The evidence presented in Thomas Friedman’s column today would lead readers to believe that the economy’s biggest problem is that companies are being run by executives who are so ignorant of economics that they don’t know that the way to attract more workers is to raise wages. The column begins with the story of Traci Tapini, who with her sister is co-president of Wyoming Machine. For some reason Friedman assures us Tapini “is not your usual C.E.O.”
According to Friedman, back in 2009, when the economy was collapsing and unemployment was soaring Tapini had to struggle to find 10 welders that she needed to meet an order from the military. She could not find workers with the right skills, which now includes not only the ability to make a good weld, but also a knowledge of metallurgy. Eventually she found a welder who had passed the American Welding Society Certified Welding Inspector exam and was able to train the other welders.
Friedman tells readers:
“Welding ‘is a $20-an-hour job with health care, paid vacations and full benefits,’ said Tapani, but ‘you have to have science and math. I can’t think of any job in my sheet metal fabrication company where math is not important. If you work in a manufacturing facility, you use math every day; you need to compute angles and understand what happens to a piece of metal when it’s bent to a certain angle.’
Who knew? Welding is now a STEM job — that is, a job that requires knowledge of science, technology, engineering and math.”
The obvious problem in this story is that Tapini apparently doesn’t understand that you have to pay more money to get highly skilled workers. If the minimum wage had risen in step with inflation and productivity since the late sixties, it would be almost $20 an hour today. Back in the late sixties, a typical minimum wage worker would have a high school degree or less. Now, according to Friedman, we have CEOs who think that they can get highly skilled workers at the some productivity adjusted wage as someone who would have had limited literacy and numeracy skills 45 years ago. If we applied the same standard to doctors, they would be averaging around $100,000 a year today (instead of around $250,000). If employers really do have such poor understanding of how markets work then it will certainly be a serious impediment to economic growth in the years ahead.
Friedman continues:
“Employers across America will tell you similar stories [that they can't find workers with the right skills]. It’s one reason we have three million open jobs around the country but 8 percent unemployment.”
If the argument is that employers don’t understand how markets work Friedman might be right, but if the argument is that there is a skills mismatch, the evidence doesn’t support his case. The overall ratio of job openings to positions has risen from the trough of the recession but is still well below its pre-recession level.
Ratio of Job Openings to Employment
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
While Friedman argues that this means employers can’t find workers with the right skills, it is worth noting that we see the same pattern in restaurant employment.
Ratio of Job Openings to Employment:
Accommodation and Food Service
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The current ratio of job openings to employment in the restaurant and hotel sectors is 2.8 percent (it had been 3.5 percent in the summer months). This is slightly higher than the 2.6 average for the economy as a whole. Unless we think that it is especially hard to find someone with the skills needed to work in a restaurant or hotel, then there must be some other explanation for the rise in the job openings ratio. For example, employers may be taking advantage of the fact that there are large numbers of unemployed workers to be more picky about who they hire.
The failure of wages to keep step with productivity growth would suggest that this is the case. While Friedman tells readers about the rise in the gap in the wages of workers with college degrees and workers without, this was mostly an 1980s story and to a lesser extent a 1990s story. There has been little change in this ratio in the current century. In fact, wages for workers with college degrees have been dropping since 2000.
The evidence suggests that if employers like Traci Tapini really can’t find workers with the necessary skills it is primarily because they don’t understand that it is necessary to raise wages to attract more skilled workers. If this is the case, we should hope that Ms. Tapini is not your usual C.E.O.
Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economy and Policy Research. He also writes a regular blog, Beat the Press, where this post originally appeared.
Photo by William M. Plate Jr., USAF in the public domain.






16 Comments

I think many employers are still standing in line, drinking the cool-aid and quoting buzzwords.
The financial wiz-bangs have them hypnotized, and they expect the conditions in the labor market to contain lessons that workers are supposed to take to heart, resulting in lower expectations and more compliant attitudes.
They believe the labor market’s lessons are determined by employers.
I believe the W$ MOTU are advising employers that labor is about to become much cheaper and better behaved right after the Austerity Bomb goes off.
One thing employers are absolutely not thinking about is; who will be able to afford their products when the unemployment rate goes up and wages go even lower.
