Fareed Zakaria is very unhappy that “the American Left,” by whom he means the vast majority of people across the political spectrum who oppose cuts to Social Security and Medicare, insist on taking arithmetic seriously. They are refusing to join Peter Peterson and his wealthy friends in the Campaign to Fix the Debt in their crusade to cut these key social insurance programs.
Zakaria tells readers:
The American left has trained its sights on a new enemy: Pete Peterson. The banker and private-equity billionaire is, at first glance, an obvious target—rich and Republican. He stands accused of being the evil genius behind all the forces urging Washington to do something about the national debt. …
The facts are hard to dispute. In 1900, 1 in 25 Americans was over the age of 65. In 2030, just 18 years from now, 1 in 5 Americans will be over 65. We will be a nation that looks like Florida. Because we have a large array of programs that provide guaranteed benefits to the elderly, this has huge budgetary implications. In 1960 there were about five working Americans for every retiree. By 2025, there will be just over two workers per retiree. In 1975 Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid made up 25% of federal spending. Today they add up to a whopping 40%. And within a decade, these programs will take up over half of all federal outlays.
Yes, the facts are hard to dispute. That is why those of us on “the American Left” try to use them wherever possible. As Zakaria points out, apparently without noticing, we have already seen most of this aging disaster story. As he says, in 1960 there were about five working Americans for every retiree. Currently the number is less than three. It is projected to fall to around 2 workers per retiree by 2030 or “just over two” if we prefer Zakaria’s 2025 date. And the big three programs grew from 25 percent of federal spending to 40 percent between 1975 to 2010, they are projected to rise another 10 percentage points in a decade.
Apparently Zakaria missed it, but this sharp decline in the ratio of workers to retirees did not prevent us on average from enjoying a substantial rise in living standards over this period. Of course the gains were not evenly distributed because of policies that redistributed income to people like Peter Peterson and his friends in the Campaign to Fix the debt (e.g. trade policy, anti-union policies, deregulation of the financial sector — the fuller story is available
here). However per capita after-tax income is more than twice as high today as it was in 1960, in spite of the scourge of a growing elderly population.
The reality known by arithmetic fans everywhere is that even modest gains in productivity growth swamp the impact of demographics. Here is the story for the years from 2012 to 2035, the peak stress of the baby boomers retirement.
Note that even in the most pessimistic productivity story, the slowest rate of productivity growth of the post-war era, the impact of productivity in raising living standards is more than three times as large as the impact of demographics in reducing them. Furthermore, this takes 2035 as an endpoint. After that year there is little projected change in demographics for the rest of the century whereas productivity will continue to grow.
Of course it is worth noting that our broken health care system can impose a serious burden on the economy. We already pay more than twice as much per person for our health care as do people in any other wealthy country with little to show for it in terms of outcomes. If the gap rises to a factor of three or four to one as some projections show, then
it will impose a serious problem for the budget and the economy. However the answer is to
fix our health care system, not to get angry at people for growing old.
The American Left is very willing to face the facts and look at the arithmetic. Unfortunately Mr. Zakaria and his editors at Time Magazine don’t have the same interest.
Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economy and Policy Research. He also writes a regular blog, Beat the Press,
where this post originally appeared.
” In 1975 Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid made up 25% of federal spending. Today they add up to a whopping 40%.”
Why in the world should we be worried about that?!? That is money well spent, money used to keep our country’s senior citizens out of poverty. What does Mr. Zakaria think the government should be spending its money on, weapons systems and military bases originally built to keep the USSR in check?
Facts have a left bias, probably radical left bias. So naturally, arithmetic does too.
The fact is there is no way on this earth that detaining American citizens on American soil without trial or any other rights does NOT meet the intent of the US Constitution.
Yet here we are.
The fact is the economy, mostly any economy, are driven by demand. And so the only way to stimulate it is to create more demand, i.e., government spending. But that too is considered “wrong” even though it’s as much a fact as water is wet.
The fact is shooting armed drones into soveriegn countries we are not at war with is a violation of internation law. But that fact is not to be discussed either.
And the fact is that both parties are to blame for most of our mess as they only differ on social issues, never on economic or forieng policy ones. And one is considered “far left” if he utters this fact, despite it being as much a fact as water is wet too. Also.
Recommended (FDL)
Tweeted
Recommended (FB)
Thank you for all you do Prof. Baker. Great appearance Saturday on “Up with Chris Hayes.”
Ugh, double negative there in the the first “fact is” sentence.
The word NOT should NOT have been there. lol
Zakaria is just another overpaid mouthpiece of the corporate media. I’m sure Faux News considers him a “liberal.”
