
Frank Rich captures America’s angst and anger at government and corporate financial elites in his Bernie Madoff is No John Dillinger. Madoff was a genteel but noxious racketeer who stole $65 billion dollars. Dillinger was a charismatic but homicidal bank robber who became a Robin Hood because the banksters he was robbing were first perceived as the Sheriff of Nottingham.
Mr. Rich echoes Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz by encouraging Mr. Obama to rethink the tentativeness of his economic recovery package and his legal reforms, which do too little, and his Wall Street bail-outs, which reward the behavior he claims to punish. This comment from Joe Stiglitz captures how the developing world, and in Rich’s view, how many people here and abroad, view Mr. Obama’s economic stewardship:
[P]eople look at Washington and see a system of government that allowed Wall Street to write self-serving rules which put at risk the entire global economy — and then, when the day of reckoning came, turned to Wall Street to manage the recovery. They see continued re-distributions of wealth to the top of the pyramid, transparently at the expense of ordinary citizens.
Mr. Rich notes that banks are jacking up checking account fees and interest rates (even for good credit risks) ahead of the formation of Mr. Obama’s new consumer finance regulator. (Given Obama’s style, its leadership is likely to reflect the "bipartisanship" of Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman rather than the critical expertise of an Elizabeth Warren.)
He notes how Wall Street’s bail-out beneficiaries are rapidly returning to their old ways, with fewer competitors among whom to share the loot. He cites Matt Taibbi’s blistering critique in Rolling Stone of Goldman Sachs, and adds,
What’s uncontroversial and indisputable is that Goldman alumni have played key roles in both the Bush and Obama administrations’ responses to the current crisis — even though Goldman has a big stake in the outcome. The dense revolving-door conflicts of interest are appalling.
Lastly, Mr. Rich reminds us that there are vast social as well as economic consequences to massive job losses and continued maladministration of the economy by a purported centrist Democrat.
Americans who felt betrayed didn’t just take to cheering Dillinger; some turned to the populism of Huey Long, or to right-wing and anti-Semitic demagogues like Father Coughlin, or to the Communist Party. The passions unleashed by economic inequities are explosive because those inequities violate the fundamental capitalist faith. It’s the bedrock American dream that virtues like hard work and playing by the rules are rewarded with prosperity.
In 2009, too many who worked hard and played by the rules are still suffering, while too many who bent or broke the rules with little or no accountability are back reaping a disproportionate share of what scant prosperity there is. The tepid national satisfaction taken in Bernie Madoff’s terminal prison sentence should be a warning to the White House. In the most devastating economic catastrophe since Dillinger’s time, many Americans know all too well that justice has yet to be served.



12 Comments







Frank Rich cites this comment by Reuters’ Felix Salmon, quoting its first sentence. But the two sentences he doesn’t quote (emphasis mine) are much scarier. The last sentence is laughable in its likelihood:
Great whites don’t become less predacious because seals get tired trying to outswim them. They become more well-fed. Calling Capt. Quint….
So, Rich says that since bankers are motherf*****s that Obama is to blame?
OTOH, I agree we need some serious regulations or this bad economy will just continue forever.
Getting more money into the system might help too.
Obama is partly to blame for a poorly devised bail-out scheme for banksters that provided too much untraceable money with too little reform of those he gave it to, whose predatory practices were the primary cause of the crash of our economy.
Obama would also be worthy of blame if he does too little to reform our health care system by protecting too much the power and profits of its health insurers. That he is and has done so well as a status quo man does not suggest he would be willing to rock our boat enough to right its course.
The worst of all possible worlds would be to force more business onto insurers without adequately regulating them. Among other reforms, that would include mandating minimum levels of coverage and prohibiting cancellations and the money making exclusion known as pre-existing injuries.
NOT adequately regulating banksters and allowing reforms that merely channel more money into unreformed health insurers would be a terminal sentence for many American families and severely curtail the prospects for the Democratic Party. It’s the course Mr. Obama seems to have set for himself and only he can change it.
Recovery?
With U3 at 9.5% and climbing? Those jobs aren’t coming back, and those folks aren’t spending at malls.
With U6 somewhere around 16%?
With a big contraction in the money supply? Yes, contraction, because the money supply includes money on loan…bank-created (not Fed-created) money.
With deflation and a strong dollar the only way to manage the monstrous and growing U.S. debt?
Recovery?
Don’t think so.
That’s my point, hence the head in sand, backside in air graphic.
Any recovery following the current policies will benefit few and set us up for a deeper recession to follow, which will result in fewer jobs and fewer yet that are secure or high paying. They make no significant reforms of what led to this one. They continue to deprive the poor and middle class of essential services, while channeling their tax dollars to the few – who will benefit from this recovery and quite likely from a deeper depression.
