Joe McGinnis writes this morning:
Sarah told the Sunday Times of London, “I am going to Sudan in July and hope to stop in England on the way. I am just hoping Mrs Thatcher is well enough to see me as I so admire her.”
Aides to the ailing Margaret Thatcher won’t let Sarah anywhere near the former British prime minister. That’s no surprise.
But how about the trip to Sudan, where summer temperatures in the capital, Khartoum, average more than 105 degrees? (Maybe the move to Arizona was to acclimatize her.)
On anyone’s list of the most unfortunate countries on earth, Sudan would have to be near the top. Put it this way: Sarah’s not going there for the shopping.
Can anyone see any reason for Sarah to make this trip other than to give herself another “foreign policy” credential for the 2012 campaign?
Questions:
–Is Franklin Graham paying for it?
McGinniss goes on to ask a series of intriguing questions about the trip. The answer to this one, though, is that the odds are heavily in favor of “Yes.”
Palin is Graham’s political protégé.
In early 2009, as Palin’s executive abilities in Alaska were rapidly declining, and Alaskans along the lower Yukon and Kuskokwim Rivers faced severe hardships, Graham was the one to lead her mission of mercy delivery of trinkets and blankets to people along the Yukon. The trip was a public relations disaster for her, surpassed that early part of the year only by her choice of a person mostly despised by the same people along those rivers, Wayne Anthony Ross, to be the discredited Talis Colberg’s replacement as Alaska Attorney General. Her selection of Ross was roundly rejected, and was Palin’s biggest political debacle.
Here she was caught, on her Graham-sponsored trip, screwing up her face time with Emmonak elder, Nick Tucker:
After Palin quit, Graham has been there for her, during the first book tour, and to lead her mission of mercy shameless drive-by photo shoot to Haiti:
Palin is so anti-Alaska Native, she probably thought the trip to Marshall and St. Marys with Graham qualified as a foreign visit, so this will probably be her third foreign policy-oriented experience under Graham’s wing.
Samaritan’s Purse has been in Sudan since the late 1970s, and some of the work done there has been notable in its genuine effort to relieve what is some of the worst human suffering on the planet:
(Note that Samaritan’s Purse Canada was able to piggyback these young doctors’ medical training in socialist Cuba into their program.)
Graham has insinuated himself into African politics for decades, especially in Sudan, and – naturally – very deeply in the highly Christianized southern part, which is slated soon for independence, as a result of the plebiscite of January 2011, in which 98.83% of the electorate opted for secession. The numbers of Christians in the population there are variously estimated, but most agree upon the explosive expansion of their interests there in the first decade of this century:
Scholarly and U.S. Department of State sources state that a majority of southern Sudanese maintain traditional/indigenous beliefs with those following Christianity in a minority (albeit an influential one). However, some news organizations claim a Christian majority and the US Episcopal Church claims the existence of large numbers of Anglican adherents from the Episcopal Church of the Sudan: 2 million members in 2005, 4 million, or almost half of the nation’s population, in 2011.
Southern Sudan might be close to hell on earth, but it has apparently been missionary heaven.
Graham’s involvement in Sudanese politics has gone so far as to intervene on behalf of Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, when al-Bashir was indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court in March, 2009:
For all his faults, Mr. Bashir has demonstrated that he is able to cooperate. On several occasions he has complied with my requests. When a hospital we operated in eastern Sudan was seized by government forces, Mr. Bashir granted us limited access. Mr. Bashir also made television time available for us to broadcast a Christian program at Christmas and Easter.
More important, Mr. Bashir helped make the peace agreement a reality. Now, his arrest could threaten the south’s elections and referendum, and hurl the country back into civil war. His removal could also spur retaliation by Bashir loyalists and other forces against civilians, United Nations peacekeepers or international aid workers.
We do have other options. The statute that established the court allows for the United Nations Security Council to postpone the court’s proceedings for 12 months, giving Sudan the time it will need to achieve peace. In that period President Bashir should do everything he can to ensure that the provisions of the agreement go fully into effect, and to cooperate with the United Nations and the United States to bring about political stability in Darfur.
On the surface, it appears that Graham’s view on this wasn’t far from the mark.
Right now, 40 heads of African nation intelligence agencies are meeting in Khartoum, under al-Bashir’s wing. Importantly, al-Bashir, while addressing the conference yesterday, stated:
“We have realized peace in South Sudan, and we paid its dues which resulted in the creation of a new entity in Africa, and we will be the first to welcome and cooperate with the new nation.”
Graham may be up to speed on the complexity of Sudanese politics, but can any mortal drive enough information into Palin’s head about this that she can make some sense out of it? Or to leverage and use this to pick up the debris of what is looking more and more like total failures of the Pawlenty, Bachman, Perry and Santorum campaigns, as revealed today (with net changes among likely GOP voters between March and late May)?:
Full results for Republican contest. Palin benefits the most from Huckabee, Trump and Daniels departure. Two person race as of now.