Zakaria conflates Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, as if all three were financed in the same manner and had the same funding problems. I’d like to call this a common error among journalists, but I don’t think this is inadvertent.
We all know that this guy does not have an original thought in his head, so when he tells us from whom he plagiarized THIS ONE, then we’ll discourse with him. Not before.
The same goes for Dean Baker.
Why on earth is Zakaria lumping Social Security in with Medicare and Medicaid? Social Security is not just self funding, it is funded well out in to the future with excess payroll taxes. Medicare and Medicaid may have issues (and in fact do have issues), but it’s blatantly dishonest (or maybe just clueless) for Zakaria to lump these things in together and pull out the “together they will be 40 percent of federal spending” canard. Social Security isn’t “spending” so much as it is administration of the money already paid in by workers.
Can Zakaria really be this ignorant? I suspect not.
Huh? You’ve got to be kidding!
Where did Zakaria find this “American Left? Has he been seeing Wobblies again?
Generational warfare is just another variation on divide and conquer. Instead of setting the bar where it belongs, i.e. fundamental human dignity for all senior citizens, Zakaria is trying to scare us with his little mathematical “imperatives”.
Instead of pitting one generation against another, how about gutting corporate welfare? How about shutting down the military establishment and closing up shop abroad? How about just simply addressing the perverse concentration of wealth?
Even accepting Zakaria’s “fewer employees to Social Security recipients” ratio, and we shouldn’t, such imbalances could be easily addressed with borrowing. As larger generations die off, their wealth will be passed along to smaller generations and any debt incurred could then easily be repaid.
The problem, Fareed, is not that one generation benefits at the expense of the next; the problem is that a tiny one or two percent benefit at the expense of the rest of us. Keep your eye on the grape, my friends.
The article also quotes Peterson:
I want to strengthen the safety net for the poor. But to do so, we have to reform entitlements, because they are simply not sustainable in their current form ….The elderly population is doubling, and health care costs are rising rapidly
. His foundation is making the control of health care costs its No. 1 priority. [Peterson says] we need to start making changes soon, because the longer we wait, the more painful will be the eventual changes.
This is often the theme – the people who have a modicum of comfort: Perhaps own their own home after many years of labor, eat 3 squares a day, maybe go out to breakfast once a week or so, have a refrigerator and microwave oven, own a car – funded through SS and get health care through Medicare – these are the people who are hurting the poor. Get it. The lower middle and middle middle class elders are the real problem plus they have a sense of dignity.
People like Peterson want us to come to the portals of power with an empty bowl in our hands: May we have more porridge please.
That they have the full front-on audacity to put these statements out there leaves me wondering what they think of our mental capacity.
My plan is to emulate John McCain. I won’t retire, and I’ll just get more and more cranky and irritable. Of course in my case I don’t have enough money to retire!
You should have married a rich spouse like McCain did.
That’s interesting, given that some people claim that real incomes are decreasing. Of course averages are misleading, given that a relatively few people have humungous incomes.
The problem with your post is that it makes sense. Therefore, it is politically untenable.
Economist are nothing more than overpaid hucksters. Any economist who is not stridently advocating that we humans move away from this bullshit monetary-market economy that is destroying the planet to a resource based economy that meets our universal human needs, is just another high priest to the god of greed. The study of economics is a pseudo-science at best, a destructive religion at its worst. The racist, semi religious bullshit purported by John Locke and Adam Smith has been regarded as gospel for far too long. Locke’s crap of “a race of laborers” gave the intellectual underpinning for slavery in the US. Yet these are considered the founding fathers of economic and legal thought of the modern age.
Peterson is the focus of derision because he has committed to spending a cool $Billion in his personal jihad to fix a problem that doesn’t exist. So it’s not so much that he’s “rich and Republican” as it is that he’s just another garden-variety asshole with a fat wallet, who wants to screw up things for tens of millions of (what I will characterize as) regular Americans.
It also didn’t prevent us from “enjoying” fat, unpaid for wars Fareed.
Do you think if you tried you could be more unpleasant? Why don’t you start your own blog and call it “Everybodyisacluelessdoucheexceptme”?
I didn’t know I had to state my opinions in a manner that doesn’t offend your sensibilities.
Funny how that works, Americans lost TRILLIONS in retirement funds all while they GAVE Wall St TRILLIONS so that the same people that caused the economic collapse could stay in business.
Now, Americans have to cut Social Security, a program fully funded for at least the next twenty or so years (and easily tweaked to be funded “forever”), a program which did not contribute to the Federal debt, or cause the economic collapse?