It’s essential for progressives to hammer away at this president’s predilection for the status quo and the middle ground, regardless of the position, credibility or outrageousness of the opposing goalposts. We need credible reforms now. We’re already paying for the ones we get.
Being President is like being the captain of a ship. If Something Bad happens under your command, you are at fault. Period.
I campaigned enthusiastically for Mr. Obama. I am greatly disillusioned. But–and this is a big but–the proof is in how it all comes out. If by some miracle he saves the economy with these current, neo-Republican schemes, he will be able to take credit. But, when the seemingly all but inevitable happens, it will all–justly–be HIS fault.
He will be more widely blamed than Bush. Indeed, having failed to reverse Bush’s excesses, he will be blamed for all of his predecessor’s failure, as well as his own–and rightly so. Bush might plausibly claim to have known no better. Mr. Obama has no such excuse.
The above applies as well to Congress and the Democratic Party as a whole. I doubt that it can survive the kind of economic disaster we are facing. Yet the Party leadership continues to act as if the disapproval of a lobbyist or two and coming up a few dolalrs short in their campaign chests is the worst thing facing them, as long as they say the right thing about Choice. My Representative, Betsy Markey–foisted on us by Ken “Nightcrawler” Salazar and our “centrist” governor–is responding to the crisis by tacking somewhere well to the right of the egregious Marilyn Musgrave, complete with calls for balanced budgets and pay as you go. This, even though Musgrave lost while touting this economic line in one of the most conservative districts in the nation.
At some point soon, a Father Coughlin or a Communist Party USA might be the least of it. While much is made of the supposed passivity of an electorate managed and controlled by big TV, I think that this is as much a Beltway dream as recovery via Goldman. The uniformity of the message in the MSM is backfiring, from what I can see. People are definitley ill-informed and ignorant pf the real causes of their problems. But this is not producing complacency or passive acceptance of the Demopublican Wall Street status quo. It is, rather, producing an angry, resentful, suspicion of all authority and a distrust of all information. If history is any indication, this smoldering populism can produce almost anything.
and I thought we were going to change our heading.
The captain is at fault regardless of which seaman slipped a line or which ensign grounded the ship. S/he is responsible for staffing, training, oversight, procedures and most of all, the chain of command.
In this case, Obama is also the primary actor influencing many of these policies and setting the tone, the limits for acceptable policy. He decides what he will and his Party ought to fight for and what’s not worth the fight. So far, his talks to the troops are stirring, but he saves his time and money to enjoy the “O” Club.
Bernie Madoff was hardly alone.
Jamie Dimon at JPMorgan;
John Mack at Morgan Stanley;
Lloyd Blankfein, Jon Corzine, and Hank Paulson at Goldman;
Stanley O’Neal and John Thain at Merrill;
James Cayne at Bear Stearns;
Martin Sullivan, Hank Greenberg, Joseph Cassano and Edward Liddy at AIG;
Winfried Bischoff, Robert Rubin and Vikram Pandit at Citigroup;
John Stumpf at Wells Fargo;
Richard Fuld at Lehman;
Arthur Levitt, Harvey Pitt, William Donaldson, and Christopher Cox at the SEC;
Larry Summers and John Snow at Treasury;
Wendy Gramm, James Newsome, Walter Lukken at the CFTC;
Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke at the Fed, and Timothy Geithner at the NY Fed.
All of these people plus the 50 or so immediately beneath them at each of these institutions should be in jail for life right along with Bernie Madoff.
Yes. The point about Madoff is the Dillinger comparison. In the discussions I hear, he rates less populist sympathy than the old-time bank robber. But the comparison is there.
Most people I speak to agree that the main thing that made Madoff the epitome of all evil to the press, Wall Street, and Washington and the real reason for his 150-yr maximum sentence is that he turned on his own kind and scammed his fellow scammers.
They are shocked–shocked!–to find that no honor among thieves and no professional courtesy among Ponzi artists.
Wholeheartedly agree that its those leaders and their direct reports who have done enormous damage to our economy – and been bailed out without charge (to them) because they’re so thspecial.
Madoff’s fault was that he got caught and didn’t have a note from mom like the people on Hugh’s list. He didn’t even pretend to invest his client’s money, he just stole it. Citi, AIG, et al. stole a lot more. But they played the game and hid behind financial and business models, lawyers and a lot more lobbyists. His problem may have been he wasn’t a big enough scam artist.
He is no Robin Hood; he kept it all for himself. What he gave away to charities to buy his way into heaven was more than lost when those charities investments were lost along with many others.
recommended. i love your articles and comments e of h.