Romney – 21% (16)
Palin – 17% (5)
Giuliani – 8% (-)
Gingrich – 6% (2)
Paul – 6% (2)
Cain – 4% (-)
Pawlenty – 4% (1)
Bachmann – 3% (1)
Perry – 3% (-)
Huntsman – 1% (*)
Santorum – 1% (*)
Johnson – * (-)
Other / no opinion – 17%
That poll was taken before Palin’s bus tour, which probably didn’t help her, but if Palin somehow makes this African trip into something more substantive, less self-centered than what we’ve grown so accustomed to, she could conceivably move past Romney into first place among GOP voters. The regional implications of South Sudan’s impending independence are something that has yet to be recognized much in the American media.
The temptation of blowing it, might be too great for Queen Esther, though. One of the proposed names for the new country of South Sudan is the Kush Republic, named after the Biblically noted entity known as Cush, which briefly ruled from the Southern Sudan all the way to Jerusalem, Tyre and what would now be Damascus, from around 727 BC to 653 BC.
Franklin Graham’s American political protégé is the candidate of choice of the Dominionists, and he knows it. Her political machine might be closer to farce than a force, but Graham’s organizations are quite astute. He will probably engineer a meeting and photo op between incoming South Sudanese President Salva Kiir Mayardit, who is Catholic, and Palin, who wants to scoop up Santorum’s potential acolytes.
This is shaping up to be the most fascinating GOP runup to presidential primaries I’ve ever witnessed.




33 Comments




She’s trying to find her way to Alaska?
— she’s seriously trying to find her way out of Alaska.
Tremendous insights, thanks ET, rcc’d as always.
Thank you, thank you, ET!! Seriously, when I read about the Grifter going to Sudan, the first thought that came into my head was Franklin Graham.
Doug Coe’s boyz (they are nearly all male) have been busily at work in Africa, esp Uganda, for years. I wasn’t clear on Graham’s “mission” in Sudan, so I appreciate your insightful report on it.
Of course, Graham is as much of a Grifter (if not more so) than his protege, Palin, so Graham will be “using” Palin for his own nefarious “ends” as well. Ick: now that’s a “two-fer” I wish didn’t have to contemplate. Is that: Evil and Eviler???
Great post. Highly recommended.
Yup. She’s already pretty much burned that bridge to nowhere.
I’m glad she left Wasilla before I have.
Arizona is soooooo “lucky”.
Barstow won’t have her?
Sarah Palin is gong to Sudan to cultivate a tan to run in the Republican campaign against all those other pale faces.
I didn’t know where Hell was until I started seeing on all the cable shows her puss and sound bites. Do you remember that Twilight Zone episode where the guy goes to Hell but he thinks it’s heaven until….? Please, Sarah, go to Hell and give me peace.
The poll noted above (pre bus tour though it was) leaves me feeling just a tad bit unsettled – 17% other/no opinion notwithstanding. It is almost conceivable that Palin could actually pull off a GOP nomination. And she has her own TeeVee network to promote her 24 hours / day. (More than one, if you count TBN and other (so-called) Christian media outlets.
This is a fascinating runup to the GOP nomination, alright. Just…surreal.
Ding
if it’s wrong for me to wish that while in the Sudan she gets kidnapped by local warlords and forced into a harem – then i don’t want to be right.
If Sarah is going to run for prez there are a lot of places more important than Sudan but she just sort of wanders around clueless – except for money.
I don’t mean that Sudan is not important but it seems that our allies in Europe would be the people to visit and “learn” to talk with as prez. IMO
Has Franklin Graham taken a pay cut yet? In his book The Lies of Sarah Palin, Geoffrey Dunn noted that Graham’s Samaritan’s Purse paid him over half a million a year (on top of another half a mil his daddy’s ministry pays him), making him the highest-paid head of a U.S.-based international charity–which in Graham’s case, obviously begins at home.
Has the GOP finalized its delegate selection rules? I’ve read that the party was going to limit winner-take-all primaries and move to a system more like the Democrats. If that is the case, a candidate like Palin will rack up delegate votes in almost every state and become a Class A pain in the ass to the rest of the field.
I’m telling you, folks, if you would just superimpose a photo of Virginia Foxx (who is about as coherent and christiany as Sarah The P) over Sarah’s face now and then….especially photos where she’s wearing those fuck-me shoes, well, people might stop and think. If one of our ‘major’ news channels could ‘accidentally’ put up Tina Fey in place of Sarah the P, then we could ‘accidentally’ show folks what Sarah is like if her facial features weren’t so well-balanced and ‘desirable.’
Evangeligal Christians have always been real good about finding helpless people have to buy their bullshit or go without eating that day.
Not wrong at all. In fact, let’s pray together and perhaps our Lord will grant our prayer.
The last thing the Sudanese need are poseurs like Palin and Graham. How about people going to the Sudan who actually want peace?
