The Obama Administration just unveiled a huge Defense Department budget for next year shaped by the Afghanistan war. War spending is exempt from the president’s proposed spending freeze, despite President Obama’s statement at West Point that, "we can’t simply afford to ignore the price of these wars."
The Obama administration plans to unveil a defense budget on Monday that pours billions into drones, helicopters and special forces, reflecting a focus on fighting Islamist extremists rather than conventional armies.
The Pentagon’s spending priorities as well as its strategic vision — which is also due to be unveiled this week — are a product of the counter-insurgency campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan that have severely stretched the military.
The proposed 2011 defense budget comes to more than 700 billion dollars, a modest two percent increase, and unlike last year avoids sweeping cuts to major weapons programs, according to Pentagon officials and draft documents.
Politico also reports that the administration’s war funding estimates for the next 2 years far exceed last year’s estimates:
President Barack Obama’s new budget, to be released Monday, forecasts two consecutive years of near $160 billion in war funding, far more than he hoped when elected and only modestly less than the last years of the Bush Administration.
In 2011 alone, the revised numbers are triple what the president included in his spending plan a year ago. And the strain shows itself in new deficit projections, already hobbled by lagging revenues due to the weak economy.
We can’t afford to keep spending huge amounts of blood and treasure on a war that’s causing massive human suffering and that’s not making us any safer.
In other news, Bloomberg reports that, "Defense Stocks May Rise With Government Budget Increase." Note especially the giggling about the profitability of drones. Mass murder from above is good for business!



14 Comments




Tremendous video, Derrick. By all means, we must keep those defense shareholders happy!
I’m as progressive as there is and I suspect we may differ on the Afghan policy; We must agree that this is better than supplemental funding GW Bush used off budget.
Thanks Jim. The giggling about the drones…too much.
Our money for our people! Our health, our education, our welfare. No more killing in our name with our money. No more war..evermore. Our mission on this earth is peace and heaven on earth.
A couple of things:
1) Putting all the costs on the table is better than hiding them in supplementals. However, with a supplemental vote coming up — the second, if I’m counting correctly, since the Democrats promised there’d never be another — let’s not count our chickens before they hatch re: supplementals being a thing of the past.
2) Afghanistan is a total charlie foxtrot and spending more on it is costing us jobs. For our money we’re getting:
- an insurgency on the march,
- a phantom Afghan Army (which we’re footing almost all of the bill for) that, according to Petraeus is “not at war,”
- more than 5K dead or injured civilians last year including 1,000 children,
- almost 1,000 dead U.S. troops, and
- more terrorism around the world.
This 10-year, trillion-dollar fiasco has got to end.
Yuck. I hadn’t watched the full Bloomberg video yet. You’re right, giggling about the drones is ridiculous, but I find their whole upbeat, chirpy discussion of the value of defense stocks offensive. This is making money off death, and they’re basically saying death will pay really well this year.
Amen.
Yeah it’s the laughter of the super-elite who will never see the things they’re encouraging people to buy.
Or, you know, the laughter of the damned.
That’s probably coming from the defense CEO’s (or former CEO’s in the case of Cheney).
I love your thought but it is like MLK I have a dream.
I hear alot about freezing domestic spending. I say not one dime goes outside the USA for anything until we are in the black again. The milk maker has gone dry!!!!!!
Considering that Afghanistan is where empires go to die I consider the increased commitment to mire down there to be a symptom rather than a policy.
Great video clip. Thanks.
700 billion for defense. Follow the money.
How much money will be going to Afghanistan for Hospitals, medial centers access to water, electric, roads.
To U.S. and other defense companies. Follow the money
How much money will go to…… US…… for hospitals, medical centers and clean water, electricity (heat and shelter) and roads or improvement to infrastructure? Thats where our tax money belongs- right here. Yes, lets see where it goes.