BBC reports that U.S. forces piloting helicopters killed three children last night in the Arghandab district of Afghanistan. Enraged locals took the bodies to Kandahar to display them to local officials. (Warning: graphic photo.)
"What was the fault of my innocent children? They were not Taliban," Mr Rahim said. "Did they come here to build our country or kill our innocent children?"
But keep in mind, this is all making you safer, America.
… The villagers shouted "Death to America! Death to infidels!" as they displayed the corpses in the back of a pickup truck.
AFP reports the boys killed in the strike were ages 10-13, along with a 25-year-old man.
There’s discontinuity between the descriptions of the strike: locals say the helicopters attacked a house, while the U.S. military claims they attacked "militants" in an open field. Stay tuned.
Civilian casualties in general and casualties specifically caused by U.S. forces and their allies have steadily increased in each year for which we have systematically collected data, despite repeated escalations intended in part to reduce non-combatant deaths.
UPDATE: The New York Times is on the story. One addendum to Dexter Filkins’ piece: while his closing paragraph is true,
As the Afghan war has intensified in recent months, more civilians have died. A United Nations report released last week said that 1013 civilians were killed in the first six months of 2009, compared with 818 in the same period last year. Insurgents were to blame for 59 percent of those deaths, the report said.
…it fails to point out that it’s not just the total number of civilians killed that increased during the months in question. As I point out above, the number of civilians killed by the U.S. and our allies also increased.



8 Comments







I think we’ve heard this one before. Many, many, times.
Thanks for the warning, Derrick. That’s a very tough photo to look at.
Thanks for reading, JimWhite. FYI, I updated the above with a link to a NYT story covering this incident.
I place the blame for these deaths squarely on Obama.
Thanks, Derrick.
10-4 on that.
always voting for the least worst means your vote goes to prolong Bush’s criminal, missionless, deadly occupations.
Democrat Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey ran on their legacy in Vietnam, and lost.
Obama seems determined to follow in those footsteps, even in unconquerable Afghanistan.
Derrick,
You have gotten little attention here, either because you are unknown here or because your message offends many here.
You are right on.
Thanks ART45. I appreciate the kind words.
sporkovat: There’s a saying: “Better to vote for the one you want and not get him than to vote for the one you don’t want and get him.” Okay so it’s not that old, but it’s good.
nanb: I share your disappointment. That’s why it’s important to keep cajoling our progressive groups to hold his feet to the fire.
I just have to sit down and cry in anger and frustration and total disappointment in Obama and what is happening all over, what WE are doing . Not only in Afghanistan and Iraq and now this ranting nonsense over supposed WMDs…oh no its Nuclear Bombs..sure …in Iran..And in Nicaragua and Mexico and Africa…Welcome back to the 50s. And now these 3 children. How many more ?
It was President Bush’s fault 6 months ago now it’s Obama’s fault. Impeach both. Or was it Jimmy Peanut’s fault?