“We Want Peace” – Emmanuel Jal
Hey, Sarah, Alaska is north…not south…north
Who cares why Sarah Palin is going to Sudan?
Sarah Palin is one of many distractions provided by corporate owned mainstream media and she is only too glad to accommodate them. I believe that she made $14 million in 2010 alone.
As a “red herring topic Palin ranks right up there with Rev Wright; flag pins; Balloon Boy; Weinergate.
As long as Americans are discussing such irrelevant but titillating topics, we won’t be discussing the ones that really matter to our lives:
-lack of job creation
-selling out of social security and medicare
-the fact that almost half of our elected officials in DC are multimillionaires who own hundreds of thousands of dollars of Wall Street stock and vote to increase the value of their personal wealth against the best interests of the majority of the American people
-the fact that the number of ordinary American voters outnumber the plutocrats and could overthrow them in one election.
and oh so much more. . . But as along as we take their bait, the ensuing feeding frenzy over the irrelevant will blind us to what the plutocrats who run the USA oligarchy are doing: robbing the rest of us blind.
These types of trips can be eye openers for some folks. It strikes me that Sarah Palin is one of those “protected” few, who avoids all that is distasteful to her. It may either change her view of things (not likely) or show us her disgust for those different than she is. It’s hard for me to imagine that she has the emotion regulation skills to hide her judgements and true feelings. Funny how the camera pics that stuff up. It’s okay. The world will take care of itself here.
Going to Sudan with Franklin Graham is not clueless in this case. Well, Palin may still be rather clueless, but Franklin Graham is not. Ergo, keep an eye on this expedition. I repeat that the fundies of various stripes have their hooks & claws in Africa; have done so for years. So called “missionary” work is one of the tools of empire-building. These rightwing “Christianists” are using African nations & rulers for their own aims & ends. It behooves all of us to pay attention.
Palin wandering around in Sudan may seem silly or ridiculous, but her trip merits attention bc of the missionary work happening in Africa. Just my 2 cents worth…
Sadly, yes…
I hear what you’re saying, but see some of my commentary, above. It behooves us to pay *some* attention to what the fundies, like Graham, are doing in Africa. They are nation-building in order to build up their “Christianist” empire.
Witness how Doug Coe’s “Family/Fellowship” has been hard at work in Uganda for *years,* and are now attempting to pass “Kill the Gays” legislation. Just saying…
Yep, I bet the letter that the native Alaskan gave her went straight into the garbage can as soon as nobody was around or her grifter husband ate it to hide any evidence.
If she goes with Graham will this photo op be on the tax payers dime like the one in Haiti? The Awl did a great piece on how Graham gets millions in gov money for his organization. Funny since on that trip Palin was bragging about how much better private organizations were than gov when it came to handling disasters. She forgot to mention the millions Graham gets from the gov. Not to mention my personal belief that these religious groups shouldn’t be getting a dime of tax payer money.
http://www.theawl.com/2011/01/our-government-funded-mission-to-make-haiti-christian-your-tax-dollars-billy-grahams-son-monsanto-and-sarah-palin
You put her natural and unnatural limitations rather well. I’m skeptical that she can pull much off on this trip, as I wrote above. But Graham’s operations there are large and include a skilled media operation. When she is on FOX, it is either close to real time or within a short news cycle. Her Sudan trip, as will most likely be shown through Graham’s propaganda outlets and other Christian affiliates, will have more time to put together a narrative that will help her.
It might be important to remember that on Palin’s Israel trip, she rejected being sponsored there by the RJC (Republican Jewish Coalition) and chose to use a fundamentalist Christian tour organization, yet was able to be hosted at the Jewish holy places by Likud heavyweight Danny Danon and Rabbi Schmuel Rabinowitz, and had dinner with the Netanyahus.
So, her sole major trip to Native, rural Alaska, was with a Christianist (Graham maintains a heavily stocked bunker at his
cabinfortress near Lake Clark, AK), Haiti with that same Christianist, Israel through fundamentalist-evangelical organizers, and now Sudan, I’m assuming, with Graham’s people.Not only American government money, and Canadian government money, but he’s actually using Cuban-trained medical workers, so Cuban money too. heh…
She wants support from the Fundies in America who fund anti Gay politics in Africa? She wants to adopt an African baby so she can keep saying Racist things about Obama then hide behind the Baby if we call her on it?
The Python Spirits demanded Sarah make a Pilgrimage? Do you still have that link ET?
ET,
It is extremely important to keep a written focus on Dominionists and the many conflicts which exist with their viewpoints and practices if imposed on our Constitution through political power.
Additionally, I cannot help but ask myself why does Franklin have a “bunker” in AK? This displays a lack of stewardship as well as a lack of faith and leadership. Remember, even the bunker cannot go with you. A material display of fear sold as preparedness is not a foundation of faith.
Over 1.5 million international signers came together in a matter of days on this Avaaz.Org petition to smack down that legislation. The conscious is raised and we need to and can do more.