Your last sentence says it all and most in this position seem to be those dealing with dod and heaven for bid (lowest always) if the wars ever stop.
I’m very disappointed in you Dean because your reeducation of little tommy has failed. Then again thanks for the Great Knox Down. I can hardly wait until 0 jobs program called TPP starts and with all the other wonderful Austerity programs from Hell coming what could go wrong for us on Main Street.
Employment has been a buyers market for many years, especially for low-wage jobs. Employers can dictate the terms. Now they’re cutting hours or laying people off so they won’t have to pay health insurance.
As far as the latest from the Mustache of Wisdom, one can always find an example to (try) prove any point.
Fortunately for Mr. Friedman, there are still “jobs” that pay great and require no knowledge of anything.
Mr. Friedman also neglects to tell us that the town this welding company is in has a population of 1,457. It’s probably just crawling with highly skilled, highly educated people, just no welders…
Thomas Friedman right about something? Its just proof that a broken clock is correct twice a day.
Such vast open country. Trucking costs must be a killer.
If we’re going to talk about a skill set mismatch, let’s start with Tom Friedman.
How come so many college grads can’t find a job? Does that mean colleges are training people for jobs that don’t exist? Or maybe industry is looking for “experience” in addition to skills? Then, how come so many experienced older workers can’t find a job? Maybe because companies are looking for younger people to hire at lower wages and lower health care cost? The truth is, employers want to have their cake and eat it too. Their H-R personnel are fixated on keyword search formulas, inflexible and discriminatory requirements, and unwilling to consider training people for specialized skills. All the more reason for the government to hire people directly.
Right off the top of my head, I can think of half a dozen skilled welders in my little rural town of a couple of thousand people. Good welders are actually not all that scarce. Not one of them would put aside what they are now doing for a living to work for $20/hour, and apparently Friedman’s example of a CEO wants to offer less. Friedman is reflecting his class prejudice and general cluelessness when he doesn’t see this as a supply/demand problem where people offering those skills are not willing sellers of their services at the price offered. In a truly competitive labor market, the too cheap employers would soon adjust their behavior. She is failing to take advantage of business opportunities while that waiting occurs, an act that a competitive market should punish. Evidently that punishment and correction is not happening, which implies several layers of non-competitive behavior. Therein lies the interesting part of Friedman’s tale.
Workers have less buying power now than they did in 1979. The only ones whose buying power has increased appreciably are the 1%.
But, we all know this.
Question is, what in God’s name can we do about it and, if there is something that we can do about it, are we prepared to do it?
These employers are just a bunch of scum sucking bottom feeders.
This surprisingly, is also true for high tech jobs. There are jobs being offered in the semi-conductor industry at $17/hr with requirements I’ve noted in years past that would start at $30 and go up from there.
“… Tapini, who with her sister is co-president of Wyoming Machine.”
This company needs two presidents?
These sisters inherited this business: ” About 15 years ago the sisters joined their father at Stacy, Minn.-based Wyoming Machine …”
http://www.thefabricator.com/article/forceos/accounting-for-growth-in-lean-manufacturing
“… struggle to find 10 welders that she needed to meet an order from the military …”
Yep, and when this order is finished, the welders get a pink slip.
Most military spending in the US is a subsidy to industry – it’s the government’s way of re-distributing wealth from productive areas of the country to less productive areas.
Tapini inherits wealth – which is dependent upon exploiting labor and obtaining government contracts. I’ll bet she is a Republican.
Yep, and the ‘employers’ are using the lack of people willing to work for 1/2 what they’re worth to justify asking for more H1B visas to import high-tech wage slaves from overseas.
There is no skills-mismatch, there is an unwillingness to pay ‘market-rates’ for labor.
Aint it funny how the free-market supposedly deserves worship except when it indicates to employers the need to pay higher wages?
These people want all the advantages of a free market with none of the pitfalls.
I’m really going to enjoy watching these places that have cut back hours scramble to find people willing to have open availability to work a less than 28 hour work week for minimum wage with no benefits. Uh like that’s gonna happen.
I predict there is going to be a whole lot of bitching about the inability to find workers- uh I mean idiots willing to put up with fuedal lords.