Why?
Dean Baker can pitch it either way.
–We need another stimulus because the economy is going to hell — “The economy badly needs stimulus . .the incredible failure of this administration” he has written.
–We don’t need to cut benefits because living standards are way up and will continue to rise because of increased productivity.
…X 2 wT2
Misdirection seems to be at the middle of much post 1950 USian events,histories and around the choices we USians have been “shown” and “given” or “presented with” … little wonder after some 60+ years of this being the case we are now told 90% of USians have had it too damn good for too damn long and we need to be taking less of the USian economic pie…
…meanwhile USian Wall Streeters,Big Bankers,Corporatists and Militarists are getting/keep getting billions/trillions of $$ decade after decade/year in/year out.
Oddly ( or not at all odd if this is viewed as the feature and not the bug ) the fiscal threats of unbound USG deficits! and the terrors of not done now austerity! and SS is running out of $$! scare stories do not apply to any of them…funny how the fiscal scolds manage to tumble the numbers to suit 1%/10% USians Win/90% USians Lose tilted politics.
POTUS Obama … you getting this? do you give a rats ass?… comment?
As Jane’s pointed out numerous times, he’s been out to destroy Social Security since his time in Nixon’s Cabinet, yet Zakaria ignores that so well I think I can almost see a Peterson paycheck stub in his wallet.
Over on another social site, here is one person’s response: Look, Newt was speaker and my representative.
I attended a town hall and he told us that they fixed social security. My worry has been: Don’t worry about social security, worry about the cost of Medicare.
I never heard of social security cuts until Obama brought it up 2 years in a row and Madame Ex-Speaker now agrees.
I don’t. They want to CUT social security. If they were serious they would scrap the cap and for Medicare, negotiate drug rices like the VA. Even chimpy gave up real quick on his privatize social security scheme. Now Obama and Pelosi are am wanting to head the cat food commission. I did not support candidates that want to do that and did not vote for that!
####
Our “Democratic President” is far to the right of Eisenhower, Nixon, and probably Barry Goldwater too. Yet there are now all these folks claiming they are Democrats and that they will support him because he is their leader. Well, he’s not my leader.
By the way, the proper link to Dean Baker’s calculations is here: http://nsc.newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/Baker_Dean_DebtDeficitsDemographics_November2012.pdf
Thanks, PW, for that link. That document is great reference material.
It’s no surprise. Zakaria has constantly confirmed the reasons he was chosen by Time Magazine. He’s the perfect lackey.
Zakaria appeals to educated fools ,smart enough to absorb knowledge but too dumb to process it .He spent an hour to make an unreasoned argument as to how sheepies can eliminate unemployment by imposing a VAT tax on themselves while prospering Wall St who will then lavish us with trickle down investment .
If I were to assess the net’s major attributes ,near the top would be busting the well-guarded myth that intellectuals are smarter than tens of millions who possess good common sense ,and especially street smarts ,i.e., a high aptitude for abstract reason and hence pattern recognition.
Let’s be honest ,Clinton and Obama are both Wall St stooges ,they do the filthy and immoral janitorial tasks that would be expected from ,not moderate ,but right-wing pubs .Welfare reform was just as vile and” repugnant as Obama fucking us out of our SS and destroying Medicare .We didn’t have any skin in the game with welfare elimination ,and now it’s happening to us .That’ always the divisive game ,”and when they came after me there was no one left” .
Spare me the semantics about this being insurance we paid taxes to receive in our later years .We all know the elites have always considered the entire deal welfare alms
Accordingly ,most of us know Clinton balanced those budgets with our SS surpluses . As planned austerity defunds pensions and other retirement obligations at every level of government while making a mockery of the projected earnings for sustainable payouts ,tm he real dem agenda will be too draconian for denial .
I’m not trying to piss on anyone’s holidays ,but instead emphasize that this is class warfare ,and nobody on corporate media portrays the world in which we live .They create a fictitious normalcy that insinuates a pervasive and permeating sense of alienation via which many of our social pathologies could be cultivated .
I would implore everyone to stop the devastation to our lives before this corporate/political coup gets its legs .This is not an O problem ,it is a systemic problem.T o think the DLC will select someone better for you next time ,is quite literally as insane as the thinking of these recent mass murderers .
Well said.
But, maybe the Tea Party will save SS from cuts yet again, as they did in July 2011.
You can solve the money problem by becoming a freeloading, do-nothing senator sucking from the public teat – just like McCain.
Best commentary on Fareed Zakaria evah (this was when he was caught for plagiarism) :
http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2012/08/fareed-zakaria.html