As there is scant coverage of day two of the civil trial over the death of Rachel Corrie in Gaza, I’m stuck with quoting the press release from the Rachel Corrie Foundation for Peace and Justice.
When and if I find more information, I’ll post it in the comments.
Today 14 March 2010 the Haifa District Court saw the second full day of testimony in the civil lawsuit filed by Rachel Corrie’s family against the State of Israel for her unlawful killing in Rafah, Gaza. Rachel Corrie, an American human rights defender from Olympia, Washington, was crushed to death on March 16, 2003 by a Caterpillar D9R bulldozer. She had been nonviolently demonstrating against Palestinian home demolitions with fellow members of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), a Palestinian-led movement committed to resisting the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land using nonviolent, direct action methods and principles.
In today’s hearing:
Dr. Yehuda Hiss, the former head of the Israel Forensic Institute who conducted the autopsy of Rachel Corrie at the request of the Israeli military, admitted that he violated an Israeli court order requiring that an official from the U.S. Embassy be present during Rachel’s autopsy. Hiss also stated that his policy was not to allow entrance to the autopsy to anyone who is not a physician or biologist. Dr. Hiss stated that he spoke by phone with the US Embassy after receiving the court order and was told they would not be sending a representative, and that the Corrie family had agreed to the autopsy. Dr. Hiss admitted there was no documentation in his file of this conversation with the Embassy. The U.S. Embassy has repeatedly told the family that this was not the conversation that occurred.
Dr. Hiss also disclosed that he had kept samples from Rachel’s body for histological testing without informing her family. Dr. Hiss admitted that he did not inform the family about their right to bury the samples and that the samples were likely to have been buried with other body samples from the Institute, but he was uncertain. This was the first time that the family of Rachel Corrie received confirmation that the Israeli Forensic Institute had indeed kept samples of her body, despite prior attempts to receive this information. Dr. Hiss has been the subject of a prior lawsuit in Israel brought by families for whom he did not return body parts and samples.
The judge granted the Corries’ request to expand their punitive damages request, to include the failure to ensure that a U.S. Embassy official was present during the autopsy. In response to the State’s demand, the judge requested that the Corries specify the amount of claimed punitive damages. The Corries set the punitive damages at the symbolic amount of $1, stating that the court’s pronouncement of accountability and preventing future harm to others was more important to them than money.
T
he judge granted the Corries’ motion to allow into evidence the medical report of Dr. Ahmed Abu Nikera the Palestinian physician who pronounced Rachel’s death in Rafah, Gaza. The State agreed to the admission of this report only after the judge granted the Corries’ earlier motion to allow Abu Nikera to testify via video conference from Gaza. In Professor Hiss’s testimony, he stated that Abu Nikera’s medical report was consistent with his findings, including the statement that Rachel had arrived dead at the hospital.
Today’s hearing also included the conclusion of Tom Dale’s testimony, a fellow ISM activist and eyewitness to Rachel’s killing.Today’s hearing was attended by several observers, including Andrew Parker, the U.S. Embassy Consul General and human rights representatives, including Lawyers without Borders, and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI). [emphasis added]
Testimony will continue on March 15 from 9am-1pm, and on March 17 from 9am-4pm.



16 Comments







Did the family in fact agree? Was the family informed that the American Embassy would not be sending someone to watch the autopsy?
My bold if this creep stole organs from an American and the Press covers this story…the impact will be horrible.
Are there organs missing from Rachel’s body?
I’d recommend commenters not speculate on the part of Dr. Hiss’ testimony regarding his legal history re other autopsies. If this issue becomes important in the lawsuit – I doubt it will – then you can take it from there.
During that incredible interview that Amy did with the Corrie family. One of the Corrie family members (forget which one it was now) stated that the Israel government tried to keep the International observers who witnessed Rachel’s murder from testifying. The Israeli government was also trying to block the testimony of the Palestinian Doctor who first examined Rachel’s crushed body. The Israeli government is not willing to let this Doctor out of the Gaza.
Israel is terrified by the truth. Committed to not telling the truth or allowing it to be exposed
Has anyone done an autopsy besides Israel on the body?
don’t know
Thanks for the update.
from here,,
http://mwcnews.net/focus/politics/1147-family-of-slain-us-peace-activist-rachel-corrie-heads-to-israel.html
so maybe no second autopsy.
I can’t see how that could possibly happen now.
Neither do I, but I was thinking that the family probably wouldn’t have allowed another autopsy then.
(Thanks for the post, BTW.)
One of my first impressions of the Corries, when I began corresponding with them in mid-2003, was their utter lack of animus about her death, about how the case was handled, or about right-wing attacks here and abroad on their daughter’s motives and motivation. That impression has only deepened over the years.
In a somewhat related case, that of American Tristan Anderson, who was shot in the head by the IDF just over a year ago, while photographing demonstrations in the occupied territories, it was announced today that:
Here’s more from former San Francisco writer, Henry Norr:
The combination of the Corrie trial, the Gen. Petraeus recommendation that I/P be transferred from European to Asian military command & control (because Israeli actions directly endanger U.S. troops in the Middle East), media coverage of the intentional Israeli insults to VP Biden and Pres. Obama last week, a possibly frosty keynote to AIPAC’s annual conference by S. o S. Hillary Clinton, rapidly growing unrest in the West Bank and Jerusalem (as I predicted last week would happen soon), this month is indeed turning out to be Israel’s worst PR disaster in a long time.
Although press coverage is, as usual, scant and biased toward Israel, the message that there is a change in the works is probably getting through to many.
I’ve posted a diary on Monday’s testimony.
Doesn’t anyone here find it disturbing that Joseph Smith, who took all those pictures of Rachel standing in front of bulldozers, did not take one single picture of an Israeli bulldozer going through a Palestinian home? Why couldn’t he get even one picture of that if that is what the IDF was doing?
Nor does anybody see a problem with the ISM expressing a motive (after the fact) for wanting Rachel to be killed in the presence of Israel’s security forces, or that it knowingly, willfully, and recklessly endangered her life by allowing or encouraging her to engage in this form of protest after she was (by its own account) almost run over the same afternoon.