariman Behravesh, the chief economist of the forecasting firm IHS Global Insight and author of Spin-Free Economics: A No-Nonsense, Nonpartisan Guide to Today’s Global Economic Debates. The last part of the segment told listeners:
“But going forward, America’s role in the world will be largely shaped by how well Congress handles the budget deficit problems in coming months, he [Behravesh] said. As other countries, especially in Europe, grapple with the problem of too much government debt, people around the world are looking to the United States for moral leadership, he said.
If the United States shows that it’s possible for democracies to discipline themselves and control their debts, then its economic and soft power may surge …”
Wow, isn’t that impressive. So Europe, China and the rest of the world will be really impressed if the United States throws even more people out of work as long as it reduces its budget deficit! That’s interesting, had it not been for NPR I never would have known people in the rest of the world thought this way.
It is an especially bizarre way to think since the large budget deficits of the last few years are almost entirely due to the downturn that followed in the wake of the collapse of the housing bubble. The chart belows shows the actual deficit for 2007 and the projections for 2008-2012 that the Congressional Budget Office made in January of 2008, before it recognized the impact of the collapse of the housing bubble on the economy. It also shows the actual deficits for these years.

Source: Congressional Budget Office.
As can be seen the deficit was actually quite modest prior to the collapse of the housing bubble and was projected to remain small in the year ahead. In fact, it was projected to turn to a surplus in fiscal year 2012 after the expiration of the Bush tax cuts, although even if the tax cuts had remained in place, the deficits would still have been consistent with a declining debt to GDP ratio.
There were no big new programs that exploded the deficit in 2008 and 2009, rather the collapse of the economy caused tax collections to plunge and spending on transfer payments like unemployment insurance and food stamps to increase. In addition, the one-time spending and tax cuts in the stimulus also added to the deficit. However, there were no substantial permanent changes to underlying tax and spending policies that would have led to permanently larger deficits.
In short, NPR wants its listeners to believe that a deficit that is attributable to a collapsed economy is a bigger problem than the collapsed economy itself. That takes great insight!
Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economy and Policy Research. He also writes a regular blog, Beat the Press, where this post originally appeared.




14 Comments

As one of those long term un/underemployeds may I respectfully say to Mr Behravesh that he is totally and completely full of shit?
I second your comment and suggest that Mr. Behravesh bite me.
It’s the same as those who say that the utterly failed and revivified Finance System, that has more debt than the actual economy produces, was a victim of the real economy.
Not surprising to “hear” this on National Plutocratic Radio.
As far as I’m concerned, DMoney or RMoney can go right ahead and unfund National Propoganda Radio. Unlike my Tea Party friends who hate NPR because of it’s alleged hideous “liberalness,” I’m pretty facking sick of how MY tax dollars is being given to Corporations to spew forth their bullshit propoganda on yet another media outlet.
As it stands right now, the corporations must own most of NPR/PBS. Why not let them pay for it 100%? At least then citizens won’t be fooled into believing foolishly that crap like what Nariman Behravesh is spewing has any veracity just bc it’s on vaunted NPR.
Unsurprised but thanks for highlighting yet another death by a thousand cuts that represents how LOW the mighty have fallen at NPR/PBS (which I rarely listen to or watch anymore just because of this kind Fox-Lite “nooz reporting”).
bah humbug
Yep, pond scum I stop listening to npr 20yrs ago and only watch Bill Moyers on pbs and never give them any money.
NPR is with very few exceptions useless at-best and more often destructive as Baker again demonstrates.
CUT THE FUNDING! Romney was right… I don’t want my tax dollars going to Bullshit, beltway, conventional wisdom zombie, propaganda like what is spewed everyday on the Diane Rehm show.
They don’t even have a likable “Big Bird” character that I’d be sad to see get the axe…. the whole lot of em can go as far as I’m concerned… the Car Talk guys too.
Why do I have the feeling that Behravesh will next be telling those workers in America that to be competitive they have to accept a lower standard of living as employers must cut wages and benefits to compete with China and Malaysia and …
Let’s start by cutting his wages. I can spout badly documented crap masquerading as facts as well as he can, and I’ll do it for half what he gets.
Yesterday NPR interviewed Richard Perle on a segment about foreign policy. He gave his opinion on Iran’s nuclear capability and the perceived threat.
Sound familiar?
NPR has some good points, but sometimes they just go so far off the track, it’s unbelievable.
Thing is, everything is a problem. The plutocracy; unemployment, which is the result of the plutocracy; the fact that no one seems to have a long term plan to fix unemployment, other than green jobs, which have not exactly been a rousing success; gridlock, thanks to a sixty vote filibuster rule that should have be abolished decades ago instead of being made easier; the deficit; the interest burden; the elevation of party over principles; the insane rw media. All of it.
This country does not have one problem; it has many.
If Democracy Now! with Amy Goodman is in your radio listening market, I would suggest switching your news consumption habit to it instead of NPR.
More and more NPR stories are on neutral topics like sports, celebrity coverage, book, music, and movie reviews. Their election coverage has been mainly about the horse race; e.g. polling, strategy, who is up who is down, interviews with voters. Even if they had someone outside the narrowed parameters of discourse, like a Richard Wolff or Micheal Hudson to talk about the economy, the format itself would limit a meaningful analysis.
When was the last time you heard a breaking story originate at NPR? They seem to be (d)evolving into an Organ of the status quo, a bland middle of the road repackaging, regurgitation of news.
Honestly, after hearing these people I was hard pressed to stay awake. Their droning tone was almost hypnotic. So, for the most part, I ignore them. Their reactionary response to Juan Williams was one of the few times I paid attention that they existed. It was not a good moment. This is another.
If I were an NPR Employee type person, I might form a quick opinion of them as an organization and judge all their actions based upon this. I would call for their defunding.
As it is, I am an individual with a functioning mind. I think this was one lone idiot and that NPR should disavow him and move on.
It seems that the oligarchs own everyone.
I so, so agree! NPR has been cowardly to get republicans to back off for decades. In my opinion it is a very slightly more literate sounding version of MSM and Fox News. Let it be defunded! Good riddance to bad rubbish!